Dyno'ed the 2003 TL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2012, 07:33 PM
  #41  
Instructor
 
AZsilverTl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Age: 36
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1





i love paper racers


15.3 is slow for a type-s. I was able to run a best of 14.9s (averaged 15.1) with my tlp with nothing more than comptech mufflers and a K&N and modified stock intake.

Paper racers? You better come correct if you want to get a point across. I am going to call BS on your times unless you post a slip.

15.3 is accurate time for the TL-S, it was posted by the magazines, drag time supports it, and my car ran EXACTLY that. Show me a video or a verified time slip of a bone stock TL-S running 14.5 or less, then I will acknowledge your point.

I posted a video of my car doing 0-60, it is exactly mid 6s. So my TL-S runs 100%. Here is my time slip. If you plug numbers into any HP/0-60 calculator, you get 6.5 seconds 0-60 times, and HP number that supports the 240-260 crank HP.



To the main point of this thread, TL should have been a direct competitor to the 5 series. They are in the same size class- E.

Acura used the engine they had, and it was weaker than its competitors- that is it. Just because Acura says "TL is competitor for 3 series", it doesn't make it one. Ford could have said that "Pather cars (Crown Victoria, Grand Marquise) are now E class and they are competing with TL...since they just make 250 HP", come on.
Old 05-08-2013, 01:06 PM
  #42  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
P-TownTL35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Plymouth, MN
Age: 31
Posts: 129
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Hey guys i started this thread awhile ago haha but when i got my dyno he said i leaned out around 6k.. so i was thinking maybe, MAYBE a 10% mix of e85 would help me solve that problem.. before i only filled up with 91 at shell.. Im going for another shot this spring on the dyno, i modified my exhaust and cleaned the intake system and put on a tbs.. so i really want to hit 200 fwp.. any input? i made 185 fwp last year
Old 05-09-2013, 10:31 AM
  #43  
Unregistered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Karanx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 33
Posts: 4,144
Received 556 Likes on 446 Posts
Originally Posted by AZsilverTl
Acura used the engine they had, and it was weaker than its competitors- that is it. Just because Acura says "TL is competitor for 3 series", it doesn't make it one.
Lol, you're a fucking idiot
The following 2 users liked this post by Karanx7:
fsttyms1 (05-09-2013), Stephen00TL (05-09-2013)
Old 05-09-2013, 10:36 AM
  #44  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by AZsilverTl
Paper racers? You better come correct if you want to get a point across. I am going to call BS on your times unless you post a slip.

15.3 is accurate time for the TL-S, it was posted by the magazines, drag time supports it, and my car ran EXACTLY that. Show me a video or a verified time slip of a bone stock TL-S running 14.5 or less, then I will acknowledge your point.

I posted a video of my car doing 0-60, it is exactly mid 6s. So my TL-S runs 100%. Here is my time slip. If you plug numbers into any HP/0-60 calculator, you get 6.5 seconds 0-60 times, and HP number that supports the 240-260 crank HP.



To the main point of this thread, TL should have been a direct competitor to the 5 series. They are in the same size class- E.

Acura used the engine they had, and it was weaker than its competitors- that is it. Just because Acura says "TL is competitor for 3 series", it doesn't make it one. Ford could have said that "Pather cars (Crown Victoria, Grand Marquise) are now E class and they are competing with TL...since they just make 250 HP", come on.
lol calling bs on me coming from the guy showing his slip that lifted his TL and put off road tires on it trying to use it as a comparison as to how all should run. I would post slips but its been over 8 years and those arent exactly something i have kept laying around. There are others that have been high 14s low 15s with the TL-P and MANY with type-s running mid low 14s (not bone stock like you are trying to use as an example, but all NA bolt ons) Use the Search button and look. (oh and im in the 13s now) Also 1/4 mile times have more to do with the driver than the car. I have seen people with automatic corvettes/mustangs etc. run 15s.

Also Engines alone dont make cars "considered" competitors, Size, content, etc do

Last edited by fsttyms1; 05-09-2013 at 10:47 AM.
Old 05-09-2013, 12:03 PM
  #45  
Chapter Leader (Southeast Region)
 
Stephen00TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 33
Posts: 2,355
Received 451 Likes on 394 Posts
Once I finish up my last few mods on this engine I need to get to the track and see what I run. I should have the most bolt ons for a tl-p engine so it should be interesting to see what I run. It will also give me a good comparison for when I swap to a 3.5.
The following users liked this post:
fsttyms1 (05-09-2013)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drillzzz
2G CL (2001-2003)
19
07-28-2019 06:30 PM
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM



Quick Reply: Dyno'ed the 2003 TL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.