Back seat folding down?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #1  
Danyo of the sbcdjs's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: The Yay baby.. if u aint know, ask somebody
Back seat folding down?

This might be a stupid question but i just assumed that the rear seat would fold down just cuz i figured nowadays all the seats in most cars do. but i didnt find anyting that would allow that.. the only thing i saw was the middle console in the rear seats opened to access the trunk. Am i just blind or do that not actually fold down? im such a noob
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #2  
havokgroup's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Texass
The seat does not fold down.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #3  
Danny04TL's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 1
From: So. Cal
nope
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #4  
coykiam's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 38
From: New York,NY
I wonder whats Acuras decision to not allow it to fold down....
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:22 PM
  #5  
#1HuskerTL's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
One of the keys in building a performance sedan like the TL is a strong structure that resists twisting. To do so Acura needed to further enforce the weaker areas of the Accord that it's based on. One of these weak areas is the trunk pass-through. So the engineers enhanced the structural rigidity of the TL by placing additional cross members in this area, blocking the pass-through and eliminating fully folding rear seats. If the cross members weren't there the TL wouldn't handle as well nor be as responsive to driver input.

It's a sacrifice to make in the name of performance, and depending on why someone buys a TL it may not be something you need.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:45 PM
  #6  
mlody's Avatar
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 90
From: Chicagoland
I call Acura explanation total BS. TSX handles better with narrower tires and has the folding back seats.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #7  
Rpappi's Avatar
DRINKING HAS A ME PROBLEM
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
its a smaller car less weight to intice twisting and its not based on an accord. the TSX has its own platform that is designed for this in mind.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #8  
MichaelBenz's Avatar
CTS-V Import Slayer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 18
From: Fishers, IN
Fold down seats are SO Soccer Mom!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 01:05 AM
  #9  
datmrman's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 39
From: San Diego, CA
Not if you want to fit a snowboard in the trunk.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 01:33 AM
  #10  
randomthought's Avatar
rebmeM deretsigeR
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 572
Likes: 13
From: San Francisco, CA
^^ Thats what the Ridgeline is for!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #11  
manhattan01's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
I miss fold down seats. My old 2 door accord had em. Now I practically have to rent a truck to go to Ikea.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #12  
MichaelBenz's Avatar
CTS-V Import Slayer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 18
From: Fishers, IN
Originally Posted by randomthought
^^ Thats what the Ridgeline is for!
I mean....not if I want to fit a peice of plywood in it either...BUT....thats what they make trucks for!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #13  
FADE's Avatar
Thread Necromancer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 441
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by manhattan01
I miss fold down seats. My old 2 door accord had em. Now I practically have to rent a truck to go to Ikea.
Yup I am in the same boat, My Accord coupe had fold down seats, they came in handy when I had to move stuff.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #14  
#1HuskerTL's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
I disagree that the TSX handles better. It's a smaller car and therefore "feels" more nimble, but that test data doesn't lie.......

TSX*
300 ft skidpad = .80 g
Lane change = 61.7 mph
* Car and Driver, Feb 2006

TL*
300 ft skidpad = .89 g
Lane change = 62.3 mph
* Car and Driver, March 2004

Furthermore, take into consideration that the tests above were done on the 2nd model year of the TSX and the 1st model year of the TL and there's no way in a flat out comparison test that the TSX out handles the TL.

Sure, it'd be nice if the rear seats folded down in the TL. If that's an important factor for the buyer then the buyer shouldn't choose the TL. For me it didn't matter because my wife drives an SUV and we use that for hauling things. It all comes down to making the best overall decision for your specific situation, circumstances and needs.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #15  
rshanahan's Avatar
07 TL-Navi 5AT, NBP
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: North East, MD
Back in the early to mid 90's I was with a friend who was looking to purchase an Integra. While looking at the Vigor (I LOVED that bodystyle) and Legend I made a comment to him about the lack of fold down seats, which was overheard by the snooty salesman.

His response (with his nose in the air) was something like "Anyone who would buy an Acura wouldn't even THINK of carrying things such as lumber or plywood. You would never put stuff like that in an Acrua"

Unfortunately it was raining out side and he drowned.

My friend did by the Integra and it was a very nice car. I proceeded to stick with Mazda back then and got a '94 626 which I JUST traded for my '07. Sure I miss the fold down seats but that's why I have a truck also.

Rick
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #16  
Desert_TL's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Pretty sure most of the cars in the TL's class do not have fold down rear seats. The new ES 350 does not have fold down rear seats, for one.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #17  
llJrockll's Avatar
Rebourne
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by mlody
I call Acura explanation total BS. TSX handles better with narrower tires and has the folding back seats.



as for TL's handling better than the TSX...... ahhmmm
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #18  
coykiam's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 38
From: New York,NY
its really a BS explanation regarding tightness and rigidity in the back since theres a little opening in the rear seat area, big enough to fit snowboard and no I'm not talking about that little tiny window behind the arm rest.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #19  
geekybiker's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 120
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by Rpappi
its a smaller car less weight to intice twisting and its not based on an accord. the TSX has its own platform that is designed for this in mind.

The TSX is based on the accord. Just not the accord in the US. (Its a slightly tweaked euro accord)
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #20  
ljj33's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
I think it is due to cost. On other cars, 40/60 fold down rear seats is an option. You can even get this option on the M5 and I think performance was one of the key design elements for that car. I think folding rear seats is a necessity when you only have one car. I actually took out the lower bolt holding the upper portion so I just unscrew the top two bolts under the headrests and the whole uppper comes off so I can carry larger items.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #21  
007TL-S's Avatar
Be kind to us truckers !
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: New Albany,IN
Originally Posted by #1HuskerTL
One of the keys in building a performance sedan like the TL is a strong structure that resists twisting. To do so Acura needed to further enforce the weaker areas of the Accord that it's based on. One of these weak areas is the trunk pass-through. So the engineers enhanced the structural rigidity of the TL by placing additional cross members in this area, blocking the pass-through and eliminating fully folding rear seats. If the cross members weren't there the TL wouldn't handle as well nor be as responsive to driver input.

It's a sacrifice to make in the name of performance, and depending on why someone buys a TL it may not be something you need.
Agreed ! , you are 100%,correct!..... HONDA did this to maintainthe TL's structual rigidity and increase it's overall suspension performance hole!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #22  
SteveP66's Avatar
Kaa - Ching !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 3
From: Rhode Island.....Self-Proclaimed Chromed Cousin of Brettallica
I don't miss the 60/40 split as much as I thought i would............coming from a Accord Coupe to a TL I now have a whole back seat to use!!!!

and 2 extra doors....lol
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #23  
mlody's Avatar
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 90
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by #1HuskerTL
I disagree that the TSX handles better. It's a smaller car and therefore "feels" more nimble, but that test data doesn't lie.......

TSX*
300 ft skidpad = .80 g
Lane change = 61.7 mph
* Car and Driver, Feb 2006

TL*
300 ft skidpad = .89 g
Lane change = 62.3 mph
* Car and Driver, March 2004

Furthermore, take into consideration that the tests above were done on the 2nd model year of the TSX and the 1st model year of the TL and there's no way in a flat out comparison test that the TSX out handles the TL.

Sure, it'd be nice if the rear seats folded down in the TL. If that's an important factor for the buyer then the buyer shouldn't choose the TL. For me it didn't matter because my wife drives an SUV and we use that for hauling things. It all comes down to making the best overall decision for your specific situation, circumstances and needs.

Just to straight the facts - the number you provided for TL is for summer tires. Handling for all-season tires is .80-.81 (depends on tires - Michelin or Bridgstone) and other factors
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 05:02 AM
  #24  
sandiegodrive's Avatar
Back after 1 Year!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 33
From: Chula Vista, CA (San Diego County)
I thought they folded down too when I bought my car.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
weedeater's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
I was surprised and disappointed that they didn't fold down. With my last car(s), they stayed up most of the time, but for the occasional long trip it was nice to have the ability to fold down one side or the other for a little extra storage space.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #26  
260 HP's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 2
From: Socal
Actually the TL, TSX, RL, and Accord share the same platform.

Have any of you actually removed the rear seat of the TL? There's no such thing as "extra braces" or "cross members" or whatever that blocks the pass through. If you remove the rear seat itself, you'll see a wide open cutout. The cutout is of the same size as my 06 Accord's cutout. So, where did they put the extra bracing?

So.... is Acura lying through their teeth? I think not. The TL's rear seat itself acts as the extra bracing to stiffen the rear end. The seat back is bolted in 5 locations (2 on the top and 3 on the bottom) and it gives the extra flex resistance to the rear shock mounts.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #27  
#1HuskerTL's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
Originally Posted by 260 HP
Actually the TL, TSX, RL, and Accord share the same platform.

Have any of you actually removed the rear seat of the TL? There's no such thing as "extra braces" or "cross members" or whatever that blocks the pass through. If you remove the rear seat itself, you'll see a wide open cutout. The cutout is of the same size as my 06 Accord's cutout. So, where did they put the extra bracing?

So.... is Acura lying through their teeth? I think not. The TL's rear seat itself acts as the extra bracing to stiffen the rear end. The seat back is bolted in 5 locations (2 on the top and 3 on the bottom) and it gives the extra flex resistance to the rear shock mounts.
Thanks for clarifying that. I wasn't sure exactly how Acura strengthened the rear sub-frame of the TL. It makes prefect sense. I know that often times engineers even take into consideration the added strength of the windshield and rear window when looking for ways to tighten a structure. Stronger and thicker glass is sometimes used in the same way the TL's back seat is.

Just for my own curiosity I started researching other sedans of a more sporty nature to see if they have folding rear seats. I'll post my findings here when I'm done (probably tomorrow).
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #28  
trancemission's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Regions Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 218
From: Dallas TX
Originally Posted by datmrman
Not if you want to fit a snowboard in the trunk.

theres been a couple of times where I wished mine would fold down
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #29  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Another reason the TL doesn't have a pass thru back seat, it to maximize the interior space of the back seat. The TL has the largest cabin of any car in it's class. It's one of the reason I bought mine.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #30  
leedogg's Avatar
RAR
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,783
Likes: 1,286
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by datmrman
Not if you want to fit a snowboard in the trunk.
pfff who cares about snowboarders? Pass through for skis FTW!!!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #31  
SteveP66's Avatar
Kaa - Ching !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 3
From: Rhode Island.....Self-Proclaimed Chromed Cousin of Brettallica
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Another reason the TL doesn't have a pass thru back seat, it to maximize the interior space of the back seat. The TL has the largest cabin of any car in it's class. It's one of the reason I bought mine.




Ummm, even if the seats did fold down the rear cabin space wouldn't change>?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #32  
Meek32v6's Avatar
I like to whistle in my
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 1
From: Fort Washington, Md
Originally Posted by leedogg
pfff who cares about snowboarders? Pass through for skis FTW!!!
HAHA!! good one...but i snowboard
sounds like people in the trunk and boards in the back seat with seat belts and windows down
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #33  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by SteveP66
Ummm, even if the seats did fold down the rear cabin space wouldn't change>?
The access to the rear suspension, is to remove the rear seat. When folding down the seat, they would have to put some panels there to cover the access. The seat would would have to sit closer to the front because of this.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #34  
SteveP66's Avatar
Kaa - Ching !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 3
From: Rhode Island.....Self-Proclaimed Chromed Cousin of Brettallica
It couldn't possibly make that much of a difference
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #35  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by SteveP66
It couldn't possibly make that much of a difference

Honda did away with the double wishbone suspension in the Civic for this exact reason. They wanted more interior space, the wishbone didn't allow for that without making the Civic as big as the Accord.

Acura not giving up the double wishbone.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #36  
#1HuskerTL's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
List of 4-dr sedan folding rear seats

OK, so here's a list of 21 four door sedans and if they have a standard, optional or no folding rear seat according to MSN Autos. Some of these are not TL competitors, but I think it gives us an idea of what other manufacturers are offering.

Acura TL = No
Acura TSX = Std
Audi A4 = Std
Audi A6 = Std
BMW 3 series = Opt
Chrysler 300C = Std
Honda Accord = Std
Infiniti G35 = No
Jaguar X-Type = Std
Lexus IS = No
Lexus ES = No
Lincoln MKZ = No
Mazda 6s = Std
Mercedes C-Class = Opt
Nissan Maxima = Std
Saab 9-3 = Std
Saab 9-5 = Std
Toyota Camry = Std
Volkswagen Passat = Std
Volvo S40 = Std
Volvo S60 = Std

Only 5 of these 21 don't offer folding rear seats. It's interesting that 4 of those 5 are Japanese luxury brands.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
Aug 4, 2024 10:35 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
Feb 25, 2020 09:57 AM
o8 ENVII 8o
Car Parts for Sale
19
Nov 30, 2015 04:23 PM
d.lim
2G RDX (2013-2018)
10
Sep 15, 2015 08:54 PM
iRaw
ILX
3
Sep 5, 2015 12:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.