View Poll Results: Acura TL vs Lexus GS
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll
2012 TL vs Lexus GS
#41
Three Wheelin'
Personally I wanted the previous generation of the GS.. then I saw the new one and it's insane price bump without a proportionate increase in features, power, etc.
The last gen GS started at about $38k, this new one starts for $46k..... Are you kidding me?
I think it would sell in larger numbers if the price bump was smaller. It would then basically be priced like the TL +4-5k, instead of the current 7-10k+
Also, it's not "loud"
The last gen GS started at about $38k, this new one starts for $46k..... Are you kidding me?
I think it would sell in larger numbers if the price bump was smaller. It would then basically be priced like the TL +4-5k, instead of the current 7-10k+
Also, it's not "loud"
#42
As far as VTEC Racer, he has no clue about the GS that I am not even going to respond
#43
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/pr...d=2563#trimsel
(1st year of that gen)
1998 GS300 MSRP 36,900
2011 GS350 MSRP 46,100
The base MSRP went up $9,200, or nearly 25%
later year to match TL
2004 GS300 MSRP 38,875
2011 GS350 MSRP 46,100
The base MSRP still went up $7,255, or 18.5%
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/pr...Acura&model=TL
2004 TL Base MSRP 32,650
2012 TL Base MSRP 35,605
The base MSRP went up $2,955, or 9%
So no, not even close, in dollar amount or percentage.
That, IMO, is one of the contributing factors to its (the current gen GS) demise.
It may still cost less than the european brands, but have you looked at it's sales vs it's competition?
Here I got it for you, from Feb 2011:
5 series 4,212 +85.6
E class 4,203 +4%
DTS 1,512 +147.5%
M 1,178 +44.2%
A5 594 +17.2%
MKS 568 -52%
GS 349 -28.5%
RL 168 +28.2%
Thank TSX69 from TOV for the above numbers.
#44
Racer
if money is not the issue, definitely the GS. it's a class higher than the TL, it's Japan made rear wheel drive true luxury sport sedan unlike the TL which is made in here, front drive based (yes, even the sh-awd models are based on a front drive platform). if the money is a factor then the best bang for the buck is definitely the fwd TL.
#45
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
if money is not the issue, definitely the GS. it's a class higher than the TL, it's Japan made rear wheel drive true luxury sport sedan unlike the TL which is made in here, front drive based (yes, even the sh-awd models are based on a front drive platform). if the money is a factor then the best bang for the buck is definitely the fwd TL.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-25-2011 at 01:52 AM.
#46
it also has:
-wood trim
-1 touch up/down rear windows
-touchscreen nav
-power trunk closer
-sliding armrest
-brighter led footwell lights
-10 way front seats
-auto leveling hid's w/ AFS (like the RL)
-quieter interior, both for road noise AND bump absorbtion
-faster (gs350 RWD)
I might have actually gotten into either an IS350 or a GS350 if lexus sales people weren't such dicks
-wood trim
-1 touch up/down rear windows
-touchscreen nav
-power trunk closer
-sliding armrest
-brighter led footwell lights
-10 way front seats
-auto leveling hid's w/ AFS (like the RL)
-quieter interior, both for road noise AND bump absorbtion
-faster (gs350 RWD)
I might have actually gotten into either an IS350 or a GS350 if lexus sales people weren't such dicks
#47
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
"More Tech Doesn't Mean More Power
Toyota's new 3.0-liter VVT-i V-6, making its debut in the 2006 Lexus GS, is a high-tech marvel. It replaces the 220-horsepower inline-six of the previous GS 300, with 25 more horses and 10 more pound-feet of torque (to 230). It features direct injection, which means the fuel injectors are placed directly in the combustion chamber for more precise timing based on driving conditions and power demands. Because fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, it absorbs heat as it evaporates, acting like an intercooler. This allows a compression ratio increase from 10.5:1 to 11.5:1, accounting for much of the extra power. NOx regulations in the U.S. prevent the engine from running lean to save fuel, which is another advantage of direct injection in other markets. Throttle is drive-by-wire.
Continuously variable valve timing for intake and exhaust valves provides a wide, flat torque curve in the 3.0 VVT-i"
#48
Actually it was not the same engine at all, they had the same displacement 3.0. The 2nd gen came with an inline 3.0 6cyl, the 06 came with a 3.0 V6 engine.
"More Tech Doesn't Mean More Power
Toyota's new 3.0-liter VVT-i V-6, making its debut in the 2006 Lexus GS, is a high-tech marvel. It replaces the 220-horsepower inline-six of the previous GS 300, with 25 more horses and 10 more pound-feet of torque (to 230). It features direct injection, which means the fuel injectors are placed directly in the combustion chamber for more precise timing based on driving conditions and power demands. Because fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, it absorbs heat as it evaporates, acting like an intercooler. This allows a compression ratio increase from 10.5:1 to 11.5:1, accounting for much of the extra power. NOx regulations in the U.S. prevent the engine from running lean to save fuel, which is another advantage of direct injection in other markets. Throttle is drive-by-wire.
Continuously variable valve timing for intake and exhaust valves provides a wide, flat torque curve in the 3.0 VVT-i"
"More Tech Doesn't Mean More Power
Toyota's new 3.0-liter VVT-i V-6, making its debut in the 2006 Lexus GS, is a high-tech marvel. It replaces the 220-horsepower inline-six of the previous GS 300, with 25 more horses and 10 more pound-feet of torque (to 230). It features direct injection, which means the fuel injectors are placed directly in the combustion chamber for more precise timing based on driving conditions and power demands. Because fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, it absorbs heat as it evaporates, acting like an intercooler. This allows a compression ratio increase from 10.5:1 to 11.5:1, accounting for much of the extra power. NOx regulations in the U.S. prevent the engine from running lean to save fuel, which is another advantage of direct injection in other markets. Throttle is drive-by-wire.
Continuously variable valve timing for intake and exhaust valves provides a wide, flat torque curve in the 3.0 VVT-i"
#49
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Ding ding ding, we got ourselves a winner. I drove the 2004 GS300 for 1 1/2 year, The inline 6 was very smooth, but lacks power. When they changed the engine in 2006, I have already heard about the 3.5 that will come out in the '07. I was like why did Lexus waste R&D like that on the 3.0. Finally, when the 4.6 came out in '08, I just had to get it.
#50
Funny seeing this thread as I am thinking about replacing my wife's car and giving her the MDX.
I'm in the boat for a sport sedan and set my budget at $40k. I will not buy something that doesn't have ventilated seats, navi, etc., so the new TL is not in my budget. (It would also need to be the advance model anyway and that's easily mid 40's) So I am stuck comparing pre-12 TL's to the GS and I can't seem to give the win to the TL.
Yes there are some downsides to the GS, i.e. no traffic navi in the 2009 model I am looking at. However its fit and finish seems to be better and it has ventilated seats. I like the power mirrors, as gimmicky as they are.
They are both great performers with AWD and the TL does handle a little better. Let's be honest, neither is a truly amazing performer when you see what the germans offer.
We'll see which way I go but I don't think the TL is winning this battle. (Also owned a 2005 TL Aspec Navi that I sold for the MDX)
I'm in the boat for a sport sedan and set my budget at $40k. I will not buy something that doesn't have ventilated seats, navi, etc., so the new TL is not in my budget. (It would also need to be the advance model anyway and that's easily mid 40's) So I am stuck comparing pre-12 TL's to the GS and I can't seem to give the win to the TL.
Yes there are some downsides to the GS, i.e. no traffic navi in the 2009 model I am looking at. However its fit and finish seems to be better and it has ventilated seats. I like the power mirrors, as gimmicky as they are.
They are both great performers with AWD and the TL does handle a little better. Let's be honest, neither is a truly amazing performer when you see what the germans offer.
We'll see which way I go but I don't think the TL is winning this battle. (Also owned a 2005 TL Aspec Navi that I sold for the MDX)
#51
^I don't think you will have to spend a full $46k on an SH advance, even now you could probably negotiate for around $43k with little trouble and usually with new car financing being cheaper over used (assuming you intend to finance), you could be looking at roughly the same cost. There is the FWD advance if you don't really need or care for the SH, that will save some additional money.
Honestly though the TL SH is an amazing perfomer maybe with exception to straightline acceleration and especially for it's size and weight. The 6MT tested better in braking and handling than the 335i, G37, and S4 on more than one ocassion and those are the smaller, lighter, and faster models, nevermind the larger mid sized sedans like the A6, 5, etc. The 5AT isn't much different than the 6MT in that regard and the new 6AT for 2012 is probably the same.
I am just throwing some bits of info and consideration out there, it's your car and your money, both cars have their pluses and minuses, you should definately go with what you prefer overall.
Honestly though the TL SH is an amazing perfomer maybe with exception to straightline acceleration and especially for it's size and weight. The 6MT tested better in braking and handling than the 335i, G37, and S4 on more than one ocassion and those are the smaller, lighter, and faster models, nevermind the larger mid sized sedans like the A6, 5, etc. The 5AT isn't much different than the 6MT in that regard and the new 6AT for 2012 is probably the same.
I am just throwing some bits of info and consideration out there, it's your car and your money, both cars have their pluses and minuses, you should definately go with what you prefer overall.
#52
^I don't think you will have to spend a full $46k on an SH advance, even now you could probably negotiate for around $43k with little trouble and usually with new car financing being cheaper over used (assuming you intend to finance), you could be looking at roughly the same cost. There is the FWD advance if you don't really need or care for the SH, that will save some additional money.
Honestly though the TL SH is an amazing perfomer maybe with exception to straightline acceleration and especially for it's size and weight. The 6MT tested better in braking and handling than the 335i, G37, and S4 on more than one ocassion and those are the smaller, lighter, and faster models, nevermind the larger mid sized sedans like the A6, 5, etc. The 5AT isn't much different than the 6MT in that regard and the new 6AT for 2012 is probably the same.
I am just throwing some bits of info and consideration out there, it's your car and your money, both cars have their pluses and minuses, you should definately go with what you prefer overall.
Honestly though the TL SH is an amazing perfomer maybe with exception to straightline acceleration and especially for it's size and weight. The 6MT tested better in braking and handling than the 335i, G37, and S4 on more than one ocassion and those are the smaller, lighter, and faster models, nevermind the larger mid sized sedans like the A6, 5, etc. The 5AT isn't much different than the 6MT in that regard and the new 6AT for 2012 is probably the same.
I am just throwing some bits of info and consideration out there, it's your car and your money, both cars have their pluses and minuses, you should definately go with what you prefer overall.
As far as FWD, my last FWD car was an 05 TL Aspec/Navi. I will never own another FWD car in my life, so AWD is a must. I certainly wouldn't force a car into my budget by removing one of its best attributes.
I will certainly drive the 2012 TL just because I feel I should. If it truly blows me away in comparison I am sure I can bump my budget. I just need a real justification for spending 7-10k more than I plan.
#53
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
Post the exact same question on club lexus. Then add the results together.
Let us know how it turns out.
Let us know how it turns out.
#54
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Hey Bear I was thinking the same thing, place this thread in 99% most other forums even in another gen here the results of the poll would be very much different no doubt. The TL has been the ugly duckling since 09, the 12 updates help but not a whole lot & keeping it real the first thing that attracts 99% of us to a car is its looks (Interior/drive etc all come secondary). Most other car enthusiasts and forums I have been to/talked with just do not like the 09+ TL. The GS on the other hand has had alot of praise for its design and top notch interior, it has a few faults but its styling is good. The new Jag XF and even the new KIA optima took alot of styling cues from it and both of them look great.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-26-2011 at 01:43 PM.
#55
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
^^
I was thinking more along the lines of it's an Acura-based site, it'll be biased toward Acura. Just like a Lexus site would be biased toward Lexus.
I was thinking more along the lines of it's an Acura-based site, it'll be biased toward Acura. Just like a Lexus site would be biased toward Lexus.
#56
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Well based on what 3rd genners and 2nd gen TLers think of the 4th gen TL, I dunno. In the 4th gen forum it will probably prevail, the Lexus guys don't like the new TL over their although they did give the 3rd gen its props. Have seen a few threads on it the past couple years since its inception.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-26-2011 at 03:08 PM.
#57
Drifting
Noticed that a good number of the GS voters are those who are often on this forum bagging on the 4G. Not surprising, I guess.
IMO both nice cars, but with different driving characteristics, purposes and, above all, prices.
IMO both nice cars, but with different driving characteristics, purposes and, above all, prices.
#58
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
Hey Bear I was thinking the same thing, place this thread in 99% most other forums even in another gen here the results of the poll would be very much different no doubt. The TL has been the ugly duckling since 09, the 12 updates help but not a whole lot & keeping it real the first thing that attracts 99% of us to a car is its looks (Interior/drive etc all come secondary). Most other car enthusiasts and forums I have been to/talked with just do not like the 09+ TL. The GS on the other hand has had alot of praise for its design and top notch interior, it has a few faults but its styling is good. The new Jag XF and even the new KIA optima took alot of styling cues from it and both of them look great.
#59
I saw some positive reviews, though most did not like the styling. However, any thread I found that compared the TL to the GS saw the TL getting blasted. (as expected)
#60
Just for an update.
I drove a 2009 Lexus GS350 awd and liked it. The drive, especially the steering, felt great. Car moved decently for its size.
The tech was disappointing. When I got back into my MDX I felt like I jumped into a car 10 years newer. Didn't love the GS.
Decided to drive a new 2011 TL SH-AWD Tech. ($43k sticker) Liked the tech, drove like crap. I felt the steering was not remotely responsive or tight and the car felt too light. I did not like the dash layout at all. No go.
I decided to try the 2010 Infiniti M35x. Felt quick but the interior was HORRIBLE. I mean dated beyond belief. NOT A CHANCE.
Frustrated I decided to stop at Audi. I drove a 2011 S4 Premium Plus with bonus features. (Rims, trim work, etc.) This thing was amazing. Interior was gorgeous, sound system was fantastic (made the TL look pathetic) and the drive was fantastic. It was exactly what I wanted.
I decided that spending $55k on a new s4 was stupid at this point, but what it showed me was that at $40k there was nothing I wanted to buy. I'll hang my hat and wait for a while. Maybe next year I'll pick up a new s4.
I drove a 2009 Lexus GS350 awd and liked it. The drive, especially the steering, felt great. Car moved decently for its size.
The tech was disappointing. When I got back into my MDX I felt like I jumped into a car 10 years newer. Didn't love the GS.
Decided to drive a new 2011 TL SH-AWD Tech. ($43k sticker) Liked the tech, drove like crap. I felt the steering was not remotely responsive or tight and the car felt too light. I did not like the dash layout at all. No go.
I decided to try the 2010 Infiniti M35x. Felt quick but the interior was HORRIBLE. I mean dated beyond belief. NOT A CHANCE.
Frustrated I decided to stop at Audi. I drove a 2011 S4 Premium Plus with bonus features. (Rims, trim work, etc.) This thing was amazing. Interior was gorgeous, sound system was fantastic (made the TL look pathetic) and the drive was fantastic. It was exactly what I wanted.
I decided that spending $55k on a new s4 was stupid at this point, but what it showed me was that at $40k there was nothing I wanted to buy. I'll hang my hat and wait for a while. Maybe next year I'll pick up a new s4.
#62
Honda Fanboy
I'm not sure how you can say I'm taking it personally when I said today I would buy the Acura.
If you read what I said, I said they made changes over the past three years. I didn't read this thread to ask would you buy a TL or a five year old GS. I was referring to a current model year GS.
Please tell me what technology you are referring to. The GS has had a direct injection engine for four years now along with a six speed automatic. If you are referring to the stereo then you are correct, but I really don't have an issue with the technology of the stereo or nav - they work just fine for me and the ML sounds fantastic.
You are correct about the 450 gas mileage if all you care about is highway mileage. Hell, I'll give you the whole point because neither I nor anyone else could give a shit about the hybrid. Frankly I have no idea why you felt compelled to point that out - it has no bearing on this thread. You are right though - I just got back from a trip in my 350 and got 29mpg on one tankful running 75-80 mph.
If you read what I said, I said they made changes over the past three years. I didn't read this thread to ask would you buy a TL or a five year old GS. I was referring to a current model year GS.
Please tell me what technology you are referring to. The GS has had a direct injection engine for four years now along with a six speed automatic. If you are referring to the stereo then you are correct, but I really don't have an issue with the technology of the stereo or nav - they work just fine for me and the ML sounds fantastic.
You are correct about the 450 gas mileage if all you care about is highway mileage. Hell, I'll give you the whole point because neither I nor anyone else could give a shit about the hybrid. Frankly I have no idea why you felt compelled to point that out - it has no bearing on this thread. You are right though - I just got back from a trip in my 350 and got 29mpg on one tankful running 75-80 mph.
#63
Honda Fanboy
Actually it was not the same engine at all, they had the same displacement 3.0. The 2nd gen came with an inline 3.0 6cyl, the 06 came with a 3.0 V6 engine.
"More Tech Doesn't Mean More Power
Toyota's new 3.0-liter VVT-i V-6, making its debut in the 2006 Lexus GS, is a high-tech marvel. It replaces the 220-horsepower inline-six of the previous GS 300, with 25 more horses and 10 more pound-feet of torque (to 230). It features direct injection, which means the fuel injectors are placed directly in the combustion chamber for more precise timing based on driving conditions and power demands. Because fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, it absorbs heat as it evaporates, acting like an intercooler. This allows a compression ratio increase from 10.5:1 to 11.5:1, accounting for much of the extra power. NOx regulations in the U.S. prevent the engine from running lean to save fuel, which is another advantage of direct injection in other markets. Throttle is drive-by-wire.
Continuously variable valve timing for intake and exhaust valves provides a wide, flat torque curve in the 3.0 VVT-i"
"More Tech Doesn't Mean More Power
Toyota's new 3.0-liter VVT-i V-6, making its debut in the 2006 Lexus GS, is a high-tech marvel. It replaces the 220-horsepower inline-six of the previous GS 300, with 25 more horses and 10 more pound-feet of torque (to 230). It features direct injection, which means the fuel injectors are placed directly in the combustion chamber for more precise timing based on driving conditions and power demands. Because fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, it absorbs heat as it evaporates, acting like an intercooler. This allows a compression ratio increase from 10.5:1 to 11.5:1, accounting for much of the extra power. NOx regulations in the U.S. prevent the engine from running lean to save fuel, which is another advantage of direct injection in other markets. Throttle is drive-by-wire.
Continuously variable valve timing for intake and exhaust valves provides a wide, flat torque curve in the 3.0 VVT-i"
#64
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
I guess that goes to show how irrelevant the engine was. I don't know if I would call it a high-tech marvel considering the technology it had yet produced only 5 hp more than the 3.0 liter Honda Accord. Makes me wonder why this "high-tech marvel" was discontinued after only a year.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 04-04-2011 at 02:44 PM.
#65
Three Wheelin'
What changes did they make over the past three years? They got rid of the cassette player. I'm sure they have made changes, but there were no notable changes because I can't think of a single one that makes it relevant to the competition today. I think trying to debate that the GS is a modern car is like beating a dead horse. As you can see even on here, a lot of people think the car is outdated and lacks many features that other cars in it's class and even a class below it have.
There have been a few other changes as well. The 2010 has an upgraded Nav system. I have no idea whether it's as good as the TL or not, but it is upgraded from previous years.
#66
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Read my post that VTEC quoted a few post ago, they had the same displacement 3.0 but 2 totally different engines on the 06 GS vs 05 and older. The older ones were inline 6's, the 06 was a new direct injection V6 used for that 1 year only.
#67
Honda Fanboy
I was primarily referring to the engine which was changed about 3 years ago (not sure exactly what year). One of your big bitches was that the engine in the current generation GS was the same as the last generation. What I'm saying is that it was, but isn't any more.
There have been a few other changes as well. The 2010 has an upgraded Nav system. I have no idea whether it's as good as the TL or not, but it is upgraded from previous years.
There have been a few other changes as well. The 2010 has an upgraded Nav system. I have no idea whether it's as good as the TL or not, but it is upgraded from previous years.
#68
I was primarily referring to the engine which was changed about 3 years ago (not sure exactly what year). One of your big bitches was that the engine in the current generation GS was the same as the last generation. What I'm saying is that it was, but isn't any more.
There have been a few other changes as well. The 2010 has an upgraded Nav system. I have no idea whether it's as good as the TL or not, but it is upgraded from previous years.
There have been a few other changes as well. The 2010 has an upgraded Nav system. I have no idea whether it's as good as the TL or not, but it is upgraded from previous years.
3 different trims of real wood and semi analine leather Then they brought the first RWD hybrid. They debuted sport parts for it as well, suspension bits and even a Big Brake Kit. Surely there are other things if we went to the website.
But I guess I'm puzzled as the GS is clearly a category higher than the TL. Not sure how that is unchanged or not advanced? Am I missing something?
#69
own the TL Tech 2012 2 months; like it a lot.
The navigation system on the Tech is not a user friendly system; that said, the sound system is great. Should have added a CD changer instead of a single CD player in the dash. The electric motor driven power steering is superior to any of the previous hydraulic systems. The re-styled front is far more pleasant to the 2009 of which I owned, and didn't realize how much I disliked it, until I bought the 2012. In retrospect, may have waited for the 4-wheel drive model in metalic white (not their name); is my only minor regret; however, the Tech TL does feature a 6-speed AT and is nimble and agile enough; compared it to the Hyundai Genesis and preferred the TL in a 15 minute 2 AFC comparison; the ride in the TL was "better" damped felt more controlled with less "harshness"; both were well done; the Genesis's dashboard panel was far more elegant and was more pleasant to the eye, in a quick 2 AFC judgement. After 2 months; it's been a pleasure to own. The smaller iLX had not been introduced at the time or may have gone in that direction; the rear showing camera is well-worth the convenience and ease for backing tasks.
This is my 3rd Acura V-6 and not sure if I would have appreciated a 4 cylinder engine; this one (V-6) has more than any V-6 I've owned; the smoothest power initiation and direct 1:1 acceleration to foot pedal pressure; Acura has done a fine job with that, especially; each time I'm on the road accelerating the car on a slight incline I'm reminded of this.
This is my 3rd Acura V-6 and not sure if I would have appreciated a 4 cylinder engine; this one (V-6) has more than any V-6 I've owned; the smoothest power initiation and direct 1:1 acceleration to foot pedal pressure; Acura has done a fine job with that, especially; each time I'm on the road accelerating the car on a slight incline I'm reminded of this.
#70
The navigation system on the Tech is not a user friendly system; that said, the sound system is great. Should have added a CD changer instead of a single CD player in the dash. The electric motor driven power steering is superior to any of the previous hydraulic systems. The re-styled front is far more pleasant to the 2009 of which I owned, and didn't realize how much I disliked it, until I bought the 2012. In retrospect, may have waited for the 4-wheel drive model in metalic white (not their name); is my only minor regret; however, the Tech TL does feature a 6-speed AT and is nimble and agile enough; compared it to the Hyundai Genesis and preferred the TL in a 15 minute 2 AFC comparison; the ride in the TL was "better" damped felt more controlled with less "harshness"; both were well done; the Genesis's dashboard panel was far more elegant and was more pleasant to the eye, in a quick 2 AFC judgement. After 2 months; it's been a pleasure to own. The smaller iLX had not been introduced at the time or may have gone in that direction; the rear showing camera is well-worth the convenience and ease for backing tasks.
This is my 3rd Acura V-6 and not sure if I would have appreciated a 4 cylinder engine; this one (V-6) has more than any V-6 I've owned; the smoothest power initiation and direct 1:1 acceleration to foot pedal pressure; Acura has done a fine job with that, especially; each time I'm on the road accelerating the car on a slight incline I'm reminded of this.
This is my 3rd Acura V-6 and not sure if I would have appreciated a 4 cylinder engine; this one (V-6) has more than any V-6 I've owned; the smoothest power initiation and direct 1:1 acceleration to foot pedal pressure; Acura has done a fine job with that, especially; each time I'm on the road accelerating the car on a slight incline I'm reminded of this.
Anyhow, the 2013 GS is sick -- no two ways about it. I test drive one and damn near walked out minus one TL. I love the new interior styling and the front end is sexy as hell. The only real complaint I have with the new GS is that the rear looks wayyyyy too much like a Hyundai.
#72
#73
Instructor
A fully loaded Acura TL SH-AWD with every option imaginable is CAD 50,000 whereas a Lexus GS 350 AWD loaded with all options is CAD 85,000.
Acura TL wins on those grounds.
If I were to spend CAD 85,000, I would add another CAD 3000 and get the Loaded Audi A7.
#74
I am going to talk numbers as per the Canadian pricing.
A fully loaded Acura TL SH-AWD with every option imaginable is CAD 50,000 whereas a Lexus GS 350 AWD loaded with all options is CAD 85,000.
Acura TL wins on those grounds.
If I were to spend CAD 85,000, I would add another CAD 3000 and get the Loaded Audi A7.
A fully loaded Acura TL SH-AWD with every option imaginable is CAD 50,000 whereas a Lexus GS 350 AWD loaded with all options is CAD 85,000.
Acura TL wins on those grounds.
If I were to spend CAD 85,000, I would add another CAD 3000 and get the Loaded Audi A7.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
quanaman
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
01-09-2023 07:33 PM
ripit
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
09-26-2015 06:19 PM