Acura TLX spotted in production guise!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2014, 03:07 PM
  #41  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
d1sturb3d119's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,114
Received 268 Likes on 202 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
You can buy a used E90 M3 or C63 AMG for the price of the SS. Much better option IMO.
Depreciation, cost of service, reliability and its used. Just a couple things I'd think of. For the badge yes, but if that were the case I'd find an ISF instead.
Old 03-14-2014, 04:38 PM
  #42  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
goodhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 59
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I loved the Pontiac G8 and its current avatar SS. It's a great car and is a step up from TL/TLX. If I had to buy the SS, I will definitely opt-in for a used one.

I do not think we can directly compare it with anything from the Acura stable. Plus, if you have driven it, you will see that this one is all about the engine and the build quality or materials aren't that great.
Old 03-14-2014, 10:20 PM
  #43  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
You can buy a used E90 M3 or C63 AMG for the price of the SS. Much better option IMO.
Not so sure about the better option. The LSX motor line-up is old school and super easy to tune to make massive horsepower with nominal upgrades. Plus, it is extraordinarily easy to work on and fix if anything were to happen.

Both BMW and MB still have reputations for being expensive to repair out of warranty and both the M3 and C63 are much smaller cars.
Old 03-19-2014, 03:23 PM
  #44  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
goodhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 59
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
As per the latest press release, there seems to be quite a few things to look forward to:

The 2015 TLX will offer two advanced new powertrains – a 2.4-liter 16-valve, direct-injected i-VTEC® 4-cylinder engine mated to an all-new 8-speed dual-clutch transmission with torque converter; and a 3.5-liter 24-valve direct-injected i-VTEC V-6 mated to a new 9-speed automatic transmission.

Two-wheel-drive models, available with either the 2.4- or 3.5-liter powerplants, will utilize the next-generation of Acura Precision All-Wheel Steer™ (P-AWS™) technology with independent left and right rear-wheel toe angle control. The TLX SH-AWD™, available exclusively with the 3.5-liter powerplant, will employ a next-generation Super-Handling All Wheel Drive™ system that is 25-percent lighter and incorporates new torque-vectoring control logic.

The TLX was designed to deliver vault-like quietness in all driving conditions, with major improvements in noise reduction through enhancements to body stiffness, body sealing and sound insulation, and the application of electronic Active Noise Control. The TLX will be available with Acura's most advanced safety and driver-assistive technologies including Collision Mitigation Braking System™ (CMBS™), Forward Collision Warning (FCW), Lane Departure Warning (LDW), Lane Keeping Assist System (LKAS), Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) with Low-Speed Follow and Blind Spot Indicator (BSI).

The Acura press conference is scheduled for 1:50 p.m. (EST) on April 16, 2014 inside the Jacob Javits Convention Center.

Original Link: http://www.honda.com/newsandviews/ar...spx?id=7658-en
Old 03-19-2014, 04:11 PM
  #45  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Not so sure about the better option. The LSX motor line-up is old school and super easy to tune to make massive horsepower with nominal upgrades. Plus, it is extraordinarily easy to work on and fix if anything were to happen.

Both BMW and MB still have reputations for being expensive to repair out of warranty and both the M3 and C63 are much smaller cars.
The E9X M3 seems to be pretty rock hard reliability wise.. I haven't heard any stories, and I know multiple owners with 50K+ on the clock with no issues. As for upgrading, I agree the BMW will be on the more expensive side, but the C63 however is a different story. With a $1,200 tune on the C63 you will be pushing 540bhp (90 bhp over stock) easy... If you add high performance exhaust manifolds you're at ~580bhp. All for around ~3-4k. SS also takes 5.0 sec. to get to 60. You're going to need some serious power to compete with M3/C63/ISF.

Last edited by VR1; 03-19-2014 at 04:16 PM.
Old 03-20-2014, 11:45 AM
  #46  
Racer
 
BattleofXs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 390
Received 34 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
The E9X M3 seems to be pretty rock hard reliability wise.. I haven't heard any stories, and I know multiple owners with 50K+ on the clock with no issues. As for upgrading, I agree the BMW will be on the more expensive side, but the C63 however is a different story. With a $1,200 tune on the C63 you will be pushing 540bhp (90 bhp over stock) easy... If you add high performance exhaust manifolds you're at ~580bhp. All for around ~3-4k. SS also takes 5.0 sec. to get to 60. You're going to need some serious power to compete with M3/C63/ISF.
lsx with the same amount of money invested will put way more out than 580 bhp which is only about 490whp btw

it just depends if you want to spend more on the c63 to get all the interior goodies. most people don't
Old 03-20-2014, 02:29 PM
  #47  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by BattleofXs
lsx with the same amount of money invested will put way more out than 580 bhp which is only about 490whp btw

it just depends if you want to spend more on the c63 to get all the interior goodies. most people don't
The Callaway SS with 570bhp takes 4.5 sec. to get to 60. Still slower then a stock C63. Not to mention to reach that 570bhp on the SS's LS3 requires an Eaton Supercharger + more stuff vs. Headers + Tune on the C63. You can reach 550bhp on the SS with bolt on's but its not any cheaper then a tune on a C63 anyway.
Old 03-20-2014, 03:49 PM
  #48  
Racer
 
BattleofXs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 390
Received 34 Likes on 31 Posts
please tell me what USED AMG c63 is gonna have all that for anywhere near an affordable price,

you can buy a c5 corvette with an ls2 and get it to 500-600whp more easily and reliably and less expensively. You couldn't buy a c63 for that price

there's more to a fast car than it's 0-60 time too btw
Old 03-20-2014, 04:01 PM
  #49  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by BattleofXs
please tell me what USED AMG c63 is gonna have all that for anywhere near an affordable price,

you can buy a c5 corvette with an ls2 and get it to 500-600whp more easily and reliably and less expensively. You couldn't buy a c63 for that price

there's more to a fast car than it's 0-60 time too btw
You can find 2010 C63's with ~20-25k miles for 45k. (Depends though on whether optioned with the P31 and LSD or not). Add in 6-7k (tops) for a custom tune + Exhaust manifolds and your at 550bhp. To reach 550bhp on the SS youre looking at Camshaft, headers, mid-pipes, catalyctic converters etc.. Basically full boltons, at around the same price as the 550bhp C63. Not to mention it wouldn't even be close between them. 550bhp SS might be able to keep up with a C63 with the factory performance package. I agree on you about the C5, but the C5 doesn't have 4 doors like the C63/SS. I think the SS is a cool car and everything, but there are better 4 door performance cars for the money IMO. I would consider a used SS for ~30-35k. I also agree that 0-60 time doesn't mean much. In fact, to me, it's one of the least important things compared to handling, steering feedback, driving dynamics etc..

Last edited by VR1; 03-20-2014 at 04:10 PM.
Old 03-20-2014, 05:31 PM
  #50  
Racer
 
BattleofXs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 390
Received 34 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
You can find 2010 C63's with ~20-25k miles for 45k. (Depends though on whether optioned with the P31 and LSD or not). Add in 6-7k (tops) for a custom tune + Exhaust manifolds and your at 550bhp. To reach 550bhp on the SS youre looking at Camshaft, headers, mid-pipes, catalyctic converters etc.. Basically full boltons, at around the same price as the 550bhp C63. Not to mention it wouldn't even be close between them. 550bhp SS might be able to keep up with a C63 with the factory performance package. I agree on you about the C5, but the C5 doesn't have 4 doors like the C63/SS. I think the SS is a cool car and everything, but there are better 4 door performance cars for the money IMO. I would consider a used SS for ~30-35k. I also agree that 0-60 time doesn't mean much. In fact, to me, it's one of the least important things compared to handling, steering feedback, driving dynamics etc..

you also forget the 2010 c63 has only 450bhp so that is about 405whp and it weighs ~4000lbs. Oh and they still go for 45k+ with low/medium mileage

You can buy an SS non-callaway and mod it enough to easily outperform that car for less price.

it just boils down to preference, and of course the maintenance, which is quite a lot easier on an LS engine
Old 03-20-2014, 05:46 PM
  #51  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
You can buy a used E90 M3 or C63 AMG for the price of the SS. Much better option IMO.
Agreed. The SS just lacks the style of it's foreign competitors. Surely the four door corvette would be a better looking automobile.
Old 03-20-2014, 05:51 PM
  #52  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by BattleofXs
you also forget the 2010 c63 has only 450bhp so that is about 405whp and it weighs ~4000lbs. Oh and they still go for 45k+ with low/medium mileage

You can buy an SS non-callaway and mod it enough to easily outperform that car for less price.

it just boils down to preference, and of course the maintenance, which is quite a lot easier on an LS engine
I agree.

BUT the SS only has 415bhp. A SS with 550bhp won't keep up with a 550bhp c63. AND the C63 will be cheaper to get to 550bhp (540bhp only needs a $1.2k tune)
Old 03-21-2014, 09:29 AM
  #53  
Racer
 
BattleofXs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 390
Received 34 Likes on 31 Posts
the 2014 srt8 charger would stay up with it
Old 03-21-2014, 12:34 PM
  #54  
Racer
 
evo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 443
Received 129 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by VR1
You can buy a used E90 M3 or C63 AMG for the price of the SS. Much better option IMO.
Would you like to explain cost of ownership for those cars with much better option to the rest of us??
Old 03-21-2014, 04:31 PM
  #55  
Racer
 
BattleofXs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 390
Received 34 Likes on 31 Posts
the biggest thing being, getting a brand new SS fully loaded with warranty, for the price of a used m3 or or c63amg, taking a risk on maintenance history, and vehicle longevity, for the sake of 20 more hp or so.

he's 16 according to his profile on here, so we can't expect him to elaborate on stuff like that yet
Old 03-21-2014, 08:57 PM
  #56  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
The E9X M3 is rock solid.. Look at Consumer Reports reliability ratings as well as cost of ownership. The facts back me up. If you modded a SS to keep up with a stock M3 anyways, your warranty on the SS would be voided. And there is much more seperating a M3 from the SS then ~20hp. You have to look at driving dynamics, build quality etc.. Not to mention you could also find a ISF or 556hp CTS-V for the same range.
Old 03-22-2014, 05:54 AM
  #57  
Racer
 
EricInMaryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
I spoke to the dealer while buying my TSX and he said that Acura has decided not to offer the Candy Apple Red on the TLX that was used in the marketing. He said many dealers are pissed as they had preorders / holds for that specific color.

Lets hope Acura follows the ILX mantra and offers better color choices. The hues and shades on their other lines are eh.

They should call Tesla whose colors are stunning.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bailey24
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
8
11-21-2015 08:43 PM
gokhanturk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
39
09-27-2015 12:54 PM
spoiler900
5G TLX Photograph Gallery
11
09-11-2015 09:39 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM



Quick Reply: Acura TLX spotted in production guise!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.