Went to the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2004, 05:24 PM
  #1  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Went to the track

Ok, my wife had to race the TL since her CRX is down right now waiting for the larger turbo set up. It was about 80 degrees and this was at 5800ft above sea level(Bandimere Speedway) in Colorado. All the runs were made with the car in Auto mode, as she was bracket racing.

Ran it 4 times as follows:

16.900 @ 82.80 mph
16.994 @ 82.38 mph
16.992 @ 82.69 mph
16.908 @ 83.09 mph
Old 07-12-2004, 05:37 PM
  #2  
Purchased: April 28, 2001
 
edgalang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dands99tl
Ok, my wife had to race the TL since her CRX is down right now waiting for the larger turbo set up. It was about 80 degrees and this was at 5800ft above sea level(Bandimere Speedway) in Colorado. All the runs were made with the car in Auto mode, as she was bracket racing.

Ran it 4 times as follows:

16.900 @ 82.80 mph
16.994 @ 82.38 mph
16.992 @ 82.69 mph
16.908 @ 83.09 mph

Wow...all within a 1/10 of a second...that's pretty consistent. Did she win?
Old 07-12-2004, 06:14 PM
  #3  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortanately her last light was not so good so she was eliminated
Old 07-12-2004, 08:31 PM
  #4  
UB6IB9
 
1st timer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: montreal
Age: 49
Posts: 1,400
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dands99tl
Ok, my wife had to race the TL since her CRX is down right now waiting for the larger turbo set up. It was about 80 degrees and this was at 5800ft above sea level(Bandimere Speedway) in Colorado. All the runs were made with the car in Auto mode, as she was bracket racing.

Ran it 4 times as follows:

16.900 @ 82.80 mph
16.994 @ 82.38 mph
16.992 @ 82.69 mph
16.908 @ 83.09 mph
that's it???? i thought these things ran at least high 15's to mid 15's.
Old 07-13-2004, 11:12 AM
  #5  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to remember that this was at 5800'. This typically will make N/A cars run about 1 sec slower then they would at sea level. The other thing is that my car is '99 so it has a 4 spd in it, and it was run in auto mode vs. sport shift.
Old 07-13-2004, 01:16 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
16.9 @ 83 mph?!!?? My friend's 03 TL-P pulled off 15.2 @ 98ish... Still at sea level you would still be pulling off 15.9 (1 second less)... I wouldn't even bother taking that to the track.
Old 07-13-2004, 01:39 PM
  #7  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bacardi151
16.9 @ 83 mph?!!?? My friend's 03 TL-P pulled off 15.2 @ 98ish... Still at sea level you would still be pulling off 15.9 (1 second less)... I wouldn't even bother taking that to the track.
Like I said, we are at 5800 ft. Everything is much slower here. Plus that was with a full tank of gas. She took it because her crx is down and she is currently in 2nd place in the series we run in. She only took it to keep 2nd place (which she did).
Old 07-13-2004, 04:33 PM
  #8  
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
 
Monte TLS,MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Cool yes the elevation is defiantely getting you.
Old 07-13-2004, 04:41 PM
  #9  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bacardi151
16.9 @ 83 mph?!!?? My friend's 03 TL-P pulled off 15.2 @ 98ish... Still at sea level you would still be pulling off 15.9 (1 second less)... I wouldn't even bother taking that to the track.
My car is a '99 so it has a 4spd in it which does not help for acceleration, She was just using it as a sub car for the series that we race in.
Old 07-13-2004, 05:13 PM
  #10  
ASSEMBLED TO PERFECTION
 
BLaCk Acc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Age: 39
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it dont matter if its a 4spd or 5spd auto, there the same as far as speed goes, thats why both the 99 and 00 and up have 225hp, not more or less. I have a 99 and that time is really freakin slow,
daym i didnt know sea level makes that much of a difference? What does the sea level have to do with the cars performance?
Old 07-13-2004, 05:24 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
spl1011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 44
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
higher air pressure at sea level than at altitude. That is why commercial airliners are pressurized.
You lose about a an inch of mercury for every thousand feet above 2000 feet.
Standard day at sea level is 29.92"hg - which is about 14.7 psi (I think).

Engines are like people, they have a hard time breathing at lower pressures.

Plus the heat is a factor, and even more so, humidity. You have less quantity of air per volume at a higher temp than at a lower temp.

Race your car on a cool night as opposed to a hot, muggy afternoon. Big difference.
Old 07-14-2004, 12:18 AM
  #12  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by BLaCk Acc
it dont matter if its a 4spd or 5spd auto, there the same as far as speed goes, thats why both the 99 and 00 and up have 225hp, not more or less. I have a 99 and that time is really freakin slow,
daym i didnt know sea level makes that much of a difference? What does the sea level have to do with the cars performance?
Having an extra gear does make a difference, actually. With the extra gear, you could have a shorter first gear to improve acceleration. That's why the premium upscale brands come out with 6-speed, even 7-speed automatic transmissions. It can help you with acceleration, and keep the RPM down at highway cruising speed to maximize fuel efficiency. Like I've always said, gearing is a huge part of a car's performance.



Thank God that Michigan is only at about 680' above sea level. Not the best condition, but much better than 5800'. :sqnteek:

Nice times, by the way. Very consistent. Too bad she got eliminated, but it looks like she did really well!
Old 07-15-2004, 02:06 AM
  #13  
woooo!!
 
subtledreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
1999 Acura 3.2TL
16.9 @ 83 mph
188 hp 186 ft lb

someone tell me why his 1999 TL only has 188hp? :sqnteek:
Old 07-15-2004, 02:16 AM
  #14  
Cruisin'
 
PejTL03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: san diego, ca
Age: 42
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
188hp, oh cause its prollly running on 5 cylinders!@%$%##$
Old 07-15-2004, 09:55 AM
  #15  
2003 SSM TLS
 
69ssrscam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No the 188 hp is measured at the rear wheels, which would equate to 225 or so at the crank. Manufacture ratings are bhp at the crank, But it is easier for owners to measure at the rear wheels from a dyno.
Old 07-15-2004, 10:25 AM
  #16  
Dr. TLS
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ATL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 69ssrscam
No the 188 hp is measured at the rear wheels, which would equate to 225 or so at the crank. Manufacture ratings are bhp at the crank, But it is easier for owners to measure at the rear wheels from a dyno.
Are you implying that he did a RWD conversion to his TL? Haha, sorry I couldn't resist. 69ssrscam is right for the most part, except that the 188hp is measured at the front wheels.
Old 07-15-2004, 11:55 AM
  #17  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
188 hp is WHEEL HP not flywheel
Old 07-16-2004, 01:33 AM
  #18  
Cruisin'
 
PejTL03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: san diego, ca
Age: 42
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dands99tl
188 hp is WHEEL HP not flywheel

I have 188HP on my steering wheel!
Old 07-16-2004, 09:13 AM
  #19  
Pro
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somerset, NJ
Age: 56
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bacardi151
16.9 @ 83 mph?!!?? My friend's 03 TL-P pulled off 15.2 @ 98ish... Still at sea level you would still be pulling off 15.9 (1 second less)... I wouldn't even bother taking that to the track.
Maybe I'll by the 15.2 sec ET but that '98ish' mph, nah!! The new TL runs about '98ish' in the 1/4 mile, w/6MT. I doubt a 2G TL-P will run the same traps w/o some serious mods.
Old 07-16-2004, 09:40 AM
  #20  
is the Mighty Favog
 
Tom Blasing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Age: 64
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
With times that consistant you should be running in bracket races.
Old 07-16-2004, 10:45 AM
  #21  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
dands99tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 5,800' above sea level
Age: 45
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Blasing
With times that consistant you should be running in bracket races.
She was racing in bracket... we race a series with our CRXs normally, but her's is down right now, that's why she took the TL. Plus we were curious what it would run. It's right on par, the car stock is only rated at a 15.9 at sea level, so a 16.9 at 5800' is right on the money.
Old 07-16-2004, 11:53 AM
  #22  
'99 Acura 3.2TL
 
@cUr@-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dands99tl
She was racing in bracket... we race a series with our CRXs normally, but her's is down right now, that's why she took the TL. Plus we were curious what it would run. It's right on par, the car stock is only rated at a 15.9 at sea level, so a 16.9 at 5800' is right on the money.

1/4 miles times for the 1999 3.2TL range between 15.2 and 16.. usually around 15.5


and auto mode really sucks so that didnt help!


@cUr@-TL
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
jpadilla
3G RLX (2013+)
4
09-27-2015 07:53 PM
4drviper
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-23-2015 09:00 PM



Quick Reply: Went to the track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.