Lo-Jack yes or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2011, 09:50 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Cap'n Preshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Katy, TX (Houston suburb)
Posts: 199
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Lo-Jack yes or no?

What's the concensus?

Do you really want your car back after it's stolen and maybe trashed or wrecked or would you rather get a settlement from your insurance co. and replace it? Among potential issues is "diminished value" if repairs are required, especially if it's a lease.
Old 04-05-2011, 09:54 PM
  #2  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Diminished value should be covered by insurance if you bring it up.

Many people on here have modified their cars extensively, and I doubt most of those mods are insured. That's probably $3,000 out the window. I'd want my car back ASAP, and anything that's broken/abused, I'd want repaired.
Old 04-05-2011, 09:56 PM
  #3  
Suzuka Master
 
Mr Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Received 609 Likes on 493 Posts
5 hours from Mexico? Do you honestly think you'll ever see that car again?
Old 04-05-2011, 10:20 PM
  #4  
Intermediate
 
Asynchro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got the Lojack with Early Warning System option. Supposedly I will get an automated phone call within a maximum of 30 minutes of my car being moved. They give you a key fob that you must have with you if you are driving the car, to prevent a "false alarm" phone call.

I paid more for this version of Lojack for the automatic notification, on the theory that there might be a fighting chance of recovering the car before it got chopped up or damaged. I typically keep my cars 10+ years, and it would really suck to have to buy a new car again after having paid off the car loan.
Old 04-06-2011, 04:28 AM
  #5  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
I opted not to get the lo-jack because I don't think I want it back after it's been stolen. Insurance will cover it.
Old 04-06-2011, 04:43 AM
  #6  
Instructor
 
TL Tech 18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

No... jack
Old 04-06-2011, 10:42 AM
  #7  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
Originally Posted by Stew4HD
I opted not to get the lo-jack because I don't think I want it back after it's been stolen. Insurance will cover it.


ditto..

its probably messed up by now.. broken ignition, dents, broken steering column..etc.. the list goes on.


and honestly.. all they have to do is tow the damn thing to mexico which is about 3 hours away from where i live and your car will never be found. simple as that.

also for everyone with tech package, you need your FOB key to start it so it is very difficult for them to just drive off with your car.
Old 04-06-2011, 12:39 PM
  #8  
Advanced
 
MD-DRIVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
like others said - I would rather collect the insurance and buy a new car.

This is a good spot to recommend that if you financed your car, make sure you have GAP insurance. This covers the difference between what you owe on your car and the value of your car if it's totaled or stolen.

One benefit to LoJack is that it may lower your insurance rates.
Old 04-06-2011, 12:45 PM
  #9  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
Originally Posted by MD-DRIVER

One benefit to LoJack is that it may lower your insurance rates.



at the cost of $3,000 lol..

it wont be lowered by that much tho.. probably 100-200 every half a year.

if you do the calculations, you dont save any money at all
Old 04-06-2011, 01:25 PM
  #10  
Instructor
 
SuperCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I had lojack in my other car. Cost me $800 to install. The installer from lojack says they have to come out every 3-4 years to check to see if the battery in the device was working. That was an additional $150....WTF. I sold that car last year.
Old 04-09-2011, 04:12 PM
  #11  
3rd Gear
 
CarCzar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one of my good friends had LoJack on his 2010 TL. it was stolen while we were at a concert in L.A. he got a phone call saying his car was stopped 12 miles away by the police. no dents or scratches just broken ignition. he swears by it
Old 04-09-2011, 08:09 PM
  #12  
Suzuka Master
 
VQPower37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,386
Received 84 Likes on 79 Posts
^ imo the car always feels violated, i wouldnt want it back ... hence no lo jack
Old 04-09-2011, 09:00 PM
  #13  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Cap'n Preshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Katy, TX (Houston suburb)
Posts: 199
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by MD-DRIVER
like others said - I would rather collect the insurance and buy a new car.

This is a good spot to recommend that if you financed your car, make sure you have GAP insurance. This covers the difference between what you owe on your car and the value of your car if it's totaled or stolen.

One benefit to LoJack is that it may lower your insurance rates.
This is more or less my point in opening the discussion. LoJac is $695 installed and up to $1000 if you take the bait to buy the extras (ext'd warranty & early warning system)

My opinion, if you paid cash or financed less than 50% of the deal you can maybe afford to take the hit of a depreciation loss. The insurance company will only pay you the car's wholesale book value, not what it'd actually cost you to replace it. If you still owe $$ on it you might be a lot better off getting it back.

GAP insurance should be required on any financed purchase where the buyer has less than 20% net equity in the car. It should also be required on any Lease. It's simply a good idea and it's cheap insurance.

On the other hand LoJack is only viable in the mainstream of the culture (major cities) where the local PD is equipped to track a LoJack transponder. Much beyond 100 miles out from a major city, consider the car gone.

Worth the $695? As much as I don't want to have my car stolen in the first place, I take no comfort at the mental image I have of it being brought back dangling from an improperly attached wrecker, with the back seat full of chicken bones, smelling of gunpowder or weed or cigarettes or with jheri-curl smeared all over the headrests. Call us strange but we don't "glop-up" our cars or eat in them. Even back when our kids were little, neither we nor they ever ate or drank sodas in the car. Want to go to MacDonalds? Fine , but we're getting a table and eating inside. People today think we're weird.

Any insurance discount for having LoJack would apply only to the "comprehensive" portion of the policy which is already comparatively inexpensive. Translation: Not worth it.

Now then, what I would consider buying if it was available, is On-Star. Better than Lo-Jack, On-Star can immediately locate your vehicle anywhere (when it's outside) and when in contact w/the police & with the PD having visual sighting, the On-Star operator can even stop the car (disable the ignition).

Give the programmers a little more time, there'll be an app for that...
Old 04-09-2011, 09:04 PM
  #14  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Cap'n Preshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Katy, TX (Houston suburb)
Posts: 199
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by VQPower37
^ imo the car always feels violated, i wouldnt want it back ... hence no lo jack
Ditto!
Old 04-09-2011, 09:17 PM
  #15  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Cap'n Preshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Katy, TX (Houston suburb)
Posts: 199
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by potmilkz
ditto..

also for everyone with tech package, you need your FOB key to start it so it is very difficult for them to just drive off with your car.
I had wondered about that. Can anyone else verify this is true? I would think a determined thief looking for a specific car (Ever seen "Gone in Sixty Seconds"?) would have all that worked out. Auto theft is a huge business, but mainly for chop shops. They don't want the car, they want the parts.
Old 04-20-2011, 02:38 PM
  #16  
Burning Brakes
 
Kingmeow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 958
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
My dealer threw it in for free else I probably would not get it.
Old 04-20-2011, 02:58 PM
  #17  
Instructor
 
Qwikhas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philly
Posts: 120
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by VQPower37
^ imo the car always feels violated, i wouldnt want it back ... hence no lo jack
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Old 04-20-2011, 04:15 PM
  #18  
The Sicilian
 
jspagna1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CT
Age: 63
Posts: 1,632
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
As long as the car has an alarm and you don't leave your keys in it you should be fine. Car thefts are way down compared to years ago and that is what insurance is for.
With the thechnology cars have today it's much harder for car theives and if they really want it,their going to try and steal it. It's not like the old days. My first Mustang was stolen and the found it a week later in MA. Not much damage. My father had his Falcon stolen, found it a few days later and not much damage.
My sister had her Mustang stolen twice first time no big deal second time totally trashed.
Moved to the suburbs and some guys tried to steal my 89 GMC Jimmy, but got caught by the cops.
I have not had anything touched in years and I would say I have a LOT of experience with stolen cars.
Old 04-20-2011, 05:30 PM
  #19  
Racer
 
wakattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 286
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
I would think the theft rate of 4G's are probably really low. It's just not a in demand car. The parts won't fit onto anything else. They barely move off dealer lots as it is. If your paranoid about it, a kill switch perhaps, would be a better way to spend the money, and gap insurance as others mentioned.
Old 11-30-2011, 04:52 PM
  #20  
4th Gear
 
JustAskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central Florida
Age: 71
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, you guys convinced me not to buy the Lojack. I just purchased my vehicle and apparantly they are pushing "upsells" at the end of the month. Final offer from them was $795 for advance warning system and $495 for basic system - down from $995 & $695 - plus 7 year (Lojack) warranty.
Old 12-01-2011, 08:11 PM
  #21  
Walk the walk
 
Shoot2Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 652
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
No, could have got it for $149 - lifetime on the the TL-S which to me because of the external features and the popularity of the 3G is possibly the most likely to be stolen. Just in reality sad but true you don't want it back. I saw a guy fight with and insurance company on a BMW X5 of what was damaged after being stolen. The hidden damage can be significant.You can age a transmission 30,000 miles easy in a evening of joy riding. Besides does the whole event not show up on car fax.
Old 12-01-2011, 08:15 PM
  #22  
Walk the walk
 
Shoot2Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 652
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by wakattack
I would think the theft rate of 4G's are probably really low. It's just not a in demand car. The parts won't fit onto anything else. They barely move off dealer lots as it is. If your paranoid about it, a kill switch perhaps, would be a better way to spend the money, and gap insurance as others mentioned.
People who know believe or not use the club. I know a lot of people who know Newark and that is the deal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thephantom
Member Cars for Sale
0
06-05-2013 03:49 PM
Jcxny
3G TL (2004-2008)
11
06-28-2004 06:31 PM
Jcxny
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
05-21-2004 12:06 AM
boo2
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
10-04-2003 06:19 PM
Brad
1G TSX (2004-2008)
11
09-16-2003 12:58 AM



Quick Reply: Lo-Jack yes or no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.