View Poll Results: Which size based on looks?
225/45/17
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/clear.gif)
17
32.08%
235/45/17
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://acurazine.com/forums/clear.gif)
36
67.92%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll
225/45/17 or 235/45/17
#1
Has been sold for a while
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
225/45/17 or 235/45/17
In terms of looks only what size tire would you get for the stock CL-S wheels. I know the 235 is closest to stock size but do you think they look a little big? I'm leaning toward 235's at this point however. Will the 235 sidewall be bigger at all? Also if anyone has any feedback on Yokohama es100 tires that would be great. I can get the entire set for $500.00 shipped from discount tire.
235/45/17 on Scalberts ride:
225/45/17 on peiqinglongs ride (not the best for comparison)
235/45/17 on Scalberts ride:
225/45/17 on peiqinglongs ride (not the best for comparison)
![](http://www.bui4ever.com/rbui/acl/cambers/062303_%20052.jpg)
![](http://www.bui4ever.com/rbui/acl/cambers/062303_%20055.jpg)
![](http://www.bui4ever.com/rbui/acl/cambers/062303_%20058.jpg)
#2
Senior Moderator
i prefer the 225.
but what do i know, i ran 235/40-17's.
but what do i know, i ran 235/40-17's.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#5
Red/Ebony CLS 6-Spd
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many people are using 235's and say they don't have any problems. However, the minimum recommended rim width for the 235 is 7.5 inches (for good reason).
An emergency manuever on an out-of-spec tire/rim combination can cause the bead to break loose from the rim and instantly deflate the tire. Not a good scenario during emergency manuevers.
The 2003 CL type S rims are 7 inches wide.
Aha, you say, the 2004 TL's are coming from the factory with Bridgestone EL42 235's on it's 17 inch rim. Check the specs though, and you'll find the 2004 TL's have an 8 inch wide 17" rim.
I would stick with a tire whose required rim width matches the rims I'm using. Or, buy new rims for a lot more money.
Read Consumers reports plus sizing if you're tempted to go larger than 18 inch rims. Plus 2 and larger really increases rim-bending and impacts foul weather handling.
An emergency manuever on an out-of-spec tire/rim combination can cause the bead to break loose from the rim and instantly deflate the tire. Not a good scenario during emergency manuevers.
The 2003 CL type S rims are 7 inches wide.
Aha, you say, the 2004 TL's are coming from the factory with Bridgestone EL42 235's on it's 17 inch rim. Check the specs though, and you'll find the 2004 TL's have an 8 inch wide 17" rim.
I would stick with a tire whose required rim width matches the rims I'm using. Or, buy new rims for a lot more money.
Read Consumers reports plus sizing if you're tempted to go larger than 18 inch rims. Plus 2 and larger really increases rim-bending and impacts foul weather handling.
Trending Topics
#8
Red/Ebony CLS 6-Spd
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If one is going to follow the tire manufacturer's stated width-requirements for the stock 7 inch wide rims (for reasons outlined above in my previous post) and in order to keep Speedometer readings reasonably close, that pretty much leaves 215/50-17, 225/45-17 and 225/50-17.
With 7.5 inch wide rims (non-stock) you can safely use the 235/45-17 sized tire whose speedometer readings are really close to the stock OEM tire's speedometer readings.
With 7.5 inch wide rims (non-stock) you can safely use the 235/45-17 sized tire whose speedometer readings are really close to the stock OEM tire's speedometer readings.
#10
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by resedaruss
If one is going to follow the tire manufacturer's stated width-requirements for the stock 7 inch wide rims (for reasons outlined above in my previous post) and in order to keep Speedometer readings reasonably close, that pretty much leaves 215/50-17, 225/45-17 and 225/50-17.
With 7.5 inch wide rims (non-stock) you can safely use the 235/45-17 sized tire whose speedometer readings are really close to the stock OEM tire's speedometer readings.
If one is going to follow the tire manufacturer's stated width-requirements for the stock 7 inch wide rims (for reasons outlined above in my previous post) and in order to keep Speedometer readings reasonably close, that pretty much leaves 215/50-17, 225/45-17 and 225/50-17.
With 7.5 inch wide rims (non-stock) you can safely use the 235/45-17 sized tire whose speedometer readings are really close to the stock OEM tire's speedometer readings.
The biggest problem that seems to occur is alignment of 235/45-17 tires (depending on brand and alignment equipment) on the stock wheels (I'm not sure about the '03 wheels).
The tread on the 235/45-17 will sit down a bit more at the edges when moved from a 7" wide factory wheel to an 8" wide rim (it did in my case). However, I did not pick up a huge amount of traction. The benefits of the SSR Comp wheels were due to light weight (unsprung mass/lower rotational inertia).
The 225/45-17 has the advantage of:
* Higher effective torque due to their lower revs/mile
* Lower weight due to their smaller diameter.
* Better possible fit with lowering and change to wider wheels in the future.
* Will fit without problems on the factory wheels.
The 235/45-17 has the advantage of:
* Beefier look (well, up to a point)
* Slightly bigger footprint
* Speedo is a very close match
* Higher load rating relative to the 215/50-17 and 225/45-17
The 225/45-17 will over report miles driven (a concern to some with warranty issues).
A couple of people switched from 235/45-17 to 225/45-17 when using CT springs, Konis, SSR 17x8" +48 offset to eliminate rub that showed up when the Konis were added.
Finally, if you look at some of the 235/45-17s on some cars, the shoulder of the tire will be "clean" and that will not be the case with the 225/45-17. This can't be said for every brand and make of tire (I've not seen them all, but I have seen a few).
YMMV
#11
Originally posted by EricL
The 225/45-17 will under report miles driven (a concern to some).
The 225/45-17 will under report miles driven (a concern to some).
I've got 225/45's now and will probably go with 235/45's next time just to get a little more rubber between the wheels and the road (more protection from bent wheels and slightly softer ride)
#13
Suzuka Master
Oops!
Originally posted by tinman
the mileage on the odometer will be *more than* actual with 225/45-17's since the tires spin faster (smaller diameter).
I've got 225/45's now and will probably go with 235/45's next time just to get a little more rubber between the wheels and the road (more protection from bent wheels and slightly softer ride)
the mileage on the odometer will be *more than* actual with 225/45-17's since the tires spin faster (smaller diameter).
I've got 225/45's now and will probably go with 235/45's next time just to get a little more rubber between the wheels and the road (more protection from bent wheels and slightly softer ride)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Yes, as one previous member kvetched, you won't get all the warranty miles that were “owed” to you. (This with 225/45-17, 235/40-17, 245/40-17, etc -- tires with loaded radius smaller than stock).
#18
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Las Vegas/Reno, NV
Age: 43
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
235/45
toyo t1-s and kumho 712's are awesome
my toyos lasted for 20k miles, the kumho's have ~80% tread and have around 10k miles on them.
...best bang for the buck i would go w/ the 712's, they are about half the price of the t1s.
toyo t1-s and kumho 712's are awesome
my toyos lasted for 20k miles, the kumho's have ~80% tread and have around 10k miles on them.
...best bang for the buck i would go w/ the 712's, they are about half the price of the t1s.
#22
Blown is Best
Originally posted by hemants
"imma go w. a 225 for better gearing"
How does a tire affect your transmission shift points???
"imma go w. a 225 for better gearing"
How does a tire affect your transmission shift points???
#24
I have the 225 es100s and they by far blow away the shitty Michelins that come on the CL-S. The yokos stick nicely and you know you are pushing it when they squeel, unlike the MXMs that squeel anytime you take a sharp turn. Lots of tire for the price, I just wish I had gone with the 235s, but I was worried about turning radius which already sucks on the CL...
#29
Intermediate
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fremont, ca
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys, i got a h and r sport drop on my 01 cls. i am wondering if there will be any problems running the falken st-115 235/45/17 or the toyo proxy 4 in the same size, any alignment or rubbing problems because of the drop ?
#33
I am #76,361,211,935
Originally Posted by EricL
In all the time on the forum (3 years?) I have yet to hear of a 235/45-17 coming off a 7" rim.
2 of the 4 and had to have the tires remounted. It wasn't an instant deflation problem,
more like a slow leak.
When the Pilots are done I think I'll use the stock rims for winter tires and get some
wider rims for a more agressive summer tire.
Just my $.02.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post