TL and Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
rayman009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Just too cool
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: seattle
TL and Mustang

Ok...so after i was going to the mall from the Seattle meet i see this hot shot in a greenish mustang weaving in and out of traffic. So Redmond_Tl tells me to race and i can't refuse that. Anyways so i'm changing lanes and gun by him, so he does the same and goes by me..by this time we were going about 80, then i shift up to 4th and vtec kicks in and i was gone....100 mph!!! Redmond_tl almost pissed his pants, when i almost hit a car in front of me!!! i was shaking afterwards.....hahaha.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 11:40 PM
  #2  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
That Mustang driver must have been a real jerk
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 05:51 AM
  #3  
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
What engine was in the mustang? Just curious...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 07:21 AM
  #4  
my99tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
The base mustangs are slow...

http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp

If Im not mistaken, the 99 TL does 0-60 in around 7.4 sec, and the 2000-up do it around 7 sec. Right??
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
Squidboy's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by my99tl
The base mustangs are slow...

http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp

If Im not mistaken, the 99 TL does 0-60 in around 7.4 sec, and the 2000-up do it around 7 sec. Right??
Actually, check out the same site:

http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/Acura/TL/2002S.asp

Says the TL-P is 8.6 (just a hair faster than the V-6 automatic, but slower than the V-6 manual) and TL-S is 6.9 (just a hair slower than the V-8 manual, faster than the V-8 automatic).

I haven't raced any V-8s, but I've smoked a few V-6s in my TL-S
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 08:53 AM
  #6  
Mark0824's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 3
Go to

0-60 Times

Has a lot of 0-60 times. As well as the source and the date of the test. 0-60 times look to be 6.2 for the S and 6.7 for the TL-P according to Car and Driver. The 99 is 7.2 or 1/2 second slower with the older automatic.

Mark
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 08:53 AM
  #7  
my99tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
F%@K 8.6 sec NO WAY----> 7.4!

MOTOR TREND...

http://www.motortrend.com/mar99/miusa/acura_f.html

99 TL 7.4 Secs! -- not type S either

I think MT is a respectable source.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #8  
PsyKotiC RydeR's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Re: TL and Mustang

haha vtec kicked in and his was gone..thats some funny ****t!

Originally posted by rayman009
Ok...so after i was going to the mall from the Seattle meet i see this hot shot in a greenish mustang weaving in and out of traffic. So Redmond_Tl tells me to race and i can't refuse that. Anyways so i'm changing lanes and gun by him, so he does the same and goes by me..by this time we were going about 80, then i shift up to 4th and vtec kicks in and i was gone....100 mph!!! Redmond_tl almost pissed his pants, when i almost hit a car in front of me!!! i was shaking afterwards.....hahaha.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 06:19 PM
  #9  
rayman009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Just too cool
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: seattle
well i figured if i was a gt i'd be smoked. So i assume it was a crapy v6 one.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 06:26 AM
  #10  
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
At any rate, it looks like that mustang won't mess with another TL for a long time.........
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
preludeshfan's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
i dont know what the big suprise is i have beat 2 98 and older mustang GT 5 speeds. in my stock 2001 TL the first time i had a passenger. but it wouldent have made any difference, we were about even off the line till i got 2nd gear and i pulled away from him. by 80 i had about 1.5 cars on him. the 98 and older stangs were slow i think they had like 215 hp or some ****. i raced a 2000 stang GT convertable and it was really close he got my by about 1/2 a car to 60-70 mph. i always take on the pre 99 stangs they are weak.
the first guy i raced admitted to me at the light i was faster but said he dident mind getting beat by an acura but if i were driving a camry he would have been pissed.

so for the v6 thoes are a joke you could beat a V6 stang with 2 plug wires removed. lol
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 01:57 PM
  #12  
TommyBoiSxty9's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
i had an a hole in a v6 new mustang cut in front of me by old navy last week... jerk .
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonio
Car Talk
252
Feb 5, 2019 05:43 PM
carz0159
Car Talk
37
Sep 20, 2015 06:11 PM
gavriil
Automotive News
12
Jan 4, 2004 12:19 PM
gavriil
Car Talk
3
Jan 12, 2003 05:50 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.