DIY 4" intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2013 | 06:20 PM
  #41  
NvrDwn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 677
Likes: 132
From: Franklin County Virginia
Originally Posted by anx1300c
NvrDwn, are you still making intakes or no?
Eh maybe I just got a second job so I'm doing 70 hours a week right now. So idk if id have enough time to get them out unless people didn't mind it taking some time like 3-4 weeks.

I also want to add, yes mine fit with the battery cover. However with the tl and tls being different it may not fit. I didn't get a lot of feed back from the one I made. All I know is that he couldn't make it fit. Without knowing exactly why I wouldn't want someone else out of there money unless they know and understand that they would be a guinea pig. I didn't like that the other guy was out here and I certainly am not here to intentionally out people of there money.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 08:51 PM
  #42  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
Interesting.. So there is about 1-1.5 inch difference between the accord an tl. I made a trial one for a member and he couldn't get it to fit because I cut it to spec for an accord thinking it was the same. Once I found out it wasn't I sent him a 6" extension to more than make up the loss and for whatever reason it still didn't fit for him. However looking at this, I see no reason why it wouldn't.. Odd.
it should fit, however does require playing with different angles and positions

Originally Posted by anx1300c
Paperboy, what did you do with the breather hose from the manifold? I believe some people are just using a small filter on the end of it. I also have the IAT sensor to deal with since I have no provision for it on the 3.7 manifold. I can either relocate it under the front bumper or drill and have a bung welded into the 4" intake, which is what I'd rather do. Might as well weld on a second port for the breather hose while I'm there.
i put a filter there. I would like to add the tube and iat sensor hole but its a little more work than I care for at the moment, and plus I dont think I'll notice much difference either way.

Originally Posted by Lukieluc
Will I have this issue if I use 3.5" piping?
probably not
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 01:48 PM
  #43  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
For the 100th time, intake mods before the throttlebody have absolutely no detrimental effect on low or midrange torque. I wish that myth would die already.

Explain how you can lose torque by going with a higher flowing, larger diameter intake piping? If this were true, if more restriction equals more low end, we would make peak torque at idle when the throttle is closed.

The throttle IS the single biggest restriction, that's it's only job in life, that's what it does, throttle the air to control engine output. Anything below full throttle, the throttlebody is dictating airflow, not the plumbing or filter or whatever. So again, no loss of low end can possibly be experienced by freeing up the intake system unless you also believe that you can make more low end at part throttle instead of full throttle.

My take on these intakes is you've got nothing to lose. Probably nothing to gain but who knows. I have a 4' inlet and it supports over 600whp but it's only a foot and a half long. With the additional plumbing length of the TL, it might possibly gain a couple hp. Then again, 2hp is well within the error range of the dyno.

What I'm curious about is on that dyno sheet, the car loses power around 4k rpm with the 3.7 manifold and 3" CAI and the loss disappears with the 4" plumbing.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #44  
NvrDwn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 677
Likes: 132
From: Franklin County Virginia
Originally Posted by I hate cars
For the 100th time, intake mods before the throttlebody have absolutely no detrimental effect on low or midrange torque. I wish that myth would die already.

Explain how you can lose torque by going with a higher flowing, larger diameter intake piping? If this were true, if more restriction equals more low end, we would make peak torque at idle when the throttle is closed.

The throttle IS the single biggest restriction, that's it's only job in life, that's what it does, throttle the air to control engine output. Anything below full throttle, the throttlebody is dictating airflow, not the plumbing or filter or whatever. So again, no loss of low end can possibly be experienced by freeing up the intake system unless you also believe that you can make more low end at part throttle instead of full throttle.

My take on these intakes is you've got nothing to lose. Probably nothing to gain but who knows. I have a 4' inlet and it supports over 600whp but it's only a foot and a half long. With the additional plumbing length of the TL, it might possibly gain a couple hp. Then again, 2hp is well within the error range of the dyno.

What I'm curious about is on that dyno sheet, the car loses power around 4k rpm with the 3.7 manifold and 3" CAI and the loss disappears with the 4" plumbing.
So, why did Sonnick gain midrange torque? He dyno proves it.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 05:02 PM
  #45  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Are you referring to something I said? About midrange, it looks like there's no longer a drop off at 4k which is why I mentioned it.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:19 PM
  #46  
NvrDwn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 677
Likes: 132
From: Franklin County Virginia
Originally Posted by I hate cars
Are you referring to something I said? About midrange, it looks like there's no longer a drop off at 4k which is why I mentioned it.
I'm talking about this "intake mods before the throttlebody have absolutely no detrimental effect on low or midrange torque. I wish that myth would die already."

Because Sonnick gained around 10-5wtq in the midrange by switching from the V1 to his 4 inch cai.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:28 PM
  #47  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 933
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
I'm talking about this "intake mods before the throttlebody have absolutely no detrimental effect on low or midrange torque. I wish that myth would die already."

Because Sonnick gained around 10-5wtq in the midrange by switching from the V1 to his 4 inch cai.
LOL, he's saying the larger intakes don't hurt torque, like a lot of people seem to think. Probably the same people who think eliminating exhaust back pressure hurts torque.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #48  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
I'm talking about this "intake mods before the throttlebody have absolutely no detrimental effect on low or midrange torque. I wish that myth would die already."

Because Sonnick gained around 10-5wtq in the midrange by switching from the V1 to his 4 inch cai.
Do you know what detrimental means?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fifer16
1G RL (1996-2004)
10
Nov 22, 2024 07:07 PM
Mike734
2G RL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
4
Dec 10, 2021 01:25 PM
tsx_boy
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
4
Dec 13, 2019 08:33 PM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
Aug 2, 2016 06:52 PM
scionxb3003
Car Parts for Sale
2
Sep 22, 2015 05:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.