TSX question on which one??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
cmoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
TSX question on which one??

Thinking about getting the lady a new TSX 2.4L, V4, 16valve VERSE TSX 3.4L, V6, 24 valve.......... I know there is more to the TSX than just the engine so please extend my knowledge to any pros/cons to getting one over the other. Is just getting the V4 worth saving the extra $5 g's instead of springing for the V6...? Also, I want the V6 (obviously) but having trouble convincing her it will be worth it. Is one safer than the other as a possible barging chip? Or am I wrong? If not how could I explain that to her? Thanks a ton for any and all help...

Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
TSX2010M's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
I recently bought the V4(Really it's an I4) and find the power to be sufficient at most times, a bit sluggish on the up hills specially in the 1st-3rd gear.
The V6 model i drove was noticeably faster and i found myself reaching 60 without knowing it on quiet a few occasions.
Besides the engines, the cars are the same minus the badging.

In my opinion go with the V4, save the money, and the fuel.
I currently get 9.5L/100km.
Which is the same as my old corolla.
You get more millage, and it's cheaper like you said.
For a woman, not being sexiest, but I don't believe your wife will care tremendously about speed as much as going farther for less.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #3  
cmoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Thanks man, good advice. Since I will be getting her this car I will be stuck with my old truck. Was kinda hoping to get the extra power as a little toy for myself but I think you are right. Thanks again..
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #4  
nj2pa2nc's Avatar
it's a car-drive it
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 262
From: North Carolina
the v-6 only comes with automatic. I like manual transmission
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #5  
cmoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Did not know that, thanks..
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #6  
TSteezyX's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 375
Likes: 1
And also as a result of the bigger V6 up front, the TSX V6 is heavier. Larger motor, more beefier suspension components, more unsprung weight. So, in theory, it's more prone to understeer. Which might annoy you depending on how aggressive you drive and what type of driving you'll be doing(i.e. highway cruising or around town stuff).
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 06:56 AM
  #7  
hondu's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 56
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by cmoney
Thinking about getting the lady a new TSX 2.4L, V4, 16valve VERSE TSX 3.4L, V6, 24 valve.......... I know there is more to the TSX than just the engine so please extend my knowledge to any pros/cons to getting one over the other. Is just getting the V4 worth saving the extra $5 g's instead of springing for the V6...? Also, I want the V6 (obviously) but having trouble convincing her it will be worth it. Is one safer than the other as a possible barging chip? Or am I wrong? If not how could I explain that to her? Thanks a ton for any and all help...

I went with the I-4 engine and I think it has plenty of power for most driving conditions, plus I like the 32-33 mpg each week.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #8  
cmoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Thanks all, going with the I4 as advised. Looking forward to becoming an owner......
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #9  
its rayden's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
Likes: 28
i test drove both cars and the i4 didn't have enough power for me. there's just not enough low end torque. i don't know if the demo car i drove didn't have the right gas or what, but i didn't really feel the power up top either. and although i don't really need all that power most of the time, i know if i do need it, and it's not there, i'd be pretty upset.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 12:07 AM
  #10  
No1nfoProvided's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by its rayden
i test drove both cars and the i4 didn't have enough power for me. there's just not enough low end torque. i don't know if the demo car i drove didn't have the right gas or what, but i didn't really feel the power up top either. and although i don't really need all that power most of the time, i know if i do need it, and it's not there, i'd be pretty upset.
I totally agree. I already put in the CTE icebox and it does help noticeably with the low end torque. It's on the pricey side of CAI's though..
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #11  
DJMcGee's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by its rayden
i test drove both cars and the i4 didn't have enough power for me. there's just not enough low end torque. i don't know if the demo car i drove didn't have the right gas or what, but i didn't really feel the power up top either. and although i don't really need all that power most of the time, i know if i do need it, and it's not there, i'd be pretty upset.
No offense, but this is why Americans are thought to be wasteful to the rest of the world. We think we need 300 horsepower when we really don't.

For years I drove a vw TDI with 90 hp. I only stepped up to the TSX because of the nice amenities of the car, the I4 has more than enough power for any situation. Might you want more - sure, do you need more - NO. Requiring 0-60 times of less than 7 seconds in a car is ridiculous and giving up 5-7 mpg for that is even worse.

If we don't start changing our attitude now just wait until all you have to choose from are 1800 lb cars that get 0-60 in 12 or 16 seconds.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #12  
coffeefingers's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 361
Likes: 3
That's like saying...yeah...I'll date an ugly girl instead of a pretty girl. I mean the ugly girl functions just a well as a pretty girl. Who needs the extra bells and whistles?

That's also like saying...why are people modifying their TSXs with expensive rims and parts? The car runs fine stock.

Last edited by coffeefingers; Jul 31, 2010 at 09:33 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #13  
hondu's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 56
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by coffeefingers
That's like saying...yeah...I'll date an ugly girl instead of a pretty girl. I mean the ugly girl functions just a well as a pretty girl. Who needs the extra bells and whistles?

That's also like saying...why are people modifying their TSXs with expensive rims and parts? The car runs fine stock.
Not sure if I would say that is a fair analogy. Buying a car versus getting a girl is a completely different story. All you need to get more car is a little more money (or borrow more), while getting a hot girl depends on several other factors as well...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
coffeefingers's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 361
Likes: 3
Haha. Yeah...the girl story maybe a bit extreme.

BUT...many people like working for and getting nice shit...the car companies are just complying to our wishes by making nicer more powerful cars.

That's human nature...can't really change that.

BTW...I've dated ugly chicks...and attractive chicks. I'm sticking with the attractive ones...even if they're a bit more troublesome at times. I like the extra bells and whistles.

Last edited by coffeefingers; Jul 31, 2010 at 10:48 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 10:49 AM
  #15  
Nickybcareful's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
I chose the V6. I agree with 'its raden' that the base model does not have enough low in torque. The base weights 3470 and develops 170 FtLbs of torque (20 ratio). The V6 weights 3680 and develops 254 FtLbs of torque (14 ratio) That 41% more torque per pound, very noticable and much more in line with other cars in its class.

I also agree with DJMcGee that purchase decisions should also consider emissions and petroleum consumption. However, I am getting 25MPG overall and 30 on the highway. When I calculated the miles I drive in a year, the difference in gas milage was only a 2 - 3 gallons per month. I can make that up in other ways, like riding my bike to work more often.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #16  
ed_423's Avatar
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
i KINDA agree on what djmcgee said. but like coffeefingers said, human nature to want more. i think its jsut the way ppl see it, some ppl might want mroe power for spirited drive, others that are less of a car enthuist might only want to get from point A to B.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 06:30 PM
  #17  
TSteezyX's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 375
Likes: 1
lol...the U.S. is a HP hungry country.

While the skunk works at AMG, ///M, and Audi's RS create 450HP+ models at whim. Not to mention VAG world owning Bentley, Buggati, Lamborghini, Scoda, Seat, VW, and Audi.

The RS6 isn't even sold here in the states anymore, and M3's, RS4's, C63's etc. are a rarity in the states, relatively speaking. In Europe, however, they're a dime a dozen.

The executive saloon fully caught on in Europe decades ago. Now, 760iL's and S65 AMG's are their personal limousine to work and back. You surely don't see that here in the states.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #18  
lightjak_tsx's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 737
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #19  
Nickybcareful's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
TSteezyX said:
The executive saloon fully caught on in Europe decades ago. Now, 760iL's and S65 AMG's are their personal limousine to work and back. You surely don't see that here in the states.
I didn't buy my TSX to go fast, that's what my Ducati is for. (Short hand for I can't afford it*@!)
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #20  
Cornerstrike's Avatar
7th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Americans dont need 300 HP. They want 300HP. Technically, 140HP would probably be enough for the current TSX. That being said, the 4 Cyl is the better buy. Especially when you can get a Base TL for almost the same price as the V6 TSX. I think the V6 TSX was a mistake, but that's just my 2 cents.

I drive a 2010 TSX 6 Speed 4 Cyl and I sell Acura
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
divac
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
16
Aug 29, 2018 10:13 AM
Heyzuez20
1G TSX (2004-2008)
10
Oct 14, 2015 07:18 AM
atsx1313
2G TSX (2009-2014)
13
Sep 22, 2015 09:04 PM
datadr
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
Sep 12, 2015 09:12 PM
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.