Why RDX over CX-5?
#1
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Why RDX over CX-5?
Hello! I'm new here. I want to start off by saying that this forum is wonderful and I'm really enjoying reading everyone's perspectives. While I don't have a vast automotive knowledge (and perhaps don't belong here), I tend to be particular and observant and I love information. Reading through these threads is addictive and everything I've ever wanted that's been lacking from reviews. I've been car shopping for a while now and really the only two that have stood out to me have been the RDX and the Mazda CX-5 (turbo only). For anyone who considered a CX-5, can you tell me why you ultimately went with the RDX?
#2
We've been shopping the same cars, RDX, CX-5, and a few others. For us, the overall interior design of the RDX was far nicer than the CX-5.....much more sporty. Personal preference I guess.
The following users liked this post:
NBPDC505 (11-06-2020)
#3
Be the Best Be Great
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan, Colorado, Key West
Posts: 1,620
Received 101 Likes
on
82 Posts
If you haven't already, here are a few sources for your review. Members of this forum may have their own thoughts for each but they, the sources, give a varied evaluation of the RDX. One common criticism is the 'touchpad system'. I have a 2019 RDX and find that although it will have a long learning curve but once familiarity, with practice, is achieved it becomes a great system.
https://www.edmunds.com/acura/rdx/2020/
https://www.caranddriver.com/acura/rdx
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/acura/rdx/2020/
https://www.edmunds.com/acura/rdx/2020/
https://www.caranddriver.com/acura/rdx
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/acura/rdx/2020/
Last edited by Acure4RDX; 11-04-2020 at 08:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
katalina (11-04-2020)
#4
Intermediate
The CX5 was at the top of my list until I actually sat in it. It is very nice but is just too small and cramped for me. The RDX is the perfect size - not too big and not too small. I was also impressed by the interior quality and layout of the RDX after seeing it in person. I never did test drive the CX5 because the small interior was a non-starter.
The following 6 users liked this post by rdevillers:
Cuzz (12-01-2020),
droth8um (11-04-2020),
dweilbacher (11-06-2020),
fogdoctor (11-10-2020),
NBPDC505 (11-06-2020),
and 1 others liked this post.
#5
This subject has been discussed here before. We chose the CX-5 Signature over the RDX Advance mainly because they both were very close to our needs and wants. The price differential was the main factor that we went with the Mazda. The other big factor was that it's my wife's vehicle, so she had veto power. ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I don't think you could go wrong with either. You just have to weigh the plusses and minuses against your situational needs.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I don't think you could go wrong with either. You just have to weigh the plusses and minuses against your situational needs.
The following users liked this post:
JB in AZ (11-05-2020)
#6
Racer
I love the CX-5 and thought it would be my next car until I tried it with rear-facing car seats. I'm 6ft and couldn't get into a comfortable driving position with the seat behind me. Cargo space is also on the small side. This was a problem because we take 1000mi road trips back to my hometown.
If not for the space issue, I'd gladly buy a CX-5 right now and save $$ over the RDX.
If not for the space issue, I'd gladly buy a CX-5 right now and save $$ over the RDX.
#7
Mazda seems to be an unique brand, you dont hear a lot about them, but what you do hear is positive. My brother in law just bought a new mazda cx-5, loves it. test drive both and go with the 1 that feels "right"
The following users liked this post:
katalina (11-04-2020)
Trending Topics
#8
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,445
Received 1,607 Likes
on
967 Posts
I own a CX-5 non turbo and I love it. I am sure the Turbo version is much nicer and has better features. I also helped a colleague to cross shop CX-5 Turbo with RDX. I test drove both cars and I can tell you the following.
The RDX is much smoother and I find it's a step above the CX-5. Also, the RDX is bigger. I find the CX-5 on the smaller side of the suvs. My colleague finally purchased the CX-5 turbo for one reason: Price. He is paying $525 CAD per month and the RDX A-SPEC was around $700 CAD.
The RDX is much smoother and I find it's a step above the CX-5. Also, the RDX is bigger. I find the CX-5 on the smaller side of the suvs. My colleague finally purchased the CX-5 turbo for one reason: Price. He is paying $525 CAD per month and the RDX A-SPEC was around $700 CAD.
The following users liked this post:
katalina (11-05-2020)
#9
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Posts: 3,001
Received 1,026 Likes
on
716 Posts
There is a big difference in the AWD systems, so if that matters, it pays to learn about the difference between Acura Super Handling AWD, and Mazdas improved FWD/AWD predictive system.
If all you have are flat, straight roads with few slippery condition situations, Acura might be overkill. Here in the NE with lots of two lane blacktop twisties and bad weather, the SH-AWD shines.
Of course, the rest of the car is upgraded, but, IMO it is the AWD systems that are essential differences.
If all you have are flat, straight roads with few slippery condition situations, Acura might be overkill. Here in the NE with lots of two lane blacktop twisties and bad weather, the SH-AWD shines.
Of course, the rest of the car is upgraded, but, IMO it is the AWD systems that are essential differences.
#10
Too small and interior/exterior not as nice as the RDX
#11
I was in the same boat. The CX-5 was cheaper, but had some features the RDX was missing such as self leveling headlights, power folding side mirrors, an actual projector for the HUD instead of using reflections...I had to think at the margin and be very picky in order to edge our the CX-5 for the RDX.
RDX had the better AWD system, active dampers (I have the Advanced), was more sport and performance focused...luxury is a bit better too. RDX has a wider stance as well. Gas tank is slightly larger than the CX-5. I just saw more potential with the RDX, especially with some new tires and new wheels...and even K-Tuner for more HP and torque than the CX-5. Additionally, the CX-5 felt much less spacious internally...I felt like the sales rep was in my lap while doing the test drive. The RDX has very comfortable seating and space.
Also, I was coming from a 2006 Toyota 4Runner. I wanted a true upgrade....and the removal of the shifter knob and instead a push button with a 10-speed transmission was a considerable upgrade in my eyes. The CX-5 has a 6 speed transmission and a shift knob. Nothing wrong with that at all, but for me....it represented what I already had in my 4Runner and I wanted something a bit more radically different.
Although Mazda is for sure headed towards a more luxurious focus, the Acura is already there. The sound system in the RDX is insanely good and I'm an audiophile...I'm hearing things in music I have not heard with some of my most expensive headphones. The CX-5 just has a Bose system which is...well nothing like the RDX system. Technology package in the RDX was just...better. I like the touch pad and the large HD screen. I know the CX-5 just upgraded its screen as well...but the Bose system remains.
Lastly, the engine bay hood on the RDX can stand up on its own with it's piston/shock arms. The CX-5, you have to pull a rod out which holds up the hood.
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle...just depends on if you're willing to think at the margin and if it's in your budget. You have to be critical because the CX-5 is a fantastic car....
RDX had the better AWD system, active dampers (I have the Advanced), was more sport and performance focused...luxury is a bit better too. RDX has a wider stance as well. Gas tank is slightly larger than the CX-5. I just saw more potential with the RDX, especially with some new tires and new wheels...and even K-Tuner for more HP and torque than the CX-5. Additionally, the CX-5 felt much less spacious internally...I felt like the sales rep was in my lap while doing the test drive. The RDX has very comfortable seating and space.
Also, I was coming from a 2006 Toyota 4Runner. I wanted a true upgrade....and the removal of the shifter knob and instead a push button with a 10-speed transmission was a considerable upgrade in my eyes. The CX-5 has a 6 speed transmission and a shift knob. Nothing wrong with that at all, but for me....it represented what I already had in my 4Runner and I wanted something a bit more radically different.
Although Mazda is for sure headed towards a more luxurious focus, the Acura is already there. The sound system in the RDX is insanely good and I'm an audiophile...I'm hearing things in music I have not heard with some of my most expensive headphones. The CX-5 just has a Bose system which is...well nothing like the RDX system. Technology package in the RDX was just...better. I like the touch pad and the large HD screen. I know the CX-5 just upgraded its screen as well...but the Bose system remains.
Lastly, the engine bay hood on the RDX can stand up on its own with it's piston/shock arms. The CX-5, you have to pull a rod out which holds up the hood.
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle...just depends on if you're willing to think at the margin and if it's in your budget. You have to be critical because the CX-5 is a fantastic car....
#12
6th Gear
Thread Starter
I agree with everything you said. I've test driven both more than once. What I noticed in the RDX: the exterior styling is very pleasing to me (I prefer the A-Spec), the armrest moves (I'm short), I'm a sucker for red interior (even though I wonder how the ultrasuede will wear over time), the seats are the most comfortable I sat in during any test drive and they feel roomy (the seats alone almost sold me on the spot), sound system is fantastic, flat 2nd row floor, I would use the storage underneath the back floor constantly, the floor cover snaps in place. Though both cars are attractive, I think the RDX looks the best. I've never had a panoramic sunroof. Really attractive but also freaks me out a little, so much glass overhead. Maybe I'd use it often or maybe I'd forget it existed.
What I noticed about the Mazda CX-5: soul red paint is beautifully unique, parchment interior is also to my liking though the seats are a lot firmer (I was uncomfortable after 30 minutes of driving, maybe they'd soften up over time, or maybe it will be the sole reason I don't choose the car). There seems to be less hesitation when accelerating from a stop or roll, perhaps from more torque or less gears to work through... the power is instant and felt really nice. I didn't even feel the need to put it in sport mode even though I did just to try it out. Brakes felt natural, not too soft or too sensitive. The cabin seems quieter but unfortunately the dealerships were no where near each other and I didn't drive on the same road in both cars. Includes HUD, heated rear seats, and heated steering wheel (I know these are standard on the Advance but I would get the A-Spec). MPG seem to be better but that's obviously not my focus if these are the cars on my list. Mazda's reliability over the last few years has really gone up. The NHTSA complaints are very low. No limp mode concerns. They finally got the infotainment right in my opinion. The toggle seems easier to work than the touchpad in the RDX, but muscle memory would probably negate any noticeable difference over time. Backup camera isn't stellar but I can get over that. I may like the blind spot monitor being inside the mirror instead of on the pillar, I'm not sure yet. I wish it had a handsfree liftgate. The backseat is cramped even though the headroom is pretty good.
I'm familiar with my nearest Mazda dealership's service department and it's topnotch in my experience, I have owned a CX-7 for 12 years. They will give you a loaner upon request every time you come in, not just for warranty work. Definitely not my experience when I had a Honda. They video their assessment of your vehicle and send these videos to you so you can review their recommendations with visual explanations along with a cost breakdown before making a decision. I have no experience with an Acura service department, if anyone would like to give their opinion. Ok I know it sounds like I'm team Mazda over here but I'm just more familiar with them. There are not a lot of Acuras where I live. I stumbled upon the RDX by chance when I went to look at a Honda Passport (didn't care for the big boat feel) and they had a 2020 RDX A-Spec that had just been traded in. Thus my investigation began.
I completely understand about wanting a true upgrade and not just a nicer version of something you already have. Since I have had a CX-7 for so long, in a way I'd like something that doesn't resemble what I have. A complete restart for the next decade of ownership.
As has been stated before, if Acura would just let Advance and A-Spec packages be combined, it would tick a lot of boxes for people. I appreciate everyone's input on such a mundane question. I know it comes down to personal preference and what compromises a person is willing to make, just wanted to see what persuaded others in the end since I saw on a few threads that people had considered the CX-5.
What I noticed about the Mazda CX-5: soul red paint is beautifully unique, parchment interior is also to my liking though the seats are a lot firmer (I was uncomfortable after 30 minutes of driving, maybe they'd soften up over time, or maybe it will be the sole reason I don't choose the car). There seems to be less hesitation when accelerating from a stop or roll, perhaps from more torque or less gears to work through... the power is instant and felt really nice. I didn't even feel the need to put it in sport mode even though I did just to try it out. Brakes felt natural, not too soft or too sensitive. The cabin seems quieter but unfortunately the dealerships were no where near each other and I didn't drive on the same road in both cars. Includes HUD, heated rear seats, and heated steering wheel (I know these are standard on the Advance but I would get the A-Spec). MPG seem to be better but that's obviously not my focus if these are the cars on my list. Mazda's reliability over the last few years has really gone up. The NHTSA complaints are very low. No limp mode concerns. They finally got the infotainment right in my opinion. The toggle seems easier to work than the touchpad in the RDX, but muscle memory would probably negate any noticeable difference over time. Backup camera isn't stellar but I can get over that. I may like the blind spot monitor being inside the mirror instead of on the pillar, I'm not sure yet. I wish it had a handsfree liftgate. The backseat is cramped even though the headroom is pretty good.
I'm familiar with my nearest Mazda dealership's service department and it's topnotch in my experience, I have owned a CX-7 for 12 years. They will give you a loaner upon request every time you come in, not just for warranty work. Definitely not my experience when I had a Honda. They video their assessment of your vehicle and send these videos to you so you can review their recommendations with visual explanations along with a cost breakdown before making a decision. I have no experience with an Acura service department, if anyone would like to give their opinion. Ok I know it sounds like I'm team Mazda over here but I'm just more familiar with them. There are not a lot of Acuras where I live. I stumbled upon the RDX by chance when I went to look at a Honda Passport (didn't care for the big boat feel) and they had a 2020 RDX A-Spec that had just been traded in. Thus my investigation began.
I completely understand about wanting a true upgrade and not just a nicer version of something you already have. Since I have had a CX-7 for so long, in a way I'd like something that doesn't resemble what I have. A complete restart for the next decade of ownership.
As has been stated before, if Acura would just let Advance and A-Spec packages be combined, it would tick a lot of boxes for people. I appreciate everyone's input on such a mundane question. I know it comes down to personal preference and what compromises a person is willing to make, just wanted to see what persuaded others in the end since I saw on a few threads that people had considered the CX-5.
#13
...
What I noticed about the Mazda CX-5: soul red paint is beautifully unique, parchment interior is also to my liking though the seats are a lot firmer (I was uncomfortable after 30 minutes of driving, maybe they'd soften up over time, or maybe it will be the sole reason I don't choose the car)....
What I noticed about the Mazda CX-5: soul red paint is beautifully unique, parchment interior is also to my liking though the seats are a lot firmer (I was uncomfortable after 30 minutes of driving, maybe they'd soften up over time, or maybe it will be the sole reason I don't choose the car)....
You should post this question on the Mazda forum to get a different perspective. There are a couple people on there that have traded in their 3rd gen RDX for CX-5's. They had issues with Acura, so they are probably more biased. The majority of people will give you their honest opinion, though.
The following users liked this post:
katalina (11-05-2020)
#14
Burning Brakes
1. Needed a back seat that could reasonably handle 2 adults plus a child seat and the CX-5 was just a bit too small for that whereas the RDX handled it just fine. While official trunk capacity is the same the RDX's is functionally slightly bigger (wider, longer).
2. I couldn't get comfortable with the CX-5's seat. No matter how I adjusted it I got a wedgie. Was a shame since I loved the first generation's bucket seat but they changed the seat bottom design in the 2G version.
Both cars are terrific though and I'd recommend either to anyone who wants my opinion. FWIW, I'm not sure that on features or functionality that the RDX is worth the extra money (for most people).
2. I couldn't get comfortable with the CX-5's seat. No matter how I adjusted it I got a wedgie. Was a shame since I loved the first generation's bucket seat but they changed the seat bottom design in the 2G version.
Both cars are terrific though and I'd recommend either to anyone who wants my opinion. FWIW, I'm not sure that on features or functionality that the RDX is worth the extra money (for most people).
#15
Just sit in RDX
I was convinced I wanted a Mazda CX-5 for about nine months. Then I finally sat inside both of them and it wasn't even close. I also got the RDX Tech. package for about the same price as the highest trim level CX-5. All the reviews above really explain the differences well.
I actually thought the highest trim level Hyundai Santa Fe was better competition.
I actually thought the highest trim level Hyundai Santa Fe was better competition.
#16
Three Wheelin'
As has been stated before, if Acura would just let Advance and A-Spec packages be combined, it would tick a lot of boxes for people. I appreciate everyone's input on such a mundane question. I know it comes down to personal preference and what compromises a person is willing to make, just wanted to see what persuaded others in the end since I saw on a few threads that people had considered the CX-5.
https://www.acura.com/pmc-edition
You could check with your dealer(s) if they are able to get one.
There's some discussion here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/third-g...-pearl-988356/
And here's a link which talks about the combination of A-Spec & Advance features in detail.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news...cid=uxbndlbing
#17
Hey Katalina. That was a well written review. You nailed all the pros and cons. I learned something new.
I also agree with you about "wanting an upgrade". It was either Acura, Lexus, Genesis or Germans for me. I moved on from the Honda/Toyota/Mazda/Hyundai class.
I also agree with you about "wanting an upgrade". It was either Acura, Lexus, Genesis or Germans for me. I moved on from the Honda/Toyota/Mazda/Hyundai class.
Last edited by Ludepower; 11-04-2020 at 11:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
thetrev68 (11-05-2020)
#19
6th Gear
Thread Starter
![Cheers](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cheers.gif)
#20
6th Gear
Thread Starter
The closest thing would be the PMC edition which is a limited build.
https://www.acura.com/pmc-edition
You could check with your dealer(s) if they are able to get one.
There's some discussion here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/third-g...-pearl-988356/
And here's a link which talks about the combination of A-Spec & Advance features in detail.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news...cid=uxbndlbing
https://www.acura.com/pmc-edition
You could check with your dealer(s) if they are able to get one.
There's some discussion here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/third-g...-pearl-988356/
And here's a link which talks about the combination of A-Spec & Advance features in detail.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news...cid=uxbndlbing
#21
I'm familiar with my nearest Mazda dealership's service department and it's topnotch in my experience, I have owned a CX-7 for 12 years. They will give you a loaner upon request every time you come in, not just for warranty work. Definitely not my experience when I had a Honda. They video their assessment of your vehicle and send these videos to you so you can review their recommendations with visual explanations along with a cost breakdown before making a decision. I have no experience with an Acura service department, if anyone would like to give their opinion. Ok I know it sounds like I'm team Mazda over here but I'm just more familiar with them. There are not a lot of Acuras where I live. I stumbled upon the RDX by chance when I went to look at a Honda Passport (didn't care for the big boat feel) and they had a 2020 RDX A-Spec that had just been traded in. Thus my investigation began..
The following users liked this post:
katalina (11-06-2020)
#22
Three Wheelin'
So far I have not had a problem getting a loaner from my local dealer. The first time they paid for an Enterprise rental, but thereafter they have always given me a 2018/2019/2020 RDX. I have been in several times because of warranty issues, flat tire, regular service.
#23
Instructor
Our garage consists of a 2018 CX-5 and a 2020 RDX. The seats in the CX-5 being uncomfortable is absolutely true for me. They lack much padding and feel like they were designed for a 5' 8" frame at the most. Also have to agree with the points of it feeling somewhat cramped. The center console design, more specifically the cup holder placement is questionable. You have to reach back at an awkward angle to retrieve your beverage. The older CX-5 was designed better in that regard (she had a 2016 previously). The RDX seats have been fantastic, and stay comfortable on road trips while never tiring my backside. As far as driving dynamics, the Mazda feels tight but the sporty intentions feel forced and shallow.
#24
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Our garage consists of a 2018 CX-5 and a 2020 RDX. The seats in the CX-5 being uncomfortable is absolutely true for me. They lack much padding and feel like they were designed for a 5' 8" frame at the most. Also have to agree with the points of it feeling somewhat cramped. The center console design, more specifically the cup holder placement is questionable. You have to reach back at an awkward angle to retrieve your beverage. The older CX-5 was designed better in that regard (she had a 2016 previously). The RDX seats have been fantastic, and stay comfortable on road trips while never tiring my backside. As far as driving dynamics, the Mazda feels tight but the sporty intentions feel forced and shallow.
#25
#26
Cars have personalities based on the people who designed them. I always tell people to go look for themselves when shopping and see what they think and decide what is important to them personally. My next door neighbors...one has a Lexus RX, the other a high end Ford Explorer, anther a Caddy SUV, and all love their cars. I doubt any of them would buy the RDX I have have and am super happy with. Its just not the right car for them. Its difficult for anyone to make a decision for you, no matter how much they know about cars. I periodically go out and look at all the vehicles in the segment that I am interested in. I like to know my options. I like Mazda's in general as they are a solid car. But when I went and set in one and looked at details I knew it was not the car for me. Its a great car, just not a great car for me. My RDX hit the sweet spot. It helped that my wife also liked it from the first time she sat in it. (She had refused to allow me to buy the previous generation...said it was just a pricey CR-V). I love the seats in my Advanced...heated and cooled...(wife is crazy about that!). I like all the adjustments. I like the feel of the car and how it handles. Oh, and passing while going uphill in the mountains...plenty of power. The SH-AWD system is a personal favorite of mine. Its fun to watch the graphic while going uphill on a curvy road. That system really does a great job directing the power.
The RDX, like every car, is not perfect. You have to decide if it has the features and look that appeal to you, and the same goes for the Mazda or any other car. For me the RDX Advance AWD with the RED exterior was the right car. I can easily work around its few oddities and rare bugs. OH, and I like that touch pad thing just fine.
The RDX, like every car, is not perfect. You have to decide if it has the features and look that appeal to you, and the same goes for the Mazda or any other car. For me the RDX Advance AWD with the RED exterior was the right car. I can easily work around its few oddities and rare bugs. OH, and I like that touch pad thing just fine.
The following users liked this post:
Ludepower (11-09-2020)
#27
Instructor
Our garage consists of a 2018 CX-5 and a 2020 RDX. The seats in the CX-5 being uncomfortable is absolutely true for me. They lack much padding and feel like they were designed for a 5' 8" frame at the most. Also have to agree with the points of it feeling somewhat cramped. The center console design, more specifically the cup holder placement is questionable. You have to reach back at an awkward angle to retrieve your beverage. The older CX-5 was designed better in that regard (she had a 2016 previously). The RDX seats have been fantastic, and stay comfortable on road trips while never tiring my backside. As far as driving dynamics, the Mazda feels tight but the sporty intentions feel forced and shallow.
#28
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Cars have personalities based on the people who designed them. I always tell people to go look for themselves when shopping and see what they think and decide what is important to them personally. My next door neighbors...one has a Lexus RX, the other a high end Ford Explorer, anther a Caddy SUV, and all love their cars. I doubt any of them would buy the RDX I have have and am super happy with. Its just not the right car for them. Its difficult for anyone to make a decision for you, no matter how much they know about cars. I periodically go out and look at all the vehicles in the segment that I am interested in. I like to know my options. I like Mazda's in general as they are a solid car. But when I went and set in one and looked at details I knew it was not the car for me. Its a great car, just not a great car for me. My RDX hit the sweet spot. It helped that my wife also liked it from the first time she sat in it. (She had refused to allow me to buy the previous generation...said it was just a pricey CR-V). I love the seats in my Advanced...heated and cooled...(wife is crazy about that!). I like all the adjustments. I like the feel of the car and how it handles. Oh, and passing while going uphill in the mountains...plenty of power. The SH-AWD system is a personal favorite of mine. Its fun to watch the graphic while going uphill on a curvy road. That system really does a great job directing the power.
The RDX, like every car, is not perfect. You have to decide if it has the features and look that appeal to you, and the same goes for the Mazda or any other car. For me the RDX Advance AWD with the RED exterior was the right car. I can easily work around its few oddities and rare bugs. OH, and I like that touch pad thing just fine.
The RDX, like every car, is not perfect. You have to decide if it has the features and look that appeal to you, and the same goes for the Mazda or any other car. For me the RDX Advance AWD with the RED exterior was the right car. I can easily work around its few oddities and rare bugs. OH, and I like that touch pad thing just fine.
#29
Racer
This is our third RDX and love it. (The other two went to our offspring who needed cars, otherwise we’d still have them.) The car more than fulfills our needs but is a little too complex in the way of features and safety nannies, and the touchpad, in our view, is terrible and unsafe to use when driving. We travel 1500 miles to our summer place and it’s perfect - cargo space, ride and handling.
I’ve driven a couple of CX-5s at Ride and Drive events. The handling and point-and-shoot capabilities were impressive but the hard, short seats were deal-breakers. That and the small interiors. But oh that Soul Red!
I’ve driven a couple of CX-5s at Ride and Drive events. The handling and point-and-shoot capabilities were impressive but the hard, short seats were deal-breakers. That and the small interiors. But oh that Soul Red!
The following 2 users liked this post by CanTex:
Ih8honda (05-25-2021),
Midnight Mystery (11-10-2020)
#30
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Posts: 3,001
Received 1,026 Likes
on
716 Posts
This is our third RDX and love it. (The other two went to our offspring who needed cars, otherwise we’d still have them.) The car more than fulfills our needs but is a little too complex in the way of features and safety nannies, and the touchpad, in our view, is terrible and unsafe to use when driving. We travel 1500 miles to our summer place and it’s perfect - cargo space, ride and handling.
I’ve driven a couple of CX-5s at Ride and Drive events. The handling and point-and-shoot capabilities were impressive but the hard, short seats were deal-breakers. That and the small interiors. But oh that Soul Red!
I’ve driven a couple of CX-5s at Ride and Drive events. The handling and point-and-shoot capabilities were impressive but the hard, short seats were deal-breakers. That and the small interiors. But oh that Soul Red!
I wish I had her father for a father, because I got squat when it came to cars.
#31
My daughter also benefitted from a hand-me-down Accord, which she put on 100K miles, and a CR-v, which she put on 30,000 miles and traded in for a new one when she got a good job. She is now married and off the payroll, but still on the cellphone plan.
I wish I had her father for a father, because I got squat when it came to cars.
I wish I had her father for a father, because I got squat when it came to cars.
#33
I dunno, couldn't she be on a cell phone plan with her husband +/- their kids if they have any? I could see it if she didn't have a job or even if she had a job but was single. I don't know, is that a common thing and I'm just out of touch?
#34
Starting a new plan is $80/month...adding an additional line to an existing plan is just $20/month. In what world does it make sense to give the phone companies an extra $720 each year?
The following users liked this post:
Midnight Mystery (11-10-2020)
#37
Cool cell phone plan chat!
#38
Looks like the RDX is going to have some real competition from the CX-5 soon.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
Hopefully Acura isn't just sitting on their hands. RWD, straight-six, and a mild hybrid system are all things the RDX does not have.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
According to the same source, the CX-5's transformation will be made possible by two key elements. First, it will ride on a new rear-wheel-drive platform that it will share with the next Mazda6, though all-wheel-drive will also be offered. Using this architecture will allow stylists to increase the dash-to-axle ratio, which will in turn expand its footprint. Second, the space between the extra sheetmetal will be occupied by a new straight-six engine whose existence has already been confirmed by Mazda. It will get SkyActiv-X technology, and it will be available with a 48-volt mild hybrid system.
The following users liked this post:
katalina (12-02-2020)
#39
Three Wheelin'
Looks like the RDX is going to have some real competition from the CX-5 soon.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
Hopefully Acura isn't just sitting on their hands. RWD, straight-six, and a mild hybrid system are all things the RDX does not have.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
Hopefully Acura isn't just sitting on their hands. RWD, straight-six, and a mild hybrid system are all things the RDX does not have.
#40
Instructor
Looks like the RDX is going to have some real competition from the CX-5 soon.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
Hopefully Acura isn't just sitting on their hands. RWD, straight-six, and a mild hybrid system are all things the RDX does not have.
https://www.autoblog.com/2020/11/30/...-5-luxury-car/
Hopefully Acura isn't just sitting on their hands. RWD, straight-six, and a mild hybrid system are all things the RDX does not have.