Why get underdrive pulleys instead of non-underdrive.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 08:02 AM
  #1  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Why get underdrive pulleys instead of non-underdrive.

So i was curious, when replacing your crank pulley, i assume the power gains come from the differance in weight between the stock crank pulley and the lighter crank pulley. If the power gains come from less weight, why get the smaller, underdrive pulley if it has possible negative affects. Why not just get the same size pulley, but lighter and reap the benefits of the weight loss?

I have read tons of posts, i already know some people say the underdrive pulley doesnt negativley affect your car and some people say it does, so i am not asking that, just the reasoning behind getting the smaller underdrive pulley over just the lighter same size pulley.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #2  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
i'd like to know too!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
us000011's Avatar
Old&CnL
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
UR says you gain 15% hp more above and beyond the weight change, by driving your AC, power steering, and alternator at a lower speed- makes sense, because you exert greater leverage on the accessories, ie less power drain.

Love my pulley!!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #4  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
So if you gain maybe 10 hp at the most from the standard lighter crank pulley, you might get 11hp by using the underdrive pulley. I think its a much more wise idea to not gain 1 hp and have absolutley no risk of messing up anything electrical or air conditioning related by underdriving your accessories, nor will you have that restriction on running additional electrical items in your car with the underdrive pulley.

I guess its up to the user, are you willing to increase your output by 1 measly horsepower for changing something like speed at which your accessories run, which could or could not have a problematic long term effect on your accessories. The possible risk definatly out weighs the 1hp benefit.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
phipark's Avatar
Not Asian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by zoltanh
So if you gain maybe 10 hp at the most from the standard lighter crank pulley, you might get 11hp by using the underdrive pulley. I think its a much more wise idea to not gain 1 hp and have absolutley no risk of messing up anything electrical or air conditioning related by underdriving your accessories, nor will you have that restriction on running additional electrical items in your car with the underdrive pulley.

I guess its up to the user, are you willing to increase your output by 1 measly horsepower for changing something like speed at which your accessories run, which could or could not have a problematic long term effect on your accessories. The possible risk definatly out weighs the 1hp benefit.
which is why I went with the stock diameter UR pulley.

Just to note, the whp/tq numbers for the UR pulley are from the underdrive crank pulley.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #6  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by phipark
which is why I went with the stock diameter UR pulley.

Just to note, the whp/tq numbers for the UR pulley are from the underdrive crank pulley.
yeah okay, but is it similar numbers for the stock diameter one as well?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by berny
yeah okay, but is it similar numbers for the stock diameter one as well?
read post #3 and #4
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #8  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
ok.ummm . you answered your own question..

your avatar reminds me of Mikey Tuttel from Orange County Choppers..
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #9  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by Smitty
your avatar reminds me of Mikey Tuttel from Orange County Choppers..
Its some guy that was selling a mind reading machine on ebay...
I thought it was halarious.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #10  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
well you must of bid, won and used it, because it read your mind....
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #11  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by Smitty
well you must of bid, won and used it, because it read your mind....
I guess i just didnt understand the logic in reducing the speed of your accessories from stock to gain 1hp. Plus i am not an eleet mechanic so i didnt know if there is some alterior motive to underdrive your accessories besides the 1 hp gain. Maybe most people dont know that underdriving only gives you 1 hp. This might sway people to get the standard size pulley instead of underdrive, cause thats what i am going to do.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #12  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #13  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by berny
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............
because the unorthodox pulley is like 6 pounds lighter then the stock pulley
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #14  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by berny
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............



inertia..... mass// weight

example... why do people buy light weight rims???.. think about it...

This is why I find it SO funny when these idiots buy 24 inch rims and put them on their SUV and DO NOT upgrade the brake calipers/pads & rotors.. total disaster waiting to happen....
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #15  
robeaneee's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: 909 foo
i would think smaller radius would have a greater effect..seeing as how moment of inertia for any object involves mass x radius squared. but that's purely from a physical standpoint..i dunno much about pulleys on the car
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #16  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #17  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
is it your helmet that helped you figure that one out?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #18  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by berny
is it your helmet that helped you figure that one out?

i thought it was pretty good info to have....

thanks Mikey Tuttel.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #19  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by Smitty
i thought it was pretty good info to have....

thanks Mikey Tuttel.
I agree
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #20  
rtatsutani's Avatar
Never had a clean run
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
Unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs does not include underdriving but rather from just the weight loss alone which account for only 85% of the gains. You have to add the additional 15% that you get from underdriving which would bring the total HP to 21.91 when underdriving giving you a whopping 3.28 hp difference. GIVEN THEIR INFLATED NUMBERS...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #21  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by rtatsutani
Unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs does not include underdriving but rather from just the weight loss alone which account for only 85% of the gains. You have to add the additional 15% that you get from underdriving which would bring the total HP to 21.91 when underdriving giving you a whopping 3.28 hp difference. GIVEN THEIR INFLATED NUMBERS...
Actually, 18.63hp * 1.15 ~ 21.42hp and 21.42hp - 18.63hp = 2.79hp so theoreticly, you only get 2.79 hp by underdriving, and im sure they get the 2.7hp/lbs with the a/c off and only thing running is the engine. So realisticlly your probably only looking at 1hp or less gained with underdriving.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #22  
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
The aftermarket pulleys are a smaller for crank and larger for accesories diameter across. Think of a moutain bike and the different size teeth. The larger the sprocket, the easier to turn.

The con of pulleies is spinning your accessories slower, less amperage from alt.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #23  
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #24  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...

u sure about that?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #25  
berny's Avatar
I need FI
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
thats what I thought...

Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #26  
6MTpromises's Avatar
Relax!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Frederick/Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
huh?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #27  
6MTpromises's Avatar
Relax!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Frederick/Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #28  
o1s's Avatar
o1s
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 7
From: Tallahassee Fl.
uh...i'm all confused. math never was my strong point. what next theories of universe expansion?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #29  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Not to be a dick, but can you NOT give people TOTALY INCORRECT information!?
Everyone please ignore his post and continue reading.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #30  
rtatsutani's Avatar
Never had a clean run
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Actually, 18.63hp * 1.15 ~ 21.42hp and 21.42hp - 18.63hp = 2.79hp so theoreticly, you only get 2.79 hp by underdriving, and im sure they get the 2.7hp/lbs with the a/c off and only thing running is the engine. So realisticlly your probably only looking at 1hp or less gained with underdriving.
Huh, you got the equation wrong? I used this equation. 85/100 = 18.63/x
18.63 being 85% of the gains and X being the 100% equivalent of 18.63.

Let's not get too technical over 10ths of a hp, but seriously, all in all, if you're worried, don't underdrive, not worth the extra ~1-3 hp. If you're not worried and have tons of friends who've had no problem, underdrive the sucker!

Installing mine next week (underdrive that is) I'll definitely let you guys know if I run into problems!
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #31  
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Lighter rotating mass mey give you some tourque, but not horsepower. It would be the equivalent of lighter flywheel weight.

Thinking about it, the flywheel may be bigger on underdrive pulleys...with smaller accessory pulleys
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 07:17 AM
  #32  
us000011's Avatar
Old&CnL
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
I am running the UR underdrive pulley with no problems and improved performance. For various dynamometer graphs showing HP and torque gains, check their website(unorthodox racing). You may debate their accuracy, but in every case you apparently gain both with the underdrive pulley. Also, I have found their people to to helpful and responsive.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 08:42 AM
  #33  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
here's the real answer...the stock size UR is new....they only developed it for the super charger guys...but another benefit of the under drive s smaller diameter is moving the rotational mass inward also increase it's weight loss effect...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #34  
Excelerate's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,877
Likes: 624
From: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
UR makes it underdrives to make power by not only lightening their weight but also by underdriving the accessories so that there is less parasitic drag. Therefore the lighter weight and the reduced drag created from running the accessories at peak creates more hp. Now the UR Ultra S Underdrive crank pulley will not affect anything adversely if you do not have a supercharger or a stereo system over 600 watts RMS.

- If you run the Ultra S underdrive pulley and your car is supercharged you could be suffering from a loss of boost (less psi) b/c the accessories are underdriven and a S/C runs off the belts.

- With a car with a large stereo system (over 600 watts RMS) there is a large draw on the alternator and electrical system. So your lights could dim somewhat b/c there is such a large amount of electrical current needed to run the stereo system and all the other accessories.

You do not need the Ultra Sc 12 Volt pulley designed for the stereo guys and the S/Ced guys. However if you want it is your choice.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #35  
Sun Diego CL-S's Avatar
says "hello to my TLX".
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,789
Likes: 17
From: San Diego, Ca
so to get the gains mentioned above, you have to buy only the Ultra S underdrive crank pulley, the underdrive pulley set, or all of these together?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #36  
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Horsepower is created through allowing air/gas mixture into the motor and exhausting that mixture.

Tourque is the ability/quickness of creating that horsepower. (i.e. the ease of the motor creating creating hosrepower)
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #37  
Sun Diego CL-S's Avatar
says "hello to my TLX".
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,789
Likes: 17
From: San Diego, Ca
yes, that is true. but it is also true that horsepower is unleashed by allowing more flow or decreasing resistance in many parts of the engine where otherwise you can't allow to happen cos of stock parts.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #38  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
there is no such thing as hp...it is a calculation derived from torque
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #39  
zoltanh's Avatar
Thread Starter
I need a Hybrid CL-S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
The bottom line is this:
The unorthodox underdrive pullies will give you 15% more horsepower then the unorthodox same size pullies, which as mentioned before equals 1-2 more horsepower.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #40  
Smitty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA


u guys R pissing off Mikey Tuttel.....

I know you knew the answer, so I do not know why you put yourself through 2 pages of torture..
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.