3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thinking of running NX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2004, 01:12 AM
  #1  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of running NX

im thinking of getting direct port NX system.I'm a big nitrious fan for i ran17 bottles of 75shot of zex in my 92 Prelude Si AWS with 145k miles and held up just fine.but i dont know if i can run 100shot on the J32 or will the drive-by-wire will some what be a hassel.Anyone have any tips?
Old 07-19-2004, 01:35 AM
  #2  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
nitrious = on 04TL
Old 07-19-2004, 10:19 AM
  #3  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraTLjaTT559
nitrious = on 04TL
That was scientific. Why not?
Old 07-19-2004, 10:22 AM
  #4  
SOLD
 
NightRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakehood, CO
Age: 40
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
That was scientific. Why not?
Old 07-19-2004, 10:23 AM
  #5  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TheOne305
im thinking of getting direct port NX system.I'm a big nitrious fan for i ran17 bottles of 75shot of zex in my 92 Prelude Si AWS with 145k miles and held up just fine.but i dont know if i can run 100shot on the J32 or will the drive-by-wire will some what be a hassel.Anyone have any tips?
I don't think the DBW would be an issue. Just use a separate WOT switch.
Old 07-19-2004, 11:58 AM
  #6  
Moderator Alumnus
 
rets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 0
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
Let us know how it performs, please...
Old 07-19-2004, 12:57 PM
  #7  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
I don't think the DBW would be an issue. Just use a separate WOT switch.

not sure what you mean by seperate WOT switch,do you mean manual switch or just use the WOT that comes with the kit
Old 07-19-2004, 01:40 PM
  #8  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TheOne305
not sure what you mean by seperate WOT switch,do you mean manual switch or just use the WOT that comes with the kit
The one that comes with the kit.
Old 07-20-2004, 12:26 AM
  #9  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
That was scientific. Why not?
I was just whoring :fingerfawk:
Old 07-20-2004, 03:06 AM
  #10  
I don't have a Ferrari in
 
mastertl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I thought the displacement of the TL would not allow you to run a NOS system
Old 07-20-2004, 01:24 PM
  #11  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Universal direct port adaptors

well the direct port fuel injector adaptor wont work on the tl.I look under the intake manifold and theres not enough room the injectors are already barely fitting.So a dry or wet shot from the intake tube seems like the only place other then tapping your intake which im not going to do
Old 07-20-2004, 02:00 PM
  #12  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TheOne305
well the direct port fuel injector adaptor wont work on the tl.I look under the intake manifold and theres not enough room the injectors are already barely fitting.So a dry or wet shot from the intake tube seems like the only place other then tapping your intake which im not going to do
Yep. Run it to the intake tube - should be fine for a small shot. Use an aftermarket CAI and the whole thing could be pulled out in a few hours with no obvious signs it was ever there. I'm sure there are plenty of 2nd gen A-CL/A-TL folks who've done this. A search would probably retreive some good advice and tips.

I'd get my butt kicked by the 'boss' for running NOS to such a new car , but I'd consider it a few years down the road. Hard to beat the bang for the buck.
Old 07-20-2004, 02:27 PM
  #13  
You touch my tra la la...
 
GaleForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 37
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NOS is like steroids for your engine. I think its a bad idea. Put real hardware in like a Supercharger, something that provides constant boost as an actual addition to the engine. NOS is as bad for your engine as steroids are for a person. And on top of that NOS is only a temporary boost.
Old 07-20-2004, 03:06 PM
  #14  
Overlord of Networking
 
Tommy_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 57
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, But it will give you the edge against an M5
Old 07-20-2004, 03:12 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
ensley696's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about the new M5 though, 500HP is a lot of friggen power. I would rather a supercharger or turbo charger myself.
Old 07-20-2004, 10:06 PM
  #16  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
NOS is like steroids for your engine. I think its a bad idea. Put real hardware in like a Supercharger, something that provides constant boost as an actual addition to the engine. NOS is as bad for your engine as steroids are for a person. And on top of that NOS is only a temporary boost.

NOS is always mistreated as a bad idea.like a turbo/nos your motor has limits.both setups do the samething but in a diffrent way.Turbo forces air into your motor and nos does it in a form of science.Basicly doesnt matter what you run the KEY word for most blow motor(AKA most f ck ups)is not enough FUEL.I'll say it again FUEL,and there's a key phrase MUST HAVE PROPER MIXTURE.dont have proper A/f your gonna run lean or rich.i have ran almost 20 bottles of nos on my 92 prelude with almost 150k miles and it held up just fine and i passed emissions before i sold it.my .02 about nos
Old 07-20-2004, 10:24 PM
  #17  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
NOS is like steroids for your engine. I think its a bad idea. Put real hardware in like a Supercharger, something that provides constant boost as an actual addition to the engine. NOS is as bad for your engine as steroids are for a person. And on top of that NOS is only a temporary boost.
This is a common sentiment, but is it accurate? Consider this: Is there really a difference (in stress and strain on internal engine components) between making 350hp with a properly configured supercharger and 350hp with a properly configured nitrous system?
Old 07-20-2004, 10:37 PM
  #18  
I love cars!
 
fast-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: TEXAS
Age: 51
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Yes, as I see it. Boost from the S/C builds power gradually with RPM, while the engine is "shocked" by the shot of nitrous. Flooring your car gradually is not the same to the drivetrain as flooring it from a dead stop.
Old 07-20-2004, 10:49 PM
  #19  
You touch my tra la la...
 
GaleForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 37
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
This is a common sentiment, but is it accurate? Consider this: Is there really a difference (in stress and strain on internal engine components) between making 350hp with a properly configured supercharger and 350hp with a properly configured nitrous system?
Yes. The SC provides a constant boost as the engine builds power up (well, RPMs anyway). The NOS takes the engine, running under NORMAL, non-boost conditions, and suddenly shocks it into one with boost. Granted, a SC gives the car boost, but the car is constantly running boost. Just like working out you can constantly work out to build your muscles, or try and do way too much way too fast when you're not normally exercising (or boosting in the case of the engine) and end up hurting yourself. I don't see suddenly boosting your engine from normal running conditions while you're driving as something that can be good for the engine. Kinda like flooring the car from a stop light. Its fun to do every once in a while, but redlining the car to the limiter isn't good for the engine.
Old 07-20-2004, 10:51 PM
  #20  
I love cars!
 
fast-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: TEXAS
Age: 51
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Uhhh, GaleForce? Thanks for the backup, eh?
Old 07-20-2004, 10:54 PM
  #21  
You touch my tra la la...
 
GaleForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 37
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just defending my stance since he was challenging my post .
Old 07-20-2004, 11:27 PM
  #22  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fast-tl
Yes, as I see it. Boost from the S/C builds power gradually with RPM, while the engine is "shocked" by the shot of nitrous. Flooring your car gradually is not the same to the drivetrain as flooring it from a dead stop.
I see the point you are making, however I disagree that the cylinder pressures or rod/piston/crank forces and acceleration rates are greater when nitrous kicks in at say 4500rpm than they would be at 6800rpm in either a supercharged or nitrous engine. In fact, the cooling effect of nitrous should allow nitrous systems to produce the same power as supercharged cars at lower cylinder pressures.
Old 07-21-2004, 02:26 PM
  #23  
I love cars!
 
fast-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: TEXAS
Age: 51
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
OK, but the problem as I stated is the sudden, rather than gradual change in pressure. It's the same with a balloon, even in that you can inflate it gradually better than a 300psi burst, which could, well, burst it. Either power adder could blow the engine, it's just that it's much easier to mis-apply nitrous than a s/c. Either can be done incorrectly, though.
Old 07-21-2004, 07:59 PM
  #24  
Advanced
 
Azuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't use NOS to my TL until year 2012

Hey, TheOne, I used to have a 92si also, were you ever at HondaPrelude.com? The site got shut down because no $$$~~
Old 07-22-2004, 01:11 AM
  #25  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Azuki
I wouldn't use NOS to my TL until year 2012

Hey, TheOne, I used to have a 92si also, were you ever at HondaPrelude.com? The site got shut down because no $$$~~

No i wasnt on a forum until i got my TL.I wish i was i like being on forums
Old 07-22-2004, 01:22 AM
  #26  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
Yes. The SC provides a constant boost as the engine builds power up (well, RPMs anyway). The NOS takes the engine, running under NORMAL, non-boost conditions, and suddenly shocks it into one with boost. Granted, a SC gives the car boost, but the car is constantly running boost. Just like working out you can constantly work out to build your muscles, or try and do way too much way too fast when you're not normally exercising (or boosting in the case of the engine) and end up hurting yourself. I don't see suddenly boosting your engine from normal running conditions while you're driving as something that can be good for the engine. Kinda like flooring the car from a stop light. Its fun to do every once in a while, but redlining the car to the limiter isn't good for the engine.

well you cant compare a human body to a motor and when you say shock you make it sound like a dry shot makes a instant slam your fist hard on the table shock :sqnteek: .have you ever use a dry shot before.It actual lags for a second and its doesnt hit that hard at once.You should have some EXP!! first with nos because if you did you would know that a dry shot does not hit with great shock all at once :sqntfawk:
Old 07-22-2004, 01:26 AM
  #27  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
This is a common sentiment, but is it accurate? Consider this: Is there really a difference (in stress and strain on internal engine components) between making 350hp with a properly configured supercharger and 350hp with a properly configured nitrous system?

right on
Old 07-22-2004, 02:03 AM
  #28  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
Yes. The SC provides a constant boost as the engine builds power up (well, RPMs anyway). The NOS takes the engine, running under NORMAL, non-boost conditions, and suddenly shocks it into one with boost. Granted, a SC gives the car boost, but the car is constantly running boost. Just like working out you can constantly work out to build your muscles, or try and do way too much way too fast when you're not normally exercising (or boosting in the case of the engine) and end up hurting yourself. I don't see suddenly boosting your engine from normal running conditions while you're driving as something that can be good for the engine. Kinda like flooring the car from a stop light. Its fun to do every once in a while, but redlining the car to the limiter isn't good for the engine.

well you cant compare a human body to a motor and when you say shock you make it sound like a dry shot makes a instant slam your fist hard on the table shock :sqnteek: .have you ever use a dry shot before.It actual lags for a second and its doesnt hit that hard at once.You should have some EXP!! first with nos because if you did you would know that a dry shot does not hit with great shock all at once :sqntfawk:

Just defending my post
Old 07-22-2004, 09:44 AM
  #29  
Instructor
 
Scott GN231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
Yes. The SC provides a constant boost as the engine builds power up (well, RPMs anyway). The NOS takes the engine, running under NORMAL, non-boost conditions, and suddenly shocks it into one with boost. Granted, a SC gives the car boost, but the car is constantly running boost. Just like working out you can constantly work out to build your muscles, or try and do way too much way too fast when you're not normally exercising (or boosting in the case of the engine) and end up hurting yourself. I don't see suddenly boosting your engine from normal running conditions while you're driving as something that can be good for the engine. Kinda like flooring the car from a stop light. Its fun to do every once in a while, but redlining the car to the limiter isn't good for the engine.
Your analogy does not hold up.

As a poster above pointed out, a key part of any power adder such as nitrous oxide, turbocharging, or supercharging is ensuring that fueling as adequate. You're not going to be able to safely run a supercharger or turbocharger without adding fuel or pulling timing.

Explain your last sentence? You are not redlining your car if you shift before the limiter...

-S.
Old 07-25-2004, 02:46 AM
  #30  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 48
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
Fabian43
2G RDX (2013-2018)
16
07-13-2016 09:07 PM
giovane
2G RDX DIY & FAQ
12
07-08-2016 10:46 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
nuldabz
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-03-2015 05:49 PM



Quick Reply: Thinking of running NX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.