Top speed for a TL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #81  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ayethetiense
you are about a year late on the response there buddy

and in response to this thread, i hit about 235mph in my TL, my penis is 18 inches long and i can pee about 12 yards away
LOL didnt really look at the dates..............well lets hope that the extra year has brought some more knowledge and less silly posts by him.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #82  
RVC's Avatar
RVC
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
I've had my TL up to about 85!!!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #83  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,120
Likes: 4,765
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by RVC
I've had my TL up to about 85!!!
Loved that response,

Here's Road and Track's test results for a 2004 6MT

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...2004172540.pdf
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #84  
Final's Avatar
Opium den in
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
150 last night with 19's on.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #85  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ndx2
Just a reminder - whether these 155'ers are lying or not, don't attempt at this with stock rubbers... neither the EL42's nor the MXM4's are suitable for a stunt like this.
not that I would attempt a sustained run at 155, the factory MXM4's are rated to 168 mph maximum
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #86  
jayhawk101031's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
ive seen it hit 160.. my friend somehow got the limitor disengaged or so he says.. and we hit 160
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #87  
ndx2's Avatar
6MT & LSD
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pohljm
not that I would attempt a sustained run at 155, the factory MXM4's are rated to 168 mph maximum
:sigh:

Do you just like to argue or what?

Are you saying you'd be comfortable going 150+ with those MXM4's?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:22 PM
  #88  
vincethe1's Avatar
3.2 VTEC
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Exclamation

I am here to break all the myths In my 2002 3.2TL Type-S, the top speed limiter was as the speedometer read, 147mph, I am sure because I have hit it at least 3 times. In my 2006 TL 6MT, the top speed limiter it at an exact 150mph, and no more. Since the 6MT TL gets up there so easily, I have bounced off of 150MPH atleast 15 times by now, and no it's not 151 or 155 or whatever, it's 150 exact i even made a video so i can look closely afterwords it's at an exact 150.

Other car governers i have tried is a 2004 Honda Pilot, which is sumwhere between 108-109....and a 2000 Toyota Camry CE 5MT, which was at 115.

If someone claim that they did over 150mph in a 2004-2006 TL without taking out the governor, than that means mabe the earlier years had a higher limiter than 2006.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #89  
Ramairgt1's Avatar
Miss you :(
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
I hit 149 in 6th gear when I owned my TL
http://img35.imageshack.us/my.php?image=johntl1zq.jpg


and no way in hell would an N/A R1 hit 200mph....mine is highly modified and I cant even hit 185
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #90  
Tripnbeats's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 2
From: USA
I have nailed the speedo at 160 but it takes a minute to get there. All i have done is the "mid" muffler removed and an intake with the "off road" temperature sensor moved to the intake.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #91  
jackasswhy's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
eh my 06 tl is smooth but at 100 it gets kinda scary in my 98 m3 i hit 140 and waasnt scard.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 11:06 PM
  #92  
Infamous_Ghost769's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
I've only hit 120, I still think it can keep going. my car is completely stock so wit some mods it might have more potential. has anyone wit a supercharger in there car 150 or more?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 11:31 PM
  #93  
kenny5's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: gotham, new york
My 06 TL only has 600 miles on it so far, and the fastest I have driven is 75 mph. When the odo hits 1200 miles, I think I will be driving twice as fast, ie at 150 mph. Simple math
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #94  
dave0935's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by vincethe1
I am here to break all the myths In my 2002 3.2TL Type-S, the top speed limiter was as the speedometer read, 147mph, I am sure because I have hit it at least 3 times. In my 2006 TL 6MT, the top speed limiter it at an exact 150mph, and no more. Since the 6MT TL gets up there so easily, I have bounced off of 150MPH atleast 15 times by now, and no it's not 151 or 155 or whatever, it's 150 exact i even made a video so i can look closely afterwords it's at an exact 150.

Other car governers i have tried is a 2004 Honda Pilot, which is sumwhere between 108-109....and a 2000 Toyota Camry CE 5MT, which was at 115.

If someone claim that they did over 150mph in a 2004-2006 TL without taking out the governor, than that means mabe the earlier years had a higher limiter than 2006.
I CAN DEFINATELY SAY MY CARS' SPEEDO HAS SEEN 155MPH W/ FREIND IN CAR W/ ME. NO "BS"
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #95  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ndx2
:sigh:

Do you just like to argue or what?

Are you saying you'd be comfortable going 150+ with those MXM4's?
Argue? I am not following you. I am just letting you know that the "W" speed rating indicates the tire is rated for a maximum of 168 mph. I can say without a doubt that it would not matter what tires were on my vehicle I would never be comfortable at 150, even with a (Y) rated tire good for in excess of 186 mph I would not be comfortable.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #96  
ndx2's Avatar
6MT & LSD
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Ratings don't mean shit on these tires; if you wanna get technical, fine. I was being realistic and gave a reminder accordingly for the sake of people's safety, because so many people come online and post ridiculous BS.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #97  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,120
Likes: 4,765
From: Maryland
If the tires are rated for that speed, load, and the proper inflation then there's no safety problem from a tire point of view.

However going that fast on the street is just foolish and stupid, we all know know there is an incredible list of safety issues you deal with. It's just not worth the risk to you and others on the road. If you want to go that fast go to a track.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #98  
Spedizzo's Avatar
G
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: JerZ
Originally Posted by Final
150 last night with 19's on.
This sicko ain't kiddin either.... shit was moving so fast I was scared if I moved in the car it would lose balance and we would become TL roadkill
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #99  
acuratl732's Avatar
Advanced
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: 732 area
i tapped mt automatic out at 155 im in nj and ill prove anyone wrong if they think or wanna call me a liar
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 01:15 AM
  #100  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ndx2
Ratings don't mean shit on these tires; if you wanna get technical, fine. I was being realistic and gave a reminder accordingly for the sake of people's safety, because so many people come online and post ridiculous BS.
you are to funny......talk about posting rediculous BS. "the ratings dont mean shit" OK I supose the manufacturers just toss out a letter that sounds good at the end of the tire sizing string and it has no bearing whatsoever on the capabilities that have been engineered into that specific tire. Let me assure you that is not the case. The engineering department will ensure, and the legal department will demand that the tire perform up to its rated speed.

Your statement would lead people to believe that they could save some money and mount up a H rated tire on their TL and be safe because......... "the ratings dont mean shit" So if you truly are looking out for other peoples safety and not just trying to argue, I suggest that you take your own advice, and dont post rediculous BS
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #101  
ndx2's Avatar
6MT & LSD
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pohljm
you are to funny......talk about posting rediculous BS. "the ratings dont mean shit" OK I supose the manufacturers just toss out a letter that sounds good at the end of the tire sizing string and it has no bearing whatsoever on the capabilities that have been engineered into that specific tire. Let me assure you that is not the case. The engineering department will ensure, and the legal department will demand that the tire perform up to its rated speed.

Your statement would lead people to believe that they could save some money and mount up a H rated tire on their TL and be safe because......... "the ratings dont mean shit" So if you truly are looking out for other peoples safety and not just trying to argue, I suggest that you take your own advice, and dont post rediculous BS
I said ratings don't means shit with THESE specific tires, the EL42's and the MXM4's, which aren't much for traction or performance.

Yeah, the ratings will stand true if they were tested in optimal condition; I've driven on EL42's and MXM4's, and they weren't very stable at higher speeds.

At 150+, these tires could turn a slightest mistake into a major disaster, whereas better tires could be more forgiving.

I didn't feel safe at all even at 80, 90 MPH on EL42's, and I was giving my opinion based on my experience. Since I've switched tires to Ecstas, with same W ratings as the EL42s, and have felt a huge difference in traction and overall stability at higher speeds.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #102  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ndx2
I said ratings don't means shit with THESE specific tires, the EL42's and the MXM4's, which aren't much for traction or performance.

Yeah, the ratings will stand true if they were tested in optimal condition; I've driven on EL42's and MXM4's, and they weren't very stable at higher speeds.

At 150+, these tires could turn a slightest mistake into a major disaster, whereas better tires could be more forgiving.

I didn't feel safe at all even at 80, 90 MPH on EL42's, and I was giving my opinion based on my experience. Since I've switched tires to Ecstas, with same W ratings as the EL42s, and have felt a huge difference in traction and overall stability at higher speeds.
I agree with you that these tires are borderline crap, but the ratings only indicate that the tire will maintain its structural integrity at that speed for a given amount of time, not that they will be forgiving and or stable. To much of that equation is vehicle dynamics. I do not think that at 150+ there is such a thing as a slight mistake, only big hairy ones!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 06:29 AM
  #103  
meburdick's Avatar
'17 RDX Tech AWD - WDP
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 284
Likes: 14
From: Connecticut
Yes, the tires are crap. And, yes, you could end up dead with one little mistake at 150 miles per hour. But, that isn't a reflection of the tire's traction.

As for tire ratings, the speed rating has a lot to do with whether or not the tire can handle the cetrifugal force and amount of heat generated from driving at a specific speed for a duration of time. If you take a "S" rated tire and drive it 140 MPH for a quick burst, you might come out of it ok. But, your tires would completely disintegrate if you tried to maintain that speed.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #104  
Georgiapeach's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by trancemission
I dont think I will ever take mine that fast....

I second that the highest I have ever had it was 120 on I-10 going back to Jacksonville Florida. The highest that I have had it here in Italy is about 80-95 which very bad because of how unpredictable the driving is here and the curvy roads. I have to slow down I fear that I will be in a very bad accident before I leave Italy.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 11:32 PM
  #105  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Georgiapeach
I second that the highest I have ever had it was 120 on I-10 going back to Jacksonville Florida. The highest that I have had it here in Italy is about 80-95 which very bad because of how unpredictable the driving is here and the curvy roads. I have to slow down I fear that I will be in a very bad accident before I leave Italy.
You need to head north.......fun fun fun on zee autobahn............
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #106  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Originally Posted by Twenties
Mine topped out reading about 155. According to Road & Track it is electronically limited to 147 MPH. Without the limiter I bet it would reach mid 160s. When I hit the limiter and it read ~155, the RPMS were NOT close to maxing out.
Most street cars will not pull to the red line in the top gears; even without the nanny chip geting in the way.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 04:41 PM
  #107  
FamusFace's Avatar
FamusTLX
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Best Generation of Acura Grills

Just curious to know what people thought of as the best headlight/grill combination there is of the 3 generations of TLs. I really love and admire the second generation headlight/grill combination. I really think its looks the best. As for the third generation, the grill is nice but the headlight aren't as aggressive as the second gen.

What do you guys think

'02 - '03 TL is the best looking by far, at least the front part anyway.

Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 07:39 PM
  #108  
evantec's Avatar
Ev an' Tec
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Exclamation

Originally Posted by FamusFace
Just curious to know what people thought of as the best headlight/grill combination there is of the 3 generations of TLs. I really love and admire the second generation headlight/grill combination. I really think its looks the best. As for the third generation, the grill is nice but the headlight aren't as aggressive as the second gen.

What do you guys think

'02 - '03 TL is the best looking by far, at least the front part anyway.

I actually thought the 3G was more aggressive than the 2G, and it took awhile for me to get to like it. But this whole topic really oughta be in a new thread. Maybe the moderator can look at re-posting it.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #109  
TL1110's Avatar
2007 TL Type-S
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
i hit 135 and then started to bring it down cuz there was a curve coming up. coming through the curve a cop clocked me at 82 mph, my boy told me if i had gotten clocked at 135 i would have gotten arrested (is that true). i know the car had more in it but i got a little nervous; at least i got it kinda outta my system.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #110  
BENDER08's Avatar
Back in a TL again.
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,091
Likes: 0
From: Find the Needle
i know hitting 3 digits is wreckless driving and up to the cops discretion to arrest you ive done 147 in the tl and 178 + - on the spedo being off on my 03 r1
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 17, 2015 09:01 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 08:57 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.