Rv6-p strut bar
#2
Remove plastic engine bay covers, use 14mm and 17mm sockets to remove the old nuts as well as a 10mm socket to remove other miscellaneous brackets. Install new bar and tighten to 32fl/lbs with torque wrench as per service manual. It is optional to use the included brackets from Richie to reattach the engine harness. I just zip tied mine in place down below. If you do, it kind of takes away from the clean look of the RV6 strut bar *In my Opinion.*
Done
Done
#4
I've put these on. It is not rocket science at all, very straightforward.
Our FLP bar is a little more tricky because it is one solid piece. Installing the 3-piece RV6 bar give you more flexibility to fit it.
I'd also suggest installing with the car on jack stands.
Our FLP bar is a little more tricky because it is one solid piece. Installing the 3-piece RV6 bar give you more flexibility to fit it.
I'd also suggest installing with the car on jack stands.
#7
I have to disagree...you wanna tighten the strut bar while the car is on the ground, with its full weight on the strut towers...when done on jack stands without the wheels touching the floor and tightening the strut, once the car's lowered, any flexing caused by the weight of the car on the strut towers, is now transfered directly on strut bar, which causes even more stress on the strut towers....with the weight on the towers, they sit where they're supposed to , and once the strut bar is tightened, they will be held in place once any flexing is attempted by them, when hard cornering and such....the other way, would put more strain towards the towers.
its like doing a wheel alignment with the weight of the car off the suspension, and thats not the way to go
its like doing a wheel alignment with the weight of the car off the suspension, and thats not the way to go
Trending Topics
#8
I would argue that the strut towers are where they are supposed to be when they are without load. And that bracing prior to loading will keep the chassis in place to maintain proper geometry.
The loading of the suspension deflect the chassis. That is the entire point behind installing the brace in the first place. To limit deflection. Doing so stresses the brace, not the towers. Which is why having a strong brace is so important.
And I am sorry, the analogy to aligning the car with the wheels in the air is no way, shape, or form an accurate.
The loading of the suspension deflect the chassis. That is the entire point behind installing the brace in the first place. To limit deflection. Doing so stresses the brace, not the towers. Which is why having a strong brace is so important.
And I am sorry, the analogy to aligning the car with the wheels in the air is no way, shape, or form an accurate.
#9
I would argue that the strut towers are where they are supposed to be when they are without load. And that bracing prior to loading will keep the chassis in place to maintain proper geometry.
The loading of the suspension deflect the chassis. That is the entire point behind installing the brace in the first place. To limit deflection. Doing so stresses the brace, not the towers. Which is why having a strong brace is so important.
And I am sorry, the analogy to aligning the car with the wheels in the air is no way, shape, or form an accurate.
The loading of the suspension deflect the chassis. That is the entire point behind installing the brace in the first place. To limit deflection. Doing so stresses the brace, not the towers. Which is why having a strong brace is so important.
And I am sorry, the analogy to aligning the car with the wheels in the air is no way, shape, or form an accurate.
#10
We need a vehicle design engineer to settle this.
Question, is the vehicle suspension geometry designed to take into account inherent chassis flex exhibited under normal vehicle load?
My guess is no, because how could the engineers predict the load and therefore accurately design the suspension? I don't see how vehicle design engineers would allow for slop enough in the chassis to account for it in their suspension design. They would need to assume a certain amount of rigidity. When that rigidity doesn't exist they install tower braces. So my thinking is, rigidity is assumed to be there loaded or not. The car is designed and built, then deflects in real life. As long as it doesn't deflect too much, it is marketed and sold.
Question, is the vehicle suspension geometry designed to take into account inherent chassis flex exhibited under normal vehicle load?
My guess is no, because how could the engineers predict the load and therefore accurately design the suspension? I don't see how vehicle design engineers would allow for slop enough in the chassis to account for it in their suspension design. They would need to assume a certain amount of rigidity. When that rigidity doesn't exist they install tower braces. So my thinking is, rigidity is assumed to be there loaded or not. The car is designed and built, then deflects in real life. As long as it doesn't deflect too much, it is marketed and sold.
#13
BTW, has there been any talk on making a rear strut bar?
#14
#15
The car can always be made more rigid! Just don't let the wife get frigid.
#16
I have to disagree...you wanna tighten the strut bar while the car is on the ground, with its full weight on the strut towers...when done on jack stands without the wheels touching the floor and tightening the strut, once the car's lowered, any flexing caused by the weight of the car on the strut towers, is now transfered directly on strut bar, which causes even more stress on the strut towers....with the weight on the towers, they sit where they're supposed to , and once the strut bar is tightened, they will be held in place once any flexing is attempted by them, when hard cornering and such....the other way, would put more strain towards the towers.
its like doing a wheel alignment with the weight of the car off the suspension, and thats not the way to go
its like doing a wheel alignment with the weight of the car off the suspension, and thats not the way to go
#17
IMO, the chassis should ne as neutral as possible when installing bracing.
Bracing can make the ride feel firmer but it does not have as much of an impact as changing suspension parts. Really the feeling you get is more feedback from the road. It gives you the perception that the ride is firmer even though it really isn't.
As far as the rear towers go, I don't think much is really needed back there. Now the rear subframe, that is a different story.
Bracing can make the ride feel firmer but it does not have as much of an impact as changing suspension parts. Really the feeling you get is more feedback from the road. It gives you the perception that the ride is firmer even though it really isn't.
As far as the rear towers go, I don't think much is really needed back there. Now the rear subframe, that is a different story.
#18
IMO, the chassis should ne as neutral as possible when installing bracing.
Bracing can make the ride feel firmer but it does not have as much of an impact as changing suspension parts. Really the feeling you get is more feedback from the road. It gives you the perception that the ride is firmer even though it really isn't.
As far as the rear towers go, I don't think much is really needed back there. Now the rear subframe, that is a different story.
Bracing can make the ride feel firmer but it does not have as much of an impact as changing suspension parts. Really the feeling you get is more feedback from the road. It gives you the perception that the ride is firmer even though it really isn't.
As far as the rear towers go, I don't think much is really needed back there. Now the rear subframe, that is a different story.
#23
#26
#27
tru but if i dont have to go threw that whole process that would be great as i dont have jack stands and don't really feel like purchasing any either
#28
the dont worry too much about it...sit the car on a flat surface...and retighten it....most ppl wont feel any difference..and hardly anyone pushes their car's cornering ability (with sticky tires) to their limit...aside from all that...flexing is going to be noticable when your suspension is stiff enough, and ur tires to go with it.
think about it...for chassis flexing to occur on our cars, ur suspension has to be somewhat solid and allow almost no compression whatsoever...0 flexing on the tires and very sticky...now if my guess is right...no one has done such, and been on a high speed autox with it. It takes quiet a bit to flex the chassis on the car, but before you even go there...ur suspension and tires absorb all the stress beforehand
think about it...for chassis flexing to occur on our cars, ur suspension has to be somewhat solid and allow almost no compression whatsoever...0 flexing on the tires and very sticky...now if my guess is right...no one has done such, and been on a high speed autox with it. It takes quiet a bit to flex the chassis on the car, but before you even go there...ur suspension and tires absorb all the stress beforehand
#29
Yea its not something to be too concerned with like Opel says..
I have my strut bar on to hold a few brackets that attach to it and pretty much for looks. I had the nuts on loose, Opel thought I was crazy when I told him about that while he was doing the checkvalve mod for me lol
I have my strut bar on to hold a few brackets that attach to it and pretty much for looks. I had the nuts on loose, Opel thought I was crazy when I told him about that while he was doing the checkvalve mod for me lol
#37
#38
1- this post is not o topic. It doesn't have all that much to do with what's being discussed in this thread.
2- If you are rubbing without lowering, it is just going to be worse if you drop it at all. You might need different wheels with a higher offset.
3- running some negative camber might help
#39
No, it is designed to reduce body roll during cornering (keep the body of the car from folding over on itself). It gives a stiffening point to the car. Rougher ride would come from changing suspension spring rates and shock rebound points.
BTW, has there been any talk on making a rear strut bar?
BTW, has there been any talk on making a rear strut bar?
An upgraded strut brace is something you would do to a TL after you've done every suspension mod and have a race tire on it. Otherwise you will never know the difference.
As Opel said, you want the car loaded as it will be in real life and on level ground. The amount of deflection from unloaded to loaded is known to the engineers and already factored in. Level ground is very important.
Starting with traditional H-frame body on frame cars, the results of proper/improper installation of braces are much more obvious. I've installed braces with the car on unlevel ground and had the car actually start pulling a little to one side. The TL is much, much stiffer to start out with and it won't be as obvious but it's still important.
#40
idk, im gettin different feedback from everyone. Correct me if im wrong.. i need to stiffins the struts and spring or just change my wheels to something smaller? and about 2 inches in the front and like 4 or 5 in the back