Mpg ?
#2
Instructor
Check out others posts. One dude said 18.8 on first tank but lots of idle.
Once engine broken in we will still find the turbo has knack for average of 20 mpg with occasional 28-29 mpg on steady highway trips.
My Accord Sport 2.0T (same engine in 99% regards) can really consume fuel but 37 mpg is possible on extended trip as well. Much lighter and not SHAWD either.
Once engine broken in we will still find the turbo has knack for average of 20 mpg with occasional 28-29 mpg on steady highway trips.
My Accord Sport 2.0T (same engine in 99% regards) can really consume fuel but 37 mpg is possible on extended trip as well. Much lighter and not SHAWD either.
The following users liked this post:
R. White (06-13-2018)
#4
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Posts: 3,001
Received 1,025 Likes
on
715 Posts
Check out others posts. One dude said 18.8 on first tank but lots of idle.
Once engine broken in we will still find the turbo has knack for average of 20 mpg with occasional 28-29 mpg on steady highway trips.
My Accord Sport 2.0T (same engine in 99% regards) can really consume fuel but 37 mpg is possible on extended trip as well. Much lighter and not SHAWD either.
Once engine broken in we will still find the turbo has knack for average of 20 mpg with occasional 28-29 mpg on steady highway trips.
My Accord Sport 2.0T (same engine in 99% regards) can really consume fuel but 37 mpg is possible on extended trip as well. Much lighter and not SHAWD either.
Do you think the 1.5 with its far better fuel economy would have been acceptable to you?
#6
Instructor
yes however, the discount on the 2.0 was much better percentage wise. I like the 1.5T overall. Also the 2.0T Accord has sunroof, bsw, rcta and true keyless entry as well as the overkill engine.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wangjt
4G TL (2009-2014)
14
07-08-2018 04:57 PM
kdybread
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
72
03-05-2015 08:04 PM