TLX 2.4 base or accord coupe v6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2014, 11:22 PM
  #1  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
lhn9021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
TLX 2.4 base or accord coupe v6?

I'm considering these two vehicles. And I'd like to hear other opinions. Which one would you buy and why? Thx

TLX
Quiet, Luxury interior, 8Speed DCT,MPG is better but requires premium gas, 1 more year warranty

ACCORD COUPE V6
$4000 cheaper, more power ,more technology
Old 08-05-2014, 04:11 AM
  #2  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
I don't see these as comparable cars. The coupe is a nice car though. I have one and will be upgrading to the TLX if all goes well.
Old 08-05-2014, 04:16 AM
  #3  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
lhn9021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Stew4HD
I don't see these as comparable cars. The coupe is a nice car though. I have one and will be upgrading to the TLX if all goes well.
So why are you upgrading to TLX ?
Old 08-05-2014, 04:22 AM
  #4  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Better interior, better sound system, 4 doors, tilt mirrors, cooled seats, P-AWS, etc. MORE HEAD ROOM! My head is too close to the ceiling
The following users liked this post:
kurtatx (08-06-2014)
Old 08-05-2014, 05:46 AM
  #5  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Accord coupe and TLX I4 base are very different cars. That said I will always opt for the Acura over the Honda just due to some of the extra features.
Old 08-05-2014, 06:56 AM
  #6  
Intermediate
 
MikeAmmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 40
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I would go with the TLX.

LED headlights, P-AWS, better fuel economy (even on Premium) and more athleticism.
Old 08-05-2014, 07:43 AM
  #7  
Pro
 
Nedmundo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 610
Received 159 Likes on 105 Posts
I would buy the TLX because I need (and generally prefer) four doors. If I didn't need four doors, it would be a tougher call, and basically boil down to the Accord's power + 6MT + lower price v. Acura's quiet interior + features + mileage + (possibly) superior handling. I suspect the TLX would win that battle if the handling is better as I suspect.
Old 08-05-2014, 08:02 PM
  #8  
Burning Brakes
 
WheelMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 764
Received 151 Likes on 115 Posts
I'd go with the V6 Accord Coupe just to get the 6 speed manual transmission. Honda makes some of the best manuals in the business. Comparing automatics, it would be a toss up for me.
The following users liked this post:
silverTL6 (01-04-2015)
Old 08-06-2014, 12:18 AM
  #9  
Intermediate
 
White Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 38
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Tlx 2.4 FTW

Two different classes of cars and IMO it's not even close. Especially with all these reviews about how well the 2.4L is performing. Refinement and luxury in a nice package with the TLX. If pure performance is what you want then your wouldn't be looking at either of these cars.
Old 08-06-2014, 08:59 AM
  #10  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
I agreed Acura before the TLX reviews came out, but now that they are out, I am even more certain that the Acura is a better car for people who want and can afford the better automobile.
Old 08-06-2014, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
yooin14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LA California Korea town
Age: 41
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 23 Posts
I think TLX / Tech package has more features than accord. Plus, TLX has more subtle amenities that makes you happy ( ELS Sound, LED Jewel Headlights, Led lights on license plate, Auto Dimming mirrors, tilt down side mirror, Higher resolution dual screen and much more I guess.)

I would get TLX over Accord without no question but drive them both first.
Old 08-06-2014, 12:38 PM
  #12  
-Brandon
 
UA6~RBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 28
Posts: 787
Received 221 Likes on 172 Posts
I have a 2014 Accord Coupe EX-L with the 2.4L and I love it. I don't think it is fair to compare the Coupe to the TLX, though. A lot of the features that I miss having on my old 3G TL (Homelink, Power Passenger Seat, Memory Seats, ect..) are available on the V6 Accord Coupe, so you do get a lot out of the V6 option. Paired with a 6MT, the Accord Coupe is a promising choice, but only if you are okay with two doors, like others have mentioned.

I have to admit, the 2.4L is adequate for power, but I do miss the torque of Honda's V6 that I had in the TL. I assume the TLX will weigh more, so don't expect killer performance out of the 2.4L TLX. If you opt for the 6MT Accord Coupe, you lose Honda's VCM which shuts off cylinders when you're not using them. People on DriveAccord prove the 3.5 Coupe gets fantastic gas mileage.

One feature I hate not having on the Accord is HID lights. After having them on the TL, it's hard getting used to standard projector halogens. Of course that's just nitpicking and in no way changes how I like the Accord Coupe. And for those saying to get the TLX for the ELS audio, the sound system in EX-L trim Accord Coupes is FANTASTIC. The car is smaller than a sedan, so the sound quality is VERY good in my opinion.

Last edited by UA6~RBP; 08-06-2014 at 12:40 PM.
Old 08-06-2014, 01:27 PM
  #13  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
The Accord Coupe EX-L model doesn't have an auto-dimming rear view mirror nor tilt side mirrors. It does have LDW (lane departure warning and an irritation in town freeway driving) as well as FCW (front crash warning) but they cheaped out on the mirrors!
Old 08-06-2014, 06:50 PM
  #14  
Advanced
 
acuranj18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 90
Received 43 Likes on 26 Posts
My son just leased an Accord EX-L coupe, and I must say that it's a great value for the price. I have driven it and it handles extremely well and is very quiet. Also, the 4 cylinder engine does not feel underpowered, so the V6 should be very fast.
Tough choice, as I am sure the TLX will be phenomenal as well.
Old 08-06-2014, 08:53 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
internalaudit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 343
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Can the FWD V6 Accord really handle that much power gracefully?

I was just over DA and someone who seemed knowledgeable suggested the V6 FWD will experience a lot of understeer and there may just be too much raw power for a FWD with 62/38 weight distribution.
Old 08-08-2014, 06:28 AM
  #16  
2020 Acura RLX Advance
 
CadiGTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 441
Received 178 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Stew4HD
The Accord Coupe EX-L model doesn't have an auto-dimming rear view mirror nor tilt side mirrors. It does have LDW (lane departure warning and an irritation in town freeway driving) as well as FCW (front crash warning) but they cheaped out on the mirrors!
Honda is making the auto dimming rear view mirror standard on the 2015 Accord's in EX trim and up.
Old 08-08-2014, 06:56 AM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
Originally Posted by internalaudit
Can the FWD V6 Accord really handle that much power gracefully?

I was just over DA and someone who seemed knowledgeable suggested the V6 FWD will experience a lot of understeer and there may just be too much raw power for a FWD with 62/38 weight distribution.
the car comes from the factory and is made to understeer.

I think the correct term you are looking for is torque steer.
yes, torque steer is apparent if you jam the go fast pedal.
Dont peg the skinny pedal at a stop, feather the throttle and torque steer is non-apparent.

Just like you wouldnt punch a RWD at a stop while taking a right or left turn...
(the back end will come loose)
The following 3 users liked this post by justnspace:
internalaudit (08-08-2014), Stew4HD (08-08-2014), YeuEmMaiMai (01-02-2015)
Old 08-08-2014, 07:42 AM
  #18  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
I have noticed torque steer on FWDs when I want to punch the car to pass a vehicle quickly.. it's a little unsettling the first time it happens
Old 08-08-2014, 08:16 AM
  #19  
Racer
 
internalaudit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 343
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by CadiGTi
Honda is making the auto dimming rear view mirror standard on the 2015 Accord's in EX trim and up.
When does CarPlay become available and will Honda (rather than Acura) get that first?
Old 08-08-2014, 08:23 AM
  #20  
Racer
 
internalaudit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 343
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
the car comes from the factory and is made to understeer.

I think the correct term you are looking for is torque steer.
yes, torque steer is apparent if you jam the go fast pedal.
Dont peg the skinny pedal at a stop, feather the throttle and torque steer is non-apparent.

Just like you wouldnt punch a RWD at a stop while taking a right or left turn...
(the back end will come loose)
Ah, so that and this are what torque steer is.
http://www.cnet.com/news/what-the-he...s-of-car-tech/

Why would I even take both hands off the wheel though? I don't drive muscle cars and if I go for the TLX V6, it will be the strongest car I will have owned.

I guess I was talking about under steering and you are right in that it is much better than too much over steer.
Old 01-01-2015, 09:53 PM
  #21  
4th Gear
 
Raven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro DC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Also considering TLX 2.4 v Accord V6 EX-L

Lease expiring on '09 TSX. Drove Accord 4 and 6 and TLX 2.4. Disliked the Accord 4 and transmission, the 6 has great power and more quiet. I terribly miss the paddle shifters. TLX 2.4 felt a bit underpowered, but unwilling to pay 4k more for the V6. Have always been uncomfortable buying car in first model year as there are always kinks that get worked out (thus I waited until 1988 for my first Legend). Tho always loyal Acura person, if Accord had paddle shifters on the 6, I might hold my breath and return to Honda. I appreciate all the comments in this forum. Any opinions are welcome.
Old 01-01-2015, 10:14 PM
  #22  
Burning Brakes
 
a35tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,091
Received 383 Likes on 239 Posts
Originally Posted by Raven20
Lease expiring on '09 TSX. Drove Accord 4 and 6 and TLX 2.4. Disliked the Accord 4 and transmission, the 6 has great power and more quiet. I terribly miss the paddle shifters. TLX 2.4 felt a bit underpowered, but unwilling to pay 4k more for the V6. Have always been uncomfortable buying car in first model year as there are always kinks that get worked out (thus I waited until 1988 for my first Legend). Tho always loyal Acura person, if Accord had paddle shifters on the 6, I might hold my breath and return to Honda. I appreciate all the comments in this forum. Any opinions are welcome.
Personally, I've been spoiled by the V6 power and as fuel efficient as they are now, I don't ever see myself going back to a 4 cylinder. As much as I love the TLX, if I were in your shoes I would choose an Accord V6 over the TLX 2.4. If paddle shifters are a must get the Accord V6 Coupe. It has them.
The following users liked this post:
silverTL6 (01-07-2015)
Old 01-01-2015, 10:41 PM
  #23  
4th Gear
 
Raven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro DC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
32TL-thanks for your thoughts...I agree the V6 is very nice, just tough to give up the Acura after all these years. What are you currently driving.
Old 01-02-2015, 04:23 AM
  #24  
Racer
 
Pens Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Age: 71
Posts: 482
Received 234 Likes on 146 Posts
As mentioned in an earlier post in this thread the Accord is a great value and the current model is the closest to offering Acura features at thousands less. I drive a 2012 TL SH AWD and 2013 Accord V-6 sedan and they are both outstanding. The fuel economy of the Accord is amazing as well. The Accord is now in its third model year and I have had no issues in 15,000 miles on mine so it is a proven car in that regard. You cannot go wrong with either choice. I would like tilt mirrors and loaner cars at service but honesly you are not giving much up if you go with an Accord.
Old 01-02-2015, 05:09 AM
  #25  
vbx
Instructor
 
vbx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 225
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
If you're not in a rush. I would wait for the Detroit Autoshow (Jan 15th) just to see what is coming out around the corner for 2016.

The Q60 Coupe might be a surprise.
Old 01-02-2015, 06:15 AM
  #26  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
The downside of the accord is double wishbone is gone in front. The BIG plus is that the v6 used is butter smooth (typical Honda greatness there) I'd rather have the silky smooth V6 over the turbo 4...
Old 01-02-2015, 07:27 AM
  #27  
Three Wheelin'
 
Quandry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Thornhill, Ontario
Posts: 1,321
Received 400 Likes on 282 Posts
Originally Posted by Raven20
Lease expiring on '09 TSX. Drove Accord 4 and 6 and TLX 2.4. Disliked the Accord 4 and transmission, the 6 has great power and more quiet. I terribly miss the paddle shifters. TLX 2.4 felt a bit underpowered, but unwilling to pay 4k more for the V6. Have always been uncomfortable buying car in first model year as there are always kinks that get worked out (thus I waited until 1988 for my first Legend). Tho always loyal Acura person, if Accord had paddle shifters on the 6, I might hold my breath and return to Honda. I appreciate all the comments in this forum. Any opinions are welcome.
Have a look at the car buying tips thread as you may be able to squeeze some of that 4k from your budget. The difference is lease payments may not be that great so it is worth researching.
Old 01-02-2015, 09:24 AM
  #28  
Racer
 
frainc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 77
Posts: 303
Received 150 Likes on 73 Posts
My wife needed a car and being a Honda/Acura family, she choose a 2015 Accord EX-L V6. Got it for $28.6 and what a great car. The V6 is so smooth and fast. Can't go wrong.
The following users liked this post:
Majofo (01-06-2015)
Old 01-02-2015, 09:33 AM
  #29  
Burning Brakes
 
a35tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,091
Received 383 Likes on 239 Posts
Originally Posted by Raven20
32TL-thanks for your thoughts...I agree the V6 is very nice, just tough to give up the Acura after all these years. What are you currently driving.
Currently driving a '12 TL Advance (FWD). Am looking to replace it in about a month. Looking for one more TL before making the leap to TLX. Would like to find a very low mileage '13 or '14 TL Advance. They are quite difficult to find though in my area so I'm not opposed to choosing an Accord Touring to drive for a year or two before getting a TLX. Not willing to go lower than the Touring trim on the Accord simply because I don't want to give up HID or LED headlights.
Old 01-02-2015, 12:07 PM
  #30  
Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 9-2014
 
brutustlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 85
Received 54 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Raven20
Lease expiring on '09 TSX. Drove Accord 4 and 6 and TLX 2.4. Disliked the Accord 4 and transmission, the 6 has great power and more quiet. I terribly miss the paddle shifters. TLX 2.4 felt a bit underpowered, but unwilling to pay 4k more for the V6. Have always been uncomfortable buying car in first model year as there are always kinks that get worked out (thus I waited until 1988 for my first Legend). Tho always loyal Acura person, if Accord had paddle shifters on the 6, I might hold my breath and return to Honda. I appreciate all the comments in this forum. Any opinions are welcome.
I just would never compare these cars, and it even surprises me more when you are coming from a TSX. You are coming from 4 doors and that is a huge deal IMO. I guess I do not know your situation, but for me I want a sports sedan that is also a great family car. I came from a TSX and the TLX is better in every way, including faster. I am very familiar with the Accord 4 door and my friend it is no TLX. I do miss a stick so a 6 cyl stick coupe Accord sounds sweet if you go that route, assuming you can find one, they are unicorn-like. I think I would have a hard time losing 2 doors, and I see no benefit styling wise where the Accord 2 door looks better then a 4 door TLX.

If you drive Auto, then is there no more to say, seriously no contest between the Accord CVT and the DCT of the TLX, it is like Hulk Hogan pinning a small child.... did I just date myself :-)

The TLX has so many cool features above the Accord. If you liked your TSX, then you should love a TLX and being able to switch to different IDS modes while traveling in perfect serenity while transporting 4 adults in a great comfort.

Good luck.

B.
Old 01-02-2015, 12:11 PM
  #31  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by YeuEmMaiMai
The downside of the accord is double wishbone is gone in front. The BIG plus is that the v6 used is butter smooth (typical Honda greatness there) I'd rather have the silky smooth V6 over the turbo 4...
Think its also gone from the TLX so that would be a wash.
Old 01-02-2015, 12:16 PM
  #32  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
SERIOUS bummer and if that is the case, accord hands down... The double wishbone make the Accord and previous TLs a blast to drive...
Old 01-02-2015, 03:41 PM
  #33  
a77
Racer
 
a77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 491
Received 85 Likes on 61 Posts
If it is a V6 manual Accord then it is a real fun car to drive and more alive feeling than any TLX. If the sedan Accord came with a V6 and a 6 speed manual I would have been all over it. For all the TLX's luxury and quality and refinement and equipment....the fun to drive factor would have won out. We still have 14 Accord V6 manual coupes in stock and stupid prices. Well at least one last time I checked.
The following users liked this post:
silverTL6 (01-07-2015)
Old 01-02-2015, 04:12 PM
  #34  
Racer
 
kevTL888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san gabriel, ca
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
i would get the Accord V6 Coupe hands down. people forget Accord coupe is based on a mid-size Accord sedan, so even though it lacks 2 doors it probably still has similar if not more interior room than a TLX which is filed under compact if i remember correctly. Also, the tried and true 3.5 V6 and 6 speed auto would probably last longer and cheaper to maintain in the long run.
Old 01-02-2015, 04:46 PM
  #35  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by kevTL888
i would get the Accord V6 Coupe hands down. people forget Accord coupe is based on a mid-size Accord sedan, so even though it lacks 2 doors it probably still has similar if not more interior room than a TLX which is filed under compact if i remember correctly.
I don't think anyone would forget the coupe is based on the sedan. However, people do forget that it normally that it uses a shorter wheelbase, generally 2". I would try out both to make sure that this not an issue for rear seat legroom. Also remember that the relationship of the B pillar will be a little different in the coupe, this will change the feel of ingress and egress. This could be good or bad depending on your needs.
Old 01-02-2015, 04:56 PM
  #36  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
I don't think anyone would forget the coupe is based on the sedan. However, people do forget that it normally that it uses a shorter wheelbase, generally 2". I would try out both to make sure that this not an issue for rear seat legroom. Also remember that the relationship of the B pillar will be a little different in the coupe, this will change the feel of ingress and egress. This could be good or bad depending on your needs.
Having just came out of a V6 coupe, I can say that the front seats have a lot of room as does the rear. getting in and out of the rear is another thing. The seat doesn't seem to go far enough forward to allow an adult to squeeze past the B pillar and seat very easy. I guess it would depend on the size of the adult. It nearly gave me a broken neck getting in and out of there!
The following 2 users liked this post by Stew4HD:
Colin (01-02-2015), YeuEmMaiMai (01-03-2015)
Old 01-02-2015, 06:08 PM
  #37  
4th Gear
 
Raven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro DC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thanks to everyon

To a32TL, Pens Fan, vbx, YeuEm, Quandry, brutustlx and others. Thank you all for your responses...can't say you have made my decision any easier, although I still feel I will remain in the Acura fold. I may have to drive the 2.4 again and will wait for the January auto show. I look forward to more comments.
The following 2 users liked this post by Raven20:
a35tl (01-02-2015), YeuEmMaiMai (01-04-2015)
Old 01-03-2015, 06:40 AM
  #38  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
Originally Posted by Stew4HD
Having just came out of a V6 coupe, I can say that the front seats have a lot of room as does the rear. getting in and out of the rear is another thing. The seat doesn't seem to go far enough forward to allow an adult to squeeze past the B pillar and seat very easy. I guess it would depend on the size of the adult. It nearly gave me a broken neck getting in and out of there!
been that way for a very long time (rear seat access) my 94,98, and CLS getting in and out of the rear is a PITB
Old 01-03-2015, 08:00 AM
  #39  
Racer
 
wlkeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: So California
Posts: 433
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
This will sound snobbish (and maybe it is), but here in So California it seems like every other car on the road is a Honda Accord. I'm willing to pay a bit more for just a little exclusivity. And my car may be somewhat easier to find in crowded parking lots.
Old 01-03-2015, 11:37 AM
  #40  
Moderator
 
CheeseyPoofs McNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,993
Received 1,405 Likes on 636 Posts
A couple thoughts:

1) It's my opinion that if you're a true 6 cyl person you will never be happy, long term, owning a a 4 cylinder car. The fact that you felt the 2.4 was a bit underpowered (I would heartily disagree with you - but I'm a 4 cly guy) is a red flag here.
2) Be sure to take the Accord on a long test drive over the roads you'll be driving on. While I really loved my 13 Accord EXL the Firm/Harsh ride on the side roads really wore me down over the 20K miles I owned it. The TLX rides much better IMO while losing nothing in the handling department.
3) The 2.4 will get much better MPG around the God Awful DC (one of my favourtite cities!!) traffic - if that matters. The V6 gets great mileage only if you can take advantage of the VCM on the highway.
4) If value and rational behaviour is the driving force here it's nearly impossible to beat the Accord.

Good luck!


Quick Reply: TLX 2.4 base or accord coupe v6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.