91 Ocatane ?
Advanced
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: West Orange, NJ
I'm not a chemist, but I did hear an explanation once of what the point is with the octane rating. I believe the only issue is that the higher the octane, the higher the 'threshhold of combustion'. Raising this prevents the gas/air mixture from igniting before the spark fires due to the compression in the cylinder. If you use low octane gas on a car with high compression (like the TL), you'll tend to get 'pre-ignition', which means the gas explodes before the spark fires (i.e. before the piston gets to the top of the cylinder). This is a bad thing because it tries to push the piston back down, when it's still coming up. It results in a metallic pinging sound on hard acceleration.
Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.
If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.
If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by unlemming
Come out west and you'll never see more than 91 from any company..
Originally Posted by iceneedle
I'm not a chemist, but I did hear an explanation once of what the point is with the octane rating. I believe the only issue is that the higher the octane, the higher the 'threshhold of combustion'. Raising this prevents the gas/air mixture from igniting before the spark fires due to the compression in the cylinder. If you use low octane gas on a car with high compression (like the TL), you'll tend to get 'pre-ignition', which means the gas explodes before the spark fires (i.e. before the piston gets to the top of the cylinder). This is a bad thing because it tries to push the piston back down, when it's still coming up. It results in a metallic pinging sound on hard acceleration.
Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.
If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.
If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
IMO, if you liven in a moderately cool climate, don't live in hilly terrain which puts a long consitant load on the car, you should be able to get away with running 89 without detonation.
However, you also have to ask yourself this. Just how much are you saving. Here in SoCal, gas prices are typically .10-.15 per grade with say 87 at $2.15, 89 at $2.25 and 91 at $2.35. So if you fill up on with 14-15 gallons, you're only looking at $1.50 to $3.00 per tank difference to run 91. Then comes how much to you fill up. I commute 50 each way to work so I'm filling up way more frequently than most people and it still comes out to about $6/wk extra for 91.
Originally Posted by GaleForce
Wow. How much did it cost?
In SoCal I've seen it for as cheap as $2.75 if you buy it by the drum (when prem 91 was $2.17/gal) and that's not bad at all. But then they get nearly as much again for delivery if you don't pick it up yourself.
But from my understanding ConocoPhillips which bought the Unocal refineries and I think even their service stations is no longer making these "race" grades anymore.
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Up until recently there were some Unocal stations (Madero Road in Mission Viejo comes to mind) that sold Unocal 100 at the pump (I used it for my GN). It was expensive, but you could get it.
Stations around here have 87, 89 or 93 octane. I remember years ago that Sunoco had a switch on the pumps that would blend the grades, depending on what octane you wanted. Seemed like a good idea since only 2 grades would be required and the desired octane could be anywhere between the low and the high.
Advanced
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: West Orange, NJ
Originally Posted by fishacura
Isn't 89 fine....in the grand scheme of things???
Advanced
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: West Orange, NJ
Originally Posted by Pug
Why does higher octane cost more? Does it take more time to refine it?
Anybody know something about this?
Originally Posted by GaleForce
I heard the West Coast only has 91 octane due to some stupid limits on octane levels. For example, Mobil sells 93 octane except on the west coast where the same name gas is only 91.
FWIW, if you're in the neighborhood cheapest Premuim at $1.22/gal at 76
station at DuPont exit off I-5. Price goes up if you're not in the neighborhood.
Originally Posted by iceneedle
In case you didn't realize, airplanes run on 100 octane Low Lead. That Unocal stuff was probably aviation fuel.
Originally Posted by iceneedle
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
Originally Posted by iceneedle
Not for the TL. Its compression ratio is too high. You'll get pinging as explained above, which can potentially damage the engine. Honda compensates for this by changing the timing, but it's an imperfect solution, designed to be used if, for some reason, you can't get a tank of 91 octane gas.
10th Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Roswell, GA
Cleaner
Burning higher octane fuel has all the benefits mentioned in prev. threads... However, in burning lower octane fuels - when it detonates prematurley, it leaves very high carbon deposits on the cylinder wall and piston heads.
Not Good....
Not Good....
Originally Posted by Ron A
The manual calls for 91 octane, so that is the minimum you should use.
I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.
I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.
Quick Q. I thought the same thing, but ever heard that Sunoco uses two tanks (high and low) and mix together to have all their octane oils...
Anyone knows this?
Thanks.
The differences in the octane of the west coast vs the east coast are because of altitude differences. The west coast is closer to sea level and therefore the air pressure is higher. The air here in the east coast is generally thinner and combusts much more easily therefore requiring a higher octane rating. Remember octane retards combustion.
I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.
Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.
Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
Originally Posted by HuKaShI
The differences in the octane of the west coast vs the east coast are because of altitude differences. The west coast is closer to sea level and therefore the air pressure is higher. The air here in the east coast is generally thinner and combusts much more easily therefore requiring a higher octane rating. Remember octane retards combustion.
I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.
Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.
Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
Originally Posted by Ron A
The manual calls for 91 octane, so that is the minimum you should use.
I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.
I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.
As such, they sent out a survey to all the Cali refineries to see if they would make the new ethanol blend at the new octane rating. Most of course responded yes, thus the switch was made and we're stuck with the new ethanol 91 octane blend.
Maybe the base stock is part of it, since I do know that compared to other parts of the country you'll seldom find a car exhaust that has the rotten egg smell in the upper midwest. But other areas... pew
Originally Posted by kosh2258
Very strange since here in the midwest we have 92 octane premium that's 10% ethanol blend. We've had ethanol in nearly every grade of gas for close to 20 years.
Maybe the base stock is part of it, since I do know that compared to other parts of the country you'll seldom find a car exhaust that has the rotten egg smell in the upper midwest. But other areas... pew
Maybe the base stock is part of it, since I do know that compared to other parts of the country you'll seldom find a car exhaust that has the rotten egg smell in the upper midwest. But other areas... pew

Originally Posted by GaleForce
I heard the West Coast only has 91 octane due to some stupid limits on octane levels. For example, Mobil sells 93 octane except on the west coast where the same name gas is only 91.
Yep, west coast (CA at least) has only 91 as premium. Nothing higher than that. It used to be 92 a few years back. I've been driving for 15 years here and don't recall ever seeing 93/94.
Originally Posted by jdone
Trust an old chemical engineer, mixing different octane gas works just fine.
Now that I know the TL reccomends 91, I'm gonna have to remind him to call me everytime he "drops a load" in Simi Valley where I live.
I wonder how much a 50 gallon drum and a hand pump costs....
Originally Posted by dcarlinf1
Not entirely true. The better the quality of the gas (higher octane rating) you use will directly effect your gas mileage. It makes the engine more efficient. So, it's true that it costs more, but you get some of that back in the extra miles traveled. Something to consider. Personally, I use premium in any car that has a high compression ratio as the TL does and 89 octane in everything else. Never use 87 octane. You save some $$ but you lose gas mileage and increase engine wear over time.
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Up until recently there were some Unocal stations (Madero Road in Mission Viejo comes to mind) that sold Unocal 100 at the pump (I used it for my GN). It was expensive, but you could get it.
I recently saw 100 octane gas at a Mobil station in Connecticut. It was $5.00+ per gallon. It was called CAM2 or something and was labeled "racing fuel." I'm pretty sure that putting this in the TL would not improve performance at all and could actually, over a long period of time, damage the engine that is not made to "handle" such high octane fuel.
I was tempted to put some in to see what happened, but then I started thinking rationally.
Don't waste your money.
91 Octane is dependant of what elevation of the city is at. Out here in SLC, UT, we don't have anything higher than 91. You will probably find the same situation in cities like Denver also. I don't recall what is the specific reason for this, but I think the higher octane is not as efficient burning in the high elevation because of the lack of oxygen. Also quarter mile times are lower up here because of the lack of oxygen compared at sea level.




