Cd of New TL
#4
SOLD
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakehood, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tread
more like 0.29 for the TL, not class leading, but good still
#6
Originally Posted by NightRider
I have heard this quote about having the same c of d as a corvette from several people on here, who's car in the near luxury sedan class is more aerodynamic than a Corvette? Let alone our car. When I was looking at a G35 I belive those are .30
Thanks for the replies guys.
#7
Advanced
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Southeast Texas
Age: 43
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by STi
G35 and TSX are both around 0.26 I believe. Keep in mind that the actual drag force is lower with the TSX even though they have the same Cd, because of the smaller frontal area.
Thanks for the replies guys.
Thanks for the replies guys.
TSX is 0.27 as is a G35. A G35 with a spoiler is 0.26. TL is 0.29, but I read somewhere recently that its one of the lowest in the class.
Trending Topics
#8
I think G35 may get to .26 with the optional Aero Kit only. Then its a .27 which is pretty damn slippery. The LS 430 is a .26, which is incredible for such a huge car.
The Vette is very slippery but sacrificed some styling b/c that flat rear helps tons.
The Vette is very slippery but sacrificed some styling b/c that flat rear helps tons.
#9
Burning Brakes
One quick question guys...Am I right to assume that you only get the .28 with the FULL A-Spec package including the lowered suspension. Many of us including myself only have the underspoiler and the lip spoiler. I imagine that ride height plays into the cd as well. Can someone enlighten me on this topic. thanks.
dsc888
dsc888
#12
an Acura has-been
Originally Posted by NightRider
In reality I don't know if in let's say, 2 quarter mile runs with the same car, that c of d of .30 or .26 is noticably beneficial to performance.
Don't play too much into Cd changes of 0.01 - 0.02, in the real world it is not noticable.
#13
Registered Abuser of VTEC
Originally Posted by NightRider
In reality I don't know if in let's say, 2 quarter mile runs with the same car, that c of d of .30 or .26 is noticably beneficial to performance.
#14
Senior Moderator
Yup!
Originally Posted by NightRider
Funny enough, it is the same coefficient of drag as a Corvette which I believe is .26
The TL in stock form coefficient of drag is .29. That is exactly the same as the Corvette's: .29. The new 2005 Corvette improves that slightly to about .285.
Source: www.corvette.com - specs.
And, actually, it IS class leading. I don't know of another sport-luxury sedan that is more slippery.
The LS430, although not a sport-luxury, is even more impressive at .26.
XP
#15
Senior Moderator
Um, pardon?
Originally Posted by STi
G35 and TSX are both around 0.26 I believe. Keep in mind that the actual drag force is lower with the TSX even though they have the same Cd, because of the smaller frontal area.
Thanks for the replies guys.
Thanks for the replies guys.
As to the G35 and TSX being .26, they are not. The G35 COUPE is .29 and the aero package brings it done to .28 like the A-Spec SEDAN.
Not sure about the TSX. I'll have to check but I don't remember that it is lower than the TL. I'll get back to you.
XP
#16
Senior Moderator
Sure does.
Originally Posted by birdboy
can someone explain this spec? would it have something to do with the way the car is shaped and how wind resistance reacts to it?
If you look at the underside of the TL in front, you will see an air dam below the bumper and other panels to smooth the flow of air under the car. Tires and wheels are also a consideration. It takes a lot of testing in wind tunnels to get a car down to .29 or less. It doesn't matter how heavy the car is nor how long. Actually, longer sometimes helps the Cd as it straightens the flow around the car body and lets it exit without a lot of turbulance. As an example, a fairly big car like a Lexus LS430 has less drag than many sports cars (even its own). Lexus spent the time in the wind tunnel and tuned everything from door handles to wheels and trim and it paid off.
XP
#18
Originally Posted by Xpditor
The TL in stock form coefficient of drag is .29. That is exactly the same as the Corvette's: .29. The new 2005 Corvette improves that slightly to about .285.
Source: www.corvette.com - specs.
And, actually, it IS class leading. I don't know of another sport-luxury sedan that is more slippery.
The LS430, although not a sport-luxury, is even more impressive at .26.
XP
Source: www.corvette.com - specs.
And, actually, it IS class leading. I don't know of another sport-luxury sedan that is more slippery.
The LS430, although not a sport-luxury, is even more impressive at .26.
XP
#19
Senior Moderator
knowledge base increases...
Originally Posted by EZZ
It is NOT class leading. The G35 sedan is 0.27 without aero package. 0.26 with aero package. I can't let misinformation slide
If accurate, thanks for the info. I did say that I didn't know of one more slick. Interesting that the sedan has a lower Cd than the COUPE. But, this is often the case. I wonder what the VW Phaeton is?
XP
#20
Originally Posted by Xpditor
I only listed the COUPE Cd as I did not have the figures for the sedan.
If accurate, thanks for the info. I did say that I didn't know of one more slick. Interesting that the sedan has a lower Cd than the COUPE. But, this is often the case. I wonder what the VW Phaeton is?
XP
If accurate, thanks for the info. I did say that I didn't know of one more slick. Interesting that the sedan has a lower Cd than the COUPE. But, this is often the case. I wonder what the VW Phaeton is?
XP
#22
Senior Moderator
Alert! Apology!
Originally Posted by STi
G35 and TSX are both around 0.26 I believe. Keep in mind that the actual drag force is lower with the TSX even though they have the same Cd, because of the smaller frontal area.
Thanks for the replies guys.
Thanks for the replies guys.
You are entirely correct. I misread your post the first time.
The CD is a ratio of the 2 dimensional frontal area (flat board) theoretical drag vs. the actual 3 dimensional (shaped) drag. The result is a factor (CD) that needs to be multiplied by the frontal area to get the actual drag force.
Implied in this: a larger car with a lower CD can have more "wind resistance" than a smaller car with a higher CD.
I could go into this in more detail if anyone is interested in the math.
Sorry about the misunderstanding. :o
XP
#23
Senior Moderator
Some examples
Originally Posted by Nicki
What is the lowest drag coefficient possible with an automobile, and what car is it? Year make model...
SUV's, with their larger, flatter shapes, typically achieve a Cd of 0.35-0.45.
Sports cars can achieve figures of 0.25-0.30, although sometimes designers deliberately
compromise drag in favor of reducing lift.
The Mini convertible has a coefficient of drag of 0.37.
Present day ‘Stock Cars’ have managed to achieve a “cee-dee-alpha” (coefficient of drag)
of less than 0.30 – typically 0.25.
A runner has a CD about 0.5, a racing bicyclist about 0.4. An airfoil shape used on aircraft wings or rotor blades, typically has an extremely small CD about 0.04.
I would suspect the lowest CD on autos would be for super-streamlined Bonneville Salt Flat top speed contenders. Long, cylindrical with a basic tear shape on its side with the pointy end in the back. The exit shape is as important as the entry shape.
A falling drop of water is a free form which takes its shape from the path through the air of least resistance. Falling drop of water in a vacuum is perfectly round.
Am I putting you to sleep? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
XP