I'm sure you've all seen this but I thought I'd share just in case

0-60 list of cars.
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...d1=0&Speed2=60

Compared to Audi A4 Quattro
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...D1=194&ID2=146

I was surprised when I saw the cars that the S was compared to...

 

What this tells you is that average condition TL-S might be able to beat nissan leaf in 0-60 drag race.

 

TL-S beating an RSX-S!??!

 

6.4 sec 0-60 for the 2003 TL-S
5.8 sec 0-60 for the 2003 CL-S

Seems like too big of a difference for cars that are so similar no?

 

The CL-S is a lot lighter and it's offered with a manual transmission.

 

they are slow.

 

stock wise, isnt the 2g tl-s 0-60 around 7 sec. not 6?

 

new, they were rated in the mid 6's as mentioned above.

 

No... The TL-P was 7.5sec. The TL-S was 6.6sec.

 

raced my cousin's rsx-s 6speed in my tl-p and off the hole he got me, rolling at 20 i whored him up to 70 then he started pulling stock to stock

 

From the numbers my TL ran at the track, I got exactly 6.6-6.8 seconds using the http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php.

10.027 1/8 mile at 73.94
9.998 1/8 mile at 73.06

AT and traction really detract from the TL's 0-60 time.

 

wow, hearing all this stuff just makes me more happier about owning a 2g TL-S

 

^^^
Yeam but it makes me miserable for just settling for a TL-P but the nearest S was 2K more. lol seems to be worth it now.
But when it goes bad im going to swap everything.
ILL SHOW YOU!!!!!
I'LL SHOW ALL OF YOU!!!!!

 

As much as I love the TL-S, I like my TL-P alot too. I got a hell of a deal on it and just broke 71k miles so still in great shape. Got a good deal on it too.

 

I looked at both the p and the s ..... what made the s the choice for me was the fact that the gas mileage was about the same...

Of course...I imagine that's partly due to the fact that we have to run premium.

 

3.2L w/better hp/tq, Im not surprised
J32a2 FTW