3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

removing Rev Limiter??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2004, 12:50 PM
  #1  
Team NightHawk VP
Thread Starter
 
cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
removing Rev Limiter??

is there anyway to do it? the TL was dynoed and it showed the car still making power until the rev limiter kicked in, if it was removed, we would get more hp.

im just asking about this, i have no intentions of doing this, at least not until my warranty runs out, so i dont want to hear people flaming for all the "this car wasnt meant to be.."

thanks
Cliff
Old 08-19-2004, 01:36 PM
  #2  
Moderator Alumnus
 
rets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 0
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
5at...

Rev Limiter = 6800 PRM cut-off?

Or you meant "the ECU cuts off fuel flow to the engine if there is danger of over-revving the engine. The transmission will upshift itself to prevent engine damage in the rare situation where the fuel cutoff alone is unable to prevent further engine over revving (as could happen on a steep downhill). "...
Old 08-19-2004, 01:48 PM
  #3  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Speculation until proven, but it certainly looks like there could be another 300-500rpm or so of near peak power. Probably harder than just removing the limiter - I'm guessing the fuel and timing maps probably don't extend beyond the current limit.

I'm with you, I wouldn't touch the ECU for a few years.



Oh, and as rets mentioned, 5AT programming to contend with too.
Old 08-19-2004, 02:24 PM
  #4  
Instructor
 
93SHOcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I would definitely want to know the weak points that the rev limiter was designed to protect before changing it. On my SHO, the Yamaha motor was well known to be able to support much higher RPM's but the wear and tear on the accessories was the issue. By switching to underdrive pulleys along with some other mods that would take advantage of higher rpms, I felt comfortable going with a modified limiter. However, this was all done after factory warranty was over.
Old 08-19-2004, 03:53 PM
  #5  
Team NightHawk VP
Thread Starter
 
cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
Old 08-19-2004, 04:40 PM
  #6  
Instructor
 
bluenose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orleans, Ont
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Peak horsepower at 6200rpm - Rev limiter at 6800rpm. Power already falling off after 6200 why rev it any higher?
Old 08-20-2004, 12:19 AM
  #7  
Powered by Guinness
 
Aegir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bluenose
Peak horsepower at 6200rpm - Rev limiter at 6800rpm. Power already falling off after 6200 why rev it any higher?
My car makes peak power at 6800 - and still rising at the limit. I know 6200 is the published peak, but the dyno is telling a different tale.
Old 08-25-2004, 11:07 AM
  #8  
Intermediate
 
achonda2_4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gastonia
Age: 41
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6mt

Corret me if I am wrong but my TL is on 7000 rpm. When racing, I shift exactly at 6900rpm.
Is there anyway I can move the limiter to aout 7400 or 7500 rpm?? Thanks
Old 08-25-2004, 11:31 AM
  #9  
Safety Car
 
caball88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aegir
My car makes peak power at 6800 - and still rising at the limit. I know 6200 is the published peak, but the dyno is telling a different tale.
yup the published figures not exactly the engine is capable of. TOV dyno'ed a 6MT and it was pulling hard past 6200 but the dyno had a little blip in it which indicates that the ecu probably cut power to it early. its speculated that the engine is capable of another 15hp at least. i figure that the engine was limited due to ulev2 requirements.
Old 08-25-2004, 08:33 PM
  #10  
Racer
 
pettydw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The two technical things that normally decide the rev limit are valve float and crank shaft torsional critical speeds (that is, if Honda does not other motive like NSX HP). The valve float would be measured using experienced springs by the factory (springs lose preload over the miles), so new enignes may not experience a problem by extending the rev range. Crankshaft torsional issues can crack the cranks fairly quick, if left at or near a critical speed.
Old 08-25-2004, 10:17 PM
  #11  
Three Wheelin'
 
ryder1650's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,641
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cliff
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
The new RL is 300 hp...
Old 08-25-2004, 11:56 PM
  #12  
Senior Moderator
 
cM3go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 15,295
Received 131 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by ryder1650
The new RL is 300 hp...

but it also has a 3.5 liter engine
Old 08-26-2004, 11:26 AM
  #13  
Intermediate
 
achonda2_4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gastonia
Age: 41
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ryder1650
The new RL is 300 hp...
300 hp but heavy as heck.
Old 08-26-2004, 11:46 AM
  #14  
Instructor
 
dougpt10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LI, NY
Age: 52
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cliff
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
Totally agree. How can you have your $30,000 TL produce more horsepower than the NSX supercar?
Old 08-26-2004, 04:34 PM
  #15  
Safety Car
 
caball88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dougpt10
Totally agree. How can you have your $30,000 TL produce more horsepower than the NSX supercar?
the nsx is much lighter than the TL and handles a whole lot better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
10-01-2015 12:59 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-25-2015 06:05 PM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM



Quick Reply: removing Rev Limiter??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.