REAL 3.5L Superchared :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 04:52 AM
  #121  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
You have to do both the cam gears and crank gear, planning on about 20d advance, which you then set a 20d retard in the FIC and reduce the retard to actually create a advance, ie you would reduce the retard 10d in a cell to create a 10d advance.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #122  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
You have to do both the cam gears and crank gear, planning on about 20d advance, which you then set a 20d retard in the FIC and reduce the retard to actually create a advance, ie you would reduce the retard 10d in a cell to create a 10d advance.
Is it not simply possible to advance by 10 degrees via the FIC? or is it limited to around 5?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #123  
RACINGHART03's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 20
From: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Originally Posted by csmeance
Is it not simply possible to advance by 10 degrees via the FIC? or is it limited to around 5?
From what I have gotten from AEM the FIC will only allow retarding of timing. No advance. ?!?!?!?!?!?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #124  
ThinJim's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 10
From: 3rd rock
Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
You have to do both the cam gears and crank gear, planning on about 20d advance, which you then set a 20d retard in the FIC and reduce the retard to actually create a advance, ie you would reduce the retard 10d in a cell to create a 10d advance.

You'd need a set of THESE, more to come at a later date on that. Using these, you'd have to make a trigger bracket, easy, then figure out a simple crank trigger which sounds like your on top of it.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #125  
RACINGHART03's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 20
From: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Well after a lot of thought and along with the fact that I am a max dollar per HP guy... this is my plan. I am going to focus on a 3.7 MDX block. TL S heads, go a step or two in injector size and a few clicks higher in N20 jetting. Ill let the stock ECU do it thing. Seeing as it keeps the A/F at about 12.5 under WOT which is pretty close to where I would tune it anyway (off the bottle) This entire set up will cost far less than a 4500 blower kit and if I can pull it off I dont think there will be a TL S who has a chance in putting down more power to the ground. I have EVERYTHING to do this except a 3.7 block. I even have a extra TL S heads and block to experiment on. I may sell the block to fund the purchase of an MDX block but I really wanted to have a backup 3.5 block JIC. Just need to see it the heads will fit on the 3.7 block. Hey CSMEANCE... Can I borrow your truck for a day?!?!?!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #126  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
Well after a lot of thought and along with the fact that I am a max dollar per HP guy... this is my plan. I am going to focus on a 3.7 MDX block. TL S heads, go a step or two in injector size and a few clicks higher in N20 jetting. Ill let the stock ECU do it thing. Seeing as it keeps the A/F at about 12.5 under WOT which is pretty close to where I would tune it anyway (off the bottle) This entire set up will cost far less than a 4500 blower kit and if I can pull it off I dont think there will be a TL S who has a chance in putting down more power to the ground. I have EVERYTHING to do this except a 3.7 block. I even have a extra TL S heads and block to experiment on. I may sell the block to fund the purchase of an MDX block but I really wanted to have a backup 3.5 block JIC. Just need to see it the heads will fit on the 3.7 block. Hey CSMEANCE... Can I borrow your truck for a day?!?!?!
The heads will fit the block, but your tranny will NOT, the bell housing pattern is different on the J37 block, now what you can do is take your J32A3 block and use the J37 crank and rods to get to a J36.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #127  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
Well after a lot of thought and along with the fact that I am a max dollar per HP guy... this is my plan. I am going to focus on a 3.7 MDX block. TL S heads, go a step or two in injector size and a few clicks higher in N20 jetting. Ill let the stock ECU do it thing. Seeing as it keeps the A/F at about 12.5 under WOT which is pretty close to where I would tune it anyway (off the bottle) This entire set up will cost far less than a 4500 blower kit and if I can pull it off I dont think there will be a TL S who has a chance in putting down more power to the ground. I have EVERYTHING to do this except a 3.7 block. I even have a extra TL S heads and block to experiment on. I may sell the block to fund the purchase of an MDX block but I really wanted to have a backup 3.5 block JIC. Just need to see it the heads will fit on the 3.7 block. Hey CSMEANCE... Can I borrow your truck for a day?!?!?!
In all honesty, i don't think the J37 will hold up with any sort of boost. If I got the S/C and the built motor in the mdx, sure, why not
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #128  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
^ um.. it may be a while to get it considering the car isnt even out yet, but what about the new TL SH-AWD Block?
It uses the same grade-logic tranny from the 07+ TL-S... so it should fit on the tranny? no ?

09+ RL
J37A2

Displacement: 3,664 cm3 (3.7 L)
Bore and stroke: 90.0 mm x 96.0 mm (3.54" x 3.78")
Compression: 11.2:1
Power; torque: 300 hp @ 6300 rpm; 271 lb. ft. @ 5000 rpm
Valvetrain: 24v SOHC VTEC
Fuel control: Multi-point fuel injection; PGM-FI


09 TL SH-AWD

J37A4
Displacement: 3,664 cm3 (3.7 L)
Bore and stroke: 90.0 mm x 96.0 mm (3.54" x 3.78")
Compression: 11.2:1
Power; torque: 305 hp @ 6300 rpm; 273 lb. ft. @ 5000 rpm
Valvetrain: 24v SOHC VTEC (intake and exhaust)
Fuel control: Multi-point fuel injection; PGM-FI

engines look similar.. but i can only assume the SH-AWD Ecu would cause massive amounts of problems considering our car is only FWD.... both cars come standard with SH-AWD.. as does the MDX (or does it? not sure)
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #129  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
the J37's out now are in the RL, TL and the MDX. Both come with SH-AWD standard.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #130  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
wheres the J37A3 ?

A1 = MDX
A2 = RL
A4 = TL
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #131  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 12
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
I thought the single dual tip 4th genner was fwd, and double dual tip 4th genner was sh-awd

edit: the 3.5 is fwd, 3.7 is sh-awd lol

Last edited by stillhere153; Oct 24, 2008 at 10:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #132  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
^ correct

SH-AWD gets the quads

its a glorified type-s...however, the SH-AWD has 19 more ponies, BUT almost 400lbs heavier!!!! ...i hope to see a SH-AWD-S

anyways back on topic... we're getting some good info in this thread!!!! lets keep talking about tuning the 3.5L
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 01:12 AM
  #133  
Ac_Attack's Avatar
Not your moms TL.
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
can all my fellow a'ziners and gear-heads see what they can do about finding me the ECU pinout/diagram for an 08 Type-S ??

I'm gonna head to Rallye tomorrow and see if one of the guys can find it or give my a copy of it....

to be the first s/c type-s !!!
i got the tech manual...ill get you whatever you need!!!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #134  
Ac_Attack's Avatar
Not your moms TL.
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
also, what about the blower that was on ebay a few months ago that looked like it mounted on top of the intake? if i remember correctly i think it said it would fit a 3.5 and the pulley was right there on top...just curious since this thread is actually going somewhere...
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 09:28 AM
  #135  
RACINGHART03's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 20
From: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Yeah my bad. Got excited about the prospect of a 3.7 swap and got off topic. I really feel that tuning a N/A tl will yield minimal if any gains but may help a blown TL. would def go with the fic as it can retard timing, add fuel, and move vtec. All of these go nice with a blower. as far as blower and size.. howbout a high boost pulley to increase cfms on the 3.5? the additional boost may offset the additional volume and essentially give the same effect as a stock pulley on a 3.2. obviously more wear and tear on the unit but no more than some of the guys running the hb pulley are already doing.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #136  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
so why isn't someone with the Type-S using the FIC????
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #137  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
^ i think i might be a the guinea pig.. just dont want to waste my money!!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #138  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
whats the difference between

30-1910
30-1911

both are F/IC-6
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #139  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
30-1910 is the universal for most apps
30-1911 is specific for the S2K I believe, there is also 30-1912 and a 30-1913, one of whioch is specific to the chyrsler 300
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #140  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
^ so since you really seem to know your stuff

what unit should i be purchasing to start tuning my car N/A ?? FI/C ?

and will that also be the best unit for tuning once i get S/C'ed ? I really want to start all the work and part gathering on this.. so come springtime, i'm F/I'ed
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #141  
nim090's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: New Hyde Park, NY
^ Can't wait to see this...has anyone tried the AEM FIC??
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 05:20 AM
  #142  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
Althoug I have not installed one on a 7th gen or 3rd gen TL "YET", based off of conversations with AEM I would say the 30-1910.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #143  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
Yeah my bad. Got excited about the prospect of a 3.7 swap and got off topic. I really feel that tuning a N/A tl will yield minimal if any gains but may help a blown TL. would def go with the fic as it can retard timing, add fuel, and move vtec. All of these go nice with a blower. as far as blower and size.. howbout a high boost pulley to increase cfms on the 3.5? the additional boost may offset the additional volume and essentially give the same effect as a stock pulley on a 3.2. obviously more wear and tear on the unit but no more than some of the guys running the hb pulley are already doing.

With the extra airflow of the 3.5 or 3.7, the HBP might be needed just to make the same boost as the 3.2 but of course it will be flowing more air at the same boost pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #144  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by I hate cars
With the extra airflow of the 3.5 or 3.7, the HBP might be needed just to make the same boost as the 3.2 but of course it will be flowing more air at the same boost pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #145  
ssmtl2nv's Avatar
2009 g37s 6mt
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: Queens N.Y
Wink

Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
^ correct

SH-AWD gets the quads

its a glorified type-s...however, the SH-AWD has 19 more ponies, BUT almost 400lbs heavier!!!! ...i hope to see a SH-AWD-S

anyways back on topic... we're getting some good info in this thread!!!! lets keep talking about tuning the 3.5L
we need to tune my 3.2 as well, forgeting about the J32??
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #146  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
So if i go invest $ into an AEM FI/C and boomslang harness... will i get positive / worthwhile results? can i then use it to tune the S/C...

in order to clone what comptechs ACM does, i would need to adjust MAP, Air Fuel trim, lower vtech and i believe a knock sensor... although the knock sensor on the last page looked pretty cool to me
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #147  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
So if i go invest $ into an AEM FI/C and boomslang harness... will i get positive / worthwhile results? can i then use it to tune the S/C...

in order to clone what comptechs ACM does, i would need to adjust MAP, Air Fuel trim, lower vtech and i believe a knock sensor... although the knock sensor on the last page looked pretty cool to me
vtech

If you s/c, you will need to adjust the timing on it, so you would need some timing gears. If you do procede with the FI/C, you might want to look at having VTEC engage at early RPM's, like 3K so the aggressive cam setup works when boost is present.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 02:05 AM
  #148  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
^ wow nice spelling error on my part....totally missed that one

for s/c, do you advance or retard the timing? i really hope i can get positive results of the fi/c... seems to be the better choice, and i plan on getting some within a month.. to start my tuning

USSI... what are you planning to use for your tune once the new build is complete? still the comptech/hondata ??
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #149  
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
^ wow nice spelling error on my part....totally missed that one

for s/c, do you advance or retard the timing? i really hope i can get positive results of the fi/c... seems to be the better choice, and i plan on getting some within a month.. to start my tuning

USSI... what are you planning to use for your tune once the new build is complete? still the comptech/hondata ??
I will definately let you know what the F/IC can do, im trying to get mines working on my car now.

check out this link for more info

http://forum.aempower.com/forum/inde...oard,89.0.html
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #150  
Excelerate's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,877
Likes: 624
From: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
I'm really impressed with the amount of technical info in this thread. There are a lot of J series enthusiast/experts in this thread. It's a good read.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #151  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
I will definately let you know what the F/IC can do, im trying to get mines working on my car now.

check out this link for more info

http://forum.aempower.com/forum/inde...oard,89.0.html
you are trying to get it to work on a CL-S or do you have a 3G too?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #152  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
He is a CL-S with some engine mods...
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #153  
RACINGHART03's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 20
From: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Originally Posted by I hate cars
With the extra airflow of the 3.5 or 3.7, the HBP might be needed just to make the same boost as the 3.2 but of course it will be flowing more air at the same boost pressure.
Yeah that was my thinking. I thought it was an easy workaround since they were saying the stock blower may be too small for the 3.5.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #154  
RACINGHART03's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 20
From: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
So if i go invest $ into an AEM FI/C and boomslang harness... will i get positive / worthwhile results? can i then use it to tune the S/C...

in order to clone what comptechs ACM does, i would need to adjust MAP, Air Fuel trim, lower vtech and i believe a knock sensor... although the knock sensor on the last page looked pretty cool to me
I wouldnt even bother with the FIC on N/A. Cars run so close to what you would wanna tune it to anyway. Itll be nice to have later once you get the blower set up should you need it. I would most likely budget for it but not pull the trigger till you get the rest of the gear on the car and see how it acts. Going up a size in injectors and fuel pump may be all you need to stay strong once you are boosted. The factory computer may be able to compensate. More air (blower) more fuel (injectors) may balance out nicely and if the computer can keep it around 13.1 A/F I think you may be ok. Just a thought.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #155  
BLACKURA_NY's Avatar
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,307
Likes: 51
From: Queens, NY
RDX injectors fit with minimal modifications? how big are they? how big are the stock 3G injectors?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #156  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
it looks like lookinco did get the FI/C done, but with some issues:
http://forum.aempower.com/forum/inde...c,22415.0.html
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #157  
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
you are trying to get it to work on a CL-S or do you have a 3G too?
yea CLS-6, hit a little bump in the road with it at the moment so put the FIC to the side for a minute to focus on getting my custom exhuast built so when I do get the FIC right I have better potential gains opposed to the stock exhaust.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 05:08 AM
  #158  
NVA-AV6's Avatar
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 695
Likes: 35
Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
I wouldnt even bother with the FIC on N/A. Cars run so close to what you would wanna tune it to anyway. Itll be nice to have later once you get the blower set up should you need it. I would most likely budget for it but not pull the trigger till you get the rest of the gear on the car and see how it acts. Going up a size in injectors and fuel pump may be all you need to stay strong once you are boosted. The factory computer may be able to compensate. More air (blower) more fuel (injectors) may balance out nicely and if the computer can keep it around 13.1 A/F I think you may be ok. Just a thought.
The only reason to put a FIC on NA is if you have major engine mods, like going from 3.2L to 3.5L or even 3.7L, with that amount of displacement change you are outside the base maps form the factory that you need to adjust them.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #159  
swift22's Avatar
luvs redheads!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 1
From: back in WI
Attention

For those building 3.5/3.7L's..........

Did anyone sleeve their block or hone it out to 90mm yet and use aftermarket pistons??

I am looking for a forged 90mm piston without having to custom order one just yet. I swear someone is running this bore?????

Ps- these blocks have forged internals and a 4bolt main, they can EASILY hold 400whp, pistons are the weak spot.

Last edited by swift22; Oct 29, 2008 at 06:04 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #160  
swift22's Avatar
luvs redheads!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 1
From: back in WI
PS_ MOderators can you clean up the beginning of this thread and delete posts by wannabee banned loser. Thanks in advance. This will be a great thread, i guarantee it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.