removing Rev Limiter??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 12:50 PM
  #1  
cliff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team NightHawk VP
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Manalapan, NJ
removing Rev Limiter??

is there anyway to do it? the TL was dynoed and it showed the car still making power until the rev limiter kicked in, if it was removed, we would get more hp.

im just asking about this, i have no intentions of doing this, at least not until my warranty runs out, so i dont want to hear people flaming for all the "this car wasnt meant to be.."

thanks
Cliff
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 01:36 PM
  #2  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
5at...

Rev Limiter = 6800 PRM cut-off?

Or you meant "the ECU cuts off fuel flow to the engine if there is danger of over-revving the engine. The transmission will upshift itself to prevent engine damage in the rare situation where the fuel cutoff alone is unable to prevent further engine over revving (as could happen on a steep downhill). "...
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #3  
Aegir's Avatar
Powered by Guinness
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 2
From: Stockton, CA
Speculation until proven, but it certainly looks like there could be another 300-500rpm or so of near peak power. Probably harder than just removing the limiter - I'm guessing the fuel and timing maps probably don't extend beyond the current limit.

I'm with you, I wouldn't touch the ECU for a few years.



Oh, and as rets mentioned, 5AT programming to contend with too.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #4  
93SHOcar's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 3
From: Salisbury, MD
I would definitely want to know the weak points that the rev limiter was designed to protect before changing it. On my SHO, the Yamaha motor was well known to be able to support much higher RPM's but the wear and tear on the accessories was the issue. By switching to underdrive pulleys along with some other mods that would take advantage of higher rpms, I felt comfortable going with a modified limiter. However, this was all done after factory warranty was over.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #5  
cliff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team NightHawk VP
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Manalapan, NJ
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #6  
bluenose's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 129
Likes: 3
From: Orleans, Ont
Peak horsepower at 6200rpm - Rev limiter at 6800rpm. Power already falling off after 6200 why rev it any higher?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #7  
Aegir's Avatar
Powered by Guinness
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 2
From: Stockton, CA
Originally Posted by bluenose
Peak horsepower at 6200rpm - Rev limiter at 6800rpm. Power already falling off after 6200 why rev it any higher?
My car makes peak power at 6800 - and still rising at the limit. I know 6200 is the published peak, but the dyno is telling a different tale.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 11:07 AM
  #8  
achonda2_4's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Gastonia
6mt

Corret me if I am wrong but my TL is on 7000 rpm. When racing, I shift exactly at 6900rpm.
Is there anyway I can move the limiter to aout 7400 or 7500 rpm?? Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 11:31 AM
  #9  
caball88's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Aegir
My car makes peak power at 6800 - and still rising at the limit. I know 6200 is the published peak, but the dyno is telling a different tale.
yup the published figures not exactly the engine is capable of. TOV dyno'ed a 6MT and it was pulling hard past 6200 but the dyno had a little blip in it which indicates that the ecu probably cut power to it early. its speculated that the engine is capable of another 15hp at least. i figure that the engine was limited due to ulev2 requirements.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #10  
pettydw's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
The two technical things that normally decide the rev limit are valve float and crank shaft torsional critical speeds (that is, if Honda does not other motive like NSX HP). The valve float would be measured using experienced springs by the factory (springs lose preload over the miles), so new enignes may not experience a problem by extending the rev range. Crankshaft torsional issues can crack the cranks fairly quick, if left at or near a critical speed.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #11  
ryder1650's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Originally Posted by cliff
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
The new RL is 300 hp...
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #12  
cM3go's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
Originally Posted by ryder1650
The new RL is 300 hp...

but it also has a 3.5 liter engine
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
achonda2_4's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Gastonia
Originally Posted by ryder1650
The new RL is 300 hp...
300 hp but heavy as heck.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #14  
dougpt10's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Originally Posted by cliff
the J32 engine is definitely capable of higher rpms, i think one of the reasons they limited so low is because they dont want the hp exceed NSX's 290hp engine?? anyone agree with me?
Totally agree. How can you have your $30,000 TL produce more horsepower than the NSX supercar?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #15  
caball88's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by dougpt10
Totally agree. How can you have your $30,000 TL produce more horsepower than the NSX supercar?
the nsx is much lighter than the TL and handles a whole lot better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
Nov 15, 2015 05:52 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
Oct 9, 2015 10:13 PM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
Oct 1, 2015 12:59 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 25, 2015 06:05 PM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
Sep 25, 2015 12:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.