Engine braking ???
#1
registered !!
Thread Starter
Engine braking ???
Hey all, just wondering how many of you, whether an auto or 6MT owners use engine braking. I have an automatic and usually on a highway, when i need to adjust my speed jus a tad bit without hitting the brakes and alerting the drivers behind me for no reason, just shift to L, which automatically shifts the gear down to the lowest permitting by the car. It seems to work pretty nicely. Does it matter how often this should be used, any ramifications?
#2
Kenpachi Teichou
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use the SS to engine break from time to time as well. Nothing major, just a little extra breaking power. I don't think this would hurt the engine. I'm curious to see what people have to say on this one.
#3
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 60
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I brake with SS all the time. I've been engine-braking my automatic transmissions for about ten years, including a '00 Ford Explorer. The Explorer had an overdrive button at the end of the column-mounted shifter, and I would just tap that to downshift into 4th.
I don't use L because it shifts pretty abruptly -- esp. 1st. In traffic, I routinely cancel cruise, pop into SS and downshift twice, and then put it back into drive before it's finished slowing down. In this way, I can shed 10-20mph in just a few seconds without hitting my brakes or even moving my feet. My passengers are hardly aware that I'm working the shifter.
I don't use L because it shifts pretty abruptly -- esp. 1st. In traffic, I routinely cancel cruise, pop into SS and downshift twice, and then put it back into drive before it's finished slowing down. In this way, I can shed 10-20mph in just a few seconds without hitting my brakes or even moving my feet. My passengers are hardly aware that I'm working the shifter.
#4
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine braking on an Auto is absurd! The cost of repairing an auto tranny or replacing the torque converter doesn't justify saving the brakes. Replacing brake pads a few thousand miles earlier is so cheap as to almost be a non-issue.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
#5
i souport publik edekason
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Granada Hills, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brokedoc
Engine braking on an Auto is absurd! The cost of repairing an auto tranny or replacing the torque converter doesn't justify saving the brakes. Replacing brake pads a few thousand miles earlier is so cheap as to almost be a non-issue.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
But is it in fact true thought that engine braking an automatic is harmfull to the tranny?
I don't know, that is a question...
I usually always drive sticks (as mentioned in many other posts)...
With the couple automatics I had (80s S10 Blazer and 2001 Buick Lesabre) I always used the gears to "downshit" "trans-brake" or whatever you want to call it...
I never found this to be a problem...
#6
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 60
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Calling engine braking "absurd" is a bit of a stretch. As the term implies, the lion's share of the load is imposed on the engine; not the transmission.
The transmission is really only taxed by the initial downshift. A firm shift does not necessarily imply more wear on clutch packs and bands than the wear caused by automatic shifing. In fact, I'm pretty sure some of the clutches used during engine braking are dedicated for that very purpose, which is why you don't get a braking effect during automatic downshifting as you coast in gear.
The transmission is really only taxed by the initial downshift. A firm shift does not necessarily imply more wear on clutch packs and bands than the wear caused by automatic shifing. In fact, I'm pretty sure some of the clutches used during engine braking are dedicated for that very purpose, which is why you don't get a braking effect during automatic downshifting as you coast in gear.
#7
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Age: 58
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was listening to "Click and Clack" one day and this very question was asked (about Manuals, not automatics). Their thoughts are that its so cheap and easy to change brakes and you don't want to risk damage to engine, transmission or clutch that you should just brake and not 'downshift' or 'engine brake' to slow down. I usually put it in neutral and brake, but, on occasion, I admit that I downshift and let the engine rev to slow down. I seem to do it less and less now.
Trending Topics
#8
Who cares
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: lockport il
Age: 62
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I want to slow down with out the brake light coming on I will use the e-brake. I also hit N when coming up to a light pretty often and just use the brakes. The only time I do any down shifting is when I am driving agressively. I don't supose I am worried about the trans I will probably trade this car within 3 or 4 years anyway!
#9
Registered Member
If you downshift correctly with a manual transmission, there is virtually no wear on the clutch assembly.. certainly a heck of a lot less than when starting out in first gear from a stop on a level piece of road.
#10
Shift_faster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04acura tl
If I want to slow down with out the brake light coming on I will use the e-brake. I also hit N when coming up to a light pretty often and just use the brakes. The only time I do any down shifting is when I am driving agressively. I don't supose I am worried about the trans I will probably trade this car within 3 or 4 years anyway!
I agree with SouthernBoy, but if it is a situation that needs me to brake fast, I just brake and disengage the clutch to pop it in neutral towards the end of my braking. Its always safer to be in gear while moving rather than just coasting in case an emergency manuever is required.
#11
Originally Posted by Brokedoc
Engine braking on an Auto is absurd! The cost of repairing an auto tranny or replacing the torque converter doesn't justify saving the brakes. Replacing brake pads a few thousand miles earlier is so cheap as to almost be a non-issue.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
OTOH, the clutch pad on a manual tranny is a simple thing to replace and is designed to support engine braking without extensive wear.
#12
7th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brighton, MA
Age: 51
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO, engine braking is a useless exercise with ANY transmission, but even more so on an automatic. Perhaps someone can enlightne me as to the point? I can understand it if you have a semi where the brakes would catch fire and not be able to stop you, in which case engine braking and downshifting is required, but I don't understand why people do it in passenger cars. Unless it's strictly for the "fun" of downshifting or in the case of an automatic, pretending to be driving a manual.
My TL is a 6MT and I NEVER engine brake in it, just as I never did in any of my cars with or without manual trannies. If I need to get into a gear I'm already there.
My TL is a 6MT and I NEVER engine brake in it, just as I never did in any of my cars with or without manual trannies. If I need to get into a gear I'm already there.
#13
Who cares
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: lockport il
Age: 62
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoochaKannInc
You use the e-brake to slow down? Unbelievable. I haven't used the e-brake while driving since I was in high school.
I agree with SouthernBoy, but if it is a situation that needs me to brake fast, I just brake and disengage the clutch to pop it in neutral towards the end of my braking. Its always safer to be in gear while moving rather than just coasting in case an emergency manuever is required.
I agree with SouthernBoy, but if it is a situation that needs me to brake fast, I just brake and disengage the clutch to pop it in neutral towards the end of my braking. Its always safer to be in gear while moving rather than just coasting in case an emergency manuever is required.
#14
Kenpachi Teichou
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04acura tl
I said if I dont want the brake lights to come on I use the e-brake ....which is a very very rare thing.....
#15
TL User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I downshift on my AT all the time. Sometimes it is to help with breaking, more often it is to provide better gearing so I can pass other cars faster. I see no problems with using SS for either of these purposes, after all it IS what it was designed for.
P.S.
My cousin who is driving a '96 Celica with MT now has 170,000 miles on it and has not changed brakes even ONCE. Now that is some nice engine breaking!!
P.S.
My cousin who is driving a '96 Celica with MT now has 170,000 miles on it and has not changed brakes even ONCE. Now that is some nice engine breaking!!
#16
7th Gear
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nevada,Iowa
Age: 67
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually guys, I believe our cars are'nt considered to have e'brakes anymore. They are parking brakes now - not intended to slow the car unless necessary because of catastrophic brake failure. Just my .02
#17
Kenpachi Teichou
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gizzsdad
Actually guys, I believe our cars are'nt considered to have e'brakes anymore. They are parking brakes now - not intended to slow the car unless necessary because of catastrophic brake failure. Just my .02
#18
TL User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gizzsdad
Actually guys, I believe our cars are'nt considered to have e'brakes anymore. They are parking brakes now - not intended to slow the car unless necessary because of catastrophic brake failure. Just my .02
#19
Shift_faster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slava
Anyone seen Ronin and how they used emergency breaks to add superior cornering ability to their Pegiouts and an Audi S8? I wonder if we could do that in our TLs
When I started paying for my cars, I began to realize I was a dumbass. You are killing your car for no real rhyme or reason.
#20
Racer
Originally Posted by PoochaKannInc
You use the e-brake to slow down? Unbelievable. I haven't used the e-brake while driving since I was in high school.
It will beep and read "RELEASE PARKING BRAKE" in orange letters.
EDIT: This may only happen if auto tranny is in "D"
#21
Instructor
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
6MT also
Originally Posted by jdb8805
The TLs MID will "scold" you if you use the E-brake while moving at more than a slow roll.
It will beep and read "RELEASE PARKING BRAKE" in orange letters.
EDIT: This may only happen if auto tranny is in "D"
It will beep and read "RELEASE PARKING BRAKE" in orange letters.
EDIT: This may only happen if auto tranny is in "D"
In my previous car (93 Volvo 850 GLT), the owners manual has a section on "breaking-in" the hand brake, by stopping the car with the hand brake for a few times from 30 MPH.
So I wonder if it is advisable to "break-in" the hand brake on the TL.
#22
Not a Blowhole
Other than descending a mountain grade where constant braking can overheat most stock brake systems, engine braking is not something i do, as the wear and tear on the tranny (especially a tranny with a History like the TL's) is riskier. Why? Because brake pads and a rotor or two now and then are far less costly than a tranny re-build.
#24
7th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brighton, MA
Age: 51
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
To Road Rage;
Amen. Unless you have a manual. Then you're Ok.
Amen. Unless you have a manual. Then you're Ok.
Going down a mountain or steep hill, is different IMO. There you just put in in a lower gear and go - I agree. But to constantly downshift from 6-1, 5-1, 4-1, 3-1, or 2-1, etc., etc. is useless and silly.
#25
Registered Member
To burma;
Downshifting to a lower gear for a bit of engine braking is less injurious with a manual transmission. This assumes you know how to do it properly - rev-matching so that there is virtually zero stress and wear to the clutch assembly. But I do avoid downshifting when the engine will be turning quite a few RPMs going down a hill. That generates a lot of vacuum in the cylinders.
So I use my brakes most always for slowing or stopping the car and downshift when I need to.. not to be cool or because I think it looks or sounds cool. For normal driving, downshifting to me is just done like one might expect.. to get into a lower gear for efficient engine operation. I am definitely not one of those who will go from third at 3000 RPM to second at say, 4000 RPM just because I can.. unless I have a darned good reason and need to do so.
So you and I are not fair apart at all in our assessment here.. pretty close, actually.
Downshifting to a lower gear for a bit of engine braking is less injurious with a manual transmission. This assumes you know how to do it properly - rev-matching so that there is virtually zero stress and wear to the clutch assembly. But I do avoid downshifting when the engine will be turning quite a few RPMs going down a hill. That generates a lot of vacuum in the cylinders.
So I use my brakes most always for slowing or stopping the car and downshift when I need to.. not to be cool or because I think it looks or sounds cool. For normal driving, downshifting to me is just done like one might expect.. to get into a lower gear for efficient engine operation. I am definitely not one of those who will go from third at 3000 RPM to second at say, 4000 RPM just because I can.. unless I have a darned good reason and need to do so.
So you and I are not fair apart at all in our assessment here.. pretty close, actually.
#26
Not a Blowhole
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
To burma;
Downshifting to a lower gear for a bit of engine braking is less injurious with a manual transmission. This assumes you know how to do it properly - rev-matching so that there is virtually zero stress and wear to the clutch assembly. But I do avoid downshifting when the engine will be turning quite a few RPMs going down a hill. That generates a lot of vacuum in the cylinders.
So I use my brakes most always for slowing or stopping the car and downshift when I need to.. not to be cool or because I think it looks or sounds cool. For normal driving, downshifting to me is just done like one might expect.. to get into a lower gear for efficient engine operation. I am definitely not one of those who will go from third at 3000 RPM to second at say, 4000 RPM just because I can.. unless I have a darned good reason and need to do so.
So you and I are not fair apart at all in our assessment here.. pretty close, actually.
Downshifting to a lower gear for a bit of engine braking is less injurious with a manual transmission. This assumes you know how to do it properly - rev-matching so that there is virtually zero stress and wear to the clutch assembly. But I do avoid downshifting when the engine will be turning quite a few RPMs going down a hill. That generates a lot of vacuum in the cylinders.
So I use my brakes most always for slowing or stopping the car and downshift when I need to.. not to be cool or because I think it looks or sounds cool. For normal driving, downshifting to me is just done like one might expect.. to get into a lower gear for efficient engine operation. I am definitely not one of those who will go from third at 3000 RPM to second at say, 4000 RPM just because I can.. unless I have a darned good reason and need to do so.
So you and I are not fair apart at all in our assessment here.. pretty close, actually.
#27
Registered Member
To Road Rage;
That's why I didn't say no wear.. only virtually zero wear. Since it would be next to impossible to manage a 100% direct meshing of the clutch disk to the pressure plate and flywheel, your statement is correct. But with proper technique, you can get pretty close to that zero mark.
That's why I didn't say no wear.. only virtually zero wear. Since it would be next to impossible to manage a 100% direct meshing of the clutch disk to the pressure plate and flywheel, your statement is correct. But with proper technique, you can get pretty close to that zero mark.
#28
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can downshift as much as you want with either AT or MT. Downshifting will not submit a load to the transmission greater than what it takes during upshifting. It is just a matter of driving style. I do it on everyday basis.
#29
Intermediate
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 57
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don' t understand when someone says they only downshift when they absolutely have to.
What do you do when you need to make a turn at the intersection and say your going 35MPH in 3rd gear and need to slow down to 20mph in 2nd gear to make a gentle turn or how about when you're cruising the highway doing 65MPH in 6th and the traffic slows down to 45 at which point you should be in 4th or 5th otherwise you lug the engine. Pardon my ignorance just trying to learn, maybe all these years I've been doing it wrong.
What do you do when you need to make a turn at the intersection and say your going 35MPH in 3rd gear and need to slow down to 20mph in 2nd gear to make a gentle turn or how about when you're cruising the highway doing 65MPH in 6th and the traffic slows down to 45 at which point you should be in 4th or 5th otherwise you lug the engine. Pardon my ignorance just trying to learn, maybe all these years I've been doing it wrong.
#30
When I had my manual 97 cl I hardly ever used the engine to break. IF i am coming up to a light I usually just throw it into neutral and cruise to the light and use the brakes if necessary and now that I have an auto tl-s i dont think i will use anything but the breaks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post