Shud I buy a used 2003 3.2TL-S
#1
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shud I buy a used 2003 3.2TL-S
I am planning to buy a used 2003 Acura 3.2TL-S model with around 25k miles. Having gone through this site I have noticed a significant number of people having tranny problems. Existing owners -Is it a good idea to buy one?
How do I make sure that the vehicle I'm buying has the tranny problem? Can a mechanic spot it?
Appreciate ur inputs.
How do I make sure that the vehicle I'm buying has the tranny problem? Can a mechanic spot it?
Appreciate ur inputs.
#2
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Age: 47
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't seen anyone post here with tranny problems owning a 2003 S model it seems to be 2002's and below. But maybe I've overlooked them. At any rate, if it has the extended warranty I'd go for it.
#3
Re: Shud I buy a used 2003 3.2TL-S
Originally posted by chess
I am planning to buy a used 2003 Acura 3.2TL-S model with around 25k miles. Having gone through this site I have noticed a significant number of people having tranny problems. Existing owners -Is it a good idea to buy one?
How do I make sure that the vehicle I'm buying has the tranny problem? Can a mechanic spot it?
Appreciate ur inputs.
I am planning to buy a used 2003 Acura 3.2TL-S model with around 25k miles. Having gone through this site I have noticed a significant number of people having tranny problems. Existing owners -Is it a good idea to buy one?
How do I make sure that the vehicle I'm buying has the tranny problem? Can a mechanic spot it?
Appreciate ur inputs.
#4
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northwest/burbs, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Make sure it has all its maintenance done..and look for the VIN# and Build Date on the drivers side. If your '03 is an early build (Your build date is right next to your VIN# in m/yy) .. you will see a x/02 as your build date. If this is so...make sure if they did swap the tranny...that they also swapped in a new ECU along w/the new tranny. This *seems* to fix the infamous tranny problem we have.
But if your '03 was built anytime after 2/03..your car *should* be fine. I say go for it..and hope to seeing you more on the forums.
But if your '03 was built anytime after 2/03..your car *should* be fine. I say go for it..and hope to seeing you more on the forums.
#5
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The one I have been offered falls into the below affected category.
2003 3.2TL Type S:
From VIN 19UUA5…3A000001 thru 19UUA5…3A019061
I was planning to buy certifed from David McDavid Acura of Austin.
What are the statistics on the failures? I have checked several websites but none of them have the exact numbers... only words like "significant", "several", etc. Now, does that verbiage mean 1%, 10%, 50% or 100%?
Are there folks on this board whose VINs fall into the above range but don't have the tranny problem? Please let me know.... since it looks like only folks who have posted are the ones w/ bad experiences. If there are cars which are doing just fine, then let me know... it would give me some confidence!
2003 3.2TL Type S:
From VIN 19UUA5…3A000001 thru 19UUA5…3A019061
I was planning to buy certifed from David McDavid Acura of Austin.
What are the statistics on the failures? I have checked several websites but none of them have the exact numbers... only words like "significant", "several", etc. Now, does that verbiage mean 1%, 10%, 50% or 100%?
Are there folks on this board whose VINs fall into the above range but don't have the tranny problem? Please let me know.... since it looks like only folks who have posted are the ones w/ bad experiences. If there are cars which are doing just fine, then let me know... it would give me some confidence!
#6
Originally posted by chess
The one I have been offered falls into the below affected category.
2003 3.2TL Type S:
From VIN 19UUA5…3A000001 thru 19UUA5…3A019061
I was planning to buy certifed from David McDavid Acura of Austin.
What are the statistics on the failures? I have checked several websites but none of them have the exact numbers... only words like "significant", "several", etc. Now does that verbiage me 1%, 10%, 50% or 100%?
Are there folks on this board whose VINs fall into the above range but don't have the tranny problem? Please let me know.... since it looks like only folks who have bad experiences only post. If there are cars which are just fine, then it would me some confidence!
The one I have been offered falls into the below affected category.
2003 3.2TL Type S:
From VIN 19UUA5…3A000001 thru 19UUA5…3A019061
I was planning to buy certifed from David McDavid Acura of Austin.
What are the statistics on the failures? I have checked several websites but none of them have the exact numbers... only words like "significant", "several", etc. Now does that verbiage me 1%, 10%, 50% or 100%?
Are there folks on this board whose VINs fall into the above range but don't have the tranny problem? Please let me know.... since it looks like only folks who have bad experiences only post. If there are cars which are just fine, then it would me some confidence!
Trending Topics
#8
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mine was 2003 with 12000 miles on it, brought it down to $24500.
#9
Originally posted by chess
That's a good deal! Did you buy certified too? I got a quote for the same amount for a car which had done 26,500 miles!
That's a good deal! Did you buy certified too? I got a quote for the same amount for a car which had done 26,500 miles!
#10
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now there is another option. Either go for the 2003 3.2TL-S which has the defect (but also the 7yr/100K warranty) or go for a 2003 3.2TL (NOT Type S) which doesn't fall under the defective ones.
If I had found a "good" 3.2TL-S, I would have gone for it. Which option do you guys suggest?
If I had found a "good" 3.2TL-S, I would have gone for it. Which option do you guys suggest?
#11
My '02 is on it's 5th tranny and on some of it's many repair stops at Acura I was given a TL-P as a loaner. Let me tell you the delta between the 2 is LARGE, I mean really LARGE.
Go with the TL-S as long as it has the 7yr/100k warranty, the rush you get about 5k rpm is worth experiencing (every day)
Go with the TL-S as long as it has the 7yr/100k warranty, the rush you get about 5k rpm is worth experiencing (every day)
#13
Originally posted by chess
Now there is another option. Either go for the 2003 3.2TL-S which has the defect (but also the 7yr/100K warranty) or go for a 2003 3.2TL (NOT Type S) which doesn't fall under the defective ones.
If I had found a "good" 3.2TL-S, I would have gone for it. Which option do you guys suggest?
Now there is another option. Either go for the 2003 3.2TL-S which has the defect (but also the 7yr/100K warranty) or go for a 2003 3.2TL (NOT Type S) which doesn't fall under the defective ones.
If I had found a "good" 3.2TL-S, I would have gone for it. Which option do you guys suggest?
#15
You can't go wrong with the Type S. Definitely a huge difference over the Premium. The 100k transmission warranty is a bonus in my book (mine doesn't qualify - late build).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LECKEY73
Member Cars for Sale
3
02-22-2016 01:32 PM