Question about our Michelins...
#1
Happy with my STi!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 40
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Question](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
As we all know, the stock Michelins on our TLs (mine is a 2003, dunno if Michelin for other years) suck. What I don't quite understand is why are they so damn expensive if they suck so much? I was reading a car magazine and I checked the prices of other good brands such as Nitto, BFGoodrich, Pirelli, etc. and they all seem to be way much cheaper than our tires (almost by $100 or more in some cases). I recently bought another Michelin to match the other 3 stock ones coz it has a nail puncture and it was nasty, it cost me around $200 with installation. I just don't understand why Michelin is so much more expensive than the other brands. In addition, my gf's TT also uses Michelin but her tires are way much better than ours, less noisy and squeaky at turns... anyone can explain? I am not a tire expert so I don't know much. Also, which brand and size would you recommend? Which would give me the best handling and road grip? Is Nitto any good?
#2
This going to open up a can of Pandora's Worms but here goes. Why are they so much more expensive? I have no real clue. But, maybe they put a lot of money into them (R&D, Production, advertising etc.) and discovered themselves that they're just shy of junk. In order to re-coup the lost expenses they sell them to a car manufacturer for cheap and see what they can get out of what stock is left; selling them to people like TireRack.com and DiscountTire.com hoping they'll get some more suckers there to buy them.
#3
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 50
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't care for the Michelins much either, but it is my understanding that they are among some of the better tires as far as balancing out almost perfectly without the addition of lots of weights. I just picked up my 02 TL-S and the dealer put brand new Yoks on it. They told me that Acura is actually switching to Bridgestone tires now for OEM. Don't know how truthful that is. I can't remember which model Yoks they put on, but I've never had any problems with Yokohomas. I've used them on my CRX and I've used Bridgestone's on my Jeep so I'm happy with both those brands overall.
#4
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Round Rock,Tx
Age: 41
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quiet sucky passenger tires almost always cost more than noisy performance based tires. You think they wouldve left the shit tires for the tlp and not just changed the profile for the Type-S. Pilot sports would've been nice :o
#5
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northwest/burbs, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally posted by The Acclude
Quiet sucky passenger tires almost always cost more than noisy performance based tires. You think they wouldve left the shit tires for the tlp and not just changed the profile for the Type-S. Pilot sports would've been nice :o
Quiet sucky passenger tires almost always cost more than noisy performance based tires. You think they wouldve left the shit tires for the tlp and not just changed the profile for the Type-S. Pilot sports would've been nice :o
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#6
My theory is that tire manufacturers make razor thin margins on average tires in order to be the OEM supplier for auto manufacturers. Their payoff is massive, predictable bulk sales, and the ability to rip off 90% of the owners who think that they have to replace their RE92s, MXVs, Turanzas, etc. with the same turds RE92s, MXVs, Turanzas, etc. that they came with.
Trending Topics
#11
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 50
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by thsiao
How come nobody is addressing my questions? ... is Nitto a good brand? What's the best brand? Etc...
How come nobody is addressing my questions? ... is Nitto a good brand? What's the best brand? Etc...
#12
TL-S driver
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Springfield, NJ
Age: 45
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think Nitto is a decent tire, not great but not bad either. Best brand? Surprise!....Michelin, oh and Good Year leads the pack. On this site, Continential xtreme contacts and Sumi HTR+ are the best and most popular all season tires.
#13
Originally posted by thsiao
How come nobody is addressing my questions? ... is Nitto a good brand? What's the best brand? Etc...
How come nobody is addressing my questions? ... is Nitto a good brand? What's the best brand? Etc...
#14
The reason OEM tires "suck" is they are designed to be a multi purpose tire. They are selected to provide the best all around performance (handeling, wear, ride quality, and fuel economy numbers). If the manufacturing company didnt have to worry about pleasing the government (CAFE), and the targeted audience (not many people would opt for a high end, low milage tire that was very expensive to replace evey 15k.
#15
Instructor
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kalamazoo Michigan
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....Model=Avid+V4S
I don't know if anyone here has tried these yet, but they are supposed to be really good tires. 215r50/17 is $101.00 each. Treadwear rating is 500, which is really good. I have Falkin 512s on my car and like them just fine. This AVID-S is re-designed for 2004 and not the same as the old AVID which is still available.
Anyone have any thoughts on these tires?
I don't know if anyone here has tried these yet, but they are supposed to be really good tires. 215r50/17 is $101.00 each. Treadwear rating is 500, which is really good. I have Falkin 512s on my car and like them just fine. This AVID-S is re-designed for 2004 and not the same as the old AVID which is still available.
Anyone have any thoughts on these tires?
#16
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 Max Performance Summer tire was initially developed for use as Original Equipment on some of the world's most prestigious sports cars and sports sedans by combining world-class wet and dry handling with confident and predictable cornering. Some of the first fitments include the BMW Alpina Z8, Chrysler Crossfire, McLaren SLR and Porsche GT2 & GT3 models. "
Im telling you, these are THE tires.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....ilot+Sport+PS2
Im telling you, these are THE tires.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....ilot+Sport+PS2
#17
Michelin is among the best, if not the best tire manufacturer. A friend of mine supplies them steel, and told me their factories are top-notch, super clean, and they are very protective the R&D which goes on in there. The materials & research that goes into michelin is about as good as it gets. Like many people above said, our michelins suck to us b/c we want a more "performance" tire, yet the tire we have is not a performance tire really, its an all purpose all season sedan tire, which is just fine for most ordinary sedan drivers, but a compromise. Like Ferrari said, the Pilot Sport PS2 is an incredible performance tire, but I don't think Acura would put that sort of tire on a stock sedan due to all season, noise, cost, wear, ride, etc.
#18
Michelin spends all their money on advertising and wooing auto companies to make their tires OEM.
They pass on these costs to the buyer.
They suck (other than pilot sports and their winter tires)
They pass on these costs to the buyer.
They suck (other than pilot sports and their winter tires)
#19
Originally posted by hemants
Michelin spends all their money on advertising and wooing auto companies to make their tires OEM.
They pass on these costs to the buyer.
They suck (other than pilot sports and their winter tires)
Michelin spends all their money on advertising and wooing auto companies to make their tires OEM.
They pass on these costs to the buyer.
They suck (other than pilot sports and their winter tires)
#20
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 50
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Chuck
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....Model=Avid+V4S
I don't know if anyone here has tried these yet, but they are supposed to be really good tires. 215r50/17 is $101.00 each. Treadwear rating is 500, which is really good. I have Falkin 512s on my car and like them just fine. This AVID-S is re-designed for 2004 and not the same as the old AVID which is still available.
Anyone have any thoughts on these tires?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....Model=Avid+V4S
I don't know if anyone here has tried these yet, but they are supposed to be really good tires. 215r50/17 is $101.00 each. Treadwear rating is 500, which is really good. I have Falkin 512s on my car and like them just fine. This AVID-S is re-designed for 2004 and not the same as the old AVID which is still available.
Anyone have any thoughts on these tires?
#22
6G TLX-S
Originally posted by Turboara
Michelin is among the best, if not the best tire manufacturer. A friend of mine supplies them steel, and told me their factories are top-notch, super clean, and they are very protective the R&D which goes on in there. The materials & research that goes into michelin is about as good as it gets. Like many people above said, our michelins suck to us b/c we want a more "performance" tire, yet the tire we have is not a performance tire really, its an all purpose all season sedan tire, which is just fine for most ordinary sedan drivers, but a compromise. Like Ferrari said, the Pilot Sport PS2 is an incredible performance tire, but I don't think Acura would put that sort of tire on a stock sedan due to all season, noise, cost, wear, ride, etc.
Michelin is among the best, if not the best tire manufacturer. A friend of mine supplies them steel, and told me their factories are top-notch, super clean, and they are very protective the R&D which goes on in there. The materials & research that goes into michelin is about as good as it gets. Like many people above said, our michelins suck to us b/c we want a more "performance" tire, yet the tire we have is not a performance tire really, its an all purpose all season sedan tire, which is just fine for most ordinary sedan drivers, but a compromise. Like Ferrari said, the Pilot Sport PS2 is an incredible performance tire, but I don't think Acura would put that sort of tire on a stock sedan due to all season, noise, cost, wear, ride, etc.
Michelin's are expensive because they are of exceptional good quality. The tire shop owner, where I bought my tires, explained that Michelin tires all spinned very smooth on the high-speed balancing machine (meaning that very little counter-weights were needed) compared to most makes.
#23
Happy with my STi!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 40
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Edward'TLS
I'm 100% with you. The stock MXM4's are all-season touring tires, not summer performance tires. They offer a very quiet and comfortable ride, and will satisfy a large percentage of (especially older age) TL buyers.
Michelin's are expensive because they are of exceptional good quality. The tire shop owner, where I bought my tires, explained that Michelin tires all spinned very smooth on the high-speed balancing machine (meaning that very little counter-weights were needed) compared to most makes.
I'm 100% with you. The stock MXM4's are all-season touring tires, not summer performance tires. They offer a very quiet and comfortable ride, and will satisfy a large percentage of (especially older age) TL buyers.
Michelin's are expensive because they are of exceptional good quality. The tire shop owner, where I bought my tires, explained that Michelin tires all spinned very smooth on the high-speed balancing machine (meaning that very little counter-weights were needed) compared to most makes.
#24
Originally posted by thsiao
Should I safely conclude that next times I get new tires I should go for the Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 if I am looking for the best of the best in all areas? Thank to everyone for their inputs!
Should I safely conclude that next times I get new tires I should go for the Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 if I am looking for the best of the best in all areas? Thank to everyone for their inputs!
#26
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 50
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mike Snyder
Hey DavidZC. Are these tires quiet? I need new tires, these may be the ones. How is high speed cornering..or haven't you broke them in yet? Thanks!
Hey DavidZC. Are these tires quiet? I need new tires, these may be the ones. How is high speed cornering..or haven't you broke them in yet? Thanks!
#27
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NNE of 716
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Edward'TLS
I'm 100% with you. The stock MXM4's are all-season touring tires, not summer performance tires. They offer a very quiet and comfortable ride, and will satisfy a large percentage of (especially older age) TL buyers.
Michelin's are expensive because they are of exceptional good quality. The tire shop owner, where I bought my tires, explained that Michelin tires all spinned very smooth on the high-speed balancing machine (meaning that very little counter-weights were needed) compared to most makes.
I'm 100% with you. The stock MXM4's are all-season touring tires, not summer performance tires. They offer a very quiet and comfortable ride, and will satisfy a large percentage of (especially older age) TL buyers.
Michelin's are expensive because they are of exceptional good quality. The tire shop owner, where I bought my tires, explained that Michelin tires all spinned very smooth on the high-speed balancing machine (meaning that very little counter-weights were needed) compared to most makes.
One reason why Michelins are so darned expensive is because most people who have them as OEM tires tend to buy the same tire brand thinking that they need to. Some tire manufacturers (and yes, Michelin too) make an odd-ball tire size that forces the typical consumer to go back to the same brand as factory OEM. Not very many people dare to try different sizes (width, aspect ratio, speed rating, etc..) apart from the OEM specified.
A surprise to many is that they find either a quieter ride, better handling , better treadwear or all of them once they switched to another brand.
As for the exceptionally good quality (?), I would strongly disagree. If you did a search on this forum about the stock Michelin MXMs, you'll find that they are quite inferior (and costs more) than what most tire members have switched to. I have experience a tire bubble that was replaced after some wrangling with Michelin and Honda. Situations like these forces one to buy just one newer Michelin as there are still 3 "good" ones. Michelin dealers will say "pothole" without hesitation once you get a bubble to avoid sending the tire in for warranty. It say a lot of how this company would back up this product they know is defective.
The higher end Michelin Pilots are indeed good tires, that fact alone is what classifies the stock TL-S MXM4 as a lower end model. Perhaps Honda had a better deal with the lower end ones in quantity and kept it that way. (My Acura 1.7 EL has Firestone FRS690s, probably the worst tire ever).
See how this tire performs in the snow and rain and see if you still have the same opinion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
11-16-2015 08:30 PM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM