Raced a Trailblazer Lt Today
Trending Topics
GTX, why do you post these pointless threads? I'm sorry, but you sound like an idiot from a Civic forum =\
Read the policies, these threads and posts are to be constructive and help others out. If you want to say anything idiotic, try rambling; it's a place where you can talk about anything your heart desires.
Read the policies, these threads and posts are to be constructive and help others out. If you want to say anything idiotic, try rambling; it's a place where you can talk about anything your heart desires.
Wow, just wow. The only SUV I've raced was an Escalade (from a 50roll and it got the jump, but I walked it easily after 65mph) but seriously why waste your time? If you were dead even with it, then yeah you prob need a tune up.
They actually were pretty "fast" (for an SUV) when they came out in '01. Just looked at an '02 Motor Trend in which they tested a bunch of SUV's and the TB and Envoy were tested at 8.2 to sixty and 16.0 @ 88 mph. In fact, only the Mercedes ML whatever was quicker.
But if a new TL can barely hang with one, something is very wrong.
But if a new TL can barely hang with one, something is very wrong.
I am not saying that TL/GTX posted a great thread or anything. But seriously you guys all remind me of the guys on the RSX forum. A bunch of assholes. Be constructive! lol
ah so what guys, he got beat..."anything can happen in a street race" -everyone
ive beat some faster cars than mine but, i also got owned by a FORD RANGER!!!
to this day i dont know how??? lol. i think he was supercharged???
ive beat some faster cars than mine but, i also got owned by a FORD RANGER!!!
to this day i dont know how??? lol. i think he was supercharged???
Umm the trailblazer has more then 320hp, and has alot more torque. And weighs 300 to 400 pounds more then a RL. And the RL is just as fast as the TL. U guys are starting to act like bmw guys saying ohh we can beat any one.
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...ilblazer-3.htm
I know since you have an RL you would like to believe that however the Acura RL is slower than a 04+ TL Auto and its slower than a stock 03-07 Accord V6 5at. Even with 290HP your 4000lbs RL just doesn't have the power to beat those vehicles plus your AWD drivetrain loss hurts your top end. Now the 3.7L RL will get a nice Torque boost for low-end which it despretly needed. Now the car needs 330HP just to get its porky self moving in the high end. Its slow for a luxury car in its class.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Acura-RL-Timeslip-4581.html
Won't beat a TL running a 15.3!
Last edited by SatinSilverAV6; Oct 27, 2008 at 11:06 AM.
I know since you have an RL you would like to believe that however the Acura RL is slower than a 04+ TL Auto and its slower than a stock 03-07 Accord V6 5at. Even with 290HP your 4000lbs RL just doesn't have the power to beat those vehicles plus your AWD drivetrain loss hurts your top end. Now the 3.7L RL will get a nice Torque boost for low-end which it despretly needed. Now the car needs 330HP just to get its porky self moving in the high end. Its slow for a luxury car in its class.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Acura-RL-Timeslip-4581.html
Won't beat a TL running a 15.3!
http://www.dragtimes.com/Acura-RL-Timeslip-4581.html
Won't beat a TL running a 15.3!
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
I think it's too close to call. C&D got high 14's @ 95mph from an RL, although others have it at low 15's @ 92-93. These numbers are right in line with a base automatic TL. It won't keep up with a 6 spd base or either Type-S, but against a 5AT TL, it's probably going to be close.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
This is a quote from C&D,
"after 40,000 miles, and it had gotten a tick slower over time. Its 0-to-60 run went from 6.3 to 6.4 seconds, and the quarter-mile pace went from 14.8 to 14.9 seconds at 95 mph"
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
"after 40,000 miles, and it had gotten a tick slower over time. Its 0-to-60 run went from 6.3 to 6.4 seconds, and the quarter-mile pace went from 14.8 to 14.9 seconds at 95 mph"
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
This is a quote from C&D,
"after 40,000 miles, and it had gotten a tick slower over time. Its 0-to-60 run went from 6.3 to 6.4 seconds, and the quarter-mile pace went from 14.8 to 14.9 seconds at 95 mph"
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
"after 40,000 miles, and it had gotten a tick slower over time. Its 0-to-60 run went from 6.3 to 6.4 seconds, and the quarter-mile pace went from 14.8 to 14.9 seconds at 95 mph"
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ns+page-2.html
I will admit the RL is a dog from 0-60 but after that it will beat the TL 5 A/T def. not the 6 M/T. I dont believe in mag racing. I had a 04 TL also and after 60 that is when the RL gets really strong. I reached 130 in the RL with ease. My old TL got me to 130 slower than the RL.
I also had the pleasure to race a friend who had a 05 TL A/T and had the pleasure in showing him who is the boss
sorry to thread hijack, just had to defend the RL
I also had the pleasure to race a friend who had a 05 TL A/T and had the pleasure in showing him who is the boss

sorry to thread hijack, just had to defend the RL
Last edited by Blazing GT; Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM.
Here is a RL with I/E/P going from 0-90MPH. If this is what you have for me then you have no chance lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miRR8...eature=related
Last edited by SatinSilverAV6; Oct 30, 2008 at 11:50 AM.






. give me a break
