increasing horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
cornelius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 283
Likes: 1
increasing horsepower

I wonder if the 2009 TL non-AWD has been detuned.
The accord 3.5L has 271HP and the 3.5L TL type S has 286HP.
Do any of you think an ECU upgrade could take the HP up to 300?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #2  
evocative's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: NJ
You need to increase the bore and stroke too since AWDs are 3.7 liters. hahaha..

Seriously, e-shift performance has been making high flow cats that increased 3Gs for 20 good HPs... none for the 4Gs yet. You could probably get 20 from an intake/exhaust combo too.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:43 PM
  #3  
SebringSilver's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 709
From: Vancouver, Canada
There's no way you'd actually feel any difference an extra 20 horses would bring. Save your money for other mods.

Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #4  
cornelius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 283
Likes: 1
Intake ==> around 7 HP ==> $250
cat back ==> around 3 HP ==> $800
ECU ==> 10 HP ? ==> $750 ?

total 20 HP, $1800

I agree that it's probably not worth it, but it feels like there
is something programmed in the car that deters the car from accelerating.
It feels like the car starts to accelerate and suddenly the power decreases
and it feels like Im driving a tractor.
Why does the automatic NSX feel 1000x faster when it has less power than the TL? Is it because of weight? If I totally stripped the TL (seats, spare tire, a/c, etc..), would it be as fast as the NSX? Or is the NSX just programmed to accelerate much better?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #5  
evocative's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by cornelius
Intake ==> around 7 HP ==> $250
cat back ==> around 3 HP ==> $800
ECU ==> 10 HP ? ==> $750 ?

total 20 HP, $1800

I agree that it's probably not worth it, but it feels like there
is something programmed in the car that deters the car from accelerating.
It feels like the car starts to accelerate and suddenly the power decreases
and it feels like Im driving a tractor.
Why does the automatic NSX feel 1000x faster when it has less power than the TL? Is it because of weight? If I totally stripped the TL (seats, spare tire, a/c, etc..), would it be as fast as the NSX? Or is the NSX just programmed to accelerate much better?
Yeah, the NSX is close to 1000 lbs. lighter than the TL.

If you wanted HP, you should have gone with a 135i with 3.0TT engine. Just with a $700 chip mod, you can produce up to 400 engine HP and 300 to the wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #6  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
There will be products soon enough. It's a brand new car. I think we will see some intake and exhaust stuff. I would like to see a lightweight pulley as well.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
PetesTL's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 3
From: Chicago suburb, IL
Simple....If you want faster acceleration, wait for the 6 MT 4G.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #8  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,415
Likes: 2,187
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by cornelius
Intake ==> around 7 HP ==> $250
cat back ==> around 3 HP ==> $800
ECU ==> 10 HP ? ==> $750 ?

total 20 HP, $1800

I agree that it's probably not worth it, but it feels like there
is something programmed in the car that deters the car from accelerating.
It feels like the car starts to accelerate and suddenly the power decreases
and it feels like Im driving a tractor.
Why does the automatic NSX feel 1000x faster when it has less power than the TL? Is it because of weight? If I totally stripped the TL (seats, spare tire, a/c, etc..), would it be as fast as the NSX? Or is the NSX just programmed to accelerate much better?
1. the NSX is RWD
2. the NSX is Mid engine
3 the NSX has less drive-terrain losses
4. the NSX has a much higher rev limit
5. The NSX is made out of aluminum and is tons lighter
6. The NSX motor is titanium and thus can wind up faster.
7. The NSX was engineered to go fast with little HP.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #9  
missmylegend's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by cornelius
Intake ==> around 7 HP ==> $250
cat back ==> around 3 HP ==> $800
ECU ==> 10 HP ? ==> $750 ?

total 20 HP, $1800

I agree that it's probably not worth it, but it feels like there
is something programmed in the car that deters the car from accelerating.
It feels like the car starts to accelerate and suddenly the power decreases
and it feels like Im driving a tractor.
Why does the automatic NSX feel 1000x faster when it has less power than the TL? Is it because of weight? If I totally stripped the TL (seats, spare tire, a/c, etc..), would it be as fast as the NSX? Or is the NSX just programmed to accelerate much better?

The 3G TL has the same tranny from the 2G so Acura has detuned the engine during the lower revs so the 3G would not have the same tranny problems.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 10:50 PM
  #10  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,415
Likes: 2,187
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by missmylegend
The 3G TL has the same tranny from the 2G so Acura has detuned the engine during the lower revs so the 3G would not have the same tranny problems.
this is a semi incorrect statement. The very early 04 TL's had the same trans as the 2G, then they implemented v2. of the trans. This was used until mid 2005 where it was changed to a new design that provided even more lubrication and cooling. in 2006, acura added a torque limiting algorithim to the ECU to combat the bad torque steer that people complained about on the 2004 and 2005 TL's. It limits torque in gears 1 and 2 only when at a stand-still to my knowledge.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #11  
crxb's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 45
Originally Posted by cornelius
Intake ==> around 7 HP ==> $250
cat back ==> around 3 HP ==> $800
ECU ==> 10 HP ? ==> $750 ?

total 20 HP, $1800

I agree that it's probably not worth it, but it feels like there
is something programmed in the car that deters the car from accelerating.
It feels like the car starts to accelerate and suddenly the power decreases
and it feels like Im driving a tractor.
Why does the automatic NSX feel 1000x faster when it has less power than the TL? Is it because of weight? If I totally stripped the TL (seats, spare tire, a/c, etc..), would it be as fast as the NSX? Or is the NSX just programmed to accelerate much better?
HP/lb - sums it all up
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baelim
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
May 10, 2018 09:53 AM
Oakroadsteve
3G TL (2004-2008)
9
Oct 28, 2015 10:28 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 17, 2015 09:01 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
Sep 14, 2015 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.