3.7 liter AWD TL drivetrain in the 2G TSX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2010, 01:48 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
baltimorecaesar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Age: 42
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
3.7 liter AWD TL drivetrain in the 2G TSX?

I know that the 3.5 liter FWD and 3.7 liter AWD drive train will fit in the TL, and I know you can get the 3.5 liter engine in the 2G TSX, so I was wondering first what is involved in swapping a 3.7 in a 3.5 TL, and what is necessary to swap a 3.5L in a I-4 TSX, then hopefully see what would be necessary to put the 3.7 in the TSX, and possibly fit the AWD drivetrain to the chassis of the TSX. The mounting points of the 3.7L engine I assume would be different than the 3.5L, but would probably work with some fabrication. What are your thoughts on this?
Old 10-25-2010, 02:04 PM
  #2  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
I think the 3.7L swap is plausible but not the best way to go about more power. The K24 in your car is already a capable motor, and can be boosted to upwards of 350 horsepower reliably.

AWD swap is pretty much impossible, unless you've got a few hundred thousand lying around. SH-AWD is not just a part that you can swap out car to car.
Old 10-25-2010, 04:07 PM
  #3  
Cruisin'
 
johnclancy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Age: 46
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL, buy the TL if you want that and have the money.
Old 10-25-2010, 04:42 PM
  #4  
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
ed_423's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Socal 626
Age: 32
Posts: 8,574
Received 825 Likes on 636 Posts
Originally Posted by aman
i think the 3.7l swap is plausible but not the best way to go about more power. The k24 in your car is already a capable motor, and can be boosted to upwards of 350 horsepower reliably.

Awd swap is pretty much impossible, unless you've got a few hundred thousand lying around. Sh-awd is not just a part that you can swap out car to car.
+1
Old 10-26-2010, 04:27 PM
  #5  
Racer
 
its rayden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
save yourself the money from swapping and just buy a TSX V6.
Old 11-08-2010, 11:12 AM
  #6  
Racer
 
Tannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 43
Posts: 494
Received 62 Likes on 55 Posts
Benefits of a 3.7l swap is not only do you have 305hp to start with, you have the ability to twin turbocharge it. I'd say it'd be a hell of a lot easier to push 500+hp from that 3.7 vs. the 2.4. Maybe a bit more work, a lot of money, but in the end you'd have a balls-to-wall, fast as hell TSX, and the only one with a 3.7l motor. I like the idea. If I get an extra $12k, I might just do it myself!
Old 11-08-2010, 11:14 AM
  #7  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
You'd be amazed at what the K24 is capable of. I've seen more built K's than J's
Old 11-08-2010, 10:48 PM
  #8  
Racer
 
Tannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 43
Posts: 494
Received 62 Likes on 55 Posts
You are right. The K is an amazing motor. But it will cost you $15k+ to even approach 500hp and I'm merely using 500 as a general figure since I started out with it. Anywho, the other end of the spectrum is torque. Fours have never been good on low end power. If it weren't for a turbo add on, which is the case here that I at least am entertaining, then you'd still be at a complete loss to a bigger motor like the 3.7. I'm just saying, having a great base-platform with good numbers is usually a good way to go if you want power.

Considering the options and the costs, I'd swap out my 2.4 for the 3.7 any day before throwing tens of thousands of dollars into a 2.4l four cyl and still coming up shy. Just sayin, big torque + big hp on a smaller/lighter car = a freakishly fast car. The extra weight of the 3.7 is negligible at those numbers.

But hey, whatever floats your boat.
Old 11-08-2010, 10:52 PM
  #9  
Got your mom in
iTrader: (3)
 
Silva-type-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carol City, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
You'd be amazed at what the K24 is capable of. I've seen more built K's than J's
i agree
Old 11-09-2010, 07:37 AM
  #10  
Intermediate
 
EdKiefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The amount of work to bring the 3.7 AWD to the TSX would be massive .
Just off the top you need 3.7 AWD drivetrain (front to rear , engine , tranny , rear diff with axles all around ).
now to fit this you need also new rear subframe and hubs ,plus fuel tank (to clear driveshaft), exhaust system, you also need TL AWD harnesses and ECU to go with it .

What I do think might be possible is if you already had V6 3.5 TSX , get the 3.7 long block and install . you still might need ECU but at least the harnesses are there .

Last edited by EdKiefer; 11-09-2010 at 07:39 AM.
Old 11-09-2010, 09:34 AM
  #11  
Racer
 
its rayden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
^ agreed.

swapping in a completely different engine and drivertrain will cost WAYYY more than a custom turbo setup for your i4. if you really want v6 power characteristics, then get a v6 car. this will be much cheaper than doing a swap of any kind. even a 3.5 to 3.7 swap might not be worth the trouble. i'd rather look at my FI options before thinking of a swap.
Old 11-09-2010, 09:37 AM
  #12  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Tannis
You are right. The K is an amazing motor. But it will cost you $15k+ to even approach 500hp and I'm merely using 500 as a general figure since I started out with it. Anywho, the other end of the spectrum is torque. Fours have never been good on low end power. If it weren't for a turbo add on, which is the case here that I at least am entertaining, then you'd still be at a complete loss to a bigger motor like the 3.7. I'm just saying, having a great base-platform with good numbers is usually a good way to go if you want power.

Considering the options and the costs, I'd swap out my 2.4 for the 3.7 any day before throwing tens of thousands of dollars into a 2.4l four cyl and still coming up shy. Just sayin, big torque + big hp on a smaller/lighter car = a freakishly fast car. The extra weight of the 3.7 is negligible at those numbers.

But hey, whatever floats your boat.
Again, you'd be amazed at what the K is capable of. Many of these things turbocharged end up making more torque than horsepower because of their long stroke. You could probably turbocharge and build a K-series for <$10k to give you 500 horsepower. This is a ballpark figure.

And doesn't it make sense to start with your own engine instead of dumping that, buying an entirely new engine and working on that?
Old 11-09-2010, 12:40 PM
  #13  
Intermediate
 
EdKiefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by its rayden
^ agreed.

swapping in a completely different engine and drivertrain will cost WAYYY more than a custom turbo setup for your i4. if you really want v6 power characteristics, then get a v6 car. this will be much cheaper than doing a swap of any kind. even a 3.5 to 3.7 swap might not be worth the trouble. i'd rather look at my FI options before thinking of a swap.
right, my comments were not even cost wise (you might luck out a junk yard) I was thinking pure work that would be needed and yes part list would be huge .

On K24 turbo or even V6 ,only way IMO to make it reliable is to also build the lower end (forged turbo pistons with good rods) . this way has better chance of lasting . Unless you just want low boost like 6-8lb, that might work ok with the CR in TSX .
Old 11-09-2010, 01:27 PM
  #14  
Racer
 
its rayden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
i assumed that you would be paying someone to do the work and not do it yourself. the work would be where most of the money would be spent.

personally, i'd love to see a modest supercharger made for the v6 tsx.
Old 11-09-2010, 02:24 PM
  #15  
Intermediate
 
EdKiefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by its rayden
i assumed that you would be paying someone to do the work and not do it yourself. the work would be where most of the money would be spent.

personally, i'd love to see a modest supercharger made for the v6 tsx.
Since there no PS pump above alternator I would think its doable there . Isn't there SC kit for Older TL
Old 11-09-2010, 02:27 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
its rayden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
i thought i saw something like that, but i'm new to the acura community, so i'm not too sure what's out there.
Old 11-09-2010, 02:34 PM
  #17  
Intermediate
 
EdKiefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by its rayden
i thought i saw something like that, but i'm new to the acura community, so i'm not too sure what's out there.
here one ,its not right yr so ECU tuning probably one reason .

.http://www.autocarparts.com/part/1649/0/

Edit: Thats a lot of cost for 65hp .

Last edited by EdKiefer; 11-09-2010 at 02:42 PM.
Old 11-11-2010, 06:01 PM
  #18  
SEEYOU2CREW
 
TSXKid2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Houston | New Orleans
Age: 29
Posts: 2,532
Received 207 Likes on 155 Posts
Who wants to try this first?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JByron
Car Parts for Sale
7
01-08-2016 09:49 PM
Scott a
2G TSX (2009-2014)
70
09-24-2015 10:31 PM
MyBlackBeauty
Canada
0
09-14-2015 05:28 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM
EvilVirus
Car Parts for Sale
3
08-31-2015 05:24 PM



Quick Reply: 3.7 liter AWD TL drivetrain in the 2G TSX?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.