XM Traffic is useless!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2010, 09:18 AM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
aphmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
XM Traffic is useless!

I live in the Boston suburbs, and I have found that XM traffic is not helpful. I have been stuck in traffic jams for over 30 mins, and XM traffic shows everything is fine. Does anyone else have this experience? Is there an 800 number to call and report incidents or inquire about a traffic situation? I have also noticed that several stand-alone GPS devices (Garmin, Tom Tom) have advanced lane guidance. Is there any hope for something like that on our navs?
Old 01-18-2010, 10:44 AM
  #2  
Drifting
 
Pete2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston Metro
Age: 44
Posts: 2,761
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
I don't know, it was pretty helpful for me today, showed 128 south as a parking lot, so I took the back roads to work... I think it only updates during the day. Sometimes I've driven in on the Masspike downtown and got stuck at the toll, and the traffic says it's fine. It's not 100%, but it has been helpful a few times.
Old 01-18-2010, 11:39 AM
  #3  
Advanced
 
HiroY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 54
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When you say 'advanced lane guidance', do you mean the feature that tells you what lane to be in for an upcoming interchange? If so, our unit does have that, or at least I have seen and used it on mine. If I recall correctly, it shows up on the split screen view when coming up to the interchange, with a set of lane arrows, and the ones you should be in are highlighted.
Old 01-18-2010, 01:34 PM
  #4  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
aphmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by HiroY
When you say 'advanced lane guidance', do you mean the feature that tells you what lane to be in for an upcoming interchange? If so, our unit does have that, or at least I have seen and used it on mine. If I recall correctly, it shows up on the split screen view when coming up to the interchange, with a set of lane arrows, and the ones you should be in are highlighted.
I probably have an incorrect impression about this feature, but I thought that advanced lane guidance also refered to picking a lane that had the least congestion...but I guess I was dreaming...

I still think the traffic info stinks!
Old 01-18-2010, 11:10 PM
  #5  
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 7,307
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
im pretty sure it could be where you live...

NY City & Metro Area - Nav Traffic is ON POINT.

15-20 miles east (Long Island) the Nav Traffic only reports information for 3 highways, and no major roads. it was useless for me on Long Island, so i didnt subscribe for it
Old 01-19-2010, 03:38 AM
  #6  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
The traffic advice seems very good in the NoVA/DC/MD area.

The detour function of the NAV has worked very well, too.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:47 AM
  #7  
CPR
Burning Brakes
 
CPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 916
Received 280 Likes on 146 Posts
Nav/Traffic

Only problem so far, is the Belt Parkway, from exit 11, till the Southern State Parkway. There is absolutely NO info on that route. Someone said, it was a security issue with JFK airport. Anyone else experiencing the same problem? other than that, it works great!
Old 01-19-2010, 11:03 AM
  #8  
10th Gear
 
Redduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Age: 59
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, the traffic info is next to useless. I drive 62 miles one-way to work each day along I-25 from northern Colorado to Denver. The traffic always shows Denver as having no traffic, when it almost always does. Comparing that to the free Google Navigator on my driod and the Acura nav looks pathetic. The other glaring problem is that the Google Nav shows traffic info on I-25 from one end of CO to the other, where are the Acura nav only shows traffic for the Denver area.

I am disappointed in the Acura nav, to say the least.
Old 01-19-2010, 02:34 PM
  #9  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
aphmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does anyone know if there is an 800 number for real-time traffic updates?
Old 01-19-2010, 03:31 PM
  #10  
Racer
 
jzacuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by aphmd
I probably have an incorrect impression about this feature, but I thought that advanced lane guidance also refered to picking a lane that had the least congestion...but I guess I was dreaming...

I still think the traffic info stinks!
I don't even think traffic with crowd sourcing information could tell you which individual lane has the least congestion. And even if it did, and everyone had that technology, it'd be useless because everyone would attempt to get into the same lane causing... congestion.

The traffic info is up-to-date for me in the SFO area about 75% of the time. It takes 1-2 minutes to update after turning on the car which is typically enough time between my origination point and the highway.
Old 01-19-2010, 04:25 PM
  #11  
Instructor
 
bagbklyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 45
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CPR
Only problem so far, is the Belt Parkway, from exit 11, till the Southern State Parkway. There is absolutely NO info on that route. Someone said, it was a security issue with JFK airport. Anyone else experiencing the same problem? other than that, it works great!
Certain hwy is doesn't pick up the jackie robinson, the belt pkwy, the cross island. I'm guessing it has to do something with the city and the fact that XM is either charging for it. the reaosn I say that is because the traffic shows up on google maps for these roads. Who knows i'm sure someone had to call to complain.
Old 01-20-2010, 08:19 PM
  #12  
Instructor
 
bw5556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: "Paradise"
Age: 39
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by aphmd
I have found that XM traffic is not helpful
It has been pretty helpful for me thus far in LA. Sometimes late night freeway ramp closures update too early and sometimes there are sporadic coverage gaps but I'll continue to subscribe.
Old 01-20-2010, 11:02 PM
  #13  
Instructor
 
xrays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found it accurate only about 50% of the time in the Boston area. So I didn't subscribe after the 3 month trial period was over.

If you have an iPhone, you can get much better traffic accuracy with the apps Maps or Inrix Traffic!
Old 01-23-2010, 05:10 PM
  #14  
Advanced
 
RKEnnis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Age: 65
Posts: 58
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
XM traffic is pretty much useless for me here in the south Texas area, but I'm not surprised. They spent a bunch of money to install traffic camera and "Transguide" signs on the major highways, and they aren't accurate either.

I certainly won't be renewing...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
Jinkazetsukai
2G RL (2005-2012)
6
11-21-2015 05:28 PM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
09-27-2015 06:16 PM



Quick Reply: XM Traffic is useless!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.