35 MPG highway for almost an hour
Trending Topics
if you like to fool yourself,,,drive an hour, and dont reset the meter until already on the freeway at speed~
Thats where a lot of gas goes- getting it up to freeway speed, then it cruises easily
For accurate mileage numbers you need to do nearly full tank run, refilled to same level and calculate miles travelled and fuel burned
Thats where a lot of gas goes- getting it up to freeway speed, then it cruises easily
For accurate mileage numbers you need to do nearly full tank run, refilled to same level and calculate miles travelled and fuel burned
For iPhone users, there is a free application called Gasbag, which allows you to enter your information and keeps a running tally of your mileage. It also shows you how much on average you have paid for your gas, as well as your cost per miles driven. It uses GPS, I have used it for a couple of months and know that according to my data, I am getting 24.8 miles per gallon over the last ~1500 miles, and that I have paid an average of 2.93 (Shell V-power 93 mostly) at a cost of $0.118 dollars per mile. You can look at the totals by week, month, year, or all and email yourself your results as a backup. I am not a developer of the program but do make a point to use it every time I fill up.
if you like to fool yourself,,,drive an hour, and dont reset the meter until already on the freeway at speed~
Thats where a lot of gas goes- getting it up to freeway speed, then it cruises easily
For accurate mileage numbers you need to do nearly full tank run, refilled to same level and calculate miles travelled and fuel burned
Thats where a lot of gas goes- getting it up to freeway speed, then it cruises easily
For accurate mileage numbers you need to do nearly full tank run, refilled to same level and calculate miles travelled and fuel burned

The MID is inaccurate. It's always 1-2 mpg off. This is the correct way to do it.
Use your Cruise Control, keep your windows (mostly) rolled up and turn off the A/C. I took my first road trip last weekend--150 miles each way, plus tooling around the whole weekend. Averaged 29MPG for the whole trip and did it all on one tank of gas.
Last edited by dwb993; Jul 19, 2009 at 09:38 PM.
The TL's computer knows injector pulsewidth and fuel pressure so it knows exactly how much fuel is used down to the ounce. It obviously knows the mileage so the calculation should be extremely accurate.
Filling up at the pump, there are still variables such as pump cutoff point. I have no idea how consistant or inconsistant they are as I have no way to find out. Even if you get only an extra 1/4 gallon one time vs another, that's your 1-2mpg right there. Now average it out over 10+ fillups and it's probably very accurate.
BTW, it was nice meeting you yesterday.
I forgot, you can manipulate the MID easily. I have a picture somewhere of it saying >50 for over 30minutes and something like 48mpg for an hour. That was me getting up to speed and resetting it right before I hit the downhill portion of the grapevine heading to Bakersfield which continues slightly downhill for 45 miles.
I've used the MID to tell me when I'm on a slight incline or decline. On my old commute to work I consistanly averaged 26mpg going to work and 35-37 on the way home but I couldn't tell I was on an incline.
I've used the MID to tell me when I'm on a slight incline or decline. On my old commute to work I consistanly averaged 26mpg going to work and 35-37 on the way home but I couldn't tell I was on an incline.
For iPhone users, there is a free application called Gasbag, which allows you to enter your information and keeps a running tally of your mileage. It also shows you how much on average you have paid for your gas, as well as your cost per miles driven. It uses GPS, I have used it for a couple of months and know that according to my data, I am getting 24.8 miles per gallon over the last ~1500 miles, and that I have paid an average of 2.93 (Shell V-power 93 mostly) at a cost of $0.118 dollars per mile. You can look at the totals by week, month, year, or all and email yourself your results as a backup. I am not a developer of the program but do make a point to use it every time I fill up.
Which GasBag are you talking about? Neither get very good ratings so I'm curious. I have been using Gas Cubby which provides most of the same info but requires a little moe manual input.
Just saw that Gas Cubby is now $9.99! I got it for no more than $2.99 a few month ago. They may run periodic sales, it's a good app.
Last edited by MR1; Jul 19, 2009 at 10:37 PM.
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,022
Likes: 437
From: Houston, Texas
I get 32 when driving 70, 35 at 65 and 37 at 60mph. Too bad when I drive in city or commute to work I get like 13 MPG...Anyone know why? Tires PSI = 38, Oil Change with 5W-30 Synthetic Mobil 1, seafoamed, and I don't accelerate hard (less than 3k RPM 99% of the time).
Seafoam and the AEM V2 changed my life as far as MPG!! I highly recommend both.
Use your Cruise Control, keep your windows (mostly) rolled up and turn off the A/C. I took my first road trip last weekend--150 miles each way, plus tooling around the whole weekend. Averaged 29MPG for the whole trip and did it all on one tank of gas.
Use your Cruise Control, keep your windows (mostly) rolled up and turn off the A/C. I took my first road trip last weekend--150 miles each way, plus tooling around the whole weekend. Averaged 29MPG for the whole trip and did it all on one tank of gas.
I get 32 when driving 70, 35 at 65 and 37 at 60mph. Too bad when I drive in city or commute to work I get like 13 MPG...Anyone know why? Tires PSI = 38, Oil Change with 5W-30 Synthetic Mobil 1, seafoamed, and I don't accelerate hard (less than 3k RPM 99% of the time).
As for the 35, that is good, but try 34MPG for an entire tank! Had you gone 55 mph, it would have been even better. As you can tell from the photo, I only averaged 38mph, so it was not all highway. This was an experiment last year. I wanted to see how high I could get the MPG using some of the techniques the hyper milers use.
I've always been from that school of thought up until recently.
The TL's computer knows injector pulsewidth and fuel pressure so it knows exactly how much fuel is used down to the ounce. It obviously knows the mileage so the calculation should be extremely accurate.
Filling up at the pump, there are still variables such as pump cutoff point. I have no idea how consistant or inconsistant they are as I have no way to find out. Even if you get only an extra 1/4 gallon one time vs another, that's your 1-2mpg right there. Now average it out over 10+ fillups and it's probably very accurate.
The TL's computer knows injector pulsewidth and fuel pressure so it knows exactly how much fuel is used down to the ounce. It obviously knows the mileage so the calculation should be extremely accurate.
Filling up at the pump, there are still variables such as pump cutoff point. I have no idea how consistant or inconsistant they are as I have no way to find out. Even if you get only an extra 1/4 gallon one time vs another, that's your 1-2mpg right there. Now average it out over 10+ fillups and it's probably very accurate.
One weekend the MID showed 30, but filled up and it was 28.6. I am jealous of you 30+ guys, but upper 20's is still great.
I've been tracking every tank i do and MID isn't a 100% on. I fill up at the same gas station using the same pump. When filling up and the pump clicks off i wait a couple seconds and pull it again till it clicks off again. So i like to think that i am being consistent in how full i am getting the tank.
One weekend the MID showed 30, but filled up and it was 28.6. I am jealous of you 30+ guys, but upper 20's is still great.
One weekend the MID showed 30, but filled up and it was 28.6. I am jealous of you 30+ guys, but upper 20's is still great.
And thank you AnthraciteAspec, it was very hard to stay out of it.
Which GasBag are you talking about? Neither get very good ratings so I'm curious. I have been using Gas Cubby which provides most of the same info but requires a little moe manual input.
Just saw that Gas Cubby is now $9.99! I got it for no more than $2.99 a few month ago. They may run periodic sales, it's a good app.
Just saw that Gas Cubby is now $9.99! I got it for no more than $2.99 a few month ago. They may run periodic sales, it's a good app.
I took some screenshots of the application and my data and if I can figure out how to post them I will. The application is called gasbag. When I told someone at work about it last week they were able to find it using the search function.
At least, this is my take on it. I think this is why the marketing guys claim both horsepower AND mileage increases. In fact, it is performance OR mileage---not both.
Seafoam, on the other hand is absolutely incredible. I had never heard of it before this site and used it on my 06 with 39K both in the tank and through the throttle body. The first full tank after application my MID numbers were crazy high. Once everything settled down, I can say that it gave me an additional 3-5mpg on it's own. I do a lot of highway driving and was looking for MPG numbers more in line with what others here have reported. I am now beginning to see them---in the area of 28-31mpg consistently. Will let you know what happens after the 2nd application after 2000 miles.
I know I Hate Cars has some strong feelings on the subject of CAIs and performance/mileage and would like to hear his opinion on my comments, as he seems very knowledgeable and can translate his opinions into very good discourses.
Last edited by dwb993; Jul 20, 2009 at 04:40 PM.
You are correct (mostly), the CAI is a performance part. However, I have found that the CAI makes my throttle a lot lighter, which can translate into MPG if you don't ride it like Dale Earnhardt Jr all of the time. So, when using Cruise Control and driving normally, what used to be performance becomes MPG.
At least, this is my take on it. I think this is why the marketing guys claim both horsepower AND mileage increases. In fact, it is performance OR mileage---not both.
Seafoam, on the other hand is absolutely incredible. I had never heard of it before this site and used it on my 06 with 39K both in the tank and through the throttle body. The first full tank after application my MID numbers were crazy high. Once everything settled down, I can say that it gave me an additional 3-5mpg on it's own. I do a lot of highway driving and was looking for MPG numbers more in line with what others here have reported. I am now beginning to see them---in the area of 28-31mpg consistently. Will let you know what happens after the 2nd application after 2000 miles.
I know I Hate Cars has some strong feelings on the subject of CAIs and performance/mileage and would like to hear his opinion on my comments, as he seems very knowledgeable and can translate his opinions into very good discourses.
At least, this is my take on it. I think this is why the marketing guys claim both horsepower AND mileage increases. In fact, it is performance OR mileage---not both.
Seafoam, on the other hand is absolutely incredible. I had never heard of it before this site and used it on my 06 with 39K both in the tank and through the throttle body. The first full tank after application my MID numbers were crazy high. Once everything settled down, I can say that it gave me an additional 3-5mpg on it's own. I do a lot of highway driving and was looking for MPG numbers more in line with what others here have reported. I am now beginning to see them---in the area of 28-31mpg consistently. Will let you know what happens after the 2nd application after 2000 miles.
I know I Hate Cars has some strong feelings on the subject of CAIs and performance/mileage and would like to hear his opinion on my comments, as he seems very knowledgeable and can translate his opinions into very good discourses.
Seriously though, you know my opinon on the CAI, unless it's preventing part throttle detonation it can't increase mileage. More airflow before the throttlebody can't increase mileage, it's totally impossible. Exhaust mods can do both mileage and performance. Intake can only increase performance.
Think about this, the car always maintains the same AF ratio. The throttlebody is an artificial restriction to airflow. Going from a plugged airfilter to no airfilter would only give you the same effect as cracking the throttle open a little more.
I usually top off my summer gas with a mix of tolulene and I see up to a 3mpg increase in mileage during the hottest months due to it being able to run full timing again.
LOL. That last paragraph was too nice. It's more like opinions into shrewd crude discourses.
LOL! I've read some of your more "testy" posts! They all had it comin', IMO.
Seriously though, you know my opinon on the CAI, unless it's preventing part throttle detonation it can't increase mileage. More airflow before the throttlebody can't increase mileage, it's totally impossible. Exhaust mods can do both mileage and performance. Intake can only increase performance.
Think about this, the car always maintains the same AF ratio. The throttlebody is an artificial restriction to airflow. Going from a plugged airfilter to no airfilter would only give you the same effect as cracking the throttle open a little more.
Exactly my point. Given the exact same conditions--humidity, temperature, etc--the throttle would be less open (?) at the same speed after the install of a CAI. That equals more MPG....or, more specifically, less gas required to maintain said speed.
I usually top off my summer gas with a mix of tolulene and I see up to a 3mpg increase in mileage during the hottest months due to it being able to run full timing again.
LOL! I've read some of your more "testy" posts! They all had it comin', IMO.
Seriously though, you know my opinon on the CAI, unless it's preventing part throttle detonation it can't increase mileage. More airflow before the throttlebody can't increase mileage, it's totally impossible. Exhaust mods can do both mileage and performance. Intake can only increase performance.
Think about this, the car always maintains the same AF ratio. The throttlebody is an artificial restriction to airflow. Going from a plugged airfilter to no airfilter would only give you the same effect as cracking the throttle open a little more.
Exactly my point. Given the exact same conditions--humidity, temperature, etc--the throttle would be less open (?) at the same speed after the install of a CAI. That equals more MPG....or, more specifically, less gas required to maintain said speed.
I usually top off my summer gas with a mix of tolulene and I see up to a 3mpg increase in mileage during the hottest months due to it being able to run full timing again.
Will have to investigate tolulene further. At this point, these 2-3 mpg increases are adding up nicely.
Thanks for your comments.
Thanks, that's GasBag Pro and today it's $0.99. Funny, there are two programs, the other one is the free trial version. They are listed as 'GasBag Australia' which is what confused me. The pro version looks like it could give Gas Cubby a run for the money.
Whatever, I still only average 18.1 MPG.
I have a few pictures of some good gas mileage with my TL as well. I will say that the exhaust mods and lowering springs aid in achieving better gas mileage, moreso than one might think.
I had performance springs which yielded a 1.5" drop in ride height, I'd be lying if I said it didn't help.
I had performance springs which yielded a 1.5" drop in ride height, I'd be lying if I said it didn't help.
It's a performance intake, it flows much more freely than the stock airbox and thus allows air to enter the throttle body more efficiently. An increase in MPG is seen because there is less restriction and the car produces slightly more power.
Beside all the factors listed above, tires make a big difference in MPG, i 'm using sticky summer directional with more than average contact patch area. It kills MPG from 30-31 down to 26-27 in my case. This is going from 33 psi to 38, 39 psi.... i was hoping the added psi can counteract the sticky tire, i guess not...
I've gotten 32-35mpg on a straight hi-way run. I'm amazed that the TL will return that type of gas mileage. I only get this on a run where I fill up and hop on the highway, never get off. Like when I take my daughter to college.
I don't mean to beat a dead horse---just trying to express my experiences as best I can. No matter what, all of you guys on AZ have taken me to a higher plane, as far as loving my Acura is concerned.
Will have to investigate tolulene further. At this point, these 2-3 mpg increases are adding up nicely.
Thanks for your comments.
Will have to investigate tolulene further. At this point, these 2-3 mpg increases are adding up nicely.
Thanks for your comments.
The throttle valve is just that, a valve. If you reduce restriction upstream of it and it lets more air in for a given opening, you make more power at that opening reducing gas mileage. Even if you don't have to open it as far for the same power, you're getting the same amount of air into the engine and the corresponding increase in fuel.
In other words the throttle valve has nothing to do with mpg. It's the amount of air the engine sees after the throttle valve that determines power and mileage.
An extreme example would be a turbo car. It may blow 10psi of boost at a halfway closed throttle valve. You're making 50% more power now but you wouldn't expect to get the same mileage at half throttle as you did without the turbo. It's the same thing as the CAI, just much more drastic.
Think of it as more airflow= more power and less mpg, regardless of throttle opening.
There's always the chance that the cooler charge is reducing detonation and it's possible to see a mpg jump from that.
As for tolulene, if your car isn't pinging, there's no need for it. If it does ping like mine does in the summer time, you will pick up some mpg from it because it will allow the computer to run full timing. I doubt I break even price wise, the tolulene is more expensive than the increase in mpg but I use it to save the engine and give me a few extra hp.
Hope this helps.
I'm not an iPhone owner, but I use www.fuelly.com to log my MPG performance. It's free and a decent tool.











