Super tight under the hood

Old Nov 19, 2018 | 08:20 PM
  #1  
eaf's Avatar
eaf
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 24
Super tight under the hood

What do you guys think of what's going on under the hood?

With new RDX being only a 4-cylinder SUV I was surprised to find so little available space. E.g. accessory belt almost rubbing against the frame, and the alternator sitting so far-far behind the engine. I can't imagine the pain to replace it, if needed. 4-cylinder TLX was quite the opposite, IIRC.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 09:19 AM
  #2  
zroger73's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 573
Likes: 227
Actually, I was surprised as how much room there is under my RDX's hood compared to the 1.5T in my '17 Civic and the 2.0T in my '18 Accord. I haven't seen an "easy to work in" engine bay since the 1970's before emission control devices and plumbing took over. In the 1980's when most vehicles became front-wheel drive, that's when engine bays became really packed.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
Madd Dog's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,026
From: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by zroger73
Actually, I was surprised as how much room there is under my RDX's hood compared to the 1.5T in my '17 Civic and the 2.0T in my '18 Accord. I haven't seen an "easy to work in" engine bay since the 1970's before emission control devices and plumbing took over. In the 1980's when most vehicles became front-wheel drive, that's when engine bays became really packed.
Lots of vacant space in my Gen 9 Accord with the 2.4
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 10:21 AM
  #4  
zroger73's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 573
Likes: 227
Originally Posted by Madd Dog


Lots of vacant space in my Gen 9 Accord with the 2.4
Yup - that's because the engine bay had to be large enough to accommodate a V6. The 10th Accord uses only I4's.

When I saw how much more room there was in my RDX compared to my Accord, I immediately suspected a turbo V6 might appear in there at some point.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
Wander's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 590
From: Santa Fe, NM
Acura's engineers went to a lot of trouble to drop the engine and transmission low in the engine bay, in order to lower the center of gravity. It's part of what makes 3rd-gen RDX handle so well.

OTOH I currently have a large collection of scrapes on my knuckles from working on another Acura SUV, and I had lots of choice words for the guys who decided how much clearance was "enough". And that was just to install a darn ATF cooler.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
Madd Dog's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,026
From: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by zroger73
Yup - that's because the engine bay had to be large enough to accommodate a V6. The 10th Accord uses only I4's.

When I saw how much more room there was in my RDX compared to my Accord, I immediately suspected a turbo V6 might appear in there at some point.
My expectation is that they will use the same basic architecture for the new TL(X?), and that will get the six. I am not so sure about an RDXS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beltfed
Automotive News
27
May 2, 2005 09:26 PM
italiaCLs
2G CL (2001-2003)
16
Feb 25, 2005 05:51 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.