3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TL is way better than BMW 330XI!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2006, 02:49 PM
  #1  
Dr. Feelgood
Thread Starter
 
05TLTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: too close to Jatt
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up TL is way better than BMW 330XI!!!!!

Just went on a test drive with a budy of mine today. He is looking for an all-wheel-drive car because of the wonderful New England weather that we usually have. We went to BMW today to test the 330XI. All I've got to say about the 2006 330XI auto is, "I'm so glad I bought the TL!"
First off, the car with all the options was $8k (minus the $3k for AWD) more than the TL!
Secondly, the BMW is not as responsive as the TL. My friend floored it and it took about 1 to 2 second for the gear to kick in. With 255hp compared to the TL, I didn't think there would be a difference in acceleration, but I guess I was wrong. The upside is that the exhaust is not as loud as last year's.
Finally, to all the people whom complained about the TL's hard suspension, the 330 is even worse. I felt more bumps and road imperfections in the BMW than I did driving back in my friend's TL.
The one thing I will give the BMW over the TL is that it does handle a bit better, but not as well as the RL.
Overall, the test drive made me realize that I did in fact make a great choice with the TL. Sorry about the rambling.

BTW the BMW does rattle contrary to popular belief. The test vehicle only had 31 miles on it!
Old 02-15-2006, 06:04 PM
  #2  
Instructor
 
Boardman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 57
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO you are 100% correct sir. I drove the Canadian model myself last week and came to pretty much the same conclusions. FWIW, the price difference between them here in Canada is MORE than $8K. That said, I'm glad I went with the TL .
Old 02-15-2006, 06:25 PM
  #3  
9.5+10.5 22m=Hella Flush
 
ed99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canuck Town
Posts: 3,106
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I totally agree. Our TL feels faster. I thought the power will be very similiar when I test drove the 330i. But I did not feel the G-force like our TL. The only thing I liked about the BMW 330 over our TL is the driving experience. The cars feels like it is part of you. I guess that is why BMW always wins in the handling catagory.
Old 02-15-2006, 06:43 PM
  #4  
Tristate ViP Crew
 
CL Platano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Jersey
Age: 51
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<~~waiting for all the BMW guys to come say the BMW is awesome and Acura is ok..I will never waste money on a non M series BMW..
Old 02-15-2006, 06:45 PM
  #5  
Tristate ViP Crew
 
CL Platano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Jersey
Age: 51
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ed99
I totally agree. Our TL feels faster. I thought the power will be very similiar when I test drove the 330i. But I did not feel the G-force like our TL. The only thing I liked about the BMW 330 over our TL is the driving experience. The cars feels like it is part of you. I guess that is why BMW always wins in the handling catagory.
With a little suspension upgrade you can handle just as well as an BMW and save 8k..I put eibach sportlines on my old CL and was able to take turns at the same speed as my boy in his 330ci, he was very shocked.
Old 02-15-2006, 07:13 PM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
mclarenf3387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 8,620
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by CL Platano
With a little suspension upgrade you can handle just as well as an BMW and save 8k..I put eibach sportlines on my old CL and was able to take turns at the same speed as my boy in his 330ci, he was very shocked.
And then all he has to do is put a suspension in his car (and there are many very good suspensions for BMWs out there) and he'll regain that edge. He could also not be that great of a driver.

BMW will always have that slight edge in handling due to RWD (AWD BMWs are stupid). They also use slightly better materials. If its worth 5-8k more depends on the person. That and being a badge whore like many BMW owners are.
Old 02-15-2006, 08:17 PM
  #7  
Drifting
 
Sclass88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 36
Posts: 2,687
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CL Platano
I will never waste money on a non M series BMW..
Old 02-15-2006, 08:38 PM
  #8  
Advanced
 
frank69m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 50
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both the 06 TL and a 330i....

I can actually disagree with you...

330i feels a little faster to me because it is smaller and more agile. You can throw it around a bit more than the TL which feels heavier. Handling is better on the 330i....

Keep in mind, you are comparing an AWD with a FWD...try comparing the RWD 330i with the TL....you'll notice a difference.

:-)
Old 02-15-2006, 09:04 PM
  #9  
Instructor
 
Subhuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tacoma,Wa.
Age: 63
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being 6'2"(long legs) I can safely say that I appreciate the TL much more than the BMW 3 series.That tiny bit of edge in handling the BMW has does not impress me enough to give up the comfort and roominess the TL has over them.
Once I have my A-Spec suspension and CT RSW installed I'll compare handling and ride again with my coworkers 325i she bought the sameday I bought my TL.
My pre-suspicions are that they'll be on par in the handling dept. then,but I'll have the edge on comfort and the added roominess wich is especially nice on longer hauls.Not to mention the edge the TL has over the 3 series in bad weather conditions with any suspension set up,being FWD vs RWD.
For the price,the TL definitely has the Beemer beat hands down,unless of course you are a "badge whore" as someone put it
Old 02-15-2006, 09:27 PM
  #10  
Safety Car
 
datmrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 4,171
Received 39 Likes on 15 Posts
Since we are on the topic, can someone confirm that the BMW navigation IS NOT touch screen? A friend just bought a 330i and she opted out of the navi because the salesman told her its not touch screen. I thought that was a bit weird!

I did a search online and all I could find was a mention of an iDrive dial button that controls the navi. Can someone confirm or correct me?
Old 02-15-2006, 10:13 PM
  #11  
Dr. Feelgood
Thread Starter
 
05TLTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: too close to Jatt
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datmrman
Since we are on the topic, can someone confirm that the BMW navigation IS NOT touch screen? A friend just bought a 330i and she opted out of the navi because the salesman told her its not touch screen. I thought that was a bit weird!

I did a search online and all I could find was a mention of an iDrive dial button that controls the navi. Can someone confirm or correct me?
You are correct, it is controlled by the iDrive dial.
Old 02-15-2006, 10:22 PM
  #12  
Dr. Feelgood
Thread Starter
 
05TLTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: too close to Jatt
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by frank69m
I have both the 06 TL and a 330i....

I can actually disagree with you...

330i feels a little faster to me because it is smaller and more agile. You can throw it around a bit more than the TL which feels heavier. Handling is better on the 330i....

Keep in mind, you are comparing an AWD with a FWD...try comparing the RWD 330i with the TL....you'll notice a difference.

:-)
Frank, I'm not sure what type tranny you have, but I was comparing the auto TL to the auto 330XI. I know that the 330XI is roughly 100lbs heavier b/c of the AWD system. However, it did not impress myself or my friend when he floored it. The lag was very noticable. Believe me, my friend is a very aggressive driver. Even the salesman commented on it. The other advantage of the 330xi that I forgot to mention was their rear brakes are much bigger, thus better stopping power than the auto TL. I wish the Tl had bigger brakes.
Old 02-16-2006, 06:49 AM
  #13  
Three Wheelin'
 
mickey3c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Another aspect is an AWD setup will most likely take a hit in the power at the wheels...
Old 02-16-2006, 07:38 AM
  #14  
Burning Brakes
 
ilitig8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05TLTony
The one thing I will give the BMW over the TL is that it does handle a bit better, but not as well as the RL.
You had me until this statement, surely you jest.
Old 02-16-2006, 09:48 AM
  #15  
Instructor
 
mkaresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 56
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ilitig8
You had me until this statement, surely you jest.
Yeah, that one had me scratching my head.

AWD adds $1900 to the BMW, not $3000. If you want quick, accurate price comparisons, try my site ( www.truedelta.com ).

I love the looks of the TL, but people who think it can be made to handle as well as a car with a balanced weight distribution...I just don't get it. A bunch of weight on the nose is something you just cannot get around with stiffer springs.

I generally don't care for Audis for this reason. Driven in a sane manner (i.e. no tire-smoking four-wheel-drifts allowed) they plow.

One partial fix is to put wider tires on the front wheels, like Pontiac did with the GP GXP. But I never read of people doing this.
Old 02-16-2006, 10:06 AM
  #16  
Dr. Feelgood
Thread Starter
 
05TLTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: too close to Jatt
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mkaresh
Yeah, that one had me scratching my head.

AWD adds $1900 to the BMW, not $3000. If you want quick, accurate price comparisons, try my site ( www.truedelta.com ).

Sorry, I didn't look up the price of AWD to be precise. I think I said around 3K. Maybe because they charge extra for the auto tranny, which I did not take into account. So with the AWD and auto tranny, it is around $3k. Sorry about the confusion.
Old 02-16-2006, 10:09 AM
  #17  
Dr. Feelgood
Thread Starter
 
05TLTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: too close to Jatt
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ilitig8
You had me until this statement, surely you jest.
My friend is leasing the RL, which is in the shop, but he says the cornering on the RL was better than the AWD 330. When he took a corner which he usually takes with the RL, the 330XI didn't hugh as well.
Old 02-16-2006, 10:23 AM
  #18  
Riu
2004 TL
 
Riu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island NY/Worcester MA (College)
Age: 37
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did not read all the responses but with only 31 miles that could have been why it took time to respond. Im not a BMW fan in any way but that could be a reason.
Old 02-16-2006, 11:15 AM
  #19  
Burning Brakes
 
ilitig8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05TLTony
My friend is leasing the RL, which is in the shop, but he says the cornering on the RL was better than the AWD 330. When he took a corner which he usually takes with the RL, the 330XI didn't hugh as well.

Think you might want to compare them yourself, having driven both relatively hard, it really isn't much of a contest. Weight and poor weight distribution kill the RL. It is in the upper range for its class but on a road course a 330 (even a XI) would run away and hide from an RL. In the end his statement may indeed be accurate since the AWD 330 might well have had a significant disadvantage in the tire area, most of them are shod very conservatively.
Old 02-16-2006, 12:18 PM
  #20  
Mofo
 
maluskills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scarsdale, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RL isn't meant to be a sporty racing cornering type car
It does its job as a high-end luxury power sedan, and does it damn well I might add!
Old 02-16-2006, 03:03 PM
  #21  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both 2006 TL(wife) and 2005 BMW 545i.
545i is a complete different league and I am not going to comment on it.
However my best friend has a 2006 330i and believe me it feels a lot faster than TL, mostly because of low end torque, altough I have to admit that TL (MT) and 2006 330i have almost exact numbers.
330xi is another ballgame. If TL would be AWD I am sure a lot of TL fans will be very disappointed with the way the handling and pick up would be affected.
I don't even know why BMW bother with AWD. They should stick with RWD only!
Old 02-16-2006, 03:21 PM
  #22  
Riu
2004 TL
 
Riu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island NY/Worcester MA (College)
Age: 37
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 5 series sucks lol

I sat in it and it is so plain. Just a wheel gauges and shifter
Old 02-16-2006, 04:42 PM
  #23  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Riu
the 5 series sucks lol

I sat in it and it is so plain. Just a wheel gauges and shifter

The 545 with the larger engine is good, but I have no idea why people would even consider the new 525 or 530's???????
Old 02-16-2006, 06:43 PM
  #24  
Racer
 
SergeyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
The 545 with the larger engine is good, but I have no idea why people would even consider the new 525 or 530's???????
Because they are the best handling cars in the class, maybe?
Old 02-16-2006, 06:46 PM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Unless its an M, I dont want it.
Old 02-16-2006, 06:47 PM
  #26  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Riu
the 5 series sucks lol

I sat in it and it is so plain. Just a wheel gauges and shifter

Drive one don't just sit in it and you'll get it!
Old 02-16-2006, 06:50 PM
  #27  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SergeyM
Because they are the best handling cars in the class, maybe?

Sergey, you're right! I was impressed how smooth 530i drives...second to none. Even Lexus pales in comparison!And the overall quality is simply amazing!
Old 02-16-2006, 06:51 PM
  #28  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SergeyM
Because they are the best handling cars in the class, maybe?
What's handling when you have no engine to make the 525/530 go? Probably the slowest cars in their class as well! I'd rather slap an $800 dollar suspension upgrade (if that) on a G35/TL, have approx if not more interior room than the bmw, and put that extra 10k towards my kid's college fund.

....and I have driven both. M series / 545 different story....
Old 02-16-2006, 06:55 PM
  #29  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
What's handling when you have no engine to make the 525/530 go? Probably the slowest cars in their class as well! I'd rather slap an $800 dollar suspension upgrade (if that) on a G35/TL, have approx if not more interior room than the bmw, and put that extra 10k towards my kid's college fund.

....and I have driven both. M series / 545 different story....

530 is no slow at all! A 2006 530i (255 hp) is almost as fast as automatic TL (6.5 sec 0-60mph). G35/TL are not roomier than 5 series as a matter of fact my wife's TL feels a bit smaller than my 545.
Old 02-16-2006, 07:01 PM
  #30  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nikko
530 is no slow at all! A 2006 530i (255 hp) is almost as fast as automatic TL (6.5 sec 0-60mph). G35/TL are not roomier than 5 series as a matter of fact my wife's TL feels a bit smaller than my 545.

"almost" as fast........with probably more than a 10k price difference - case closed.

G35 interior room - smaller than 5 series, but G35 will run circles around the 525/530

TL interior room - according to the car mags, TL has more room than the NEW 5 series

You already said you weren't going to compare the 545.......
Old 02-16-2006, 07:08 PM
  #31  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
"almost" as fast........with probably more than a 10k price difference - case closed.
You already said you weren't going to compare the 545.......

Well man..I couldn't help it.
Old 02-16-2006, 07:10 PM
  #32  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed

G35 interior room - smaller than 5 series, but G35 will run circles around the 525/530

Who cares which car is faster...most of the people will not buy a BMW, TL or G35 for racing..
Old 02-16-2006, 07:13 PM
  #33  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nikko
Well man..I couldn't help it.

haha! Like I said earlier, 545/m class different story especially if we're talking about performance.
Old 02-16-2006, 07:15 PM
  #34  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nikko
Who cares which car is faster...most of the people will not buy a BMW, TL or G35 for racing..
In that case, who cares for handling? So as a result of voiding any performance or handling characteristics of these cars, why spend 10k more on a 525/530?
Old 02-16-2006, 07:20 PM
  #35  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,845
Received 1,106 Likes on 764 Posts
Thread hijacked! Lock...Lock...

https://acurazine.com/forums/misc.ph...g=0&forumid=1#
Old 02-16-2006, 07:20 PM
  #36  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
In that case, who cares for handling? So as a result of voiding any performance or handling characteristics of these cars, why spend 10k more on a 525/530?
Because build quality is so much better and ride is so smooth and composed!
Old 02-16-2006, 07:27 PM
  #37  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nikko
Because build quality is so much better and ride is so smooth and composed!
"smooth and composed" -------- aka as handling. So in conclusion, 525/530 owners would pay an extra 10k (and that's being very conservative....probably more like 15k) because build quality is "so much better."

I have better uses for my extra $10-15k.
Old 02-16-2006, 07:38 PM
  #38  
05 BMW 745i, 07 BMW 335i
 
nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
"smooth and composed" -------- aka as handling. So in conclusion, 525/530 owners would pay an extra 10k (and that's being very conservative....probably more like 15k) because build quality is "so much better."

I have better uses for my extra $10-15k.
handling = description of the way the car performs, particularly during cornering.
Old 02-16-2006, 07:54 PM
  #39  
Racer
 
SergeyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by special-ed
"smooth and composed" -------- aka as handling. So in conclusion, 525/530 owners would pay an extra 10k (and that's being very conservative....probably more like 15k) because build quality is "so much better."

I have better uses for my extra $10-15k.
You can save even more by getting an Accord and even more if you get a Corolla.
What does TL have over Accord? Good looks and a better badge. Accord is bigger, better built, as fast as TL, so why get a TL?
Old 02-16-2006, 09:17 PM
  #40  
Iro Ridg .308
 
special-ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA, IL, IN
Age: 50
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SergeyM
You can save even more by getting an Accord and even more if you get a Corolla.
What does TL have over Accord? Good looks and a better badge. Accord is bigger, better built, as fast as TL, so why get a TL?
Can you say tangent!? You obviously can't debate....

So it's settled then, why get an acura or a beemer, when we all can just get a corolla or accord!

Matter of fact, since we're no longer dealing or deciding the better value in the 35k and/or mid-size sedan segment which is basically what we started with comparing the TL to the 330ix, why aren't we all riding 2 or 3 wheeled bikes? Hell, if a country as large as China can get away with it, why can't we?

BTW, I have a corolla, and an accord, as well as my TL. Have a bike also.

SergeyM, if you're gonna come, you need to bring something stronger than that played out statement.


Quick Reply: TL is way better than BMW 330XI!!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.