acuradoc

Hello,

I just came back from an Acura dealer and my eye caught a 2004 TL "used" with ~7000 miles on it without navi. The dealer is asking for $30,990. I need your input if this an OK price, if not what price would you recommend???


Thank you.

dcarlinf1

Sounds too high. 7000 miles? I'd think it's worth 28,000-28,500. Especially since it's non-navi. I paid 31,900 for my non-navi TL with 8 miles on it back in December.

cpa4u

I had a dealer offer a non-nav unit for $30,450 about a week ago. So, I definitely think that is way too much for a used car with 7k miles. $28,000 would probably be a good number.

JoganJani

I think you can get a new non-navi in that price. Depends on where you are though. You just wrote USA, so very difficult to say.

dwcolt

Major ripoff. I just purchased a brand new SSM/Ebony non-navi in the Bay area (super expensive!!) for $31,300. Knock off about $3,000 and you might be in the right ballpark.

moeronn

As posted above, not even close to a good deal. If it was a navi, then maybe.

alv1

I paid less than that for one new.

rets

Bad deal... as ppl said...

acuradoc

Thank you all. I will wait for the 05 TL with Navi.

NightRider

That is rediculous! For insurance rate reasons I am selling my NBP/PARCH/NAVI/5AT, 8800 miles WITH NAVI and tinted windows and all season floor mats for $31K...

carcar

Are insurance rates really high for TLs......so high that you're selling it? Would it be alright if I asked you how much you payed a year? I know that edmunds.com insurance rating is $764/year. The Accord is $719. I don't know what Edmunds bases that on, but I thought it was pretty reasonable compared to the other luxury-sport/ near-luxury sedans out there.

Is Colorado generally more expensive to insure in?

Carl