TL SH-AWD vs. Q50 AWD vs. IS350 AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2014, 03:13 PM
  #161  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,842 Likes on 8,573 Posts


Originally Posted by ScottLong

1+1=2..........
Does .999.......... + .999.......... = 2 ?
Majofo is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 03:40 PM
  #162  
Pro
 
TheAcAvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver (from NoVA)
Posts: 706
Received 81 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottLong
Except that from 2000-2010(a total of 10 years) Lexus was the most popular and it was led by the RX.

You are understating the importance of SUVS'. BMW and Mercedes are going so hard at their SUV/CUV segments because it's so popular.

Cadillac sales are already down this year and I fully expect Cadillac to finish 6th in 2015.

2014 finish will probably be
Mercedes
BMW
Lexus(unless Lexus make a massive comeback with their RC/NX)
Actually, that's fairly innaccurate.

Lexus BMW MB
2002 234,109 232,032 213,225
2003 259,755 240,859 218,551
2004 287,927 260,079 221,366
2005 302,895 266,200 224,269
2006 322,434 274,432 247,934
2007 329,177 293,795 253,277
2008 260,087 249,113 225,009
2009 215,975 196,502 190,538
2010 229,329 220,113 224,944
2011 198,552 247,907 261,769
2012 244,166 281,460 295,063

Pay close attention to the major downswing between 2007 and 2009. Sure, adding the X1 to the sales played a major role in getting BMW sales back up, but it's workhorses, the two highest volume sellers, the 3 series and 5 serise, sold more units in 2013 than 2007 more units by a combined 17000. On the flipside, Lexus's workhorse, the RX sold 600 more units in 2013 than 2007, while the IS sold 20000 fewer units vs 2007, the ES sold 10000 fewer units vs 2007, the LS sold 25000 fewer units vs 2007...

You can't just let your non-SUV products die. Add to them with SUVs/CUVs for people all you want, but look no further than Acura not being what it used to be if you think that leaning on SUVs for 5+ years is going to get you places. They sold a little over 24000 TLs last year in 2013, you guys can tell me to get over the "back in the day stories", but the back in the day 2007 car moved 58545 units, the 05 did 78,218... You don't HAVE to just give up on moving cars. Lexus did and that didn't work out too well for them.
TheAcAvenger is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 03:53 PM
  #163  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
what the hell did Lexus do to get 322,000 units sold in 2007?

as good as Merc and BMW are... they did not see anything close to 300k/year in the last decade and Lexus did it 3 years in a row?
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 04:15 PM
  #164  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Good Car Bad Car numbers

BMW 2013 US 309,280 Canada 31,710
YTD 2014 US 267,193 Canada 27,442

MB 2013 US 334,350 Canada 34,781
YTD 2014 281,729 Canada 31,278

Lexus 2013 US 273,847 Canada 15,949
YTD 2014 US 244,038 Canada 14,654
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 04:50 PM
  #165  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
IMHO Hyde & Stew should open a comedy act in LA. Very interesting watching them throw a multiday hissy fit over me trying to destroy the 5G.
Another gross exaggeration, what a surprise. My posts have been quite calm and composed while you've been performing your ludicrous Chicken Little act implying the TLX is unsafe. It is actually quite sad to see the extent you are willing to twist, and distort things to suit your agenda.

Your silence is deafening regarding the unsafe TLX outbraking a similarly equipped 328. Couldn't help but notice the same lack of snippy responses for the acceleration stats showing the TLX matching up just fine with the competition. Even though you put it in a different league in terms of acceleration, braking, etc, that groups clearly includes the 328I.
Mr Hyde is offline  
The following users liked this post:
dysonlu (11-21-2014)
Old 11-21-2014, 05:08 PM
  #166  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
2014 Audi Allroad Quattro vs. 2014 BMW 328i xDrive Sports Wagon, 2015 Volvo V60 T6 AWD R-Design: Final Scoring, Performance Data, and Specs

70-0 Audi 161ft 328 165ft Volvo 177ft

2014 BMW 328i xDrive Sports Wagon Test ? Review ? Car and Driver
Top speed (governor limited): 128 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft

2012 BMW 328i Sport Line Manual Long-Term Test Wrap-Up ? Review ? Car and Driver

Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...rm-test-review

328
Top speed (drag limited): 136 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 159 ft

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...wd-test-review
Top speed (governor limited): 134 mph

TLX
Braking, 70-0 mph: 182 ft

If there is a combo that is as crappy at the TLX I would recommend that people do not buy it & step up to a version that does stop well.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-21-2014 at 05:21 PM.
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:11 PM
  #167  
Banned
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
what the hell did Lexus do to get 322,000 units sold in 2007?

as good as Merc and BMW are... they did not see anything close to 300k/year in the last decade and Lexus did it 3 years in a row?
It had a lot to do with the unleashing of the new Lexus LS and the general decline of MB during the early and mid 2000's.

The Lexus LS actually sold over 30,000+ units that year(shocking for a flagship). People forgot that Mercedes actually suffered a very long period of regression which played a huge part in Lexus being where they are at today. Mercedes really did turn things around starting from the 2010's and haven't looked back though.


Another reason is the exploding popularity of leases. It was harder to pull the trigger on a Mercedes or BMW when you needed to buy the car as oppose to just leasing it.


Obviously Lexus headquarters decided finishing third for 3 years is 3 years too many and is pushing hard for that sales crown again.


Ironically the Lexus line up now that consists of the new
IS/ES/GS/RC 350/RCF/NX/RX/GX are far superior than the Lexus of the mid 2000's but they are no longer #1, when they were #1 with a weaker lineup.
ScottLong is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:13 PM
  #168  
Racer
 
dysonlu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 271
Received 106 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by TheAcAvenger
that's not really all that true...It's true for Acura yes, but not on the whole.

Looking at July 2014 YTD numbers...
Omitting Ram, Land Rover, Jaguar, Maserati, Bentley, Jaguar because they don't sell SUVs AND cars ...

July 2014 YTD Sales Leaders by Make:

Acura: MDX (followed by RDX)
Audi: Q5 (followed by A4)
BMW: 3/4 series (followed by 5 series)
Buick: Enclave (followed by LaCrosse)
Cadillac: SRX (folllowed by CTS)
Chevrolet: Silverado (followed by Cruze)
Chrysler: Town and Country (followed by 200)
Dodge: Grand Caravan (followed by Charger)
Ford : F-Series (followed by Fusion)
Honda: Accord (followed by Civic)
Hyundai: Elantra (followed by Sonata)
Infiniti: Q50 (followed by QX60)
Kia: Optima (followed by Soul)
Lexus: RX (followed by ES)
Lincoln: MKZ (followed by MKX)
Mazda: 3 (followed by CX-5)
Mercedes: E Class (followed by C class)
Mini: Cooper (followed by Countryman)
Mitsubishi: Outlander Sport (followed by Lancer)
Nissan: Altima (followed by Rogue)
Porsche: Cayenne (followed by 911, and it's a lot closer than you'd guess: 10,259 vs 6017)
Subaru: Forester (followed by Impreza)
Toyota: Camry (followed by Corolla)
Volkswagen: Jetta (followed by Passat
Volvo: S60 (followed by XC60)

So, as you can see, only a few car companies are led by SUV sales. The Audi Q5/A4 gap is tiny (23,117 vs 22,492). Lexus has always been led by the RX. I'm a bit surprised by how poorly the Cadillac ATS and CTS are selling considering how well the previous gen CTS did.. If Acura can move 5000-6000 TLXs a month, it may recapture the title from the MDX.

For the two most popular mainstream imports (Honda & Toyota) and the two most popular luxury imports (BMW & Mercedes), SUVs are nowhere near the front of their packs.

On the topic of the NSX, i'll believe it when I see it. The C7 Z06 probably has my attention the most at the moment. Although I'm still a fan of the GTR. I'm not sure I even want to know what Acura intends to do for the NSX price, but i'm sure it will be too rich for my blood!
Just google it. "SUV outsell sedans".

BMW, Audi, Lexus pushing hard on SUV and crossovers. Just look at the new product announcements.
dysonlu is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:20 PM
  #169  
Banned
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by TheAcAvenger
Actually, that's fairly innaccurate.

Lexus BMW MB
2002 234,109 232,032 213,225
2003 259,755 240,859 218,551
2004 287,927 260,079 221,366
2005 302,895 266,200 224,269
2006 322,434 274,432 247,934
2007 329,177 293,795 253,277
2008 260,087 249,113 225,009
2009 215,975 196,502 190,538
2010 229,329 220,113 224,944
2011 198,552 247,907 261,769
2012 244,166 281,460 295,063

Pay close attention to the major downswing between 2007 and 2009. Sure, adding the X1 to the sales played a major role in getting BMW sales back up, but it's workhorses, the two highest volume sellers, the 3 series and 5 serise, sold more units in 2013 than 2007 more units by a combined 17000. On the flipside, Lexus's workhorse, the RX sold 600 more units in 2013 than 2007, while the IS sold 20000 fewer units vs 2007, the ES sold 10000 fewer units vs 2007, the LS sold 25000 fewer units vs 2007...

You can't just let your non-SUV products die. Add to them with SUVs/CUVs for people all you want, but look no further than Acura not being what it used to be if you think that leaning on SUVs for 5+ years is going to get you places. They sold a little over 24000 TLs last year in 2013, you guys can tell me to get over the "back in the day stories", but the back in the day 2007 car moved 58545 units, the 05 did 78,218... You don't HAVE to just give up on moving cars. Lexus did and that didn't work out too well for them.
And to Lexus's credit, they immediately changed that by reinventing the ES/GS/IS/LS and adding the RC/RCF.

This is just opinion but I really do believe that if Lexus had unleashed the RC 350 and NX around June this year instead of Nov and Dec........they would have regained the sales crown.



Lexus have done a fantastic job of narrowing the gap that BMW/MB created after the 2010's.........
ScottLong is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:26 PM
  #170  
Banned
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Also Lexus didn't lose the sales crown because they stop concentrating on sedans. That's a laughable myth. They lost the sales crown because the Japanese supply train stopped for 5 straight months. Leaving tens of thousands of Lexus cars in stagnant on the homeland. During that time, all those shoppers inevitably went to the Germans and Infiniti/Acura.
Were the Germans building better products? Yes. But the tsunami played a huge part in the sales charts reflecting it as fast as it did.

If the tsunami never happened, Lexus's redesign would have been ready to counter the rising Germans before even losing the sales crown.
ScottLong is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:27 PM
  #171  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
2014 Audi Allroad Quattro vs. 2014 BMW 328i xDrive Sports Wagon, 2015 Volvo V60 T6 AWD R-Design: Final Scoring, Performance Data, and Specs

70-0 Audi 161ft 328 165ft Volvo 177ft

2014 BMW 328i xDrive Sports Wagon Test ? Review ? Car and Driver
Top speed (governor limited): 128 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft

2012 BMW 328i Sport Line Manual Long-Term Test Wrap-Up ? Review ? Car and Driver

Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g

2014 BMW 328d Diesel Wagon Long-Term Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

328
Top speed (drag limited): 136 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 159 ft

2015 Acura TLX 3.5 V-6 FWD Test ? Review ? Car and Driver
Top speed (governor limited): 134 mph

TLX
Braking, 70-0 mph: 182 ft

If there is a combo that is as crappy at the TLX I would recommend that people do not buy it & step up to a version that does stop well.
BTW If there is a combo that is as crappy at the TLX I would recommend that people do not buy it & step up to a version that does stop well.

Its nice to have a choice. I run M-Sport fixed caliper multi piston brakes on my car. Its too bad Acura took away the choice of better brakes when they canned the Brembos
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:48 PM
  #172  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
BTW If there is a combo that is as crappy at the TLX I would recommend that people do not buy it & step up to a version that does stop well.

Its nice to have a choice. I run M-Sport fixed caliper multi piston brakes on my car. Its too bad Acura took away the choice of better brakes when they canned the Brembos
Oh wow, an M-Sport with a sport braking system!!
Stew4HD is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 05:49 PM
  #173  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
I like apples.

2012 BMW 328i Sedan Automatic Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

A/T, sedan, all seasons. You know, the model that people actually buy, not the wagons, or even better, the diesel wagon. ROFL. You couldn't find a more obscure model?

I guess the bread and butter of the 3 series lineup should be recalled for unsafe braking, and no one should buy them.

For the record, I don't believe any of these numbers are unsafe, just pointing out the ridiculousness of his statements.

Since we are sharing random info, I run 8 piston Brembos on my RS which are shared with the Gallardo.

Last edited by Mr Hyde; 11-21-2014 at 05:55 PM.
Mr Hyde is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 06:44 PM
  #174  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde

Since we are sharing random info, I run 8 piston Brembos on my RS which are shared with the Gallardo.
Why is that note worthy if TLX brakes are good enough for you? Anyway it was not random info just a statement that any car I buy I get the best brakes that are offered.

2013 BMW 320i Test ? Review ?Car and Driver

320 stripper. $34,700

Top speed (governor limited): 155 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 163 ft

Neat cars those Lambos. Nice vid of a Gallardo against an FFR on a road course about 5:30 in. The Lambo won.


Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-21-2014 at 06:54 PM.
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-21-2014, 08:27 PM
  #175  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
320 stripper. $34,700
Top speed (governor limited): 155 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 163 ft
Strip out the weight of options like sunroof, power seats, navi, etc, etc, and if that wasn't enough, toss on summer tires, and what do you know, it stops even shorter; imagine that. I already provided the most equivalent comparison vehicle, but I know it blows a hole in your TLX being unsafe, and 328 being far superior arguments.
Mr Hyde is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 12:28 AM
  #176  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,842 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Majofo is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 12:30 AM
  #177  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,842 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Bear.. I just watched your vid of teh beasts' first start.. just beautiful.
Majofo is offline  
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-22-2014)
Old 11-22-2014, 10:24 AM
  #178  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
Strip out the weight of options like sunroof, power seats, navi, etc, etc, and if that wasn't enough, toss on summer tires, and what do you know, it stops even shorter; imagine that. I already provided the most equivalent comparison vehicle, but I know it blows a hole in your TLX being unsafe, and 328 being far superior arguments.
The TLX distance is poor & the fade has to be added to that because they distance will just get worse. Its up to the user to say if its unsafe. I just said it was crappy & worse in its class like the magazine reviewers did.

Personally. I would not want to drive a car with brakes that were not first class. But apparently that's just me in this conversation.

Noticed you ignored all the current tests & went back to 2012 to find one that suited you.

If the 328 was consistently shown to be poor in stopping distance it should be skipped over as a buying candidate with its basic brakes.

If someone was set on any car with crappy brakes I would recommend optional ones, which are not available on the TLX.

Its not my fault that Acura leaves you with no alternative but going aftermarket for brakes & tires.

2012 BMW 328i Sport First Test - Motor Trend Page 2

2012 328

BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 107 ft
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 10:31 AM
  #179  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Majofo
Bear.. I just watched your vid of teh beasts' first start.. just beautiful.
Thanks. It was a good day. Hit on the first key turn, something I was not ready for. Made the past 8 months work very worthwhile. Hope to have a finished painted car in December/January.

Thing I like about the FFR/Lambo vid is mine is an exact clone of the red one except for tire brand. Nice to see what a pro driver can do with it.
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Majofo (11-23-2014)
Old 11-22-2014, 11:27 AM
  #180  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Its up to the user to say if its unsafe. I just said it was crappy & worse in its class like the magazine reviewers did.....
Noticed you ignored all the current tests & went back to 2012 to find one that suited you.
Try not to trip as you back pedal. You actually implied it was a problem area, and lumped it with Infinitis DAS getting a black circle from CR. You also said TLXs would be plowing into people on the road due to long distances, but of course that was before seeing the stats of an equivalent 328. If those stats came first, you probably wouldn't have had a single post in this thread after that.

I must have missed the parts were all those reviewers said or implied anything indicating that TLX owners would be plowing into everyone on the roads.

I picked the high volume A/T sedan with all seasons. You picked wagons, diesels, diesel wagons, and stripped out sport package sedans on high performance summer tires. Which are more equivalent to the TLX? Talk about stacking the deck. what a hypocrite.
Mr Hyde is offline  
The following users liked this post:
dysonlu (11-26-2014)
Old 11-22-2014, 12:53 PM
  #181  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
I said that the TLX had the worse stopping distance in its segment according to the narrative in the 4 tests. I also said it have fade problems as reported in the same tests.

My original post was just to show that many first year models have issues. You & Stew over reacted & went into recalls, safety & everything else to defend. I expect that's because I posted & you are the self designated BEAR monitor

Pure logic says it one car will stop in 100 feet & another will take 125ft from the same speed the 100 footer is safer than the 125footer by a 25 foot cushion. If brakes fade you have no brakes. You really want to debate that fact?

I also said if the 2012 328 had long stopping distances as you posted from C&D, you did not post anything on fade, I would not buy it with those brakes. At least it has an alternative set of brakes to move to.

That said the first group of tests that show up on C&D when you search BMW 328 are what I posted. You might not like them but they are what they are & show what you can have. Even the cheepo $35K 320 did very very well, best so far.

That said all the current test show good 328 results & if the TLX is worse in the class something must have changed other than the TLX going down hill from the 3 & 4G versions. Maybe while the TLX performance tanked compared to the earlier generations TL the other cars were getting better, who knows but an apples to apples 2015/2015 test might show what is the current state in braking land.

At the end of the day you are still defending as just honkey dory the poor performance of the brakes that the 4 tests had felt necessary to make specific mention of.

If the brakes are good enough for you what can I say other than they are not good enough for me.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-22-2014 at 12:57 PM.
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 02:31 PM
  #182  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Tony Pac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,445
Received 1,607 Likes on 967 Posts
another thread went off topic. I clearly said lets forget about German cars. We were supposed to discuss TLX - Q50 - IS but in the past 10 or more posts we are discussing BMW lol
Tony Pac is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 02:45 PM
  #183  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Moderators are supposed to watch the trolls. Who made you the savior of the ill informed looking at the TLX?

Still conveniently ignoring the summer tires impact on braking distance, what a surprise. Keep using your stacked deck as a baseline. Your biased comparisons are not that obvious.

Now you've gone from TLX owners plowing into everyone to the brakes not being up to par for you. I'm sure 328s posting similar numbers had nothing to do with that change. The brakes are fine for street use, and everything except any kind of track use, but then again what do I know, I've only been driving the car, you read reviews.

Last edited by Mr Hyde; 11-22-2014 at 02:47 PM.
Mr Hyde is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 05:28 PM
  #184  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
You keep harping on the 328. A car I would not buy because it has a poor overall level of performance for what I look for in a DD. Its the grocery getter 3 series even with higher end brakes. You might have a problem with it having options for better braking for people who are interested in such things but its immaterial to me. The car is not on my list.

Regardless the TLX is still listed at the bottom of the pile with disappointing brake performance. Saying another car sucks does not change the fact that the TLX also sucks.

Its really tuff that Honda has a one size fits all strategy. You keep complaining about summer tires that other brands provide to people interested in more than an oatmeal version as somehow being unfair.

Nice to know you think the TLX is the 328's equal but if the 2012 brakes suck then so do the 2015 TLX's. The 2015 TLX has the worse braking performance of any TL this century.

Do you believe the TLX has good brakes as its comes from the dealer? Or are you just interested in obfuscating to deflect attention from the 4 published reviews?

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...wd-test-review

2015 Acura TLX Road Test | Edmunds.com

2015 Acura TLX Review - Road Test / Track Test - Road & Track

Motor Trend

The TLX needed 124 feet to stop from 60 mph, 2 feet better than the lighter TSX and a foot better than the front-drive TL. The TL SH-AWD would do it in as little as 103 feet with the manual, 117 feet with the automatic.

Hey do you want to talk about CR tanking the LED headlights as a step back?
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 05:58 PM
  #185  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Who's doing the harping about brakes, Bear? You are ad nauseum

Last edited by Stew4HD; 11-22-2014 at 06:01 PM.
Stew4HD is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 06:14 PM
  #186  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
You keep harping on the 328.....Hey do you want to talk about CR tanking the LED headlights as a step back?
The 328 was your performance benchmark which the TLX couldn't touch, not mine. Nice try at backpedaling again. Keep repeating yourself regarding the rest, maybe even you will actually believe it by the end.

Sounds to me like someone was driving around with their DRLs on. That comes from someone with first hand experiernce, and hasn't driven a car without HIDs for 15 years including adaptive Euro projector lenses on my current car. I also have direct comparisons to the 4G TL, TSX, and my brother's 335 xdrive. Even he agreed, they are distinctly brighter, and sharper than standard HIDs. But again what do we know? What's first hand experience compared to what you read. Especially on something that wasn't tested, but observed. Really grasping at anything you can now? How sad.

CR is big on safety, mention of the unsafe brakes? Must have missed that. I did catch them tanking the 3 off the recommended list though.

I've been looking for a quick self esteem boost, and have been thinking about trolling the 335 forums with my RS. Any suggestions?
Mr Hyde is offline  
The following users liked this post:
dysonlu (11-26-2014)
Old 11-22-2014, 06:23 PM
  #187  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
*sigh*

What has happened to this forum in the last few months....I think I am done!
weather is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 07:00 PM
  #188  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
The 328 was your performance benchmark which the TLX couldn't touch, not mine?
Actually I never mentioned the 328 or any BMW till you brought it up for the first time in post #140.

Guess it was sort of like well the TLX sucks but so does the 328 so there. The question is that effects me how? I don't have a 328. I do have a less expensive 135 & it tested at 158ft from 70mph.

As for your self esteem that comes from the inside not the outside so I can't offer an suggestions to help your problem. You either have it or you don't; no one can confer it on you.

Best of luck in finding it.

BTW you must be making some of this stuff up:

2014 BMW 328i Wins Consumer Reports Sport Sedan Award

http://www.bimmerfile.com/2014/02/26...t-sedan-award/

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-22-2014 at 07:09 PM.
BEAR-AvHistory is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 07:30 PM
  #189  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Per you in the Edmund's thread the V6 AWD version of the TLX could only match up to the 320 performance wise

Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
You think it compares well to the 328/428 I think it matches the 320 better.
For the rest, I figure this works so well for you, so may as well go to the expert for recommendations.

I know you shouldn't feed the trolls, but sometimes you just can't help it.
Mr Hyde is offline  
Old 11-22-2014, 09:58 PM
  #190  
Pro
 
9SpeedTran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 696
Received 197 Likes on 111 Posts
It does strike me as odd that folks who aren't fans of Acuras are posting on this forum. It's like they have nothing better to do than crash a party, spill the punch, and puke on the floor.

Good times.
9SpeedTran is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by 9SpeedTran:
a35tl (11-23-2014), dysonlu (11-26-2014), Tony Pac (11-22-2014)
Old 11-22-2014, 10:26 PM
  #191  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Tony Pac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,445
Received 1,607 Likes on 967 Posts
Originally Posted by 9SpeedTran
It does strike me as odd that folks who aren't fans of Acuras are posting on this forum. It's like they have nothing better to do than crash a party, spill the punch, and puke on the floor.

Good times.
Exactly!!!! we are talking about Acuras and people are bringing BMW, MB and Ford lol

Go join those other forums and discuss.
Tony Pac is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 08:14 AM
  #192  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by 9SpeedTran
It does strike me as odd that folks who aren't fans of Acuras are posting on this forum. It's like they have nothing better to do than crash a party, spill the punch, and puke on the floor.

Good times.
I don't mind hearing from other car brand owners, even negative feedback from their ACTUAL, not read, experiences from seeing and/or driving the car. It gets old quick when those joy sponges feel the need to continually nitpick the car this forum is created for. It's obvious they have no intention of buying this car and yet, they feel we need to read those negative "opinions" over and over.

I do believe that some come here and post in a effort to dissuade possible buyers, the ones that lurk as guests (or just non posting members), from buying the TLX. It's like they want to people buy the brand they have be it Infiniti, Lexus, BMW or Audi.

Then, those wonderful posters, eluded to above, ridicule those of us that like the car and counter their BS posts asking for facts.

As one member has mentioned, it's like playing "Whack A mole"

Oh well, it's a free country and still have freedom of speech (for now), we will just deal with it

Weather, don't give up, dammit!
Stew4HD is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Stew4HD:
a35tl (11-23-2014), dysonlu (11-26-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 08:27 AM
  #193  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
*lol* I am trying not to give up and I hope you guys don't view me as the "negative one" because trust me when I say that I still think the TLX is an AMAZING car and want one in my driveway more than anything...I just want to make sure that it addresses the few outstanding glitches before I commit, especially since I live so far away from my dealership...I need something that is bulletproof (as much as possible).

Thanks for reaching out and asking me to stick around...I enjoy interacting with you guys and gals....Most of you anyway *lol* Like you said, no harm in having an opinion and expressing it but I don't like personal attacks on people and sometime, we all need to take the highroad and not engage in the none stop back and forth....
weather is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 08:30 AM
  #194  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
The topic is TL vs. Q50 vs. IS350 right?

It'd be one thing if someone jumped into a thread about their new TLX and trolled and said "you should have gotten an IS!" ... but this thread topic I believe welcomes discussions about other cars. Especially the Q50 and IS350 -- right?

If you wanted this thread to be about how awesome the TLX is - then you shouldn't have posted the topic asking about comparisons to the Q50 and IS350...

Just saying you shouldn't be surprised that people are discussing Lexus and Infiniti if you post a topic about comparing them to the TLX.

I'll give you - BMW and Ford though since that wasn't the original topic
LiQiCE is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Majofo (11-23-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 08:47 AM
  #195  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Tony Pac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,445
Received 1,607 Likes on 967 Posts
Originally Posted by Stew4HD
I don't mind hearing from other car brand owners, even negative feedback from their ACTUAL, not read, experiences from seeing and/or driving the car. It gets old quick when those joy sponges feel the need to continually nitpick the car this forum is created for. It's obvious they have no intention of buying this car and yet, they feel we need to read those negative "opinions" over and over.

I do believe that some come here and post in a effort to dissuade possible buyers, the ones that lurk as guests (or just non posting members), from buying the TLX. It's like they want to people buy the brand they have be it Infiniti, Lexus, BMW or Audi.

Then, those wonderful posters, eluded to above, ridicule those of us that like the car and counter their BS posts asking for facts.

As one member has mentioned, it's like playing "Whack A mole"

Oh well, it's a free country and still have freedom of speech (for now), we will just deal with it

Weather, don't give up, dammit!

Well said!!!
Tony Pac is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 08:50 AM
  #196  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Tony Pac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,445
Received 1,607 Likes on 967 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
The topic is TL vs. Q50 vs. IS350 right?

It'd be one thing if someone jumped into a thread about their new TLX and trolled and said "you should have gotten an IS!" ... but this thread topic I believe welcomes discussions about other cars. Especially the Q50 and IS350 -- right?

If you wanted this thread to be about how awesome the TLX is - then you shouldn't have posted the topic asking about comparisons to the Q50 and IS350...

Just saying you shouldn't be surprised that people are discussing Lexus and Infiniti if you post a topic about comparing them to the TLX.

I'll give you - BMW and Ford though since that wasn't the original topic
100% agreed!!!

If we discuss about TLX, Is and Q50, i don't see ant problem. But read the last 15-20 posts. We are talking about BMW

Anyway, it's an open forum and I don't care. But members and visitors come here to see the comparison between the above mentioned cars and they see we are talking about Ford Fusion, BMW and Audi.
Tony Pac is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:55 AM
  #197  
Instructor
 
amer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New York
Age: 40
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have been with Acura TL brand for 12years. Owned 2001 TL tech,2007 TL type S, 2009 TL Tech, 2012 TL Sh Awd tech..
I was in a market for new car . My 12 TL was lease due in Feb 2015, Shop around for cars in same category as TL. I wanted the TLX awd tech but the prices are crazy at this point. Looked at BMW 3 and 5 series, Bmw got crazy for every option u add the price went up and they are 4cyl turbo which I am not a fan of those small engines.Also looked at Lexus Is and Gs , Is was too small and Gs was also not a great lease price. Also looked Mercedes but was not too much into it. Jeep Grand Cherokee was also as my SUV but it was my last choice.Soo I end up getting, Infiniti Q50 Awd Premium with Navi. I have the car for couple weeks and I got to say I love the car overall. Price on Infiniti was by far the best price for the money. It drives really good and quality to me is also great. Didnt get chance to open it up but it feels it has the power.It was hard to leave Acura but they have to have better price program to buy me back. In this case Infiniti was the best.
amer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Toddo627 (11-23-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 09:58 AM
  #198  
Racer
 
EddieOnAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 413
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Tony Pac
100% agreed!!!

If we discuss about TLX, Is and Q50, i don't see ant problem. But read the last 15-20 posts. We are talking about BMW

Anyway, it's an open forum and I don't care. But members and visitors come here to see the comparison between the above mentioned cars and they see we are talking about Ford Fusion, BMW and Audi.
I also have a bit of a problem with some people who, no matter the thread, will come in exclusively with the intent of bashing the car in any way they can. I usually hang out in the 3g section but the tlx section seems to have one particular person trying really hard to paint the tlx as a crappy car. Not sure what it brings to the forum.
EddieOnAZ is offline  
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (11-23-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 10:10 AM
  #199  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
*lol* I am trying not to give up and I hope you guys don't view me as the "negative one" because trust me when I say that I still think the TLX is an AMAZING car and want one in my driveway more than anything...I just want to make sure that it addresses the few outstanding glitches before I commit, especially since I live so far away from my dealership...I need something that is bulletproof (as much as possible).

Thanks for reaching out and asking me to stick around...I enjoy interacting with you guys and gals....Most of you anyway *lol* Like you said, no harm in having an opinion and expressing it but I don't like personal attacks on people and sometime, we all need to take the highroad and not engage in the none stop back and forth....
My friend, I nor we could ever see you as a negative guy. You drove it and it wasn't for you but you have an open mind and carry on. If I recall, the hesitation in the acceleration is what turned you off? I don't see you harping on that, in fact, you've said more than once that if Acura fixes the issue, you'd try another test drive.

It's hard to do sometimes but the rule of thumb I used to hear on the High Def Forums was to "Attack the post, not the poster". I will do better

I'd miss your humor if you left!
Stew4HD is offline  
The following users liked this post:
weather (11-23-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 10:43 AM
  #200  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
I'm perfectly fine with people with negative opinions, even non owners, but when that's your only agenda here, and you are just continually trying to point out the tiniest imperfections, and beat people over the head with them reportedly, well that's another story.

This is especially true when you contribute little actual help, and little positivity to the forum, and it's membership.

It's not like every car doesn't have it's negatives, so I don't understand why some need to spend such considerable amounts of time taking jabs at other people's issues instead of focusing on those closer to home.

And with that note, if this thread wasn't derailed before, it can't get any further of course now.
Mr Hyde is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by Mr Hyde:
a35tl (11-23-2014), dysonlu (11-26-2014), internalaudit (11-27-2014), Stew4HD (11-23-2014), weather (11-23-2014)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
copmagnet82
4G TL Problems & Fixes
5
06-29-2016 08:09 AM
AJRozsa
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
10-05-2015 07:50 PM
c1souk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
17
09-28-2015 11:20 AM
saturno_v
5G TLX (2015-2020)
21
09-27-2015 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: TL SH-AWD vs. Q50 AWD vs. IS350 AWD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.