TL-S versus A-Spec Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #1  
SBTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
My dog thinks I'm Elvis!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 6
From: Santa Barbara,CA
Post TL-S versus A-Spec Comparison

I was in getting a routine service yesterday and passed the time waiting by test driving a TL-S in Auto. First thing I notice is the upgraded interior with the faux carbon fiber inserts is nicer than mine. The leather is better and the seats are a huge improvement. They are very comfortable and the improved side bolsters are great. The new steering wheel is a nice 3-spoke but an even trade for my A-Spec steering wheel imo. The car has a bit more get-up-and-go than mine off the line (not a huge difference) and a somewhat smoother ride but it feels somewhere in between my A-Spec and the stock TL in terms of cornering and body roll. Granted I have better (summer) tires on my car. I talked to the sales guy and he talked with service and the TL-S suspension is not the same as A-Spec. They changed it to improve ride quality. They have also done something to lessen torque steer. It has noticeably less than my A-Spec. In any event I got back in my car and felt at home and happy with what I got. I think I'll wait for the complete redesign in a few years. Here's hoping for 300+ HP/Torque and SH-AWD! And one last thing...with the positive changes in the TL I can't for the life of me figure out why anybody would pony up for an RL (an ugly duckling compared to the TL) at this point even with SH-AWD.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #2  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,407
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
the RL is still and upgrade even though it is not as agressive in looks as the TL. beinf an 04 TL owner, i;m also going to wait until the 09 TL comes out with the new engine and SH-AWD
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
GoHawks's Avatar
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 95
From: Southeast Michigan
Originally Posted by SBTL
And one last thing...with the positive changes in the TL I can't for the life of me figure out why anybody would pony up for an RL (an ugly duckling compared to the TL) at this point even with SH-AWD.
Ask all the people who have gotten out of their TLs and gone into an RL.

Sit in one and drive one.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #4  
ding069's Avatar
acura-cl.com OG
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 1
From: Rhode Is Land?
i'd take my 06 a-spec over an 07 type-s with no regrets. i haven't once thought about upgrading, other than to a 07 G35 or 335i
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #5  
SBTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
My dog thinks I'm Elvis!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 6
From: Santa Barbara,CA
Originally Posted by ding069
i'd take my 06 a-spec over an 07 type-s with no regrets. i haven't once thought about upgrading, other than to a 07 G35 or 335i
Have you driven both? What were your thoughts? I think the TL-S has a somewhat less aggressive suspension than the A-Spec to produce a better ride. The 17 inch wheels probably have a lot to do with that, however. Has anyone compared the TL-S with 18 inch wheels to a full A-Spec set up?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #6  
sybaek3's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Chantilly, VA
I agree!

I test drove the 07 type-s. Nothing really impressed me. Not even the 3.5L.

The rims are definately the ugliest thing and the red lights instead of the white lights on the interior was a turn off.

I wasn't feeling the body of the new 07 either. It really looks like a TSX. Does not have the sharp look of the 06 A-spec I have.

I do like the mirror blinkers, but other than that, nothing else is all that great.



Originally Posted by ding069
i'd take my 06 a-spec over an 07 type-s with no regrets. i haven't once thought about upgrading, other than to a 07 G35 or 335i
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #7  
jmbnova's Avatar
How may I help you.....?
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 10
From: Northern VA
TL A-Spec > TL-S
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 06:11 AM
  #8  
Armydog14's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
there's a few things that the 07 tl-s has that i want is the mp3 capatiblity, 3.5 engine and that's about it.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #9  
sybaek3's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Chantilly, VA
Anyone else think the TL-S looks like the TSX? And it's body/rims are definately uglier than the 06 A-spec?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #10  
Macruz19's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
Does the TL-S have the same suspension as the A-Spec, or are they both completly different?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #11  
juruki's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 5
From: California
Did you floor it when u drove it? I felt a big difference between the type-S and regular 3rd gen TL in performance. I used to get a lot of TL's as loaners when i dropped off my CL for service so i know how fast they feel.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #12  
badazzTL's Avatar
Peach Tea
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
lol you A-Spec advocates are funny. The TLS is awesome.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #13  
ding069's Avatar
acura-cl.com OG
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 1
From: Rhode Is Land?
Originally Posted by Macruz19
Does the TL-S have the same suspension as the A-Spec, or are they both completly different?
the a-spec is supposedly stiffer and geared more for performance.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #14  
ding069's Avatar
acura-cl.com OG
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,348
Likes: 1
From: Rhode Is Land?
Originally Posted by badazzTL
lol you A-Spec advocates are funny. The TLS is awesome.
seriously, aside from the engine....i'd take my a-spec.

i bought my Tl for 32,800 did an a-spec conversion and wouldn't want to pay the differential for the type-s, i really is not worth it.....
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
lembowski's Avatar
Trucki!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,157
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
If you were to take the 2 and sat them side ny side. Assuming you can save $7000 with the A-Spec I would take the A-Spec. Now if I were able to afford both I might jump for the TL-S simply because of the gadgets. Because I would have to add a few thousand to the A-spec to get the camera, pro-cats and a few other things to make them equal to me.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 05:56 PM
  #16  
simont53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Originally Posted by ding069
seriously, aside from the engine....i'd take my a-spec.

i bought my Tl for 32,800 did an a-spec conversion and wouldn't want to pay the differential for the type-s, i really is not worth it.....

I own both and can tell you this Type S is in another category, everyone chimes in with just paper facts, makes me smile when I am in my car.......the A-Spec is great , but I get back into it from the Type S and it is like another vehicle....night and day, the type S amazes me every time.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #17  
simont53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Originally Posted by ding069
seriously, aside from the engine....i'd take my a-spec.

i bought my Tl for 32,800 did an a-spec conversion and wouldn't want to pay the differential for the type-s, i really is not worth it.....

I own both and can tell you this Type S is in another category, everyone chimes in with just paper facts, makes me smile when I am in my car.......the A-Spec is great , but I get back into it from the Type S and it is like another vehicle....night and day, the type S amazes me every time.

My thread https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147040
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #18  
Pika817's Avatar
07 NBP TL-S
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by simont53
I own both and can tell you this Type S is in another category, everyone chimes in with just paper facts, makes me smile when I am in my car.......the A-Spec is great , but I get back into it from the Type S and it is like another vehicle....night and day, the type S amazes me every time.

My thread https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147040
I agree with you. I test drove both the 06 TL A-Spec (Manager's car) and the 07 TL-S. Although I liked the look of the A Spec better, but I found the TL-S ride to be a lot more refined with similar handling. I prefer the heavier feel of the steering wheel for the TL-S - especially at higher speeds and cornering. The TL-S is also a lot quiter - not sure if it's the ANC or not, but there is a noticable difference.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #19  
Kennedy's Avatar
OMGWTF4THGENTL
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by Pika817
I agree with you. I test drove both the 06 TL A-Spec (Manager's car) and the 07 TL-S. Although I liked the look of the A Spec better, but I found the TL-S ride to be a lot more refined with similar handling. I prefer the heavier feel of the steering wheel for the TL-S - especially at higher speeds and cornering. The TL-S is also a lot quiter - not sure if it's the ANC or not, but there is a noticable difference.
Cost value proposition isn't there.

refined handling = softer/squishier...
quiter = good tires...

Those attributes are worth $5K.

Aspec body and Tein/EDFC, CAI, pulley, procats, and some other stuff.. $2.5K (got some good deals on used stuff).
$1500 worth of AV goodies in my A-Spec, and I can:
1) Watch TV
2) Watch a DVD/mp3 CD
3) Play playstation2
4) Ipod
5) Mediagate ISOs
All independently switched.

Said and done, my A-spec does more technically, and at least = the power output... and I ony have $36K tied up... with 19 rims and 17s as snow tires.

What do I not have? red interior (I used to have a VW, I like the white/blue), silly new taillights and turn signals, and some very minor, Nav traffic, bluetooth phone book, questionable ANC, and a BADGE.

$500 get me all but nav traffic and phonebook.

Not a hater... Just happy to have $3.5K more in my pocket for a supercharger to make a TL-S killer.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #20  
simont53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Originally Posted by Kennedy
Cost value proposition isn't there.

refined handling = softer/squishier...
quiter = good tires...

Those attributes are worth $5K.

Aspec body and Tein/EDFC, CAI, pulley, procats, and some other stuff.. $2.5K (got some good deals on used stuff).
$1500 worth of AV goodies in my A-Spec, and I can:
1) Watch TV
2) Watch a DVD/mp3 CD
3) Play playstation2
4) Ipod
5) Mediagate ISOs
All independently switched.

Said and done, my A-spec does more technically, and at least = the power output... and I ony have $36K tied up... with 19 rims and 17s as snow tires.

What do I not have? red interior (I used to have a VW, I like the white/blue), silly new taillights and turn signals, and some very minor, Nav traffic, bluetooth phone book, questionable ANC, and a BADGE.

$500 get me all but nav traffic and phonebook.

Not a hater... Just happy to have $3.5K more in my pocket for a supercharger to make a TL-S killer.
Who said this was a "cost value proposition" it is a comparison between an A Spec and a type S not "look what I have done to my car" and once again own one and drive one, dont compare paper numbers.

Jeez this is tiresome
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #21  
juruki's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 5
From: California
I noticed a lot of people here are hating on the Type-S.
Of course you could use all that extra money and fix up your regular TL. We are not comparing them moneywise, we all know the Type-S costs more.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #22  
Kennedy's Avatar
OMGWTF4THGENTL
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by simont53
Who said this was a "cost value proposition" it is a comparison between an A Spec and a type S not "look what I have done to my car" and once again own one and drive one, dont compare paper numbers.

Jeez this is tiresome
Then what the hell is the point of this thread? It it was solely to compare technical differences between the TL-S and TL... well, there are at least 7 threads on that and of course the TL-S wins everytime.

The point of my previous post was to show that if you're handy you can actually have MORE bells and whistles on a standard TL vice an out of the box TL-S for way LESS money. Cost value proposition is very much a consideration of purchase and comparison, else we'd all be in Ferrarri's and such.

I don't need to own one, and I have driven one... and the "value" isn't there in my mind. Glad you're so excited about yours, but i don't need the "S" moniker to know my car is hot, and I enjoy knowing I'm driving a great car and paid a reasonable price for it. Sorry to hurt your feelings.
My attitude will probably change in the spring when prices come down to the $35K range for TL-Ss

To install all the equipment I installed on a TL-S would push teh TL-S costs into the $43K range... and again, the cost value proposition isn't there, as there are a lot nicer cars out there for that... RL included.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #23  
simont53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta GA
Originally Posted by Kennedy
Then what the hell is the point of this thread? It it was solely to compare technical differences between the TL-S and TL... well, there are at least 7 threads on that and of course the TL-S wins everytime.

The point of my previous post was to show that if you're handy you can actually have MORE bells and whistles on a standard TL vice an out of the box TL-S for way LESS money. Cost value proposition is very much a consideration of purchase and comparison, else we'd all be in Ferrarri's and such.

I don't need to own one, and I have driven one... and the "value" isn't there in my mind. Glad you're so excited about yours, but i don't need the "S" moniker to know my car is hot, and I enjoy knowing I'm driving a great car and paid a reasonable price for it. Sorry to hurt your feelings.
My attitude will probably change in the spring when prices come down to the $35K range for TL-Ss

To install all the equipment I installed on a TL-S would push teh TL-S costs into the $43K range... and again, the cost value proposition isn't there, as there are a lot nicer cars out there for that... RL included.

Hey, I didnt start the thread I just responded as I own both cars....one test drive in the Type S will not highlight this cars benefits, and my A spec is nowhere near to my Type S in performance even with an intake.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #24  
Macruz19's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
If I had the money, i would get the Type-S. I love my 05 TL A-Spec and I don't get jealous at all about the Type-S.

I still need to test drive the TL-S 6-Speed to see what you guys are talking about. I been inside one and I wanted to drive the 6-speed but my dealer didn't have one. I'm sure it's the same, but with added power.

To me... the A-Spec looks lower than the TL-S. You can see the gap on the TL-S.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #25  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,103
Likes: 4,763
From: Maryland
The 2007 TL-S MSRP is only $2K over a 2007 TL w/Nav, not $5K.

That seems much more performance value oriented than the A-Spec which has 18" wheels and lower and stiffer springs/higher rate dampers and different brake pads (for A/T). The again everyone looks at these comparisons differently.



Originally Posted by Kennedy
Cost value proposition isn't there.

refined handling = softer/squishier...
quiter = good tires...

Those attributes are worth $5K.

Aspec body and Tein/EDFC, CAI, pulley, procats, and some other stuff.. $2.5K (got some good deals on used stuff).
$1500 worth of AV goodies in my A-Spec, and I can:
1) Watch TV
2) Watch a DVD/mp3 CD
3) Play playstation2
4) Ipod
5) Mediagate ISOs
All independently switched.

Said and done, my A-spec does more technically, and at least = the power output... and I ony have $36K tied up... with 19 rims and 17s as snow tires.

What do I not have? red interior (I used to have a VW, I like the white/blue), silly new taillights and turn signals, and some very minor, Nav traffic, bluetooth phone book, questionable ANC, and a BADGE.

$500 get me all but nav traffic and phonebook.

Not a hater... Just happy to have $3.5K more in my pocket for a supercharger to make a TL-S killer.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #26  
Pika817's Avatar
07 NBP TL-S
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
The 2007 TL-S MSRP is only $2K over a 2007 TL w/Nav, not $5K.

That seems much more performance value oriented than the A-Spec which has 18" wheels and lower and stiffer springs/higher rate dampers and different brake pads (for A/T). The again everyone looks at these comparisons differently.
Exactly. You can't directly compare the price of the 06s to the 07s. For one, the 06 will sell for less next year than the 07s. The price difference is $2K from a regular TL to a Type S.

If that's what we're comparing, then there's no difference in the NAV and whatnot. The $2K extra that we paid for in our 07s was for the engine, stiffer suspension, etc. Don't include red lighting in that because it does not cost extra money to do that over having blue.

$2,000.00 for the larger engine, brembos, suspension is a bargain IMO. I can get an aftermarket kit and tires for a lot cheaper than at the dealership.

But again, I will have to admit, that the A-Spec looks WAY better than the Type S.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #27  
Kennedy's Avatar
OMGWTF4THGENTL
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
The 2007 TL-S MSRP is only $2K over a 2007 TL w/Nav, not $5K.

That seems much more performance value oriented than the A-Spec which has 18" wheels and lower and stiffer springs/higher rate dampers and different brake pads (for A/T). The again everyone looks at these comparisons differently.
$7K more than I paid for my 2006 in April. I'm comparing my price paid to actual costs today for a 2007 TL-S. My arguement, as I stated earlier, will be eroded when prices drop to Invoice... Yet I won;t be willing to take such a depreciation hit for the limited value of the minor increases...

I'll just buy a set of tails.

If I was in the market for a new TL today... I'd buy a lightly used/new 2006 first...
2007 are getting MSRP, and that's just dumb to pay. In the summer when actual prices are around 32K - TL and 35K -TL-S, the typeS will be no brainer... but not right now.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #28  
Pika817's Avatar
07 NBP TL-S
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Kennedy
$7K more than I paid for my 2006 in April. I'm comparing my price paid to actual costs today for a 2007 TL-S. My arguement, as I stated earlier, will be eroded when prices drop to Invoice... Yet I won;t be willing to take such a depreciation hit for the limited value of the minor increases...

I'll just buy a set of tails.

If I was in the market for a new TL today... I'd buy a lightly used/new 2006 first...
2007 are getting MSRP, and that's just dumb to pay. In the summer when actual prices are around 32K - TL and 35K -TL-S, the typeS will be no brainer... but not right now.
I see what you're trying to get at. If a person in the market today was to consider between the two, an 06 would be a lot better for the value.

But if you compare 07s to 07s, then the value is there - regardless of when the person plans to purchase.

Either way, this thread is way off topic. I would be interested in what you think in regards to the comparisons in the actual performance of the two without looking at value. i.e. Do you think the A Spec corners better? Does the Type S have a better ride? How do the A Spec tires compare to the standard Type S ones?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #29  
Kennedy's Avatar
OMGWTF4THGENTL
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by Pika817
I see what you're trying to get at. If a person in the market today was to consider between the two, an 06 would be a lot better for the value.

But if you compare 07s to 07s, then the value is there - regardless of when the person plans to purchase.

Either way, this thread is way off topic. I would be interested in what you think in regards to the comparisons in the actual performance of the two without looking at value. i.e. Do you think the A Spec corners better? Does the Type S have a better ride? How do the A Spec tires compare to the standard Type S ones?
My input is of limited value. Look at the ride height of the TL-S... It rides like a boat... from my test drive it was way to cushy for my liking. The front dipped hard on a good braking, the cornering was OK, but again the body rolled more than more than I like. The suspension was not as sport oriented as the lower and tighter A-Spec. $600 A-Spec suspension, or Tein coils would fix that right up.

Tires are tires. Stock usually stinks, if you want performance, you have to pay for it... and good tires are one of the first places you go.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #30  
Pika817's Avatar
07 NBP TL-S
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Kennedy
My input is of limited value. Look at the ride height of the TL-S... It rides like a boat... from my test drive it was way to cushy for my liking. The front dipped hard on a good braking, the cornering was OK, but again the body rolled more than more than I like. The suspension was not as sport oriented as the lower and tighter A-Spec. $600 A-Spec suspension, or Tein coils would fix that right up.

Tires are tires. Stock usually stinks, if you want performance, you have to pay for it... and good tires are one of the first places you go.
Perfect. I think that's the kind of info that the OP wanted.

Personally, the Type S gave me the middle ground that I was looking for between A Spec and the regular TL, as I found the A Spec to be a bit too harsh as an everyday driver. I'm used to a more cushy ride coming from a Camry.

I did find that the TL-S auto is noticably quicker than the regular on straight line acceleration, but not an earth shattering difference. Just enough extra to make me smirk. Maybe there's less of a difference on the 6MT - can anyone comment?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 03:23 AM
  #31  
winstrolvtec's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 96
The type S is just more solid in structure, and better balanced in ride. My A-spec is the full kit with 18's and michelin ps2's. I love it, but the ride is a bit harsh at times and the suspension float kills me. The type S feels more planted and rides better. Test drove, going reasonably fast, down hill, on very curvy roads and over a hump where not only the a-spec but plenty of other cars would have floated, then bobbled. The type s had no lift at all, and remained totally composed. Drove over the edge of a 1 in metal plank and the car absorbed the hit without any intrusion. Not a good feeling on the A-spec. I think the stock michelins on the S, overrate the ride, and underrate the handling. I can agree with the body roll statements to a degree but, I dont think it would be an issue if it had better rubber.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
SBTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
My dog thinks I'm Elvis!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 6
From: Santa Barbara,CA
I haven't seen any published numbers yet but I'll bet that the TL A-Spec beats the TL-S through the slalom and figure 8 (standard Motor Trend tests). You all who bought the TL-S are manifesting cognitive dissonance. I've driven both on curvy roads and the TL A-Spec has less body roll and feels more planted then the TL-S. We'll see when the numbers are published. For the record, these are the numbers Motor Trend got comparing stock to A-Spec in 2004

2004 Acura TL-------------- TL--------------------------A- SPEC
0-60 mph, sec---------------6.0----------------------------5.7
1/4 mile----------------14.44 @ 98.17-------------14.25 @ 97.81
Braking, 60-0, f t-------------141--------------------------119
Slalom, mph------------------62.5-------------------------66.1
Skidpad, g--------------------0.77--------------------------0.83

Yeah baby....A-Spec rocks
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 09:49 AM
  #33  
tmitch2315's Avatar
Instructor
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 11
From: Phoenix
Had my 2004 TL in because the power steering pump had bad O ring after 38000 miles and had to be replaced. Owned Acuras for 10years plus and never had anything like that happen. Took the opertunity to look at the new S and talk to a salesman. His view of the S was that it was too bad they forced the Nav on you, not faster off the line but pulls better after about 20-25, Aspec handles better, no one likes the wheels or all the pipes sticking out for no reason or the overall price but they will sell a bunch while waiting for the big changes in '08. I was very surprised by his attitude but after seeing the car I have to agree with the look part. Think I will wait another year.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #34  
badazzTL's Avatar
Peach Tea
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Wow, you guys must be some old farts. I think the Type-S looks amazing, wheels included.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #35  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,103
Likes: 4,763
From: Maryland
Agreed, for the 5AT the TL-S is pretty decent value at $2K increase over a 07 TL since you get Brembo front brakes, stiffer swaybars, stiffer springs/shocks, bigger motor, backup camera, improved sequential shifting, noise cancellation, and it's all done by the factory not installed by a dealer/owner. Too bad you need to buy the Nav package to get it.


Originally Posted by Pika817
Exactly. You can't directly compare the price of the 06s to the 07s. For one, the 06 will sell for less next year than the 07s. The price difference is $2K from a regular TL to a Type S.

If that's what we're comparing, then there's no difference in the NAV and whatnot. The $2K extra that we paid for in our 07s was for the engine, stiffer suspension, etc. Don't include red lighting in that because it does not cost extra money to do that over having blue.

$2,000.00 for the larger engine, brembos, suspension is a bargain IMO. I can get an aftermarket kit and tires for a lot cheaper than at the dealership.

But again, I will have to admit, that the A-Spec looks WAY better than the Type S.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #36  
AshiyaWolf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Centreville, VA
I love my 2006 A-Spec. I think the rims on the TL-S are downright ugly. There is no way I would part with my black chrome rims. After they refresed the 2007s, I was very glad I bought my 2006 in time. While I would love to have nav-traffic, mp3, 3.5 liter, and better seat support, I think the new mirror lights look cheap (reminds me of a TSX), I think the new gauges look generic (also TSXish). I love the A-Spec steering wheel, and the overall lowered look of the car.

I do wish I had the performance of the TL-S, but would rather have the looks. Let's face it, if it was just performance I would have gotten a Mustang Cobra or WRX. One of the performance features of the TL-S is larger air intake, and I think my AEM intake takes care of that aspect nicely. So while I envy a few features, in the end I'm very happy with my vehicle and won't consider a trade-in until the new model comes out, and even then I will probably be reluctant to let go of it. Everywhere I drive people constantly stare at this car. People who know what TLs are still ask me what I'm driving, and say it doesn't look like a TL. I think Acura got it right with this car and two years later I still admire how well designed it is and am proud to drive it.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #37  
princelybug's Avatar
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
TL Type-S FTW!
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 03:26 AM
  #38  
dr_brains510's Avatar
E55>>>TLS
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 798
Likes: 1
^^
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:28 AM
  #39  
VQPower37's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,386
Likes: 84
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #40  
TeknoKing's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,497
Likes: 279
Why are we dogging on each other?!?! We are all TLers.

Speed, hp and track times are all exciting elements of any sporty car, but most of us do not go to the track everyday, we do not race on streets, but use our cars as a daily commuter to work and to run errands. We are spirited drivers. I've been plenty on track with my others cars, now unfortunately I don't have the time.

A-Spec is a hot looking car, TLS is also a hot looking car. Some prefer more comfort they go with a TLS, and I guess people that seek that extra edge go for an A-Spec, all in all, we are a still part of the same TL family.
I love my WDP 08 TLS.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.