Mdx 15,16, 17?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2018, 02:55 PM
  #1  
StephTL2580
Thread Starter
 
LAGS8005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 76
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Mdx 15,16, 17?

Hey guys,

I am in the market for a 7 seater SUV. I have been on the board for about a week now and all the TSB issues are really scaring me away from wanting to purchase a MDX along with the 9 speed changes. I was originally looking at a Lexus RX 350F sport but really need the additional space for the growing family and dogs. I've also looked at the Buick Enclave but not sold. I absolutely love Acura as I currently own a 2007 TL and have babied it and it's still going strong. Should I really be weary with the MDX ? I saw that Acura contracted out a German company to make the transmission or engine? Can't recall.

It just makes me VERY nervous to drop a lot of money and only to have a lot of issues. For years 2015-2017, any idea of which one would be the best? I know to at least have SH-AWD at a minimum. Other than that, maybe I am overthinking and know that just like any car manufacturer, you could always get a bad vehicle. I currently owe a 2015 Lexus IS350 and love it but just need the space now and was wanting to stick with a Lexus but to me the 7 seater RX isn't worth it.

Thank you in advance guys!



















Old 10-04-2018, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Racer
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 251
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
The 2015 MDX has the older Honda-designed 6 speed. So if you are really that scared of the 9 speed you could always go that route.

The 2016 MDX did have some shift-quality issues that were addressed with software updates. I'm not aware of any reliability issues with the 9 speed, even in the 2016 model. There was a defective ATF warmer that could allow engine coolant and transmission fluid to mix and could kill the transmission -- but that isn't the transmissions fault. I would probably shy away from this year, personally.

The 2017 MDX (which I own) seems to be solid (only the first 5 made in 2017 were affected by the ATF warmer issue). The 2018 model is solid.

The 2019 MDX has different transmission programming, again. This model starts in 2nd gear to address some complaints of first gear being too low. Personally, I don't like this update, so I'm glad I don't have the 2019.

The bottom line is: No vehicle is perfect. The existence of a TSB shouldn't scare you. If anything, I LIKE that Acura releases TSBs because it's an admission that things can be better, and it's a step towards improving the product. I'd much rather have that honesty than a brand that doesn't acknowledge issues until the government forces them (*cough* GM/Toyota *cough*). And I'd suggest you do a thorough test drive of the vehicle to ensure YOU are okay with how it drives. I have no fears of the reliability of the transmission in my 2017. It has some quirky shifting characteristics, but I've learned how to use it, and it works well.
Old 10-04-2018, 06:51 PM
  #3  
Racer
 
bmoua15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Age: 37
Posts: 306
Received 61 Likes on 51 Posts
OP, if its in your budget then get the 2017. You get the updated exterior body, just that alone is worth it in my book. As for the 9 speed, it isn't the greatest transmission from all the reviews but its not the worst. See if you can find a used Hybrid if thats a option.
Old 10-04-2018, 07:01 PM
  #4  
8th Gear
 
frenchmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Age: 63
Posts: 8
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bmoua15
OP, if its in your budget then get the 2017. You get the updated exterior body, just that alone is worth it in my book. As for the 9 speed, it isn't the greatest transmission from all the reviews but its not the worst. See if you can find a used Hybrid if thats a option.
Hi...First time post. I have a 2015 TECH. You said something about an "updated exterior? Whats updated?
Old 10-04-2018, 07:22 PM
  #5  
Racer
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 251
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by frenchmon
Hi...First time post. I have a 2015 TECH. You said something about an "updated exterior? Whats updated?
the 2017+ has the updated front end styling compared to the 2014-2016.

2014-2016 has the “beak” which many (myself included) find ugly.

2017+ has the diamond pentagon grill, which is the current brand “look”.
Old 10-04-2018, 07:27 PM
  #6  
8th Gear
 
frenchmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Age: 63
Posts: 8
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by p07r0457

the 2017+ has the updated front end styling compared to the 2014-2016.

2014-2016 has the “beak” which many (myself included) find ugly.

2017+ has the diamond pentagon grill, which is the current brand “look”.
Oh..the beak. Yeah didnt think about that. I dont find it ugly at all....but the new front is is awesome.
Old 10-04-2018, 08:02 PM
  #7  
Burning Brakes
 
jdpdata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 798
Received 333 Likes on 230 Posts
Another vote for '17+ Sport Hybrid. You get better 7-speed DCT transmission and a few other things. Totally worth it IMO. We love ours.
Old 10-04-2018, 09:05 PM
  #8  
Racer
 
bmoua15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Age: 37
Posts: 306
Received 61 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by jdpdata
Another vote for '17+ Sport Hybrid. You get better 7-speed DCT transmission and a few other things. Totally worth it IMO. We love ours.
Some people will never know how good the Hybrid is. The only thing missing on the hybrid is the Aspec package god damn it haha!!!
Old 10-04-2018, 09:15 PM
  #9  
Racer
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 251
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by bmoua15
Some people will never know how good the Hybrid is. The only thing missing on the hybrid is the Aspec package god damn it haha!!!
I wish they used the 3.5L engine instead of the 3.0L.
Old 10-05-2018, 07:22 AM
  #10  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,772
Received 1,545 Likes on 1,201 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457
I wish they used the 3.5L engine instead of the 3.0L.
That is one area of concern for me with going with the sh-sh-awd hybrid and putting +20,000 miles per year. The posted speed limit is 75-80 mph and I usually drive 5-10 mph above that depending on conditions. Factor in elevations from 5000-11,000 feet and I can see the 3.0L sh-sh-awd being short on power and it might use more gas compared to the 3.5L at +75 mph. Not sure if the city mpgs would make up for the high speed hwy runs over time? Can't be as bad as 17.5-19 mpg combined for my 11 MDX currently in the same driving conditions.
Old 10-05-2018, 09:43 AM
  #11  
Burning Brakes
 
moose66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 935
Received 265 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by bmoua15
. . . . . The only thing missing on the hybrid is the Aspec package . . . . .
. . . and the ability to tow. Not a deal breaker for all. But worth mentioning.
Old 10-05-2018, 10:21 AM
  #12  
StephTL2580
Thread Starter
 
LAGS8005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 76
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Thank you everyone! I will be test driving a 2017 soon then
Old 10-05-2018, 10:33 AM
  #13  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,772
Received 1,545 Likes on 1,201 Posts
I think the only difference between the 17 compared to the 18/19 MDX is Apple/Android Carplay if that is important down the road for you. I don;'t know if the 14-17 MDXs can be upgraded with factory Apple/Android Carplay?
Old 10-05-2018, 02:23 PM
  #14  
Burning Brakes
 
moose66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 935
Received 265 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by mrgold35
. . . . . . . .I don;'t know if the 14-17 MDXs can be upgraded with factory Apple/Android Carplay?
This may have been discussed here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-mdx-...ssible-971086/
Old 10-05-2018, 06:48 PM
  #15  
Making it Happen
 
Renegade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Isnt the MDX being completely redesigned for 2020 or 2021 model meaning the 17 would no longer be the current style?
Old 10-05-2018, 07:57 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 251
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Renegade
Isnt the MDX being completely redesigned for 2020 or 2021 model meaning the 17 would no longer be the current style?
Considering the 2020/2021 are not available... and no one knows what they look like, or even what model year the redesign will be... that makes those “future” models.

CURRENTLY, the newest styling is the version released in 2017, making the 2017 “current” style.

i can’t believe I had to explain that. Lol.
The following users liked this post:
Comfy (10-05-2018)
Old 10-05-2018, 08:36 PM
  #17  
Making it Happen
 
Renegade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by p07r0457

Considering the 2020/2021 are not available... and no one knows what they look like, or even what model year the redesign will be... that makes those “future” models.

CURRENTLY, the newest styling is the version released in 2017, making the 2017 “current” style.

i can’t believe I had to explain that. Lol.
You aren't understanding my point, why buy a 2017 now and pay good money when there will be a total redesign in the near future which will further devalue it? If I'm not buying a couple generations behind, I'd much prefer to buy a car used 1 or 2 years after a complete redesign so that it will be current for a while.
Old 10-05-2018, 08:43 PM
  #18  
Racer
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 251
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Renegade
You aren't understanding my point, why buy a 2017 now and pay good money when there will be a total redesign in the near future which will further devalue it? If I'm not buying a couple generations behind, I'd much prefer to buy a car used 1 or 2 years after a complete redesign so that it will be current for a while.
There will ALWAYS be something new coming out in the near future.

You either need (or want) something now, or you don't.
The following users liked this post:
Comfy (10-05-2018)
Old 10-05-2018, 11:50 PM
  #19  
2014 RDX AWD Tech
 
Comfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,153
Received 354 Likes on 325 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457
There will ALWAYS be something new coming out in the near future.

You either need (or want) something now, or you don't.
That is very true. You either get the newest design and have all those bugs which needed to be sorted out, or you wait a few years but then there will be a mid cycle refresh coming to confuse you. Within a few years another generation awaits you. Basically you buy the car when you need it and whenever you feel the time is "right" for you (in terms of product cycle). There are many who buy the outgoing model of a previous generation (during model change) for a lofty discount and are happy that the car will have all bugs sorted out and is to their liking. If you always want the latest and greatest, then you may be disappointed within a few years of buying one, or you should consider leasing.... which I do not favor much anyway.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TLNV
Car Parts for Sale
3
06-07-2010 06:22 PM
balara
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
3
05-11-2010 10:32 PM
Mjakaz09TL
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
24
04-26-2010 09:53 PM
Kennedy
Car Parts for Sale
3
10-25-2009 06:05 PM



Quick Reply: Mdx 15,16, 17?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.