Dash reflection in windshield

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #1  
gojoTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
2nd Gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Dash reflection in windshield

Just purchased an '08 Acura TL. Taking the car for a test drive and noticed that when driving directly into the sun, the dash is reflecting back into the windshield. Very distracting. Any suggestions or fixes for this problem?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #2  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,396
Likes: 2,182
From: Space Coast, FL
take a damp towel and wipe down the dash board lightly. Follow up with a dry towel to help get any residual water off.

Then clean the inside of the windshield as dirt and grime can accumulate thus causing that relfection.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #3  
04TL4P3's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
I have always had this problem whether it was dirty or not and its really bad when u armor all the dash . I recently got some polarized Oakleys and they completely take the glare away. Not saying u have to go out and buy Oakleys but any polarized glasses should work.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #4  
Yakuza17's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
I second the polarized sunglasses to reduce the glare from the dash. It also helps with reflections a lot, especially when you're driving in bright sunny conditions on wet roads like after a thunderstorm.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
Originally Posted by 04TL4P3
I have always had this problem whether it was dirty or not and its really bad when u armor all the dash . I recently got some polarized Oakleys and they completely take the glare away. Not saying u have to go out and buy Oakleys but any polarized glasses should work.
LOL Armor all. Keep using that if you want to ruin your dash.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:07 PM
  #6  
04TL4P3's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Bender
LOL Armor all. Keep using that if you want to ruin your dash.
LOL I dont use cheap ass armor all I use quality products but alot of times dealers will use armor all or some other type of product that creates alot of shine and it causes alot of glare and he said he just bought the car from a dealer
FYI If you use a quality interior conditioner or leather conditioner on your dash it will actually protect it and keep it looking new longer...
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #7  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Originally Posted by Bender
LOL Armor all. Keep using that if you want to ruin your dash.


Thats pure bullshit ... old wives tale ...
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #8  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
I never use anything more than Meguiars #40 on the dash but to address your problem try using the Woolite solution on your dadh and it will remove a lot of the dressing that was put on it.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #9  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
Go ahead and look up armor all and dash cracking, something to do with high silicone content.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Originally Posted by Bender
Go ahead and look up armor all and dash cracking.
No .. you go look it up .. that was 30 years ago .. the new formula is not a problem.

Would you suggest 303 instead?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #11  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
https://acurazine.com/forums/wash-wax-23/put-armorall-my-dash-doors-bad-idea-48526/
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #12  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Very informative wives tale ..... Todays Armoral is no different than any of the other "non" Clear ( white ) dressings


The formula they have sold for the past 20 + years or so, no way cracks dashes.
It may appear too glossy for some, it may be not expensive enough for some, but in reality, it is just a PDMS resin, with a little mineral spirits to increase the "wow" factor, but nothing in it that is the source of the very old 1970's formula that all the uninformed focus on.

Have never seen the new formula cause cracking when correctly applied, which is actually due to the loss of plastizers from the vinyl, same with any of the other PDMS resin based products.

303, Mequiar's, Eagle One (VW's product is Eagle One), etc these are water borne, Polydimetalsiloxane resin formula's, every last one of them.

The present ArmorAll only differs from many other PDMS dressings, (polydimethalsiloxane) by percentage of the resin mixed into the water that is it's carrier to the surface.
Be it Eagle One, Zanio, Mequiar's, Mother's, 303 etc, all the "white-water based" dressings are PDMS.
This resin DOES NOT DAMAGE vinyl or tires, to have that, happen one would have to use the "greasy kid stuff"/"getto shine" products, which contains petroluem distillates and dimethal silicone fluids.

303 has a higher resin content, the maximum that can be used, which is why it cost more.
Most of the mass marketed PDMS are usually around 18 to 20%, most professional dressings are between 22 and 27%.
Cost is an issue for professional detailers, and even the higher resin 303 does not last "that" much longer than a, say 24% content.
Just looks better for a couple of days.

The "UV" protectant adverstising is pure bunk, it is not possible to actually put "UV" blockers in these types of resins and if it could be done, the product would have to be marketed at about 3 to 4 times a higher price, as a UV component is very, very expensive.
The claim of "UV" protection comes from the resin barrier created and the additional shine, which reflects the damaging UV's.
The real advantage of using a PDMS is protection from the far more damaging ozone that is present. This protection is only there as long as the product is.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
I like the 303, it leaves more of a matte finish which is less reflective
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 12:29 AM
  #14  
04TL4P3's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Jesstzn
Very informative wives tale ..... Todays Armoral is no different than any of the other "non" Clear ( white ) dressings


The formula they have sold for the past 20 + years or so, no way cracks dashes.
It may appear too glossy for some, it may be not expensive enough for some, but in reality, it is just a PDMS resin, with a little mineral spirits to increase the "wow" factor, but nothing in it that is the source of the very old 1970's formula that all the uninformed focus on.

Have never seen the new formula cause cracking when correctly applied, which is actually due to the loss of plastizers from the vinyl, same with any of the other PDMS resin based products.

303, Mequiar's, Eagle One (VW's product is Eagle One), etc these are water borne, Polydimetalsiloxane resin formula's, every last one of them.

The present ArmorAll only differs from many other PDMS dressings, (polydimethalsiloxane) by percentage of the resin mixed into the water that is it's carrier to the surface.
Be it Eagle One, Zanio, Mequiar's, Mother's, 303 etc, all the "white-water based" dressings are PDMS.
This resin DOES NOT DAMAGE vinyl or tires, to have that, happen one would have to use the "greasy kid stuff"/"getto shine" products, which contains petroluem distillates and dimethal silicone fluids.

303 has a higher resin content, the maximum that can be used, which is why it cost more.
Most of the mass marketed PDMS are usually around 18 to 20%, most professional dressings are between 22 and 27%.
Cost is an issue for professional detailers, and even the higher resin 303 does not last "that" much longer than a, say 24% content.
Just looks better for a couple of days.

The "UV" protectant adverstising is pure bunk, it is not possible to actually put "UV" blockers in these types of resins and if it could be done, the product would have to be marketed at about 3 to 4 times a higher price, as a UV component is very, very expensive.
The claim of "UV" protection comes from the resin barrier created and the additional shine, which reflects the damaging UV's.
The real advantage of using a PDMS is protection from the far more damaging ozone that is present. This protection is only there as long as the product is.
Man I honestly have never looked into it this much but you atleast sound like you know what you are talking about. Iv just heard that if you are going to use armor all or other products like it you have to keep a fresh application on your dash or it will dry out and crack over time.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 12:41 AM
  #15  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
All he did was Google copy and paste. Here is part of it. It is not verbatim but you get the point.
http://www.autopia.org/forum/car-det...ash-glare.html

"303 has a higher resin content, the maximum that can be used, which is why it cost more.
Most of the mass marketed PDMS are usually around 18 to 20%, most professional dressings are between 22 and 27%.
Cost is an issue for professional detailers, and even the higher resin 303 does not last "that" much longer than a, say 24% content.
Just looks better for a couple of days.
The "UV" protectant adverstising is pure bunk, it is not possible to actually put "UV" blockers in these types of resins and if it could be done, the product would have to be marketed at about 3 to 4 times a higher price, as a UV components is very, very expensive.
The claim of "UV" protection comes from the resin barrier created and the additional shine, which reflects the damaging UV's.
The real advantage of using a PDMS is protection from the far more damaging ozone that is present. This protection is only there as long as the product is. "

303, Mequiar's, Eagle One (VW's product is Eagle One), etc these are water borne, Polydimetalsiloxane resin formula's, every last one of them.

The present ArmorAll only differs from many other PDMS dressings, (polydimethalsiloxane) by percentage of the resin mixed into the water that is it's carrier to the surface.
Be it Eagle One, Zanio, Mequiar's, Mother's, etc, all the "white-water based" dressings are PDMS.


Enjoy the power of Google making people look genious since 1996.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 12:47 AM
  #16  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...&aq=f&aqi=&oq=
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #17  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Originally Posted by Bender
All he did was Google copy and paste.

Enjoy the power of Google making people look genious since 1996.

Cool eh... you just googled and got my postings in Autopia back in
July of 04 and I even gave credit to the source.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #18  
Bender's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Charleston
Originally Posted by Jesstzn
Cool eh... you just googled and got my postings in Autopia back in
July of 04 and I even gave credit to the source.
Yes, It is cool. You must have made it onto this obscure jeep board as well. Either way there are tons of links and talk about armor all and other products in this post.

http://www.jeepkj.com/forum/archive/...p/t-31736.html
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 10:31 AM
  #19  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Originally Posted by Bender
Yes, It is cool. You must have made it onto this obscure jeep board as well. Either way there are tons of links and talk about armor all and other products in this post.

http://www.jeepkj.com/forum/archive/...p/t-31736.html

Ya .. 67 Customs is another very knowledgable detailer ... anyway we have drug this way off topic ..
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #20  
gojoTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
2nd Gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
I purchased the polarized glasses and that fixed my issue.
Thanks for the detailed information on the dash protectant. I'll possibly give one of these products a try.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #21  
AMUA6's Avatar
ScoobyZINE
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 41
From: Ocoee, TN
Tint the windshield!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:41 PM
  #22  
dave_ramkumar's Avatar
2011 ZCP E92 M3!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
From: Queens,New York
Originally Posted by Jesstzn
Thats pure bullshit ... old wives tale ...
+1 i use it all the time without any problems on any of my cars
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:42 PM
  #23  
dave_ramkumar's Avatar
2011 ZCP E92 M3!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
From: Queens,New York
Originally Posted by smokd05
tint the windshield!
ftw
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #24  
Red Voodoo's Avatar
Area on my XM
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 13
From: Sacramento, CA
I've just gotten used to the reflection. Doesn't bother me so much anymore. I can imagine that using a high gloss protectant would amplify the problem. Meguiars is my preferred brand. I'm not jumping on that bandwagon about Armor-All. Not the new formula, anyways.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheMuffinMan
4G TL (2009-2014)
27
Jun 2, 2022 07:11 AM
hashbrown
4G TL (2009-2014)
37
Feb 18, 2022 11:20 AM
tsx_boy
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
4
Dec 13, 2019 08:33 PM
rhdune16
Car Parts for Sale
0
Sep 28, 2015 11:31 AM
2Quik
3G TL (2004-2008)
3
Sep 23, 2015 01:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.