Videos of me racing my TL-S on 1/8 mile track
#1
Videos of me racing my TL-S on 1/8 mile track
I will post more soon. I raced the S200 4 times and won every time. He got me off the line every time but once I found traction I toasted him (every time). The evo 8 was garbage. It is a 2003, he claims he didnt shift properly. I dont know, it should be running better than that.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oid=1434262072
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oID=1432458832
I love the chirp into third..
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oid=1434262072
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oID=1432458832
I love the chirp into third..
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by CleanCL
damn man, wats ur elevation? 9.5 is like a high 14
Well I did have VSA off but I cant get traction for nothing in first or second. If I could get solid traction I would knock more thana second off the 1/8th time. I tired (only once) to smopke em first in that one vid and I still couldnt get traction. I tried last friday to run at 20psi with the stock tires and still couldnt get traction.. I really want to run at a 1/4 mile track.
#11
Originally Posted by Final
Nice shifting, with your VSA off what did you launch at and where did your traction kick in?
If I had floored it in first or second I would just hit redline and burn the tires. I feathered first and second and floored it into third (chirped but got 100% traction).
I did one run with VSA on, it was hilarious. The vid is great, I will post it tonight after I get off of work. I could hear each tire one after the other chirp, it was hilarious. Just imagein the left and right taking turns chirping real fast, it was so funny, the vid is good but it was even funnier driving. I ran a 9.6 with the VSA on.
#16
Originally Posted by CleanCL
damn man, wats ur elevation? 9.5 is like a high 14
I ran 9.5's prior to more modification in my old Grand Cherokee 5.9 and I still turned out 14.9's. The top end on that GC sucked ass.
9.5 is a solid 14 second pass for a TL. Still should be much quicker in a TL-S.
#18
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by SuperStar
Not in a TL.
I ran 9.5's prior to more modification in my old Grand Cherokee 5.9 and I still turned out 14.9's. The top end on that GC sucked ass.
9.5 is a solid 14 second pass for a TL. Still should be much quicker in a TL-S.
I ran 9.5's prior to more modification in my old Grand Cherokee 5.9 and I still turned out 14.9's. The top end on that GC sucked ass.
9.5 is a solid 14 second pass for a TL. Still should be much quicker in a TL-S.
#20
Originally Posted by DiZlAoSbOiSoFlY
did you clear or smoke your headlights?
Originally Posted by Sun Diego CL-S
how about some rear pics?
what tires do you have wrapping around those Inspyres? talk about traction issues. how long have you had your car?
what tires do you have wrapping around those Inspyres? talk about traction issues. how long have you had your car?
Originally Posted by CleanCL
whoa, no wonder you had terrible times. look at those low profile tires.
Originally Posted by bkzjimmy
what side view mirrors are those?
Originally Posted by rondog
whas the ground wet in those pics? how much did you beat the S2K by? and was it modded at all? Sounded like you were bouncing off the rev limiter for a little bit in the begining, but I bet if you had a bit more tracktion , you woiuld have done alot better.
I loaded some more vids, check out the VSA active one, its funny sounding. Its like the VSA is struggling to control the beast.
#21
Instructor
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: los angeles
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TLFourplay
I will post more soon. I raced the S200 4 times and won every time. He got me off the line every time but once I found traction I toasted him (every time). The evo 8 was garbage. It is a 2003, he claims he didnt shift properly. I dont know, it should be running better than that.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oid=1434262072
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oID=1432458832
I love the chirp into third..
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oid=1434262072
http://vids.myspace.com/index.?fusea...oID=1432458832
I love the chirp into third..
#23
Burning Brakes
A 9.5 1/8 mile is in the 14.7 second run range. And I'm sorry, there's no way that with better traction, he'd shed 1 second off his 1/8 mile time. An 8.5 second 1/8 mile is a low 13 second run. We all know this isn't happening in any sort of TL, NA or forced induced.
#24
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by Dave_B
A 9.5 1/8 mile is in the 14.7 second run range. And I'm sorry, there's no way that with better traction, he'd shed 1 second off his 1/8 mile time. An 8.5 second 1/8 mile is a low 13 second run. We all know this isn't happening in any sort of TL, NA or forced induced.
#25
Originally Posted by Dave_B
A 9.5 1/8 mile is in the 14.7 second run range. And I'm sorry, there's no way that with better traction, he'd shed 1 second off his 1/8 mile time. An 8.5 second 1/8 mile is a low 13 second run. We all know this isn't happening in any sort of TL, NA or forced induced.
Uh... Maybe you should do your research before you go off saying stuff you have no clue about...https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=track+faster
I gaurantee you if I had 100% traction I would defintely run a mid 8 second 1/8th.
#26
Originally Posted by TLFourplay
Uh... Maybe you should do your research before you go off saying stuff you have no clue about...https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=track+faster
I gaurantee you if I had 100% traction I would defintely run a mid 8 second 1/8th.
I gaurantee you if I had 100% traction I would defintely run a mid 8 second 1/8th.
The combination of power and drive train, will not allow you to run an 8.5 in the 1/8th, with a stock TL-S. Based on generic conversion, you would have to shave over .5 off of your 60 ft to even consider running your 1/8th 1 second faster.
On the other hand the guy that wants to use mathematical equations for 1/8th mile to 1/4 mile times, better be included things like gear ratio, wind resistance, humidity, barometer readings, and elevation.
I believe that a 9.5 in a TL-S should be good for a 14.6-14.8.
#27
Originally Posted by CleanCL
there are mathematical equations to determine 1/8th mile times to 1/4 mile times. top end of not, a 9.5 down the 1/8th will put you in a high 14 unless your car revs to like 8-10K, its pretty obvious in his videos he really had no traction and was running poor times.
I dont even have to address your post with that comment. Dont post when you dont know what you're talking about.
#28
Originally Posted by SuperStar
So you'd be running near stock c5 autos that make 64 more hp, 100+ more torque, and weigh less than you?
The combination of power and drive train, will not allow you to run an 8.5 in the 1/8th, with a stock TL-S. Based on generic conversion, you would have to shave over .5 off of your 60 ft to even consider running your 1/8th 1 second faster.
On the other hand the guy that wants to use mathematical equations for 1/8th mile to 1/4 mile times, better be included things like gear ratio, wind resistance, humidity, barometer readings, and elevation.
I believe that a 9.5 in a TL-S should be good for a 14.6-14.8.
The combination of power and drive train, will not allow you to run an 8.5 in the 1/8th, with a stock TL-S. Based on generic conversion, you would have to shave over .5 off of your 60 ft to even consider running your 1/8th 1 second faster.
On the other hand the guy that wants to use mathematical equations for 1/8th mile to 1/4 mile times, better be included things like gear ratio, wind resistance, humidity, barometer readings, and elevation.
I believe that a 9.5 in a TL-S should be good for a 14.6-14.8.
You have a valid point.
Here is my arguement. I tear out all through first and second, I get traction in third but I only have about 10-15 ft of track left in the 8th when I get into third gear. So if you take that into consideration and figure in if I had 100% traction in first and second, full throttle both gears through the entire RPM range. What do you think I would run? I would think it would most definitely be in the 8's.
#29
Originally Posted by TLFourplay
You have a valid point.
Here is my arguement. I tear out all through first and second, I get traction in third but I only have about 10-15 ft of track left in the 8th when I get into third gear. So if you take that into consideration and figure in if I had 100% traction in first and second, full throttle both gears through the entire RPM range. What do you think I would run? I would think it would most definitely be in the 8's.
Here is my arguement. I tear out all through first and second, I get traction in third but I only have about 10-15 ft of track left in the 8th when I get into third gear. So if you take that into consideration and figure in if I had 100% traction in first and second, full throttle both gears through the entire RPM range. What do you think I would run? I would think it would most definitely be in the 8's.
I believe that you have a car that should be a 9.0-9.2 1/8th mile car, in stock form. Which could be enough for you to knock on the door of some low low 14's or high 13's. There is no such thing as 100% traction in any car. And I certainly dont buy into this mathematical shit, far too many variables to play with that on a forum.
#30
Originally Posted by SuperStar
The only place you have significant ground to make up is in your 60 ft. The looseness in 2nd and into 3rd is not a significant time impact. (What was your 60 ft?)
I believe that you have a car that should be a 9.0-9.2 1/8th mile car, in stock form. Which could be enough for you to knock on the door of some low low 14's or high 13's. There is no such thing as 100% traction in any car. And I certainly dont buy into this mathematical shit, far too many variables to play with that on a forum.
I believe that you have a car that should be a 9.0-9.2 1/8th mile car, in stock form. Which could be enough for you to knock on the door of some low low 14's or high 13's. There is no such thing as 100% traction in any car. And I certainly dont buy into this mathematical shit, far too many variables to play with that on a forum.
Well, I agree to disagree. I know that if I had some sort of slicks that I would gain a ton of traction instead of just having to feather it through first and second. Definitely putting me into the 8's. I know that there is no such thing as 100% traction, I was just speaking hypothetically. Obviously my car is not in stock trim either. What kind of car do you drive? I am starting to think that you drive a comptetitive vehicle and refuse to believe that the TL is this fast. I know that the people I race think that, I havent lost yet though. I raced a S2000, Evo8, 91 mustang GT, and an NSX. Either way I am proud of my car and I enjoy driving it, and I do know what it is capable of. I dont know what my 60ft was, this is some hick track, they dont have time slips or anything. I really want to go out to bowling green to run the 1/4. Have a nice one. Tony.
#31
B A N N E D
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: vancouver, BC
Age: 41
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
A 9.5 1/8 mile is in the 14.7 second run range. And I'm sorry, there's no way that with better traction, he'd shed 1 second off his 1/8 mile time. An 8.5 second 1/8 mile is a low 13 second run. We all know this isn't happening in any sort of TL, NA or forced induced.
#32
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by TLFourplay
Uh... Maybe you should do your research before you go off saying stuff you have no clue about...https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=track+faster.
I gaurantee you if I had 100% traction I would defintely run a mid 8 second 1/8th.
#33
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by lookinco
Who is we? lol...and i think if you read the forum enough, you would know the TL is more then capable of running in the 13s. One member with supercharger and 50shot nitrous even ran a 13.12 and that's with automatic.
#34
Well its cool guys. I am not getting in a pissing contest with anyone. I know who I can beat and who I cant and how good my car looks doing it .
Just to me, with simple logic.. Let me re-itterate. I have to FEATHER the throttle in first and second. I shift into third for usually around the last 15 ft of track... So basically I have to feather the throttle the whole 1/8th mile. If I had slicks and a lot more traction there is NO WAY I wouldnt be able to easily get right into the 8's. It makes sense to me. But opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
Just to me, with simple logic.. Let me re-itterate. I have to FEATHER the throttle in first and second. I shift into third for usually around the last 15 ft of track... So basically I have to feather the throttle the whole 1/8th mile. If I had slicks and a lot more traction there is NO WAY I wouldnt be able to easily get right into the 8's. It makes sense to me. But opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
#35
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by SuperStar
Top end or not?
I dont even have to address your post with that comment. Dont post when you dont know what you're talking about.
I dont even have to address your post with that comment. Dont post when you dont know what you're talking about.
yea i really know nothing about these motors/cars.
-01 NBP CL-S 3.5L
#36
Originally Posted by CleanCL
yea your right, even though an N/A TL 3.2 ran a 13.7, phew, i guess the 3.5 makes you slower then right?
yea i really know nothing about these motors/cars.
-01 NBP CL-S 3.5L
yea i really know nothing about these motors/cars.
-01 NBP CL-S 3.5L
I dont know, the hollow cams keep it pretty light lol, good one CL
#38
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by TLFourplay
Just to me, with simple logic.. Let me re-itterate. I have to FEATHER the throttle in first and second. I shift into third for usually around the last 15 ft of track... So basically I have to feather the throttle the whole 1/8th mile. If I had slicks and a lot more traction there is NO WAY I wouldnt be able to easily get right into the 8's. It makes sense to me. But opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
I don't doubt you have to feather the throttle a bit in 1st and some of 2nd. That's common with about every higher powered FWD car with a manual. My old Maxima was the same way. But I'm certain you won't get in the mid 8s, even on slicks. Now if you are just talking about upper 8s on slicks, then I can see it happening assuming you're willing to side step the clutch at 5000-5500rpms and can land some 1.8 60 foots.
#39
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Why not post your entire 1/8th mile run?
.
.
I did. I had one of my troops film it with my sony digital camera. It cant zoom after the film has been started. Not anything quality but it gets the job done.
#40
B A N N E D
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: vancouver, BC
Age: 41
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Read what you just stated. It took a forced inducation AND a 50 shot to get the 13.1. A 50 shot of nitrous typically adds 40whp, but a whoping 70wtq. That's a good bit of additional power. I said NA and forced induced. Not forced induced and nitrous.
Also the example I gave about the nitrous is just an example showing what the TL is capable of doing. All supercharged TL are running in the 13s provided that the driver can control the traction problem.