Comptech 3rd gen supercharger picture!!!!
#41
Originally Posted by PoochaKannInc
That depends on the dealer. Some will take care of it, others will pass the buck.
#42
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Big Apple
Age: 62
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraVic
Do you have NOS ? Dry or wet ?
as i have seen on a friends' camaro, he has the NoS entering aft of the air filter but before MAS. he then swapped out oem injectors with larger ones and when NoS kicks on his injectors go WOT feeding the extra fuel needed.
#45
i souport publik edekason
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Granada Hills, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andytran
is this on a 04TL?
due out by the end of this year / beginning of next...
I will most likely end up with this as my main mod...
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Salut
Ciao
#47
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
I want the s/c, and I will do it.
I love it how people freak out when someone says they want to supercharge their FWD car .. it's a rather, un-though-out reaction to the topic of s/c's.
Clearly, if I had the same low-end torque in my TL as my Nissan Maxima 3.5SE has, I would not even consider the s/c for the TL. However, this TL is seriously (in the 5AT trim) boring under 4000rpms.. and since I NORMALLY drive under 4000 rpms, i would love to invest in a product that would make those first 4k rpms MORE FUN. That does NOT mean I want to floor it to 120mph every stoplight, nor does it mean I want to burnout at every stoplight. It means I want more "oomph" w/ passing, more gusto in the low-end department, and frankly, a more broad, flat torque curve.
For those who wouldn't purchase the s/c .. congrats on your decision. For those that are thinking about it or are sure they will invest in it, I can't wait to talk shop w/ you guys/gals when this thing is officially released.
I love it how people freak out when someone says they want to supercharge their FWD car .. it's a rather, un-though-out reaction to the topic of s/c's.
Clearly, if I had the same low-end torque in my TL as my Nissan Maxima 3.5SE has, I would not even consider the s/c for the TL. However, this TL is seriously (in the 5AT trim) boring under 4000rpms.. and since I NORMALLY drive under 4000 rpms, i would love to invest in a product that would make those first 4k rpms MORE FUN. That does NOT mean I want to floor it to 120mph every stoplight, nor does it mean I want to burnout at every stoplight. It means I want more "oomph" w/ passing, more gusto in the low-end department, and frankly, a more broad, flat torque curve.
For those who wouldn't purchase the s/c .. congrats on your decision. For those that are thinking about it or are sure they will invest in it, I can't wait to talk shop w/ you guys/gals when this thing is officially released.
#54
www.teamultraspeed.com
Join Date: May 2004
Location: va beach, va
Age: 47
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spyfish007
I would put the covers back on to make it look more "sleeperish". Otherwise - oh yeah
#55
Car Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago (Lincoln Square)
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If the kit is supposed to do 5-7 psi it should not have belt problems.
My Formula's setup has seen 17psi on the dyno but only like 14psi at the track since we've been fighting belt slippage forever.
My Formula's setup has seen 17psi on the dyno but only like 14psi at the track since we've been fighting belt slippage forever.
#56
Guys, tell me it if I'm wrong. When you realy need a SC?
Well, when I decided to purchase a car the TL was one of my options. Gas milage, V6, Luxiry etc.... POWER / QUICK AND FAST. RELIABLE & WARANTY
I droved and rented multiple cars, but I decided to be Acura family this time. I'm own a 05 TL, Im still doing the breaking of the motor. So far I did not go higher than 4k RPM, when I try to increase acelaration or starting quick and fast is the only time past 3k rpm. When I m in the Hway, don't past 2.5k or max 3k about 80 or max 100 mph. The car goes very quick and I pass a lot cars. Then I slow down because I may find another car that can't see how quick Im going.
Well, my question is: If I have a SC then when it is ready working? or I'm really using it . Because the real power will be arround 6k RPM. I only push the car to 120 MPH once and the OIL life when from 100% to 90%. If I use the SC, I will short the live of the motor or I have to do more frequently oil change.
I check a chart comparinson with SC and the increase on low RPM is minimal. If the SC increase torque at LOW RPM, then I may get one....
Any sugestion.
Well, when I decided to purchase a car the TL was one of my options. Gas milage, V6, Luxiry etc.... POWER / QUICK AND FAST. RELIABLE & WARANTY
I droved and rented multiple cars, but I decided to be Acura family this time. I'm own a 05 TL, Im still doing the breaking of the motor. So far I did not go higher than 4k RPM, when I try to increase acelaration or starting quick and fast is the only time past 3k rpm. When I m in the Hway, don't past 2.5k or max 3k about 80 or max 100 mph. The car goes very quick and I pass a lot cars. Then I slow down because I may find another car that can't see how quick Im going.
Well, my question is: If I have a SC then when it is ready working? or I'm really using it . Because the real power will be arround 6k RPM. I only push the car to 120 MPH once and the OIL life when from 100% to 90%. If I use the SC, I will short the live of the motor or I have to do more frequently oil change.
I check a chart comparinson with SC and the increase on low RPM is minimal. If the SC increase torque at LOW RPM, then I may get one....
Any sugestion.
#57
Shift_faster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An SC is on tap all the time. There is no spool up time like there is for a turbo, or a set rpm to activate like NOS (NOS can also be set up to activate at a driver's discretion). So a supercharger "should" increase torque at lower rpms.
I'm interested to know what chart comparisons you are looking at. Is this for a stock TL vs. a SC'ed TL?
I am considering it because I also bought the TL for its blend of luxury & sport. It just turns out, I want a little bit more sport. I don't believe that 60-70 hp will make the TL undriveable, it will just make it a lot more fun. Of course the two obstacles for me are:
1. Cost
2. Warranty issues (depending on the dealer/installer).
If it is a reliable unit, the engine should last a long time, with no real ill-effects. I'm of course assuming it is a reliable unit...
I'm interested to know what chart comparisons you are looking at. Is this for a stock TL vs. a SC'ed TL?
I am considering it because I also bought the TL for its blend of luxury & sport. It just turns out, I want a little bit more sport. I don't believe that 60-70 hp will make the TL undriveable, it will just make it a lot more fun. Of course the two obstacles for me are:
1. Cost
2. Warranty issues (depending on the dealer/installer).
If it is a reliable unit, the engine should last a long time, with no real ill-effects. I'm of course assuming it is a reliable unit...
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#58
Originally Posted by MisterLawyer
Gotta get a new tranny though, making the charger upgrade even mooore expensive.
I would get one if it were cheap enough, but not until my 50,000 miles are up.
For the combined cost... I would rather get a 2000 BMW M3 as a spare toy.
I would get one if it were cheap enough, but not until my 50,000 miles are up.
For the combined cost... I would rather get a 2000 BMW M3 as a spare toy.
You might as well get an Enzo as a "spare toy", there are more of them for sale. Kidding aside there was no 2000 M3, there is usually a one year break without an M in a particular lineup, the 99 was the E36 and the 2001 was the E46. No 2000s. I assume you were refering to a E36 since the 2001 E46s, unless they are really trashed, are about the same price as a new TL.
Vandy
#59
Originally Posted by PoochaKannInc
An SC is on tap all the time. There is no spool up time like there is for a turbo, or a set rpm to activate like NOS (NOS can also be set up to activate at a driver's discretion). So a supercharger "should" increase torque at lower rpms.
I'm interested to know what chart comparisons you are looking at. Is this for a stock TL vs. a SC'ed TL?
I am considering it because I also bought the TL for its blend of luxury & sport. It just turns out, I want a little bit more sport. I don't believe that 60-70 hp will make the TL undriveable, it will just make it a lot more fun. Of course the two obstacles for me are:
1. Cost
2. Warranty issues (depending on the dealer/installer).
If it is a reliable unit, the engine should last a long time, with no real ill-effects. I'm of course assuming it is a reliable unit...![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I'm interested to know what chart comparisons you are looking at. Is this for a stock TL vs. a SC'ed TL?
I am considering it because I also bought the TL for its blend of luxury & sport. It just turns out, I want a little bit more sport. I don't believe that 60-70 hp will make the TL undriveable, it will just make it a lot more fun. Of course the two obstacles for me are:
1. Cost
2. Warranty issues (depending on the dealer/installer).
If it is a reliable unit, the engine should last a long time, with no real ill-effects. I'm of course assuming it is a reliable unit...
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#60
Racer
im probably not Sc'in because its useless 4 me in LIE traffic and gas prices are crazy high i dont need this type of expense srry. Plus i like more lux than sport.
#61
Team Anthracite Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The OC, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
If the kit is supposed to do 5-7 psi it should not have belt problems.
My Formula's setup has seen 17psi on the dyno but only like 14psi at the track since we've been fighting belt slippage forever.
My Formula's setup has seen 17psi on the dyno but only like 14psi at the track since we've been fighting belt slippage forever.
Yes but in the formula setup the belt is usually connected directly to the head unit on a pulley. In this setup it looks like, becuase of space concerns, they have to mount the S/C on the otherside of the engine compartment and using a long shaft to connect it to the belt sytem. I too would be concerned about the forces put on that shaft and it's ability to resist flexing. With that said I thinkI may still get it.
#62
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Big Apple
Age: 62
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blufox
im probably not Sc'in because its useless 4 me in LIE traffic and gas prices are crazy high i dont need this type of expense srry. Plus i like more lux than sport.
#63
Instructor
Originally Posted by tizo
hahaha... sorry, but that little battery cover is not hiding that thing...
#64
Car Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago (Lincoln Square)
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I have seen belt setups like that Comptech one work no problem.
Most of the time a supercharger might be in vacuum unless you get on it. Then it will go into boosting the engine. Having another 75fwhp would be nice you can never have too much power.
Most of the time a supercharger might be in vacuum unless you get on it. Then it will go into boosting the engine. Having another 75fwhp would be nice you can never have too much power.
#65
I do my own work.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there anything tunable about a SC?
Any kind of computer management for it? (thinking SAFC, VAFC, etc...)
Would it be possible to increase/decrease the boost?
I have a good understanding of SCs and know how they work, but have never had any hands on.
Hopefully, this SC kit will come with an intake and a battery relocation kit.
Any kind of computer management for it? (thinking SAFC, VAFC, etc...)
Would it be possible to increase/decrease the boost?
I have a good understanding of SCs and know how they work, but have never had any hands on.
Hopefully, this SC kit will come with an intake and a battery relocation kit.
#66
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Big Apple
Age: 62
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ITL
Is there anything tunable about a SC?
Any kind of computer management for it? (thinking SAFC, VAFC, etc...)
Would it be possible to increase/decrease the boost?
I have a good understanding of SCs and know how they work, but have never had any hands on.
Any kind of computer management for it? (thinking SAFC, VAFC, etc...)
Would it be possible to increase/decrease the boost?
I have a good understanding of SCs and know how they work, but have never had any hands on.
i would opt (if i could) to also include a intercooler under the SC exit, but i don't think that's possible for TL.
#67
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Big Apple
Age: 62
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I have seen belt setups like that Comptech one work no problem.
Most of the time a supercharger might be in vacuum unless you get on it. Then it will go into boosting the engine. Having another 75fwhp would be nice you can never have too much power.
Most of the time a supercharger might be in vacuum unless you get on it. Then it will go into boosting the engine. Having another 75fwhp would be nice you can never have too much power.
#69
Hi PoochaKann & TheOne305
I'm not expert on motors or tune up for "HighPower (HP)" diferent definition for horse power (hp).
But my understanding is that Acura/Honda develop or redisign the 3.2 TL motor with more hp and HP. How they did it? High performance motor parts, etc.. I don't know....
But I don't have the specs, I don't know how to change or where to increase power with out damage the motor.
That is why Comptech still on develop....?????. Right
So I compare with previous Dyno test:
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/cldyno.html
Now you may want to explain me the chart .. Very welcome your experience.... Thanks.
I'm not expert on motors or tune up for "HighPower (HP)" diferent definition for horse power (hp).
But my understanding is that Acura/Honda develop or redisign the 3.2 TL motor with more hp and HP. How they did it? High performance motor parts, etc.. I don't know....
But I don't have the specs, I don't know how to change or where to increase power with out damage the motor.
That is why Comptech still on develop....?????. Right
So I compare with previous Dyno test:
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/cldyno.html
Now you may want to explain me the chart .. Very welcome your experience.... Thanks.
#70
VTEC HoooA
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Longwood Florida
Age: 54
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Type S Lady
Why wait till after the warranty was up? Acura still covers it if it's by Comptech, atleast my dealer does anyway.
If you had the option to do it over again, would you purchase the SC again (say for a 2004)?
Thanks in advance!!
#73
Shift_faster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JorgeTL05 A-Spec
Hi PoochaKann & TheOne305
I'm not expert on motors or tune up for "HighPower (HP)" diferent definition for horse power (hp).
But my understanding is that Acura/Honda develop or redisign the 3.2 TL motor with more hp and HP. How they did it? High performance motor parts, etc.. I don't know....
But I don't have the specs, I don't know how to change or where to increase power with out damage the motor.
That is why Comptech still on develop....?????. Right
So I compare with previous Dyno test:
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/cldyno.html
Now you may want to explain me the chart .. Very welcome your experience.... Thanks.
I'm not expert on motors or tune up for "HighPower (HP)" diferent definition for horse power (hp).
But my understanding is that Acura/Honda develop or redisign the 3.2 TL motor with more hp and HP. How they did it? High performance motor parts, etc.. I don't know....
But I don't have the specs, I don't know how to change or where to increase power with out damage the motor.
That is why Comptech still on develop....?????. Right
So I compare with previous Dyno test:
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/cldyno.html
Now you may want to explain me the chart .. Very welcome your experience.... Thanks.
The basic bolt-on modifications currently available are intake, exhaust, and suspension mods. On to the Comptech SC. I'm looking at the chart for the CLS six speed dyno. If you look at the table on the left hand side, you see that even at 1800 rpms it is making about 30 more lb/ft of torque than a CLS with just headers. To me, that is a noticeable change. The increases keep ramping up until its peak at 5000 rpms when it is making close to 65 lb/ft of torque more than a CLS with headers.
You will not see this kind of "cheap" power gains from any other power adder other than forced induction (i.e. supercharger/turbo) or NOS. Intake, exhaust will only net you around 15-18 hp if you are lucky. And the power is only in the higher rpm ranges.
There are lots of thread about intakes, and a few about exhausts, if you search the forums. The Comptech supercharger will probably be out early 05 sometime.
NSXNext: I don't see the battery, but I'm going to keep looking. If you saw it, good eyes buddy!
#74
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Age: 47
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nodoze2004
Type S can you offer any insight into the performance improvement with the SC installed? I am not looking for top end, just more power (torque) on the low to mid level. Do you feel the SC offered this? Were there any downsides to installing this part (fuel mileage etc). Did the installation cause any issues with the sound of the car at idle and at speed (I have heard a SC'd g35 and it was burping all over the place sounded awful)?
If you had the option to do it over again, would you purchase the SC again (say for a 2004)?
Thanks in advance!!
If you had the option to do it over again, would you purchase the SC again (say for a 2004)?
Thanks in advance!!
The main thing I would change about the whole deal is I would have let the dealer do the install. At that time I was being extremely stingy and didn't want to pay an extra $1k for them to do the install. I went to Velocity Resources who were awesome but being 3 hours away wasn't the greatest. So when my tranny went the dealer didn't want to touch the blower (because they didn't do the install) which they said had to be removed in order to replace the tranny. So I had to take it to another performance shop here who had never touched an SC'd car and let them take it off. It was the biggest pain. That's the only thing I would do differently. Oh, and not have gotten a $300+ticket street racing putting other peoples lives at risk due to my stupidity. I would have saved it for the track. Will I SC my new 05/06 TL 6sp.? YES!!! Once I sold the SC I said I'd never do it again because of guilt. This time I'm going to take the time out to hit the track to cut lose and not the streets. To anyone considering the SC, talk with your dealer before hand, let them do the install if they're a little funny about it. If they are cool(some aren't) then go for it. You won't regret you did.
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
#75
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Age: 47
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nodoze2004
Type S can you offer any insight into the performance improvement with the SC installed? I am not looking for top end, just more power (torque) on the low to mid level. Do you feel the SC offered this? Were there any downsides to installing this part (fuel mileage etc). Did the installation cause any issues with the sound of the car at idle and at speed (I have heard a SC'd g35 and it was burping all over the place sounded awful)?
If you had the option to do it over again, would you purchase the SC again (say for a 2004)?
Thanks in advance!!
If you had the option to do it over again, would you purchase the SC again (say for a 2004)?
Thanks in advance!!
#76
TQ > MPG
You guys should really do some searching from the 2nd gen forum and the CL board. Lots of people have SC'd their TL/CL's with decent success. Comptech IMO makes a pretty decent kit, that will cut about 5-7 tenths off your 1/4 mile, and improved low end tq. A turbo kit will not do that, and the positive displacement SC that Comptech uses (actually an Eaton M62 unti, similar in design to the unit on the GTP) is very reliable, if not particularly ultra efficient.
#77
I do my own work.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jtkz13
...the positive displacement SC that Comptech uses (actually an Eaton M62 unti, similar in design to the unit on the GTP) is very reliable, if not particularly ultra efficient.
Thanks for the advice...will check out the CL forums.
#78
Cruisin'
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have very limited info so far since this is still under development.
The battery is changed to a 51R type and relocated under the blower unit.
This is the same setup we use in the 02-03 TL-S kit and is a simple bracket and hold down change (which we supply).
This kit should work with the factory cover parts that everyone keeps referring to. We just did not have those parts available to us at the time of this picture.
We will update the "Under Development" section when we have more information, and I will post back onto this board when I have info regarding gains, pricing or release dates.
I hope this helps a little....if just to let everyone know that we are feverishly working on this.
-Nate
The battery is changed to a 51R type and relocated under the blower unit.
This is the same setup we use in the 02-03 TL-S kit and is a simple bracket and hold down change (which we supply).
This kit should work with the factory cover parts that everyone keeps referring to. We just did not have those parts available to us at the time of this picture.
We will update the "Under Development" section when we have more information, and I will post back onto this board when I have info regarding gains, pricing or release dates.
I hope this helps a little....if just to let everyone know that we are feverishly working on this.
-Nate
#80
Thanks for the respond Poochakann. I notice the different on torque on low RPM.
Hi Nate: There some confusion if Supercharge improve gas milage or not. If I gain extra torque on low RPM, that mean I have more power when I going Up hill. That mean I can go up with power with out increase RPM. That will save me gas ????
But some drivers when they get the SC, they really want to feel the different, so the squiz the gas and go High RPM. This will make the different of spend more gas. I'm not sure.
How I can have both? I was checking and other supercharger and change/switch from Normal, Medium or Full power. It is posible? If I go normal (car stock) I will spent the same gas milage as calculated by the MFG. But if I use the SC, I may save gas. I don't know?
So, what I gaining with a SC?
A) Better Gas Milage B) Power HP & Torque
C) May shorter the life of the motor D) Combination of A & B
E) All above
Hi Nate: There some confusion if Supercharge improve gas milage or not. If I gain extra torque on low RPM, that mean I have more power when I going Up hill. That mean I can go up with power with out increase RPM. That will save me gas ????
But some drivers when they get the SC, they really want to feel the different, so the squiz the gas and go High RPM. This will make the different of spend more gas. I'm not sure.
How I can have both? I was checking and other supercharger and change/switch from Normal, Medium or Full power. It is posible? If I go normal (car stock) I will spent the same gas milage as calculated by the MFG. But if I use the SC, I may save gas. I don't know?
So, what I gaining with a SC?
A) Better Gas Milage B) Power HP & Torque
C) May shorter the life of the motor D) Combination of A & B
E) All above