trade for an 09 TL????
10-23-2008, 12:02 AM
#1
angel eye RL
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: mississippi..
Age: 42
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
trade for an 09 TL????
wow..just saw a white 09 TL on the road the other day..gotta say it looks pretty dam nice..for a second..only a second now...thinking to trade my 05 rl for the new tl...but came back to my senses..ani of u would trade your RL for a new TL..????..kinda looks like a lexus g series to me...
10-23-2008, 09:23 AM
#2
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
I posted the following in another thread.
I haven't had the chance to drive one yet. Was at the dealer getting an oil yesterday and they didn't even have one in stock.
I did get a chance to drive a loaded '09 TL (FWD).
I have to say that if you can get past the beak, it is a REALLY sharp car. I like it a lot.
What I found interesting is that the 280hp TL felt no quicker than the RL that is encumbered wth having to drive four wheels. The sales guy said the engine is bascally the '08 TL-S engine.
Again, I REALLY liked the car. Fit and finish is much improved and is very close to the RL.
The salesguy told me to come back in November when the SH-AWD TL model comes out. He said it's a beast.
I wouldn't trade my RL in, but if I was buying new, the new TL, especially with SH-AWD would be a very compelling choice.
I haven't had the chance to drive one yet. Was at the dealer getting an oil yesterday and they didn't even have one in stock.
I did get a chance to drive a loaded '09 TL (FWD).
I have to say that if you can get past the beak, it is a REALLY sharp car. I like it a lot.
What I found interesting is that the 280hp TL felt no quicker than the RL that is encumbered wth having to drive four wheels. The sales guy said the engine is bascally the '08 TL-S engine.
Again, I REALLY liked the car. Fit and finish is much improved and is very close to the RL.
The salesguy told me to come back in November when the SH-AWD TL model comes out. He said it's a beast.
I wouldn't trade my RL in, but if I was buying new, the new TL, especially with SH-AWD would be a very compelling choice.
10-23-2008, 10:31 AM
#3
I wouldn't trade an 05 RL for the 09 TL, unless maybe it was the SH-AWD version. I have posted before that I've seen the TL from afar and it looked like a really nice fullsize Saturn Aura, with a hint of Toyota Camry on profile. 
I do see what you're saying regarding the similarity to the Lexus G series in the way the C-pillar slopes. But that's one of the problems, the only unique thing from this vehicle is the overblown, out of proportion grille that is implemented only slightly better than the 09 RL, which I'm not a fan of either. 
I saw the base 09 TL at my local Costco and up close the grille was worse than from at a distance. The base wheel/tire combo was almost as bad as my RL, there was no appeal there at all. The interior seemed like a huge step forward though and I thought that was pleasing. I guess my feelings on the exterior design direction or lack thereof has me somewhat jaded, but you asked!!
I do see what you're saying regarding the similarity to the Lexus G series in the way the C-pillar slopes. But that's one of the problems, the only unique thing from this vehicle is the overblown, out of proportion grille that is implemented only slightly better than the 09 RL, which I'm not a fan of either. I saw the base 09 TL at my local Costco and up close the grille was worse than from at a distance. The base wheel/tire combo was almost as bad as my RL, there was no appeal there at all. The interior seemed like a huge step forward though and I thought that was pleasing. I guess my feelings on the exterior design direction or lack thereof has me somewhat jaded, but you asked!!
10-23-2008, 11:49 AM
#4
Senior Moderator
No.
If I were in the market, though, the SH-AWD TL is HUGE bang for the buck.
If I were in the market, though, the SH-AWD TL is HUGE bang for the buck.
10-23-2008, 12:36 PM
#5
Torch & Pitchfork Posse
I will put my styling cross aside....
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
Last edited by TampaRLX-SH; 10-23-2008 at 12:40 PM.
10-23-2008, 01:28 PM
#6
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
I will put my styling cross aside....
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
10-23-2008, 04:22 PM
#7
Torch & Pitchfork Posse
Also keep in mind Acura has a new CUV model due to launch...as an alternative to the TL.
http://www.motorauthority.com/galler...y-oct-001.html
Although heavily camo'd, I can still see the 'power phlegm' grill.
But it is based on the TL SHAWD platform. I love the interior, very TL.
The buzz is the MDX is to the X5 as this model (MSX?) is to the X6. Expect a sport sedan / couple like body shell.
http://www.motorauthority.com/galler...y-oct-001.html
Although heavily camo'd, I can still see the 'power phlegm' grill.
But it is based on the TL SHAWD platform. I love the interior, very TL.
The buzz is the MDX is to the X5 as this model (MSX?) is to the X6. Expect a sport sedan / couple like body shell.
Trending Topics
10-23-2008, 10:31 PM
#9
Senior Moderator
10-23-2008, 11:56 PM
#11
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Well, I must be the minority then because aside from the beak, I think it's a really sharp car, and even the beak is a better iteration than that abortion that was grafted to the front of the current RL.
10-24-2008, 06:17 AM
#12
10-24-2008, 08:15 AM
#13
Two word : HELL NO.
Agreed and unless they make any improvement on the new line up otherwise I'm leaning towards Lexus or Infiniti.
Agreed and unless they make any improvement on the new line up otherwise I'm leaning towards Lexus or Infiniti.
10-24-2008, 08:17 AM
#14
Hell no! The TL is hideous. Is the TL higher perfoming? No, only the manual TL offers significantly better "motivation", with the auto its mostly a wash. The only way in hell I'd trade would be for a manual and only if the changed the hideous grill and got rid of the ugly chrome sash in the rear and changed the fugly rear lights and, and......., comming to think about it they'd have to change the entire car, forget it
DIDN'T THEY LEARN FROM BMW, THEY HAVE SPENT ALMOST A DECADE DEBANGLING THEIR DESIGN TO GO BACK TO THEIR CLASSIC DESIGN. WHY THE HELL DID HONDA FUCK UP THE BEST DESIGN IT HAD EVER DONE?????? INSTEAD OF BUILDING ON SUCCESS THEY TOTALY DESTROYED IT!!! GODDAMNIT!!!
DIDN'T THEY LEARN FROM BMW, THEY HAVE SPENT ALMOST A DECADE DEBANGLING THEIR DESIGN TO GO BACK TO THEIR CLASSIC DESIGN. WHY THE HELL DID HONDA FUCK UP THE BEST DESIGN IT HAD EVER DONE?????? INSTEAD OF BUILDING ON SUCCESS THEY TOTALY DESTROYED IT!!! GODDAMNIT!!!
10-24-2008, 08:18 AM
#15
10-24-2008, 09:01 AM
#17
10-24-2008, 12:53 PM
#18
angel eye RL
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: mississippi..
Age: 42
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im with u on this..i would not trade my 05 rl for 09 rl or tl..but if no improvements are made in the future..im sori but i will be all lexus...gs!!!
10-25-2008, 03:32 PM
#20
Burning Brakes
ehhhh, trade only if you are into trading a good looking car for a fugly car. There is just no way to justify paying that much money for a fugly car you have to look at for the next few years. spending a dime on a car as fugly as the new TL is a dime too much. many ppl said that it'll grow on them. but a great car should grab you the first time you look at it... it should be love at first sight... it shouldn't be like 'dame that car is ugly, i'll let it sit over nite, maybe it'll look better in the morning'
Like I've mentioned in another thread, I really think there is some kinda conspiracy on the new Acura line of fugly beak. someone is out to screw Acura. I think someone got paid from the rival companies or spies from the rival company that created the fugly beak to drive the customers away. regardless of how good the car really perform. The consumer is looking for a total package. fugly good performer just doesn't cut it now a day . it's like having an ugly funny girl/dude... what are you gonna say to her/him?.... na, na... baby.... cover your face and just tell me some joke?
Like I've mentioned in another thread, I really think there is some kinda conspiracy on the new Acura line of fugly beak. someone is out to screw Acura. I think someone got paid from the rival companies or spies from the rival company that created the fugly beak to drive the customers away. regardless of how good the car really perform. The consumer is looking for a total package. fugly good performer just doesn't cut it now a day
. it's like having an ugly funny girl/dude... what are you gonna say to her/him?.... na, na... baby.... cover your face and just tell me some joke?
10-25-2008, 04:34 PM
#21
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
10-27-2008, 05:50 PM
#22
Go Big Blue!
I will put my styling cross aside....
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
When I checked the TL at the dealership recently (I did not drive), I would say the new TL has made advancements in fit, finish and assemble over the 3rd Gen. Intially I was impressed with the TSX (if I wanted a 4 cylinder premium car...the TSX I would buy). But I do see imrovements in the new TL with assembly.
I do like the 09 TL interior styling. I do not like the exterior, but it appears to have some better assembly and fit and felt more substantial in size and build. Still it was easy to see better materials in the RL. But the gap has all but closed. The expectations for the next gen RL is HIGH.
That said, they are different rides. They may share similar dimensions, similar features and at some point SHAWD platforms, but they appeal for different reasons. The TL is sport spiced, the RL is refinement flavored. Do you like fine French cuisine or spicey hot Cajun?
Should my RL go away today, I would not by the 09 RL. I would also not buy the 09 TL. Acura has time to win me back as I plan to hold my RL several years.
If the TL offers YOU what you want...buy it. If you buy it because you think OTHER people think you should....ask them to make the payments.
I guess I like both French and Cajun because I bought a TL/Tech today. Not getting rid of my RL or MDX. Got this for my daughter and will pick it up tomorrow. Black with Taupe interior. I know its a lot of car for a 17 year old but it's a "reward" for getting a full scholarship to college. I'm proud of her and, what the heck, it's only money!
As far as my impressions. I had some good seat time in the TL yesterday. I thought it rode very well. It is light years ahead of the old TL in refinement and a noticable step up from the new TSX. I was considering a 328i and test drove that also the same day. Of course, it doesn't drive as well as the BMW. No comparision actually. The steering is kind of numb feeling after getting out of the 328. The RL has a much better road feel (even at slow speeds). But, she's a girl and really doesn't need to take a right turn at 30mph. The tech advancements since my 07 RL are amazing. I really loved the harddrive feature and the FINALLY full integration for my cell phone contact database. Acceleration was good but not anything to get excited about. I'm sure the TL SHAWD will have some kick. The doplar radar is very cool. Not sure how many times someone needs that, but it did work well and you can zoom in and out to get different views. Keyless start has been much improved from my RL. The entry button on teh door is all redesigned. Hopefully it's not as quirky in the rain as ours. Also, the button is nicer than the retrofit steering column starter. The trunk is bigger and the back seat SEEMS more roomy. I'm not sure how they did that because I don't think it's any bigger than the RL.
10-27-2008, 06:36 PM
#23
Alpha Geek
I'm thinking about it.... I hate the grill, but in the TL part of this board, they have a "fix" or sorts...painting the top part body color...doesn't look 1/2 bad.
Personally I with they would bring the RSX back with SH-AWD/NAV/Manual.
Personally I with they would bring the RSX back with SH-AWD/NAV/Manual.
11-10-2008, 10:49 AM
#24
Base TL is a juiced up accord...the only one worth getting would be the SHAWD model, but that still doesnt reconcile its bad looks, and the most rediculous looking rims/tires..just overall ugly. in person its even worse. its not compelling, not in the least. the RL is a much better ride, across the board. keep it. TL is bloated, farty, the base model looks awkward on appearance, and the interior is nothing to write home about. if it were RL vs SHAWD TL, might be a closer call...but for the sticker the SHAWD TL will have, id be looking at different cars all together.
if i could drive my optimal acura...itd be the 2007 RL in white with beige...its the closest thing Acura sells to a german lux car in looks, fit, finish, refinement etc. most premium car in acuras lineup 100%. Spicymikey's/andys ride all the way.
if i could drive my optimal acura...itd be the 2007 RL in white with beige...its the closest thing Acura sells to a german lux car in looks, fit, finish, refinement etc. most premium car in acuras lineup 100%. Spicymikey's/andys ride all the way.
Last edited by MMike1981; 11-10-2008 at 10:52 AM.
11-10-2008, 11:36 AM
#25
Go Big Blue!
Base TL is a juiced up accord...the only one worth getting would be the SHAWD model, but that still doesnt reconcile its bad looks, and the most rediculous looking rims/tires..just overall ugly. in person its even worse. its not compelling, not in the least. the RL is a much better ride, across the board. keep it. TL is bloated, farty, the base model looks awkward on appearance, and the interior is nothing to write home about. if it were RL vs SHAWD TL, might be a closer call...but for the sticker the SHAWD TL will have, id be looking at different cars all together.
if i could drive my optimal acura...itd be the 2007 RL in white with beige...its the closest thing Acura sells to a german lux car in looks, fit, finish, refinement etc. most premium car in acuras lineup 100%. Spicymikey's ride all the way.
if i could drive my optimal acura...itd be the 2007 RL in white with beige...its the closest thing Acura sells to a german lux car in looks, fit, finish, refinement etc. most premium car in acuras lineup 100%. Spicymikey's ride all the way.
, but I think you're being too hard on the TL. I own one of them now too, and have spent a good amount of time in it to date. I was considering a 328 and test drove them both back to back. Obviously it doesn't handle like a BMW (or an RL for that matter), but depending on your priorities, it's a great car and HUGE value compared to a BMW. I'd recommend people seriously take a look at it. It's definitely a huge step forward from the 3G, which felt mostly like an econo car to me. I haven't driven an SHAWD version but I'll assume the stiffer suspension, additional HP, and shawd, solves the inferior handling and makes it more of an option for someone wanting a euro ride. Since I was getting the TL for a girl, I didn't think the shawd or additional power was money well spent and didn't test drive one.
11-10-2008, 12:21 PM
#26
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
I don't think the SH-AWD versions are in yet. Well maybe now. When I did my test drive a few weeks ago, the dealer told me to come back in November as that was when they were expecting those versions to be in.
11-10-2008, 12:26 PM
#27
i dont mean to come across hard on the car....its just, the fact is, is that Acura wants to play with the big boys...its well accepted that Acura is considered the bargain/good value among the other players. However, if they intend to tout the car around the big guys, they better bring the big guns.
Ill agree, the new TL is a vast improvement over the older one...the old TL was and is my least favorite acura to date...the interior is claustrophobic and the layout, well its all subjective, I just never cared for it (big green leds, felt very i dunno, toyota-ish). They losened up the new one a bit and it feels more spacious, but honsetly, just put my parents in an 09 Accord V6 navi over the new TL, and after driving the TL and looking at it, the base TL just doesnt have it...it doesnt come in high enough over the bar set by the Honda younger brother...thats just my subjective opinion...so when i look at it that way, the TL is even a LESSER value, im either going to get my rents the V6 Navi Accord or put them in a BMW...you follow me ...its somewhat weird logic, but the TL, at least to me, doesnt represent a big enough step, rather LEAP forward for Acura, especially considering a majority of redesigns out, the A4, C350, G37...where is the premium feel and bigger engine Acura is shooting for in the new TL?, its certainly not in the base model.
The V6 accord makes 10 less HP and is much more heavily discounted. Got a 09 Navi V6 for a little over 27. The TL offers little motivation to move up, and i certainly wouldnt do it for namesake...the interior is a little nicer, the els stereo helps, but what about the rest of the car
now that im way off track...in the end...RL to TL would be a major downgrade.
Ill agree, the new TL is a vast improvement over the older one...the old TL was and is my least favorite acura to date...the interior is claustrophobic and the layout, well its all subjective, I just never cared for it (big green leds, felt very i dunno, toyota-ish). They losened up the new one a bit and it feels more spacious, but honsetly, just put my parents in an 09 Accord V6 navi over the new TL, and after driving the TL and looking at it, the base TL just doesnt have it...it doesnt come in high enough over the bar set by the Honda younger brother...thats just my subjective opinion...so when i look at it that way, the TL is even a LESSER value, im either going to get my rents the V6 Navi Accord or put them in a BMW...you follow me ...its somewhat weird logic, but the TL, at least to me, doesnt represent a big enough step, rather LEAP forward for Acura, especially considering a majority of redesigns out, the A4, C350, G37...where is the premium feel and bigger engine Acura is shooting for in the new TL?, its certainly not in the base model.
The V6 accord makes 10 less HP and is much more heavily discounted. Got a 09 Navi V6 for a little over 27. The TL offers little motivation to move up, and i certainly wouldnt do it for namesake...the interior is a little nicer, the els stereo helps, but what about the rest of the car
now that im way off track...in the end...RL to TL would be a major downgrade.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JDM96specCTR
Car Parts for Sale
1
10-17-2015 01:06 PM