Why use premium gas when regular will do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2004 | 11:45 PM
  #1  
ktgumbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Balla on a Budget
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Cali
Why use premium gas when regular will do?

Just an interesting article.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...emiumgas_x.htm
Old 06-24-2004 | 11:51 PM
  #2  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
our (cl-s) performance suffers with regular. i know this from experience.
Old 06-24-2004 | 11:59 PM
  #3  
Chopsie's Avatar
Beware of leakage
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19,790
Likes: 0
From: Shreveport, Louisiana, just east of nowhere
Werd, I used regular when I first bought my car. about 2 months into it, i switched to Chevron 93 Octane, gas mileage got better, and beter performance.
Old 06-25-2004 | 12:54 AM
  #4  
runnerX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, CA
Yeah.. Chopper is right.. if you put regular in your tank, your car will lose power and fuel efficiency. I also heard it is not good for your engine. Ask your mechanic or Acura dealer for advice.
Old 06-25-2004 | 01:09 AM
  #5  
Joe5.0's Avatar
TQ > MPG
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
Why buy a $30k if you cant afford $3 more in gas?
Old 06-25-2004 | 01:23 AM
  #6  
ktgumbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Balla on a Budget
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Cali
Im gona put 91 like Acura recommends, but its weird how people are saying that its ok.
Old 06-25-2004 | 01:36 AM
  #7  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
on a normal low compression engine, it is. i've heard of some vehicles that run even worse on super unleaded.

but our cars (cl-s) are high compression. they need higher octane to prevent detonation. as soon as the ECU detects detonation, it retards timing, in turn reducing engine power. it does this to protect the motor.

regular isn't going to hurt the car, it just wont perform to it's potential.
Old 06-25-2004 | 02:44 AM
  #8  
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in Denver, CO
what about the first gens? They have almost similar motors. A tad smaller and less HP. Would they be better off with higher octane fuel as well?
Old 06-25-2004 | 07:01 AM
  #9  
1killercls's Avatar
GEEZER
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 44,444
Likes: 2,227
From: Dunedin, Fla.
Originally Posted by jtkz13
Why buy a $30k if you cant afford $3 more in gas?
FUKING A
Old 06-25-2004 | 07:11 AM
  #10  
Red-CL's Avatar
Doin' da crack shuffle
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,847
Likes: 0
From: Philly and Bowie
Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
what about the first gens? They have almost similar motors. A tad smaller and less HP. Would they be better off with higher octane fuel as well?

From what I remember, the compression ratio on a First Gen is in the normal area. They run better with regular grade gasoline.
Old 06-25-2004 | 10:17 AM
  #11  
fusionnv's Avatar
Gimmie my points Biatch!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by Red-CL
From what I remember, the compression ratio on a First Gen is in the normal area. They run better with regular grade gasoline.

Somebody dynoed it, car worked better with REG. Getting premo on the first generation is a waste of money.
Old 06-25-2004 | 10:36 AM
  #12  
GreenMonster's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,218
Likes: 15
From: Swansea, MA
Sure, if you don't mind the computer retarding the timing and decreasing performance on a 2nd gen (this is the 2nd gen forum right??)
Old 06-25-2004 | 10:58 AM
  #13  
RUF87's Avatar
Lead Footed
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 15
From: Plano - Texas
Originally Posted by mattg
on a normal low compression engine, it is. i've heard of some vehicles that run even worse on super unleaded.

but our cars (cl-s) are high compression. they need higher octane to prevent detonation. as soon as the ECU detects detonation, it retards timing, in turn reducing engine power. it does this to protect the motor.

regular isn't going to hurt the car, it just wont perform to it's potential.
Notes:

The CLS/TLS will suffer more noticably than the CL/TL if you run less than recommended.

If you don't care about performance you can run less and it won't hurt the engine . . . unless it starts pinging.

You can run too much and it can cause problems as well. Too much octane can result in unburnt fuel which can fowl your plugs as well as pass through you emissions system. This will harm your O2 sensor and CAT. If you've ever noticed a car smelling like rotten eggs, it could have been caused by build up in the CAT.

This is because the higher the octane the lower the ignition point of the fuel. This means that lower octane gas will burn/ignite faster than higher octane. That's why you want to run higher octane in higher compression engines so the fuel doesn't ignite before the compression stroke is complete. A lower octane that burns easier would pre-ignite, hense pre-detonation / pinging. That's really bad.

Just some things to consider.

Ruf
Old 06-25-2004 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
gdubb's Avatar
Mazda3 and Honda Civic in
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,635
Likes: 1
From: Houston
I ran 93 in my 1st gen one time and got nothing out of it but worse MPG. Now my RSX-S I only run 93 that is recommended
Old 06-25-2004 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
mattdaddyz's Avatar
M to da DZ
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by mattg
our (cl-s) performance suffers with regular. i know this from experience.
Seriously suffers. My dealer put the cheapest grade 87 gas in when I purchased my car. It ran kind of "loud" it's hard to describe. When I filled up with 93, I felt a noticable difference.
Old 06-25-2004 | 11:55 AM
  #16  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 979
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
it depends on the car and how it's setup. The Type S is designed to run on 91+. The old 3.0's are designed to run on 87. If you put 91 in a 3.0 you lose power. run what the car is designed for.
Old 06-25-2004 | 12:09 PM
  #17  
zamo's Avatar
Houses Won't Depreciate?
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,238
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL
mine pings for sure when I use 89 grade for 3 o more tanks in a row.\

Happened already twise. Sounds like a cheap Huyndai Excel
Old 06-25-2004 | 12:25 PM
  #18  
Rod's Avatar
Rod
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Good article. I only run 93 on my CL-S and will continue to do so.
Old 06-25-2004 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
Chaptorial's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18,552
Likes: 4
From: Long Island, NY
Nothing lower then 91 has ever been in my baby. Regardless of gas prices that ain't gonna change.
Old 06-25-2004 | 03:59 PM
  #20  
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
I filled up with two tanks of 87 octane and noticed no effect in performance. I also posted a kill about a modded RSX-S while running 87 octane.
Old 06-25-2004 | 04:02 PM
  #21  
hemants's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
From: toronto
The money you save using regular is less than what you would have saved by buying a non-Type S so it makes no sense to trade hp for $ by running regular.
Old 06-25-2004 | 04:46 PM
  #22  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 979
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
I filled up with two tanks of 87 octane and noticed no effect in performance. I also posted a kill about a modded RSX-S while running 87 octane.


you may not of felt it, but it was definately there
Old 06-25-2004 | 05:05 PM
  #23  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Potential for false economy...

Check it out:

Regular or Premium

I've run my 2001 auto CLS on 89, and it will work for a tank (I didn't try multiple tanks).

IMO, the CLS can make more power using 93 octane with cold weather and low humidity. My tests. My area. That's as far as I go with this.

Depending on the brand and make of car, the performance can increase or decrease with an increase or decrease in octane.

Don't be surprised to find your gas mileage dropping with 89 octane, and you end up spending the same amount of $$/mile when you finally add up the loss of efficiency from a retarded timing map (the knock sensors will dial back timing and retard doesn't generally help increase gas mileage). If you happen to be at high altitude, or have some other conditions that make it work for you – enjoy.
Old 06-25-2004 | 06:25 PM
  #24  
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in Denver, CO
i happen to be in a very high altitude area, and heard that higher octane helps i higher altitude areas. I live in denver, colorado which is a mile above sea level.
Old 06-25-2004 | 06:36 PM
  #25  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
No, altitude == lower octane in general.

Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
i happen to be in a very high altitude area, and heard that higher octane helps i higher altitude areas. I live in denver, colorado which is a mile above sea level.
It's actually the other way around -- with very few exceptions.

If you are running your car a mile above sea level, try using some lower octane – see how it performs.

link: http://www.abqjournal.com/traffic/17...-08-04.htm?rrc


I used to run regular in my Bimmer at 4500+ feet and above (Reno & Lake Tahoe), and it would normally ping like crazy at sea level if it didn’t get at least 93 premium.
Old 06-25-2004 | 08:09 PM
  #26  
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in Denver, CO
wow, ok cool. thanks for teh info. I never did actually see a suggested octane rating in the manual of my 3.0, but all it says is "unleaded fuel only" on the dash display.
Old 06-25-2004 | 10:11 PM
  #27  
RUF87's Avatar
Lead Footed
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 15
From: Plano - Texas
Great link to more than you'll ever want to know about octane.

Of course one is from a government source so I'm not sure if I trust them.

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/octane.htm

http://www.repairfaq.org/filipg/AUTO/F_Gasoline6.html

http://www.omegamotors.com/enjoy/gas...soline_06.html

Ruf
Old 06-26-2004 | 05:44 AM
  #28  
momentum3.2's Avatar
War Eagle!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
this is probably a retarded question, but do you guys have different "premium" octane levels in you area? unless I got hit with a stupid stick in my sleep last night, most cities in the south (Birmingham & Atlanta for sure) have 93 octane at the pumps, but I've seen a few of you mention 91 octane as premium.

does it vary? surely it's not market-specific...our grades are 87, 89, 93. Just curious!
Old 06-26-2004 | 08:51 AM
  #29  
RUPNOK's Avatar
'08 TL-S
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Delco, PA
Originally Posted by RUF87
Notes:



This is because the higher the octane the lower the ignition point of the fuel. This means that lower octane gas will burn/ignite faster than higher octane. That's why you want to run higher octane in higher compression engines so the fuel doesn't ignite before the compression stroke is complete. A lower octane that burns easier would pre-ignite, hense pre-detonation / pinging. That's really bad.


Ruf
This is right, but for a different reason...

Octane is a fuel stabilizer.

When something is compressed, it heats up. Remember the bicycle pump when you were a kid...

This is what happens in the second (compression) stroke of a 4-stroke cycle. A high compression engine does more compressing...

So it heats up the air/fuel mix more than a low compression engine will.

If low octane fuel is used in a high compression engine it may destabilize on compression and detonate before the spark fires... this is detonation, and as the rising piston tries to further compress the now burning and expanding fuel/air mix, it meets with resistance, heard as knock. The extreme example of this is when a gas engine 'diesels' -- keeps running after the ignition is cut...

Remember diesels do this by design, they run huge compression and ignite the mix only by compression -- no plugs.

So higher octane fuel is more stable in a high compression engine than lower octane.
Old 06-26-2004 | 04:16 PM
  #30  
RUF87's Avatar
Lead Footed
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 15
From: Plano - Texas
Originally Posted by momentum3.2
this is probably a retarded question, but do you guys have different "premium" octane levels in you area? unless I got hit with a stupid stick in my sleep last night, most cities in the south (Birmingham & Atlanta for sure) have 93 octane at the pumps, but I've seen a few of you mention 91 octane as premium.

does it vary? surely it's not market-specific...our grades are 87, 89, 93. Just curious!
It does vary by regions. Some places only have 90 as their top grade . . . not sure of the exact details, but much of it has to do with elevation and such. I remember in Colorado they only had 90 octane.

Ruf
Old 06-27-2004 | 01:32 AM
  #31  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally Posted by RUF87
It does vary by regions. Some places only have 90 as their top grade . . . not sure of the exact details, but much of it has to do with elevation and such. I remember in Colorado they only had 90 octane.

Ruf
cough .... cough ....

From an earlier posting in this thread:

link: http://www.abqjournal.com/traffic/1...5-08-04.htm?rrc

That’s just one reason -- and it does have something to do with altitude.

Old 06-27-2004 | 01:46 AM
  #32  
Eggplant-EX's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,305
Likes: 20
From: Pacific NW/Federal Way
Here in WA, we get 87 89 91.

I am using 89 regularly and do not notice any difference. But then again, I am not pushing my car except for the quick spurt to speed limits.
Old 06-27-2004 | 01:54 AM
  #33  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally Posted by momentum3.2
this is probably a retarded question, but do you guys have different "premium" octane levels in you area? unless I got hit with a stupid stick in my sleep last night, most cities in the south (Birmingham & Atlanta for sure) have 93 octane at the pumps, but I've seen a few of you mention 91 octane as premium.

does it vary? surely it's not market-specific...our grades are 87, 89, 93. Just curious!
No, you’re not retarded. But the ignition timing is retarded from crummy CA gas (well, some cars)!

You see a lot of trucks and not an AMG or Turbo every other block -- or do you?

See Sports Compact Car:

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/ed...201scc_techno/


...

Somewhere in the upper ranges of the stack are the components of gasoline. There are between 10 and 15 different blend stocks, each with a different octane rating, which are mixed together to make gasoline.

The crude oil being used and little else determine the amount of each blend stock available for mixing. Generally, if you just dump all the blend stocks into a bucket, you end up with something around 88 or 89 octane. If you're selective and only mix the good stuff, you can make 92, 93 or even 95 octane. But once you take out the good stuff, you're left with crap-something like 85 octane. Then you have to leave enough good stuff in the bucket to bring this pee-water up to at least 87 octane. This limits the amount of 95-octane gas you can make. If you make 93-octane premium instead, you use up less of the high-octane stocks, allowing you to make a higher proportion of premium fuel.

In the Midwest, where an extensive customer base of good old boys in pickup trucks consume vast quantities of 87 octane, demand for premium fuel is low enough to make genuine high-octane premium.

In California, however, Lexus-driving executives suck down premium fuel like it's Evian, so 92 was the rule.
We now only get 91-octane premium in CA. IMO, emissions, clean-air formulations, regulations, and LOTS of high-octane sucking cars – at least relative to other areas -- are partially responsible.

See my post and the one from Ruf (RE: high octane not needed at higher altitudes).



And, it has been said, on a few occasions, that CA only gets 91-octane due to the huge number of premium-hungry autos running in the state. I've now read this a number of times, and perhaps it's a big fib by the oil companies. However, there are a TON of cars in CA that NEED high octane.


LINK re: California & Nevada octane, etc:

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_ho.../17335668.html


California refineries to ship lower octane gasoline
Nevada motorists don't have much choice

By MICHAEL SQUIRES
REVIEW-JOURNAL


Premium grade gasoline will lose a bit of its luster later this week.

Beginning Thursday, the California refineries that supply more than 90 percent of the fuel consumed in Nevada will cut the octane level of the premium and midgrade gasoline they manufacture. Premium grade gasoline sold in Nevada will drop to 91 octane from 92, while mid-grade will drop to 88.5 from 89. The lowest grade gasoline will continue to be 87 octane.

Octane is a measure of gasoline's ability to resist the knocking, rattling or pinging caused by the premature combustion of the mixture of fuel and air in an engine's cylinders.

"The individual refiners determined they wanted to send 91 octane instead of 92 ... and subsequently the pipeline changed its specifications for what it was going to ship," said Jason Geddes, senior petroleum chemist for the Nevada Department of Agriculture. "We don't have much of a choice."

Officials gave several reasons for the change.

One is California's looming ban on the gasoline additive MTBE, methyl tertiary butyl ether.

The octane enhancing chemical has been added to gasoline for years to reduce tailpipe emissions. But when it was discovered the suspected carcinogen was leaking from underground gasoline storage systems and finding its way into drinking water supplies, California officials moved to ban it.

Nevada has avoided the MTBE controversy by using ethanol to cut smog during winter months. California plans to begin using ethanol when it bans MTBE in 2003.

With that ban a little over a year away, some refiners were concerned that continuing to produce 92 octane fuel using ethanol instead of MTBE would be more expensive. Some believed it could reduce production by as much as 12 percent and possibly lead to shortages.

"The removal of MTBE is going to decrease our volumes," Keith said. "We're hoping to recoup some of that by going to 91 octane."

Another reason for the switch is the refiners' use of a common pipeline to ship fuel to Nevada, making a uniform octane standard a necessity. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, which operates the pipeline that transports fuel to Southern Nevada from California, polled refineries and a majority favored adopting a lower standard octane in the premium and midgrade gasoline.

"It came down to we all go or none of us go," said Carolin Keith, spokeswoman for ExxonMobile.

California gas stations began selling the lower octane fuel in August. The switch triggered complaints from some motorists, who say the lower octane decreases their engine's power and mileage.

Although most of the gasoline sold in Nevada is the lowest grade, which will remain unchanged, opinions are mixed about whether Nevadans that pay for the higher grades of gasoline will notice a difference after they drive on their first tank of the lower octane gasoline.

"I'm told we're not going to see any effect in the performance characteristics or gas mileage," said Peter Krueger, executive director of Western Petroleum Marketers Association, a trade association for gas station operators.

Car dealers and mechanics agree that's probably true for most motorists. The fuel injectors on most vehicles are programmed to compensate for lower octane gasoline.

"The less sophisticated the engine, the less they'll notice," said Greg Young, owner of Silver State Motorcar Corp., a shop which provides service and repair for imports.

But owners of some European imports, such as Audi, Volkswagen and Porsche, and vehicles with carburetors and high-performance engines, might see the performance of their vehicles suffer.

"Cars that are 10 and 15 years old and were designed for what used to be premium are already suffering with the gas out there today," Young said. "For them this is a very bad thing."

Al Alley, assistant service manager at Desert Audi, said the lower octane gasoline may cause poorer performance and mileage, especially during summer months, but it won't damage their engines.

"They recommend 92 octane," he said. "Require is one thing, recommend is another.

"I bet 97 percent won't even notice. The few that notice are the people that are…
Old 06-27-2004 | 01:58 PM
  #34  
momentum3.2's Avatar
War Eagle!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
thanks EricL - great info. B'ham is pretty typical of a mid-major city. Loads of new benz (a few amg's) and bmw's, audi's, etc. but the majority of the vehicles are SUV's. As anyone that lives in Atlanta though, if you take I20 between the two cities, it's nothing but 18wheelers. It's always referred to as "highway of death" or "the Reaper's Derby"...

Thanks for the info though!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
10-05-2015 11:00 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
10-01-2015 12:59 PM
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
09-29-2015 10:52 AM



Quick Reply: Why use premium gas when regular will do?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.