Pricing for a TLX Advance SH-AWD found.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2014, 08:17 AM
  #1  
Tee EL
Thread Starter
 
VtecTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland, Severna Park
Age: 38
Posts: 136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pricing for a TLX Advance SH-AWD found.

5. PRIZE, APPROXIMATE RETAIL VALUE, AND ODDS OF WINNING:

A. Prize (1): One (1) winner will receive a 2015 Acura TLX Advance SH-AWD. The approximate retail value (“ARV”) of the prize is $49,995. Note: the Acura TLX is not available to the public until June 1, 2014, and not all trim levels will be available until September 2014. The ARV is based on current Manufacturer’s Suggest Retail Price (“MSRP”) estimates, but the MSRP is subject to change prior to availability.

on their sweepstakes website..so a fully loaded TLX will be just shy of $50k.
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (03-14-2014)
Old 03-14-2014, 08:36 AM
  #2  
Instructor
 
ferrcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 57
Posts: 191
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by VtecTL
5. PRIZE, APPROXIMATE RETAIL VALUE, AND ODDS OF WINNING:

A. Prize (1): One (1) winner will receive a 2015 Acura TLX Advance SH-AWD. The approximate retail value (“ARV”) of the prize is $49,995. Note: the Acura TLX is not available to the public until June 1, 2014, and not all trim levels will be available until September 2014. The ARV is based on current Manufacturer’s Suggest Retail Price (“MSRP”) estimates, but the MSRP is subject to change prior to availability.

on their sweepstakes website..so a fully loaded TLX will be just shy of $50k.
Thanks for the information but one thing bothers me... Hopefully they stay at that number....
Old 03-14-2014, 08:51 AM
  #3  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
What contest is this? Link?
Old 03-14-2014, 09:11 AM
  #4  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Price is based on the 4G so might not be relevant.
Old 03-14-2014, 09:25 AM
  #5  
Tee EL
Thread Starter
 
VtecTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland, Severna Park
Age: 38
Posts: 136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Price is based on the 4G so might not be relevant.
Where's it say that?
Old 03-14-2014, 12:15 PM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
"The ARV is based on current Manufacturer’s Suggest Retail Price (“MSRP”) estimates" Its just a guess so far. Plus some things are not even available till the fall. Will they add to the price or take away from the price?

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 03-14-2014 at 12:18 PM.
Old 03-14-2014, 12:57 PM
  #7  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Guys, here's the link:
http://www.acura.com/ThrillRules.aspx
Old 03-14-2014, 01:53 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
I have seen a suggested MSRP for the TLX of 56.5k (In CANADA) which is about 5k more than the 4G TL...so that doesn't surprise me. I have been saying this since mid January after being at the Montreal car show. That being said, an MSRP is just that and this might be something they will try although we'll find out shortly now. Just a few more weeks before the NY auto show.....
Old 03-14-2014, 02:04 PM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
TeamAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 1,175
Received 231 Likes on 207 Posts
I just had to enter the sweepstakes lol
The following 3 users liked this post by TeamAcura:
kurtatx (03-15-2014), nore03 (03-14-2014), TL Luver (03-31-2014)
Old 03-14-2014, 02:06 PM
  #10  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Void in Hawaii.... LOL
Old 03-14-2014, 03:30 PM
  #11  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ Thats because you guys have too good already!! Sand, beaches, warmth, gorgeous women...I mean come on Colin....you can't have it all
Old 03-14-2014, 03:55 PM
  #12  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
^^ Thats because you guys have too good already!! Sand, beaches, warmth, gorgeous women...I mean come on Colin....you can't have it all
Haha, you make it sound so special...

Yeah, it's a sunny 81 deg day
Old 03-14-2014, 04:00 PM
  #13  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ *sigh* After getting 2 feet of snow yesterday I don't think we'll see green grass till mid June at this rate.
Old 03-14-2014, 05:49 PM
  #14  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
I will stick with my estimates that a TLX SH-AWD Advance being at least $50K and hope they do a Type-S Advance AWD that I suspect that might go as high as $52K.
The following 2 users liked this post by KeithL:
BEAR-AvHistory (03-14-2014), Rocketsfan (03-14-2014)
Old 03-14-2014, 07:00 PM
  #15  
Burning Brakes
 
a35tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,091
Received 383 Likes on 239 Posts
I just entered the sweepstakes too and read the fine print. It states that the TLX will go on sale June 1, 2014 but that all trim levels won't be available until September 2014.
Old 03-14-2014, 07:00 PM
  #16  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,607
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by VtecTL
Note: the Acura TLX is not available to the public until June 1, 2014, and not all trim levels will be available until September 2014.
Is "V6" a trim level? Please say "no". lol.
Old 03-14-2014, 08:27 PM
  #17  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
My guess is SH-AWD will lag a few months like it did on the 4G.
Old 03-15-2014, 03:53 AM
  #18  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
I have seen a suggested MSRP for the TLX of 56.5k (In CANADA) which is about 5k more than the 4G TL...so that doesn't surprise me. I have been saying this since mid January after being at the Montreal car show. That being said, an MSRP is just that and this might be something they will try although we'll find out shortly now. Just a few more weeks before the NY auto show.....
I hope they don't try a $5K price bump, that will be bad for Acura.

Unfortunately it is a month to the NY show... April 18th - 27th
Old 03-15-2014, 08:03 AM
  #19  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocket_man
I hope they don't try a $5K price bump, that will be bad for Acura.

Unfortunately it is a month to the NY show... April 18th - 27th
Current SH-AW Advance is $46,405 so with all the new added features in the Advance model I can see just under $50K price tag. Throw a Type-S in for another $2K and you flirt with $52K. I believe the 4G when released saw about a $3-3.5K increase, not uncommon in today's market where the new gen has many more features. I suspect the base trim will have a small increase. I'm curious to see the range from I4 Base to V6 AWD Advance, that is probably a $12K+ range.
Old 03-15-2014, 04:15 PM
  #20  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by KeithL
Current SH-AW Advance is $46,405 so with all the new added features in the Advance model I can see just under $50K price tag. Throw a Type-S in for another $2K and you flirt with $52K. I believe the 4G when released saw about a $3-3.5K increase, not uncommon in today's market where the new gen has many more features. I suspect the base trim will have a small increase. I'm curious to see the range from I4 Base to V6 AWD Advance, that is probably a $12K+ range.
I'd be looking at the TLX Advanced... with the V6 since they won't offer it in the 2.4. The current TL Advanced is $42K With a ~10% bump up I'm looking at $46K, or if I'm lucky $45K. More than I expected to pay for this car. Then I need to think what else my $45K will buy and it opens up my buying options. But not just for me, for all Acura shoppers. TLX buyers will be in the same boat as RLX buyers... once you realize what you are paying for the Acura, then Audi and BMW and MB are right there.

Acura needs to tow the line on price, that is their advantage, part of the reason they didn't want to invest in RWD. The higher they price their cars the more buyers will look to the available RWD platforms and wonder why they'd pay RWD prices for a FWD car.
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (03-15-2014)
Old 03-15-2014, 04:17 PM
  #21  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ Well said. Especially when you consider that the TLX is a replacement of the TL and TSX, so in a way, you are getting a smaller car than the TL and for about up to 5-6K more. They gotta be careful.....
Old 03-15-2014, 06:51 PM
  #22  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,607
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
^^ Well said. Especially when you consider that the TLX is a replacement of the TL and TSX, so in a way, you are getting a smaller car than the TL and for about up to 5-6K more. They gotta be careful.....
Well, let's be fair. We haven't gotten official pricing and the car apparently does have more crap in it than the 4G. Most people wanted the car to shrink from the 4G. Also, they've stated that the interior space won't be affected much by the shrinkage. Combine that with better fuel economy and who knows what else, and it probably does justify at least a little price bump.
Old 03-15-2014, 07:03 PM
  #23  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ That is a good point however, my gut feeling is that the TSX owners will not be offended with paying the extra 5k for the TLX as they will be getting the impression they are upgrading to the new TL, while the current TL owners will get the impression they are paying 5K for the new TSX. That is the problem of merging 2 models in one.....
Old 03-15-2014, 11:21 PM
  #24  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocketsfan
the car apparently does have more crap in it than the 4G. Most people wanted the car to shrink from the 4G.
Uh.... Rocket, you are right - didn't we see a ton of that fake metal trim in the centre console!? LOL Wait, it's not just the inside, but the outside too..... just look at the rims....
Old 03-15-2014, 11:24 PM
  #25  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
^^ That is a good point however, my gut feeling is that the TSX owners will not be offended with paying the extra 5k for the TLX as they will be getting the impression they are upgrading to the new TL, while the current TL owners will get the impression they are paying 5K for the new TSX. That is the problem of merging 2 models in one.....
You know, that is actually an important point, Weather. I have no idea paying $50K for a new vehicle. But when you pay that much for a new car, you probably do not want to see someone who is paying $15-20K less for a vehicle that is similar to yours in a stripped down version, just for that snob value.... sorry to be thinking that way, but probably that is how lots of buyers feel.
Old 03-16-2014, 01:14 AM
  #26  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by ostrich
You know, that is actually an important point, Weather. I have no idea paying $50K for a new vehicle. But when you pay that much for a new car, you probably do not want to see someone who is paying $15-20K less for a vehicle that is similar to yours in a stripped down version, just for that snob value.... sorry to be thinking that way, but probably that is how lots of buyers feel.
It is a tricky balance for Acura. I suspect they felt the ILX would help fill in the low end of the sedan line up, but I'm not sure it is up to the task unless they revise it significantly at the MCC. Maybe if they made an Advanced trim version with the 2.4L and some of the tech from the TLX.
Old 03-16-2014, 01:29 PM
  #27  
Racer
 
internalaudit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 343
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
With the TSX and TL gone and TLX emerging, hoping the economies of scale and simplicity brought about by fewer SKU's will help keep pricing competitive.

Between the TSX and the Accord, I don't see much reason to pay for the premium Acura branding especially when SH-AWD is not offered on the TSX anyway.
Old 03-16-2014, 02:52 PM
  #28  
Instructor
 
draph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 205
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
If a TLX SHAWD Type S 6MT goes for $52K and the next gen Chevy SS based upon the Cadillac CTS architecture comes with LT1 V8, 7MT, rwd (the one with mpg ratings of 29 on the highway in the C7 'vette), and all the features of the current SS while holding its line on price, I know where my money is going in 2016 or 2017...

Acura's dilemma is "smart luxury" buyers typically aren't willing to pay thousands of dollars for an emblem on their grill. I'll take a frumpy Chevy bow tie over an Acura precision calipers if it gets me more car (performance, fun, and features) for the dollars. In other words, if Acura wants to retain my loyalty, they better bring a Type S MT to the game, and the price better stay close to, if not below, $45K. Acura taught me I could live without "Advance" for an MT, so I'm fine if they leave off the safety nannies like lane keeping assist and radar cruise control to keep the price down; but they are greedy evil B*Tards if they don't at least provide everything that's on an Accord Touring as standard equipment on the TLX.

BTW, I like how Honda fixed the discrepancy between how you could get a Civic SI sedan with Navigation while you couldn't get that on the ILX 2.4 6MT for more than $5K less - the 2014 revised Civic SI Sedan will no longer be available with navigation (only the coupe). What are Honda/Acura product planners thinking? They might redeem themselves if, starting this Spring, the ILX 2.4 6MT will only come with Nav and ELS audio at only a few hundred bucks more than the current sticker, AND they add the LSD from the Civic SI. That would still be pushing the "smart luxury value" equation pretty hard, though: Now that 2014 Civic SI has keyless features and is ~$24K, you'd still be paying $7K more for styling variations on the same architecture, leather, navigation, and ELS". As it stands now, ILX 2.4 that only adds leather and gives up LSD over Civic SI is still $7K more...Wow. Sorry if this went off track for the TL/TLX folks who don't want to read about where Acura is going off the rails in marketing its other cars as well...
Old 03-16-2014, 02:55 PM
  #29  
Racer
 
CoquiTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bracey, VA
Age: 68
Posts: 458
Received 49 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamAcura
I just had to enter the sweepstakes lol
Me too. Hopefully nobody else does.
Old 03-17-2014, 12:31 PM
  #30  
Senior Moderator
 
4cruizn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 42
Posts: 807
Received 412 Likes on 194 Posts
Originally Posted by draph
If a TLX SHAWD Type S 6MT
No such thing. Sadly.
Old 03-17-2014, 12:41 PM
  #31  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
d1sturb3d119's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,114
Received 268 Likes on 202 Posts
Originally Posted by draph
If a TLX SHAWD Type S 6MT goes for $52K and the next gen Chevy SS based upon the Cadillac CTS architecture comes with LT1 V8, 7MT, rwd (the one with mpg ratings of 29 on the highway in the C7 'vette), and all the features of the current SS while holding its line on price, I know where my money is going in 2016 or 2017...

Acura's dilemma is "smart luxury" buyers typically aren't willing to pay thousands of dollars for an emblem on their grill. I'll take a frumpy Chevy bow tie over an Acura precision calipers if it gets me more car (performance, fun, and features) for the dollars. In other words, if Acura wants to retain my loyalty, they better bring a Type S MT to the game, and the price better stay close to, if not below, $45K. Acura taught me I could live without "Advance" for an MT, so I'm fine if they leave off the safety nannies like lane keeping assist and radar cruise control to keep the price down; but they are greedy evil B*Tards if they don't at least provide everything that's on an Accord Touring as standard equipment on the TLX.

BTW, I like how Honda fixed the discrepancy between how you could get a Civic SI sedan with Navigation while you couldn't get that on the ILX 2.4 6MT for more than $5K less - the 2014 revised Civic SI Sedan will no longer be available with navigation (only the coupe). What are Honda/Acura product planners thinking? They might redeem themselves if, starting this Spring, the ILX 2.4 6MT will only come with Nav and ELS audio at only a few hundred bucks more than the current sticker, AND they add the LSD from the Civic SI. That would still be pushing the "smart luxury value" equation pretty hard, though: Now that 2014 Civic SI has keyless features and is ~$24K, you'd still be paying $7K more for styling variations on the same architecture, leather, navigation, and ELS". As it stands now, ILX 2.4 that only adds leather and gives up LSD over Civic SI is still $7K more...Wow. Sorry if this went off track for the TL/TLX folks who don't want to read about where Acura is going off the rails in marketing its other cars as well...

Not going to argue on any of those points but I do appreciate the push for more of a focus on handling but to compete they better up the ante. The SHAWD is worth the money for anyone who doesn't want RWD and is in the snowbelt. Wish it had a power plant with potential though.
Old 03-17-2014, 06:49 PM
  #32  
Three Wheelin'
 
crxb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,502
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by CoquiTSX
Me too. Hopefully nobody else does.
- right nobody else enter
Old 03-17-2014, 07:16 PM
  #33  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by 4cruizn
No such thing. Sadly.
At least not yet, anyway.

Perhaps we can nudge them in the right direction?
Old 03-26-2014, 09:26 AM
  #34  
Burning Brakes
 
NwTSXmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 827
Received 54 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by KeithL
I will stick with my estimates that a TLX SH-AWD Advance being at least $50K and hope they do a Type-S Advance AWD that I suspect that might go as high as $52K.
And both will rot sitting on dealer lots at the above prices
Old 03-26-2014, 10:02 AM
  #35  
Tee EL
Thread Starter
 
VtecTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland, Severna Park
Age: 38
Posts: 136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When Acura came out with the 3rd gen TL back in 2004, it was almost a game changer (timeless design, a lot of tech not offered in many vehicles at the time, fit and finish, etc.). Where and when did they go wrong? I wonder where that momentum and passion went...or if Acura just got luck with a one-hit wonder..
Old 03-26-2014, 02:22 PM
  #36  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by VtecTL
When Acura came out with the 3rd gen TL back in 2004, it was almost a game changer (timeless design, a lot of tech not offered in many vehicles at the time, fit and finish, etc.). Where and when did they go wrong? I wonder where that momentum and passion went...or if Acura just got luck with a one-hit wonder..
I think you are missing the fact that the 1999 3.2 TL was also a game changing car and extremely well received. Regarding the 2004, if you ask me it was a happy confluence of events. First off, horsepower increased significantly, jumping from 225 to 270 (or 260 to 270). At the same time, I believe the list price went down, compared to a TL Type-S. My memory is a little foggy so I had to look it up, but research shows that the MSRP for a 2003 Type S was $33,480 and the opening price for a 2004 TL was $32,656.

Also, there were a few options to choose from. You either got the fully loaded TL or you opted for the TL with Navigation. IMO, nobody felt like they were not getting something they wanted or paying for something they didn't want. Essentially, if you wanted navigation, you paid $2000 and got it. If not, you still had a fully featured and well equipped car. It is not lost on me (and often glossed over) that we sold 60-70,000 TL's in those early years with essentially two trim levels.

For 2009, they listened to the press that complained that Acura doesn't offer enough choice, they split the 2009 TL into distinctive trim levels with all of the good stuff in the higher trim packages. Now you had the worst of both worlds, not only did the price increase, but you got less content compared to the outgoing car. Also, the content you wanted was part of a bundle that pushed the price up to $40,000. And, as has been discussed far too many times, the awkward styling didn't help either.

Last edited by Colin; 03-26-2014 at 02:25 PM.
The following users liked this post:
VtecTL (03-26-2014)
Old 03-26-2014, 08:10 PM
  #37  
Instructor
 
JTRADAR61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 163
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
IMOP if its 50 K its dead on arrival. Acura needs to price this right or its not going to sell. I hope top model tops out at 45k. Time will tell what figure it will be in next couple of months.
The following users liked this post:
dcdriver (03-29-2014)
Old 03-26-2014, 10:59 PM
  #38  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by NwTSXmt
And both will rot sitting on dealer lots at the above prices
Originally Posted by JTRADAR61
IMOP if its 50 K its dead on arrival. Acura needs to price this right or its not going to sell. I hope top model tops out at 45k. Time will tell what figure it will be in next couple of months.
Agree. The street price of the RLX Advance is ~$51K. They can't afford to price the TLX Advance SH-AWD in this same category.

If they want to make the right first impression with this car they need to price it right out the gate. Not shoot for an 'above market' price to see if they can get it, only to bring it down later.
Old 03-27-2014, 05:14 AM
  #39  
Pro
 
TSXV6Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ontario (Canada)
Age: 58
Posts: 667
Received 108 Likes on 87 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
[...] For 2009, they listened to the press that complained that Acura doesn't offer enough choice, they split the 2009 TL into distinctive trim levels with all of the good stuff in the higher trim packages. Now you had the worst of both worlds, not only did the price increase, but you got less content compared to the outgoing car. Also, the content you wanted was part of a bundle that pushed the price up to $40,000. And, as has been discussed far too many times, the awkward styling didn't help either.
Slapping the "beak" most of their cars... The most ugly (IMHO) iteration of that beak was on the 09 TL, which pushed most of loyal Acura customers to Lexus as their lease on the 3rd gen TL expired. The "flagship" RL looked like an enlarged circa 2000 honda accord (the new one does not look any better...). Then they created the ZDX. I just imagine the "yes men" sitting around the table and nodding to approved these designs, and the question is, "what were they thinking"?
I guess with the TLX, if they price it right and design the content (infotainment / options) properly, they may have a success on their hands.
Old 03-27-2014, 09:54 PM
  #40  
Former Audio Mod
 
schalliol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Carmel, IN, USA
Posts: 549
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by weather
^^ Well said. Especially when you consider that the TLX is a replacement of the TL and TSX, so in a way, you are getting a smaller car than the TL and for about up to 5-6K more. They gotta be careful.....
I agree the TLX needs to be no more expensive than the TL. If I were pricing a future car for a contest, I'd put the price high. It's easier to pleasantly surprise people with a lower price later.


Quick Reply: Pricing for a TLX Advance SH-AWD found.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.