Been away for some time....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 01:07 PM
  #1  
joeman892's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Been away for some time....

Hey everyone, I used to be on this forums all the time when I had my 2002 tl-s but then two cars later im driving a 2008 cobalt ss/tc. I love the car for the power and fuel economy but I want to go back to a little more luxury. I was thinking of buying a 2007 acura tl... im not sure if i should go for the type-s becuase it doesnt seem to make too much more power. Honestly when I have a car that weighs 3100lbs and makes 300 whp/330wtq its gonna suck to get something that is a lot slower. My old TL made 256 / 222 and it was plenty of power. I want to make these numbers with an 07 tl and i dont think the 3.5 really is the answer. Would an 03 tl with intake exhaust headers pullies and spacers make around 250-260 wheel? If it can then no need for a type s for me. any other suggestions / help would be appreciated. Thank you all in advance.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #2  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
The Type-S makes almost 30 more horsepower than the regular TL, at 286hp. I think there was a fully bolted TL-S that broke 300whp a while back. Don't see how the 3.5 isn't the answer to power.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 01:20 PM
  #3  
renedcruz's Avatar
'That's what she said!'
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 40
^
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 07:36 PM
  #4  
joeman892's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
just going by some dyno videos that I have seen. I also looked on here and saw that baseline dynos were around 225 for the 3.5 and like 205 for the 3.2 but when things were fully bolted they were both around 250ish. Ive been away from these cars for a while so I may be wrong, thats why I need you guys to chime in.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 08:22 PM
  #5  
TheChamp531's Avatar
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,022
Likes: 437
From: Houston, Texas
Blackura had a fully bolt on Type S that dynoed 298 or so whp and he made more with another add on. There's a thread somewhere
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 11:40 PM
  #6  
joeman892's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
ohhh very nice!! was that sc? im gonna try and find that thread
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 12:18 AM
  #7  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Pretty sure it wasn't with S/C, you'd break well past 300whp running any kind of boost. IIRC he was auto, too.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 12:19 AM
  #8  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by joeman892
just going by some dyno videos that I have seen. I also looked on here and saw that baseline dynos were around 225 for the 3.5 and like 205 for the 3.2 but when things were fully bolted they were both around 250ish. Ive been away from these cars for a while so I may be wrong, thats why I need you guys to chime in.
Power-wise, 3.5>3.2.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 04:42 AM
  #9  
HsvGts's Avatar
7th Gear
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
For the minimal price difference between the two, it doesn't make sense to me to get a non S.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLACKURA_NY
3G TL Photograph Gallery
72
Oct 15, 2012 03:08 PM
prs2008RL
1G RL (1996-2004)
2
Jul 23, 2008 11:08 AM
damird
2G TL (1999-2003)
5
Jun 29, 2008 08:37 PM
Soyboy26
3G TL Photograph Gallery
18
Jun 18, 2008 07:28 PM
greendestiny
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
44
Feb 25, 2006 02:38 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.