2004 TL 6MT Dyno'ed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2004, 02:22 PM
  #41  
Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Age: 66
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Davediego
wow, I'm shocked at how un-smooth the torque curve is compared to the cl-s 6 speed. acura sure can't claim a broad and flat torque curve for this TL
You might be swayed by the small range on the Y axis. I have read other manufacturers claim a 'flat' curve with a statement like 90% of power is at xxx. Well, for the TL, 90% is about 195 lb/ft. This is around 2500 RPM. So it might be 'flat' in thier eyes.
Old 01-13-2004, 05:54 PM
  #42  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually it's smooth...it's just posted on an exaggerated scale.
Old 01-14-2004, 12:43 AM
  #43  
4dr & I like it that way
 
Davediego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Diego
Age: 40
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah you're right, i should have paid more attention to the scale. i think the old type-S engine claimed peak torque from 2500-5000 (or something along those lines) though, not just 90%. has acura issued a statement for the torque on the 04?
Old 01-14-2004, 10:51 PM
  #44  
TQ > MPG
 
Joe5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Age: 42
Posts: 3,624
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It is rated at 238 lb ft of tq @ 5000 rpm.
Old 01-14-2004, 11:09 PM
  #45  
Community Architect
robb m.
 
astro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ON
Age: 48
Posts: 72,796
Received 626 Likes on 277 Posts
Steve, you are a crackhead.

that Dyno is from my car, it's not a 6spd, it's an auto.

that's why there's the torque spike early in the graph, its the TC locking up. LOL
Old 01-18-2004, 11:57 AM
  #46  
Racer
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Age: 46
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Astroboy
Steve, you are a crackhead.

that Dyno is from my car, it's not a 6spd, it's an auto.

that's why there's the torque spike early in the graph, its the TC locking up. LOL
Actually, it's EricS's dyno. Not yours. For some reason I put your name on it, but it's most definitely a 6spd CL-S dyno. I remember he faxed it to you and then you posted and I guess I thought it was yours when I was browsing through. My bad.

http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=69991

A-CL.com Link: http://photos.imageevent.com/astrobo...ge/6spdyno.jpg
My Link: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/stevte...k_Astroboy.jpg

Look familiar?

Fixed: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/stevte...tock_EricS.jpg

All the other CL-S6 dynos show the engine making peak torque very early in the low-end before the manifold switchover also.
Old 01-18-2004, 09:03 PM
  #47  
Racer
 
chadr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ferizzo
The new TL-6 is not a second faster than a TLS/CLS auto to 60 or in the quarter. There is no 13-second stock TL-6 but there are quite a few TLS/CLS in the 14.7-15.0 in the quarter. Its faster but not that much faster!
Vtec.net already turned nearly a 14 even in a 6MT 04 TL with 2000 miles on it. With 10k and better weather the car will break into the 13's with the right driver. If you don't believe that the 6MT is significantly faster then the AT5 race one and watch his tail lights for your answer.
Old 01-20-2004, 06:57 PM
  #48  
Burning Brakes
 
Nitrotiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: south jersey
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i for 1 drove both cars back to back before i bought my 6 speed i was not impressed buy the auto at all. i had a cl type s auto that would of blown the doors off the tl auto now the 6 peed was a different story, after i backed in the auto i jumped right into the speed and MAN WHAT A DIFFERENCE i bought the car after that i was not trading in my cls for the auto tl because my cls was better. i will say the 04 tl is faster than the 03 tls becuase of the simple factor weight on a 03 was more
Old 07-10-2005, 10:24 PM
  #49  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I just got the car re-dyno'd and it came in at 250.7 WHP and 228.6 lb-ft Torque. This is with the mods mentioned in my signature. Again, it was dyno'd on a Dynapack. I gained approx. 20 WHP and 19lb-ft Torque. Not too bad at all!
Old 07-11-2005, 12:32 AM
  #50  
Type SSS
 
ssk0771's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: La Mirada, CA
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoBig
My TL was dyno'ed today at Church Automotive Testing in Torrance, CA. Church does a lot of development testing for Hondata and Temple of Vtec. See the attached results.

In a nutshell, the care dyno'ed at:
231 Horsepower (Max - SAE) @ 6321 RPM
210 lb-ft Torque (Max - SAE) @ 5303 RPM

Assuming 15% to 17% drivetrain losses (corrected):
265hp to 270hp @ 6,321 rpm
(270 hp @ 6200 RPM - manufacturer's data)
241 lb-ft to 245.7 lb-ft @ 5,303 RPM
(238 @ 5,000 rpm - manufacturer's data)

The other two runs (green and blue) were conducted after the car was already very hot from the first run. As you can see, the car loses quite a bit (5 to 10) horsepower and torque when hot.
That pretty impressive number. I know that most Auto 350Z's dyno at 220HP -235HP (stock) and 6spd ususally dyno around 230HP - 245HP (stock).

350Z is rated at 287HP & TL rating 270HP. Those numbers are pretty high.

Anyway, congrats.
Old 07-11-2005, 08:09 AM
  #51  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Again, these are on a Dynapack, which typically has higher readings than others. What's important are not the eactual numbers, but the gains. After AEM CAI and Custom Exhaust (no Cats were removed), the following readings were taken:


250.9 Horsepower (Max - SAE) @ 6299 RPM
228.6 lb-ft Torque (Max - SAE) @ 5118 RPM

Gains (over stock) are:
19.7 HP
18.6 lb-ft
Old 07-11-2005, 01:45 PM
  #52  
Safety Car
 
caball88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
those are some pretty nice numbers, what are the track times for the car?
Old 07-11-2005, 04:03 PM
  #53  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never tracked it. One of these days I'll bring it down.
Old 07-11-2005, 09:00 PM
  #54  
tehLEGOman
 
ACCURATEin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 9,135
Received 1,982 Likes on 1,335 Posts
Those are some bad ass numbers for the TL.
Old 07-11-2005, 09:44 PM
  #55  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ACCURATEin
Those are some bad ass numbers for the TL.
Thanks...

To give you guys an idea of how other cars, like the G35, do on the Dynapack, take a look at the following link:
http://clint.gurgen.com/G35/2004.09....9_04_2004.html

Most of the G35's (w/o ECU mods) were in the 240hp to 250hp range.
Old 07-12-2005, 10:18 AM
  #56  
Ak Ting Up
 
AcuraVic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairburn, Ga
Age: 59
Posts: 788
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Question

Question,
Does the same engine in a front wheel drive car put less to the wheels compared to being in a rear wheel drive car ? Same engine ?
Old 07-12-2005, 07:20 PM
  #57  
Drifting
 
avs007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,192
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraVic
Question,
Does the same engine in a front wheel drive car put less to the wheels compared to being in a rear wheel drive car ? Same engine ?
With all other things being equal (which they usually aren't), I think it's actually the othre way around, since you don't have to turn a long axle to the rear wheels, and such. I think the difference is negligable tho. something like maybe 15% parasitic loss on FWD compaed to 17% on RWD, or something like that.
Old 07-13-2005, 08:07 AM
  #58  
41 43 55 52 41 20 54 4C
 
mp3car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: OKC, OK
Age: 44
Posts: 236
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by donc
The "other" car I want is an 04 350z touring 6sp and the HP rate from the factory is 287. Dynos show about 230 - 250 RWHP. This is from a 3.5 V6. Since the TL is a 3.2 V6 to me it says the TL is fairly higly tuned. I will wait to see what becomes available for any increases/engine mods. First mod will be Alpine Sport tires...

I debated between a 350Z and a TL for months!! I know they are completly different cars, but i don't have kids yet, and i figured a 350Z would be sweet to own.... I test drove it 3 times.... But, i just couldnt justify it when it wasnt all that much faster, and so much "less" car than a TL... and not nearly as nice. Btw, it is VERY rare for a stock 350Z to dyno any higher than 235ish, during all my time on the 350Z boards, i dont ever remember seeing one as high as 250, almost all of them were 225-235 range.
Old 07-13-2005, 10:16 AM
  #59  
Safety Car
 
caball88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mp3car
I debated between a 350Z and a TL for months!! I know they are completly different cars, but i don't have kids yet, and i figured a 350Z would be sweet to own.... I test drove it 3 times.... But, i just couldnt justify it when it wasnt all that much faster, and so much "less" car than a TL... and not nearly as nice. Btw, it is VERY rare for a stock 350Z to dyno any higher than 235ish, during all my time on the 350Z boards, i dont ever remember seeing one as high as 250, almost all of them were 225-235 range.
well it depends, the 350Z is rated at 287 and theoritically should dyno in 244hp with 15% loss at the drivetrain. the G coupe is suppose to be rated at 298hp so getting 250 on a stock dyno run sounds about right. also if the 350Z was an auto it will have more power loss and dyno in closer to the 225-235 range.
Old 07-13-2005, 10:32 AM
  #60  
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mp3car
I debated between a 350Z and a TL for months!! I know they are completly different cars, but i don't have kids yet, and i figured a 350Z would be sweet to own.... I test drove it 3 times.... But, i just couldnt justify it when it wasnt all that much faster, and so much "less" car than a TL... and not nearly as nice. Btw, it is VERY rare for a stock 350Z to dyno any higher than 235ish, during all my time on the 350Z boards, i dont ever remember seeing one as high as 250, almost all of them were 225-235 range.
That is on a dynojet which dynos lower than a dyno pack. That is also the 287hp version...the new ones dyno around 245hp on a dynojet so the 300hp is pretty accurate for the new ones. On a dynojet, I've seen about 5-10hp less for a TL vs a 280hp G-coupe so both cars are probably making the advertised hp.
Old 07-13-2005, 01:06 PM
  #61  
Three Wheelin'
 
mickey3c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
231 Horsepower (Max - SAE) @ 6321 RPM
210 lb-ft Torque (Max - SAE) @ 5303 RPM

that looks about right... That's the most I have seen from the TL without a supercharger.
Old 07-13-2005, 08:08 PM
  #62  
Antracitebony TL
 
Ga_Tech_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mp3car
I debated between a 350Z and a TL for months!! I know they are completly different cars, but i don't have kids yet, and i figured a 350Z would be sweet to own.... I test drove it 3 times.... But, i just couldnt justify it when it wasnt all that much faster, and so much "less" car than a TL... and not nearly as nice. Btw, it is VERY rare for a stock 350Z to dyno any higher than 235ish, during all my time on the 350Z boards, i dont ever remember seeing one as high as 250, almost all of them were 225-235 range.
i dont know man...I had a 98 m3 before and after i bought my TL i went to a nissan dealership and test drove the 350z 300 hp version. I was pretty impressed with it. It felt just as fast as my m3 off the line but the hanlding was even better. I think they are legimately nice cars but too many cocky suckers drive them. They are not as fast as they look. Still nice looking car.
Old 07-13-2005, 08:34 PM
  #63  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure if you guys have seen this articleDYNO DASH 350Z but it compares the different dynos and their readings the test vehicle was a 350Z.

In summary:
Turbo Magazine Dyno Dash Comparison Chart
Dyno HP TQ
Dynapack 249.4 242.8
DTS 257.6 556.5*
Dynojet (Win) 235.8 227.8
Dynojet (DOS) 243.7 237.2
Clayton 265.7 240.6
Super Flow 228.9 226.6
*measured at roller without accounting for gear reduction
Old 07-15-2005, 12:02 AM
  #64  
Three Wheelin'
 
TL260power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by GoBig
Well, I just got the car re-dyno'd and it came in at 250.7 WHP and 228.6 lb-ft Torque. This is with the mods mentioned in my signature. Again, it was dyno'd on a Dynapack. I gained approx. 20 WHP and 19lb-ft Torque. Not too bad at all!
so how much would it be on a dynojet?

now imagine with headers.... On the dynapack it would put you around 275-280.. wow.....I guess on dynojet it would put you around.. 250-60whp??
Old 07-15-2005, 12:07 AM
  #65  
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TL260power
so how much would it be on a dynojet?

now imagine with headers.... On the dynapack it would put you around 275-280.. wow.....I guess on dynojet it would put you around.. 250-60whp??
I don't think you can put headers on the new J32.
Old 07-17-2005, 07:29 PM
  #66  
Instructor
 
pabound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just to make sure I (we) didn't miss this, are the dyno results WITH the CAI and exhaust upgrades (as listed below in your post) installed?
Old 07-17-2005, 07:40 PM
  #67  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
GoBig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: El Segundo, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pabound
Just to make sure I (we) didn't miss this, are the dyno results WITH the CAI and exhaust upgrades (as listed below in your post) installed?
That's correct.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM
Acura604
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
09-28-2015 12:24 PM
TLguy42
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-26-2015 11:27 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
2Quik
3G TL (2004-2008)
3
09-23-2015 01:03 PM



Quick Reply: 2004 TL 6MT Dyno'ed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.