The 3.2 liter engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 04:32 PM
  #1  
tls260
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The 3.2 liter engine

The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 04:41 PM
  #2  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
comptech headers
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 05:51 PM
  #3  
gohawks63's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 3
From: Mundelein, IL
The NSX engine is also built with exotic materials like titanium connecting rods. I'm guessing it's much lighter than the TL engine in addition to other "magic" that's worked into it.

You might get close, but short of adding a supercharger/turbo or rebuilding the engine, I'm not sure you'll equal the NSX numbers.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:19 PM
  #4  
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
what's really cool is when you stroke the 3.2 to 3.5 AND use headers, there's a stroked CL-S in SoFla with 315hp at the wheels!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
I hope you know that the NSX is a 3.2L DOHC VTEC Motor. Ours is a SOHC and it isn't the same engine. Ours is a J block..the NSX is a C series.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:22 PM
  #6  
Bitium's Avatar
Retired MOD
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 1
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: The 3.2 liter engine

Originally posted by tls260
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
Yes they are both 3.2 liters, but they are very different engines apart from V6. Second the NSX is DOHC and our engines are SOHC. The NSX revs up to 8k rpms. They might have the same block, which I'll be suprise if they do, but almost every other component is different.

Here you go for more info Click Here

Enjoy.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
Bitium's Avatar
Retired MOD
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 1
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally posted by jbrown
what's really cool is when you stroke the 3.2 to 3.5 AND use headers, there's a stroked CL-S in SoFla with 315hp at the wheels!
Sorry to correct you, but not at the wheels. 315hp at the flywheel.

Someone also have a TL-S with 335hp again at the flywheel. It was measured at the wheels and then by math came out with that number. I'm guessing 22-28 % lost.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:35 PM
  #8  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
or go here for plenty of information on Honda's exotic car. www.nsxprime.com keep in mind...I'm a NSX FREAK, I know as much as I can without even owning the car.

TL/CL - J32A1/Type S - J32A2

NSX - 91-96 - C30B/97-02 - C32B
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #9  
VolkRacing's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA, USA
Ray you're just a freak in general hahaa j/p mang
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 07:01 PM
  #10  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally posted by volkracing
Ray you're just a freak in general hahaa j/p mang
:thefinger :thefinger
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 01:22 AM
  #11  
samkws's Avatar
Comptech Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Re: The 3.2 liter engine

Originally posted by tls260
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
newbie question!!

as they have mentioned...it's different design and layout...

our 3.2 SOHC was carried over from the old TL...

the 3.2 DOHC is only available in NSX only....and it's a mid mounted engine...

they might have similar displacement and 30hp difference...but they are just like apple and orange...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 05:12 AM
  #12  
vr-tls's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 96
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
Originally posted by ElegantTL
I hope you know that the NSX is a 3.2L DOHC VTEC Motor. Ours is a SOHC and it isn't the same engine. Ours is a J block..the NSX is a C series.
My friend and I were just talking about this subject tonite. We were at his shop and he had a 94 NSX motor on the side and it wasn't pretty. Well it only needed some cleaning up. We were thinking bout a hybrid untill we match the blocks and they were a little bit different. Well i'm not sure who's quote the is but with money anythings possible.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 09:23 AM
  #13  
4thGSi's Avatar
STi
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
From: Windy City~Chicago, IL
More hp for the NSX with it's 3.2L DOHC V6 but if you notice the CL-S/TL-S 3.2L SOHC V6 had more torque...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 09:48 AM
  #14  
RAdams's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
The NSX and TL/CL engines are quite different despite having the same displacement.

The NSX, at 3.66" and 3.07", has a larger bore and shorter stroke. Piston speeds generally dictate the extreme upper limit of an engine's RPM range, so the NSX uses a shorter stroke to keep the piston speeds in check. However, longer strokes generally provide more torque which is evident when comapring the TL and NSX engines as the TL has a longer stroke (3.39") but a smaller bore (3.50"). The NSX uses Titanium connecting rods to lighten the reciprocating assembly and allow for the engine to rev quicker (and ultimately, higher)

Another classic example of piston speeds dictating an engine's redline is the 3rd generation Integra. The GS-R/Type R and the RS/LS/GS/SE both had 1.8 liter motors, but that was due to rounding. The GS-R/Type R actually displaces 1797cc (or 1.797 liters) while the others displace 1834cc (1.834 liters) due to a difference in stroke. The GS-R's stroke, at 87.2mm, actually gave it the title of production car with the fastest average pistons speeds in the world. Since it revved to 8100rpm and had a relatively long stroke, Honda went to great lengths (which I will not discuss here as this post is already too damned long) to ensure it would survive at such speeds.

Bottom line: The displacement of the two motors is the same, but they are quite different in design, mission, and operation.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 11:07 AM
  #15  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
great info guys, i definitley learned something new...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 03:05 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
Originally posted by Bitium


Sorry to correct you, but not at the wheels. 315hp at the flywheel.

Someone also have a TL-S with 335hp again at the flywheel. It was measured at the wheels and then by math came out with that number. I'm guessing 22-28 % lost.
Thanks for the correction, misinformation is the thing I hate most on these forums.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 06:28 PM
  #17  
SpoiledMan's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CA
Old TL vs. Current TL

Just to add a little something. The last generation TL had the 3.2 from the defunct Legend and shares NOTHING other than similar displacement with the current 3.2 that is an evolution of the Accord 3.0.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 06:46 PM
  #18  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by SpoiledMan
Just to add a little something. The last generation TL had the 3.2 from the defunct Legend and shares NOTHING other than similar displacement with the current 3.2 that is an evolution of the Accord 3.0.
Yep Yep. And the Accord 3.0 V6 came from the first gen CL.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 08:30 AM
  #19  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by ElegantTL


Yep Yep. And the Accord 3.0 V6 came from the first gen CL.
thats what i was about to add...that 3.0 in the accord was in my 97 cl..which is the first time that 3.0 came out.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:08 AM
  #20  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by systek


thats what i was about to add...that 3.0 in the accord was in my 97 cl..which is the first time that 3.0 came out.
beat you to the punch! :p :p haha..our engines originally came from a 97 CL...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:13 AM
  #21  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by ElegantTL


beat you to the punch! :p :p haha..our engines originally came from a 97 CL...
YEP, my cl was fun, but not nearly as fast as the tls

one quibble, the cl had a plastic dressing on the strut bar that covered all the wires, hoses and even the master cylinder w/plastic that really tidied up the engine bay when detailed. i really hate how they short changed us on this engine bay by taking that out.

now i know some ppl hate plastic in the engine bay, but if you've seen the 97-99 cl, you know what i mean.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:21 AM
  #22  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by systek


YEP, my cl was fun, but not nearly as fast as the tls

one quibble, the cl had a plastic dressing on the strut bar that covered all the wires, hoses and even the master cylinder w/plastic that really tidied up the engine bay when detailed. i really hate how they short changed us on this engine bay by taking that out.

now i know some ppl hate plastic in the engine bay, but if you've seen the 97-99 cl, you know what i mean.
oh reallly?! can you post a pic? I never knew that. haha..can we yank it from the CL and put it in our TL-S? :p
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:27 AM
  #23  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL

Originally posted by ElegantTL


oh reallly?! can you post a pic? I never knew that. haha..can we yank it from the CL and put it in our TL-S? :p
im not sure, but its worth trying... heres a pic of my old cl:






here is the url to the whole car: http://members.cardomain.com/systek
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:38 AM
  #24  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
I think it makes it look much cleaner. I think the people with the Accords can do it. hehe...oh yeah...man..the whole right side of the engine bay still resembles the 95-97 Accord V6's! haha. but then again..the whole car is a 5th Gen Accord.... :p
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:44 AM
  #25  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Originally posted by ElegantTL-S
I think it makes it look much cleaner. I think the people with the Accords can do it. hehe...oh yeah...man..the whole right side of the engine bay still resembles the 95-97 Accord V6's! haha. but then again..the whole car is a 5th Gen Accord.... :p
yep, sure does...trickle down effect...first it was on the cls, now its on the accords
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:48 AM
  #26  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
hehe..yeah. trickle down effect! honda/acura has no creativity.. :p
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #27  
Jaydef's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 808
Likes: 1
From: Westchester NY
and what makes the Type Ss different from the Ps. how do yall TlSs get that extra 35 HP??
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:52 AM
  #28  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Originally posted by ElegantTL-S
hehe..yeah. trickle down effect! honda/acura has no creativity.. :p
its definitely not that...think about the money they save and pocket doing this...add to this the premium $$$ they ask for their products

that is one thing that makes me :yack:

but at least it also means that i can service my own car cause the parts are all pretty much the same:
1. dropped my car myself
2. helped austin519 w/his ss brake lines
3. installed cai myself
4. on the cl, changed alt myself
5. on austin's tls, gave advice how to remove tls alternator
6. and the list goes on and on....
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 11:55 AM
  #29  
ElegantTL-S's Avatar
¤ Club Inspire ¤
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Very true......I agree totally. Only us car nuts will actually realize these things. the other people who buys these cars...don't have a single clue! ah well...at least Honda is making money....sort of...haha. The lawsuit against them right now on the tranny issue..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
May 30, 2020 12:40 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
Oct 8, 2015 11:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 17, 2015 09:01 PM
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.