Returned my Benz and leased a new RL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #1  
T Austin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Returned my Benz and leased a new RL

Well the day finally came. 2 years after purchasing a (lemon) 2003 Mercedes E-500, MBUSA finally took the car back and returned my money. Most of it anyway. My new lease vehicle is a 2005 RL (celestial silver/ebony) with 18" rims, 245/45 summer tires, deck lid spoiler, wood trimmed steering wheel and shift knob. I paid only $43,500 for the car + the add-ons I just mentioned which was also discounted. I feel I got an excellent deal overall and I am enjoying the RL experience. Today I purchased a blue-tooth phone to be used with the Handfree Link. I bought the Motorola V3 (Razor) and it works perfectly. I've read comments about the Handsfree Link not working properly or experiencing an echo. I have not experienced any of those problems. Knock on wood! My driving impression overall is that the RL is a very substantial car. For the price it's hard to beat. Even still Honda should have gone with a V-8 in this car. 300 hp in th RL vs. 300 hp in my E-500 and there's not even a comparison. My Benz would stomp the RL everytime. It's a matter of torque (0-60 in 5.7 seconds). Also, my E-500 had tighter handling (when in Sport 1 or Sport 2). Not to nit pick the RL, because it has a myriad of other virtues even when compared to the Merc. Not the least of which is the price difference and the technology.

Personally in my opinion, Honda has proven that they can build substantial, quality automobiles that will rival the best the world has to offer. If Honda were to upgrade the RL so that it were on par with say the BMW 7 Series, Merc S Class, Jag XJ8, Audi A8, etc. I believe there would be a market for it. If they kept the price around $65,000 and did something similiar to what Volkswagen tried to do with the Phaeton, they might have a winner on their hands. Unfortunately the VW was priced out of the market in my opinion and most people wouldn't be willing to spend that much on a VW to begin with. Honda has the Acura nameplate in the same way Lexus and Infinity have theirs. To me it makes sense for Honda to go that way with Acura anyway. I truly love the quiet interior and smooth transmission of the RL. At the end of the day, I think I made a very good choice. Being a part of this forum, I somehow have the feeling you'll agree with me. Pics to follow once the windows are tinted and the rims and accessories are added.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #2  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Looking forward to the pics.

Keep your fingers crossed on future Acura vehicles. There are strong rumors going around of a sedan that would be above the RL and possibly have a V8.

The main things holding Honda from building a V8:

- High gas prices

- Perceived lack of demand

- Lack of vehicles that would/could use it


IMO, most customers in the $40,000+ dont care about gas prices. The demand will be there if the engine is built and a proper vehicle utilizes it. As for vehicles that could use it.. the MDX, Honda Ridgeline and the unnamed Acura sedan could use it. 3 vehicles seems enough to justify a V8 motor.

Until then.. keep your fingers crossed.

And dont forget, in the vehicle survey that comes with your car, to point out that a V8 would be a major plus!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #3  
getmoney1's Avatar
IVY LEAGUE
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Congrats ...cant wait to see pics.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Congrats!

What dealership did you end up going through?

And don't forget to sign-in to the owner sign-in thread.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
hondamore's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 1,021
From: Western Canada
Congrats T Austin!! The ride in your RL should get even better when you get the 18's on.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
msu79gt82's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Congrats
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #7  
vp911's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 2
Congrats! Post some pics
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #8  
astro's Avatar
Community Architect
robb m.
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 72,841
Likes: 660
From: ON
Congrats T Austin, i think you'll be really happy with your decision, i as well look forward to the pics of your new ride!

Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #9  
GIBSON6594's Avatar
My Garage
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,386
Likes: 11
From: NY
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Looking forward to the pics.

Keep your fingers crossed on future Acura vehicles. There are strong rumors going around of a sedan that would be above the RL and possibly have a V8.

The main things holding Honda from building a V8:

- High gas prices

- Perceived lack of demand

- Lack of vehicles that would/could use it


IMO, most customers in the $40,000+ dont care about gas prices. The demand will be there if the engine is built and a proper vehicle utilizes it. As for vehicles that could use it.. the MDX, Honda Ridgeline and the unnamed Acura sedan could use it. 3 vehicles seems enough to justify a V8 motor.

Until then.. keep your fingers crossed.

And dont forget, in the vehicle survey that comes with your car, to point out that a V8 would be a major plus!
A Honda V8 would be tits
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
Steve C's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
IMO, most customers in the $40,000+ dont care about gas prices. The demand will be there if the engine is built and a proper vehicle utilizes it.
LOL!
That is what Bob Lutz told auto reporters at the NY Auto show journalist interview last August!

A reporter asked if GM was wise to invest in big V-8 powered luxury SUV's with the gas prices souring to record levels, and in doing so, abandoning its new line of mid size fuel efficient autos. His reply was similar to Kens!

Since his ill-fated comment, GM premium truck sales are falling as oil prices rise...and GM's 32% NA market share before April is now at 25%.
People care regardless of income. GM is learning that the hard way.
Steve C.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #11  
WhitePearl_RL's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Congrats. I will never sell our w140 S600 because I believe that after 2000 they were not true Mercedes-Benz.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
SPUDMTN's Avatar
has been here awhile
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by WhitePearl_RL
Congrats. I will never sell our w140 S600 because I believe that after 2000 they were not true Mercedes-Benz.
The W140 was the last true Mercedes-Benz. Call me a purist, but no other MBZ out there right now can compare (save for the Maybach, maybe). Ever since Mercedes "merged"--or rather, bought--Chrysler, their entire philosophy has changed. Whatever happened to the philosophy of non-compromising luxury, reliability, and build quality? Whatever happened to quality over quantity? I really have yet to see a new product that is befitting of the three-pointed star.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #13  
WhitePearl_RL's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Very well said. It is not surprising that my 1998 S600 had a higher MSRP than the current w220 S600... they are just not built with the same quality and tradition.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #14  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by Steve C
LOL!
That is what Bob Lutz told auto reporters at the NY Auto show journalist interview last August!

A reporter asked if GM was wise to invest in big V-8 powered luxury SUV's with the gas prices souring to record levels, and in doing so, abandoning its new line of mid size fuel efficient autos. His reply was similar to Kens!

Since his ill-fated comment, GM premium truck sales are falling as oil prices rise...and GM's 32% NA market share before April is now at 25%.
People care regardless of income. GM is learning that the hard way.
Steve C.
You know an Acura V8 would have all the bells and whistles, including variable cylinder shutdown. I'm willing to bet it could have just as good highway MPG as a V6 with proper gearing.

IMO, the comparison between a Honda V8 business plan and GM SUV plan is specious at best.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #15  
SPUDMTN's Avatar
has been here awhile
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by WhitePearl_RL
Very well said. It is not surprising that my 1998 S600 had a higher MSRP than the current w220 S600... they are just not built with the same quality and tradition.
Your S600 is the statement of Mercedes-Benz philosophy (of yore). It really is sad to see them go down hill so quickly. I think many people identify this as well--must explain why it's so hard to find a low-mileage 1998 or 1999 W140...speaking of which, how many miles do you have on your vehicle?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #16  
WhitePearl_RL's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, VA
It has a tad over 58,000 on it and still looks, drives, smells like new
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #17  
T Austin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
My only thought about the V-8 debate is that they have become much more fuel efficient over the years and many now equal the economy of a V-6. By comparison, the RL only manages to earn 1 to 2 mpg better than my V-8 E-500 and both require Premium fuel. Harldy a deciding factor when buying an automobile. The comparison to larger, heavier SUV's is a bit like comparing apples and oranges. Few people considering an RL for example, would have seriously considered an Expedition, Excursion as an alternative. Like many, I too thought about buying an SUV, but decided not to because ultimately it wasn't the type of vehicle I wanted or needed. As somebody pointed out earlier, variable cylinder shutdown would solve most concerens over the fuel effieciency of a V-8 if Honda/Acura adopted it. I now have 500 miles on my RL and my driving impression is that the RL should at least have a V-8 as an option. I think what Honda would see is that most people ultimately prefer a V-8 and would be willing to pay the premium to get it. Those are my thoughts anyway.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 03:54 AM
  #18  
TheAcAvenger's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 81
From: Denver (from NoVA)
I definitely think Acura needs a V8. Especially with the people they're competing with. Infiniti's beastly M45 really outpowers the RL. Other than that, comparable cars in the price range (530, E320, A6 3.2, GS 300) are actually underpowered compared to it. Its definitely the best V6 out there. But Acura shouldn't stop there... a V8 to tango with the M45, 545, E500, and A6 4.2 would really raise Acura's status. But maybe I'm biased...heh, a 2007 Acura TL-Type S with SH-AWD and a 350HP V8 would be a dream come true. Or better yet, make that a CL with a 6MT. The V6 is enough for now, but I really believe Honda needs to make one, at least a platform for one. Then the future NSX and RL would really be dynomite. And the Type-S could be born again.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:02 AM
  #19  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
I believe the RL and other Honda products will get more power via hybrid technology rather than adding a V8
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #20  
Rob L's Avatar
office monkey
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
I wish they would offer a V8 on the RL so it would quit people from constantly bitching about it. hehehe

Truth be told if the RL had a V8 option I probably would have gone for it instead of the base V6. Why? No real reason other than I guess because I'm a guy and am attracted to more power...I am sure if all that had happened I would be bitching right now going for the V8 since gas prices here are like $1.03 per litre which for you yanks is over $3.75 per gallon. Right now I am wishing I had a prius...heh.

I do feel the RL has good enough acceleration as it is. Havent once seen an issue where I needed more. Maybe our highways and city streets here are diff than those where people need 0-60 in 3.2 seconds in order to drive

Oh and I say if they are going to tweak the engine they add some hybrid action rather than just a V8...at least do something good for the environment/your wallet.

Also, my main summer hobby is baoting and boats guzzle gas like crazy so the few bucks I can save filling up my car the better.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #21  
T Austin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
I CHANGED MY MIND. FORGET THE V-8. GIVE US A V-12!! GAS PRICES, ENVIRONMENT AND CONSEQUENCES BE DAMMED! Ha! Ha!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #22  
jason06's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
hmmm

From what I have heard from my higher ups is that the only V-8 that will ever be on an Acura showroom floor is that of the juice variety....that being said however, the new 500+ horsepower v-10 they are shoving in the new nsx should more than suffice. also I have personally seen 300+ horsepower TL-S versions with sh-awd being rolled off the factory floor, expect to see them late this year, yummy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
May 30, 2020 12:40 AM
CarlosILX13
ILX Performance Parts & Modifications
14
Jul 11, 2016 11:07 AM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
Oct 13, 2015 10:56 AM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.