Drag Stip with the Modded TL-S
Drag Stip with the Modded TL-S
Well if it doesnt rain you can count on me going to the drag strip with this car. Ill being going with a buddy who has a modded out Civic SI like a 07 or 08, its damn quick... Ill get some HD Video of this. Ill post it on here.
Guess some E.T.s mine is going to be just cracking into the thirteens
Guess some E.T.s mine is going to be just cracking into the thirteens

Cant wait to see the vids, is that all your mods in the sig?
Good take off: 13.9 -14.1
Bad take off: 14.3 - 14.5
its all in your TL, the weight off the wheels, and the car lol and everything else, but cant wait.
Good take off: 13.9 -14.1
Bad take off: 14.3 - 14.5
its all in your TL, the weight off the wheels, and the car lol and everything else, but cant wait.
Trending Topics
Tomorrow?? Nice!
I was gonna say high 13s but I thought you had precat deletes..I'm going to say 14.11 @ 100.5
And if the Civic SI has bolt ons (I/RH/E) I'm gonna say 14.2 @100 and if Hondata too 14.0 @102.
I was gonna say high 13s but I thought you had precat deletes..I'm going to say 14.11 @ 100.5
And if the Civic SI has bolt ons (I/RH/E) I'm gonna say 14.2 @100 and if Hondata too 14.0 @102.
Well as I did go today, I do have to say it was fun. I thought my #s would be better, but there weren't. The guy lining up the cars by the xmas lights said the track was preppered horrible, and everyones times werent looking where they should be. I dont know if that would be applying to me because i have a front wheel drive car that doesnt spin the tires. Im not sure, im not a drag race guy, maybe it just effects cars that have the tires spin. I dunno... Anyway here are my slips, the earliest time was with traction control on, there otheres were with it off. Each time I held the brake and stepped on the gas untill the light turned green... All in all it was fun, guess it will be more fun when the turbo comes out. But here are my slips and ill get the videos up later. ANd yes the civic si had a shit load of bolt ons and Hondata, very tight race


You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Each time I held the brake and stepped on the gas untill the light turned green
I think that's not a good idea for the TL. If you hold the brake and gas at the same time for too long, the ECU would do something to reduce your power or something like that. I think Dave mentioned it in his 1/4 mile thread. I'd imagine that's why you are not getting much tire spin too (it's ok to spin a little).
It also seems like you have some room for improving your launch. I think you should be able to drop it down to 2.2s for the 60ft.
I think that's not a good idea for the TL. If you hold the brake and gas at the same time for too long, the ECU would do something to reduce your power or something like that. I think Dave mentioned it in his 1/4 mile thread. I'd imagine that's why you are not getting much tire spin too (it's ok to spin a little).
It also seems like you have some room for improving your launch. I think you should be able to drop it down to 2.2s for the 60ft.
It sounds like my 07 AV6 5AT is the Accord counterpart to Lazer's TL-S as both my son and I could only muster a 16.3-16.4. As my AV6 feels DEAD off the line (particularly after a brake torque), I think there is some merit to iforyou's statement.
I still think something is up with your accord. My dads 98 AV6 ran faster than that! You should be around a 15.0 at englishtown! At over 3000 elevation I ran a 15.5! at sea level im in the mid-high 14's!
there is no BS to i for you's statement. The Honda/Acura V6's do not respond well to brake torquing!. It loads the torque converter but bogs off the line unlike the maxima/altima V6 which respond well to a brake torque. The best result for honda/acura automatic V6's is just to slam the gas with no brake torque. Brake torques yeild 2.3-2.4 60fts. Non brake torque can yeild 2.2 easy!
I've tried both methods with similar results.
The results you showed were that of a FI CL-S. Can't compare that to all motor. 2.0 should be pretty easy w/FI if you can manage little wheelspin which is almost impossible with FWD.
Honestly, a 98 Accord F23A 5MT can post a quicker time than 16.3. Granted, I haven't gone back to the track with since that time (some two years ago). Maybe things will 'come together' for it next time. Seeing as I'm always busy nowadays (careerwise) I'll have my son bring it down to Etown sometime in the next month or so.
Honestly, a 98 Accord F23A 5MT can post a quicker time than 16.3. Granted, I haven't gone back to the track with since that time (some two years ago). Maybe things will 'come together' for it next time. Seeing as I'm always busy nowadays (careerwise) I'll have my son bring it down to Etown sometime in the next month or so.
Let me know the results w/ the accord at the track when your son goes! Won't touch his 14.1!

The results you showed were that of a FI CL-S. Can't compare that to all motor. 2.0 should be pretty easy w/FI if you can manage little wheelspin which is almost impossible with FWD.
what I was trying to say which I guess you didn't understand was that you would acheive a better time with less wheelspin. More wheelspin won't achieve a better 60ft time. With FWD its Hard not to spin with FI.
No wheel spin at all on the 2.0 run. I was running on all-season tires at the time too. Correct track prep, tire pressure, and throttle modulation can result in excellent short times. Before adding the blower my times were 2.1-2.2 fairly consistently.
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
well, I got that from Dave B,
"...1-second should be enough time to build enough rpm to match the stall speed. Holding the brake longer to generate a little more launch rpm really isn't worthwhile because the chances are you'll build too much heat in the tranny and loose the efficiency. Additionally, a lot of late model cars have torque management systems that kill power if you do this technique for a prolonged period."
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-2004-2008-93/drag-racing-tips-635906/
I don't know how long is "prolonged," but I'd imagine there could be some sort of sensor to monitor the torque converter fluid and make sure that it's not overheating? If it's showing signs of overheating (or rapid temperature increase), the ECU would then kill power? I mean, heck, if you brake torque the 4G TL Sh-AWD, the automatic transmission would launch in 2nd gear, even if you put it in 1st, as shown in a video posted by one of our members here. New cars nowadays do some "funny" stuff.
"...1-second should be enough time to build enough rpm to match the stall speed. Holding the brake longer to generate a little more launch rpm really isn't worthwhile because the chances are you'll build too much heat in the tranny and loose the efficiency. Additionally, a lot of late model cars have torque management systems that kill power if you do this technique for a prolonged period."
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-2004-2008-93/drag-racing-tips-635906/
I don't know how long is "prolonged," but I'd imagine there could be some sort of sensor to monitor the torque converter fluid and make sure that it's not overheating? If it's showing signs of overheating (or rapid temperature increase), the ECU would then kill power? I mean, heck, if you brake torque the 4G TL Sh-AWD, the automatic transmission would launch in 2nd gear, even if you put it in 1st, as shown in a video posted by one of our members here. New cars nowadays do some "funny" stuff.





