Tires - Acura TL 2005 - Front vs Back Sizes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2012 | 11:28 PM
  #1  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Tires - Acura TL 2005 - Front vs Back Sizes

Hi Everyone. Been reading through the forums and trying to decide on tires for my TL. Front tires are still OK (tread-wise), but back tires need to be replaced.

I wanted to put some Michelin Pilot Sport A/S Plus tires on the back, and wanted to get the 245/45/17 size (slightly wider than what the car comes with which is 235/45/17).

My question is, can I put the slightly wider tires on the back and leave the front as is...e.g. have two different size tires?

TurboNut, if you're out there, I need your help! I read lots of your threads and you know everything, so...

And anyone else who can help is certainly greatly appreciated. And as the thread name says, it's a 2005 Acura TL.

Any other suggestions are appreciated too...like if I should really be getting 4 new tires, or even tire suggestions. New to all this.

Thanks Guys.
Old 09-27-2012 | 12:25 AM
  #2  
LaCostaRacer's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 221
From: Carlsbad, CA
You could certainly do that if you eventually replace the fronts with the same size tire and model later. I have A/S Plus tires now and they wear much faster than advertised and I'm not buying them again. They were great the first 15k miles and now they're just average. I got about 25k miles on a 45k tire- I was hoping for at least 30k miles.

I'll either get Nitto Motivo, Continental DWS, or possibly the General G-Max instead. You could almost buy 4 of these tires for the price of 3 Michelin A/S Plus tires and have a matched set.

Good luck in what you find and do. Discount Tire is a pretty decent place to go.
Old 09-28-2012 | 10:02 AM
  #3  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LaCostaRacer
You could certainly do that if you eventually replace the fronts with the same size tire and model later. I have A/S Plus tires now and they wear much faster than advertised and I'm not buying them again. They were great the first 15k miles and now they're just average. I got about 25k miles on a 45k tire- I was hoping for at least 30k miles.

I'll either get Nitto Motivo, Continental DWS, or possibly the General G-Max instead. You could almost buy 4 of these tires for the price of 3 Michelin A/S Plus tires and have a matched set.

Good luck in what you find and do. Discount Tire is a pretty decent place to go.
Thanks LaCostaRacer! I had read (other threads) the Michelin do pretty well with mileage, so strange to hear you say that. But thanks for the input. And yes, I am torn between 4 new tires or just 2 on the rear...the front are in decent shape. I go back and forth everyday. Soon I'll just have to make the decision and go with it, the back are close to bald and unsafe.

If anyone else has any ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears!
Old 09-28-2012 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
^you'll have to be more diligent with tire rotations.
the point of them is to have all 4 tires wearing at the same time.
the rears must have been on the front, and you recently switched them to the back.

Unless you have camber wear on the rears. which indicates a alignment issue
Old 09-28-2012 | 01:43 PM
  #5  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by justnspace
^you'll have to be more diligent with tire rotations.
the point of them is to have all 4 tires wearing at the same time.
the rears must have been on the front, and you recently switched them to the back.

Unless you have camber wear on the rears. which indicates a alignment issue
Thanks. The car was given to me by a family member actually. But yes, the rears used to be on the front.

Any other suggestions for tires...names/type etc? And should I put just 2 on the rear or get all 4. Using this forum as my guide
Old 09-28-2012 | 01:46 PM
  #6  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
^how good are the front two?

if you can swing all 4, i would do so.
if you cant, then just replace the rear.

continental DWS(DryWetSnow) is a good all season.
Continental DW is another good tire.
Old 09-28-2012 | 02:03 PM
  #7  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by justnspace
^how good are the front two?

if you can swing all 4, i would do so.
if you cant, then just replace the rear.

continental DWS(DryWetSnow) is a good all season.
Continental DW is another good tire.
How do I tell how good the front 2 are? They look OK to me but I'm sure there's a good way to check. I can check right now if you explain how
Old 09-28-2012 | 02:09 PM
  #8  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
^read this
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=51
Old 09-28-2012 | 02:38 PM
  #9  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by justnspace
Thanks. The front tires are just fine based on doing some coin tests.

The Continental ExtremeContact DWS do seem like good tires...just checked them out on tirerack.com. Any recommendations for where to buy in terms of cheapest price etc? Online, or local tire dealer? I live in the northeast USA btw, if that makes any difference.
Old 09-28-2012 | 04:01 PM
  #10  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Oh, this may be a really really stupid question, but should I get the new tires (think I'm going with only purchasing two new tires) put on the rear of the car, or the front of the car?

the front two tires on there right now are in fairly good condition with fairly good tread on there. And it's a 2005 Acura TL with front wheel drive. Thanks again all you people who know what you're talking about out there!
Old 09-28-2012 | 06:43 PM
  #11  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Looks like you HAVE to get new tires in the rear now, the tire companies wont even let you put them in the front. At least that's what I read, wonder why
Old 09-28-2012 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
ez12a's Avatar
the overexplainer
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 385
From: OC, CA
a lot of shops like to recommend replacing rears first if you have to choose, because most people (maybe even myself) cant handle oversteer should the tail slip out. Understeer is more manageable.

full disclosure, i've never tracked or pushed my car to the limit, and that probably applies to 80% of the drivers out there.
Old 09-28-2012 | 07:24 PM
  #13  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,812
From: Bakersfield
The rears will be taller than the fronts. That's a no go for the ABS and VSA system.
Old 09-28-2012 | 08:12 PM
  #14  
nfnsquared's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,795
From: MAGA country
Owner's Manual (2004), pg 224:

"Using tires of a different size or construction can cause the anti-lock brake and the vehicle stability assist systems to work inconsistently."
Old 09-28-2012 | 08:37 PM
  #15  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,812
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by ez12a
a lot of shops like to recommend replacing rears first if you have to choose, because most people (maybe even myself) cant handle oversteer should the tail slip out. Understeer is more manageable.

full disclosure, i've never tracked or pushed my car to the limit, and that probably applies to 80% of the drivers out there.
Agreed. I wish that the US made people go through real driver training when getting your license. Once you realize how easy it is to slide around, you'll be addicted to it. I had to take some engineers out to the field the other day so we used a company truck. I drove it as I always drive it, sideways through the slippery dirt, not really thinking about it because I'm so used to it. Their reaction made me realize maybe it's not normal.
Old 09-28-2012 | 10:50 PM
  #16  
Turbonut's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 832
From: NJ
The difference between a 235 and 245 won't cause the ABS to energize, at least in my opinion, as if one had 235's all around, the difference between a worn 235 and new 235 is 5/8"(.625") difference, more than a 235 compared to a 245 (.30") depending on the manufacturer. I personally don't know what difference would be needed to energize the ABS , but don't forget that the little spare is about 1/2" smaller than the regular tire and the ABS doesn't energize when it is installed, at least not on my TL.
Old 09-29-2012 | 01:03 AM
  #17  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,812
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Turbonut
The difference between a 235 and 245 won't cause the ABS to energize, at least in my opinion, as if one had 235's all around, the difference between a worn 235 and new 235 is 5/8"(.625") difference, more than a 235 compared to a 245 (.30") depending on the manufacturer. I personally don't know what difference would be needed to energize the ABS , but don't forget that the little spare is about 1/2" smaller than the regular tire and the ABS doesn't energize when it is installed, at least not on my TL.
I've never had the ABS falsely go off from different tire sizes but supposedly stopping distances can be increased. Never tried that theory out. There's going to be a much larger difference in wheel speed between the inside and outside wheel during a corner than there could ever be from a difference in tire diameter. I would honestly be more afraid of the VSA doing weird stuff than the ABS. VSA is usually more sensitive to wheel speed changes. I'm not worried about ABS or VSA triggering when it shouldn't, just the effectiveness when in use. I already hate how the TL's ABS is so intrusive.
Old 09-29-2012 | 10:25 AM
  #18  
Limitless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Hmm...will the tire dealerships even install the different size tires on the rear or give me problems because the size doesnt match exactly? Like will they say they cant do it and site the ABS and VSA potential issues?
Old 09-29-2012 | 11:07 AM
  #19  
Bearcat94's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 32,488
Likes: 7,771
From: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Originally Posted by LaCostaRacer
You could certainly do that if you eventually replace the fronts with the same size tire and model later. I have A/S Plus tires now and they wear much faster than advertised and I'm not buying them again. They were great the first 15k miles and now they're just average. I got about 25k miles on a 45k tire- I was hoping for at least 30k miles.

....
:hmm: Mine too ... but I got 30k miles. Since I got a really nice credit against warranty, I did get another set.

Also, when new, I beat the living crap out of the first set (tracked with them .... ), so I'm not surprised they didn't last.


Rear larger than fronts? People do all the time - staggard - for looks. OP, you'll be fine.
Old 09-29-2012 | 12:16 PM
  #20  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,812
From: Bakersfield
Rears wider than fronts is fine as long as the diameter is close. It's only for looks, for performance on our cars all 4 should be the same size. IMO 255s all around look very nice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
handsom-hustla
Car Parts for Sale
70
11-13-2015 05:04 PM
GhostTL09
Car Parts for Sale
4
09-19-2015 01:57 PM



Quick Reply: Tires - Acura TL 2005 - Front vs Back Sizes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.