2nd Generation TSX I4 automatic acceleration
#41
I am not saying there is no difference between AT and MT with this car. I *am* saying that the difference between MT and AT in S with manual paddle shifts is smaller than the former, and that no one's actually tested the car using S in manual mode.
#42
Quoting myself:
I doubt that people, while on a test drive, would rev a test car up to 7K RPM using the paddle shifters. There was even a thread on Acurazine, an *enthusiast* site where people were asking how to use the paddle shifters.
I am not saying there is no difference between AT and MT with this car. I *am* saying that the difference between MT and AT in S with manual paddle shifts is smaller than the former, and that no one's actually tested the car using S in manual mode.
I doubt that people, while on a test drive, would rev a test car up to 7K RPM using the paddle shifters. There was even a thread on Acurazine, an *enthusiast* site where people were asking how to use the paddle shifters.
I am not saying there is no difference between AT and MT with this car. I *am* saying that the difference between MT and AT in S with manual paddle shifts is smaller than the former, and that no one's actually tested the car using S in manual mode.
#43
So you're saying in every professional review of the auto TSX such as Edmund's, they forgot to try the paddle shifters in S mode? I think that's a bit of a reach. You won't even find many reviews of the auto - the manual version is the focus in most car magazines. I don't think anyone has been able to get a stock auto TSX out of the 8 second 0-60 range, while the manual does it in anywhere from 6.8-7.5 seconds depending on what you read. The manual and the auto TSX are a good 1-1.5 seconds apart arriving at 60 mph. That's a big difference.
Even in MT, there would be a significant difference in 0-60 between someone who shifts at 2K versus someone who shifts at max HP (i.e. 7K RPM on our car).
That's all I'm saying, is to keep that difference in mind.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Edit: corrected my comment on powerband to 7K RPM instead after googling.
Last edited by MrOtocinclus; 02-13-2011 at 12:59 AM.
#44
Burning Brakes
Like its been said earlier: theres no replacement for displacement. I came from an 04 Maxima SE. It was the worst car we have ever owned (Horrific quality but Im not going to get into that). Trust me, even if you just get the I4 TSX you will feel like you are in a car 10 times more expensive than a 6th gen Maxima.
#45
it's a car-drive it
additional: Since I was not interested in getting a car with automatic I did not test drive them. While getting my tsx serviced I had use of automatic acura (kept them overnight and put about 300 miles on them). If the buyer wants automatic do they test drive manual transmission. I do not think so. If I want to get a new red tsx I would have to get automatic.
Last edited by nj2pa2nc; 02-14-2011 at 08:34 AM.
#46
Admittedly its not the quickest car in world but then again if your comparing it to V6's that was to be expected. That said though we have an 04 V6 Camry, and an 07 G35x and I will say it feels significantly slower then the G but its actually pretty much on par with the Camry or at least it feels that way.
Last edited by NXCBLAZE; 02-14-2011 at 11:12 AM.
#47
Admittedly its not the quickest car in world but then again if your comparing it to V6's that was to be expected. That said though we have an 04 V6 Camry, and an 07 G35x and I will say it feels significantly slower then the G but its actually pretty much on par with the Camry or at least it feels that way.
#48
The '04 Camry was actually pretty slow compared to the new model. The 2010 Audi A4 2.0t gets from 0-60 in 6.4 seconds and a 2010 Camry V6 does it right around 6 seconds so they are actually pretty even. I tried to find some numbers for the TSX V6 but I'm getting some pretty mixed numbers.
-Insideline got 6.4 seconds
-Autoguide got 6.0 seconds
-MotorTrend got 5.9 seconds
So it sounds to me like if you decide on a V6 it really hauls and I mean lets face it even the 4 Cylinder isn't exactly a pooch.
-Insideline got 6.4 seconds
-Autoguide got 6.0 seconds
-MotorTrend got 5.9 seconds
So it sounds to me like if you decide on a V6 it really hauls and I mean lets face it even the 4 Cylinder isn't exactly a pooch.
#49
Banned
A lot of those magazines mention the V6 TSX mentions that the heart of what the TSX is all about is nonexistent. If you want this car for its balance of handling then get the 4 cylinder. If you want a car that's 5k more money yet goes faster in straight line, get the V6.
#51
Admittedly its not the quickest car in world but then again if your comparing it to V6's that was to be expected. That said though we have an 04 V6 Camry, and an 07 G35x and I will say it feels significantly slower then the G but its actually pretty much on par with the Camry or at least it feels that way.
Sorry, I'm new and researching.
Edit: The Camry is auto and I do thrash it a lot as my parents didn't let me get my S15 so I'm always in a need for speed.
#52
My first car was over 40 years ago (wish i still had). 1969 Mustang Mach 1. Funny, but although it may have been faster off the line than my 2011 4cyl TSX, i must say the TSX probably does a better job of most everything else in the acceleration department. I realize i'm now 62 and things change, but this car is surprising (to me) how peppy it is. No complaints. Our other car is an 07 Lexus ES350 and it's fine as well. Most driving local, stop/go, some highway etc. I'm in no hurry to get from point A to point B being they may be 5-10 miles apart and with traffic. So who needs more power? I know i don't. Gotta laugh at some of these commercials for cars with 350-450 HP. Good luck in appreciating those numbers in traffic. And with gas over $3.00 and perhaps headed higher etc. i'll stick with the TSX-4cy. Auto.
#53
My first car was over 40 years ago (wish i still had). 1969 Mustang Mach 1. Funny, but although it may have been faster off the line than my 2011 4cyl TSX, i must say the TSX probably does a better job of most everything else in the acceleration department. I realize i'm now 62 and things change, but this car is surprising (to me) how peppy it is. No complaints. Our other car is an 07 Lexus ES350 and it's fine as well. Most driving local, stop/go, some highway etc. I'm in no hurry to get from point A to point B being they may be 5-10 miles apart and with traffic. So who needs more power? I know i don't. Gotta laugh at some of these commercials for cars with 350-450 HP. Good luck in appreciating those numbers in traffic. And with gas over $3.00 and perhaps headed higher etc. i'll stick with the TSX-4cy. Auto.
The problem with that is that the speed limit in most of these parts is 65. I've already gotten my first speeding ticket in this car, and now I'm always looking over my shoulder to see if CHP is watching.
I would feel incredibly restricted in a car with 350-450HP; I'd barely hit the gas pedal and be at 65 already. Heck, I feel a little restricted in the TSX.
#55
![](http://farm1.static.flickr.com/211/498395686_74bd9674db.jpg)
you guys realize our car has fucking vtec right?
#60
Banned
And there goes the problem magazines have. The V6 doesn't handle like the 4cyl brother. It's not nearly as light on its feet as it under-steers really bad and braking performance isn't as good as the lighter car either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
170
12-06-2022 02:29 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-17-2015 09:01 PM